Report of ANUPAM 2 & Half (Using NBC) .

A Report on
Structural Analysis and Design

of Residential Building
(Two & Half Storey)
Designed by:- Er. Mahesh Timilsina Owner:

NEC No.:- 25098 “A” Mr.Anupam Sthapit
Location:
LMC-25, Sainbu, Lalitpur
1
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
This report comprises the summary of the residential building of

Mr.Anupam Sthapit LMC-25, Sainbu, Lalitpur, Nepal. The reports consist of the
design procedures adopted, the assumptions made, the inputs made in the
design and the design output. During the design, it is assumed that the client
will completely follow the architectural as well as the structural design. It is
also assumed that the construction will be supervised by professional
engineer.
The designer will not be responsible if any alterations to the structural system
is made by the client or the contractor without the prior written permission
from the designer, or the alterations to non-structural system is made such
that the weight of each individual floor or the weight of the whole building is
altered by more than 10% of design weight of each floor and the total weight.
The design calculations and derivations are limited to only a minimum to let
the concerned people know the methodology adopted. However, the
calculations may be provided to the client or concerned authorities when
needed, upon request. Hence the building is safe.
Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

NEC regd: 25098 LMC-25, Sainbu
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I: GENERAL DATA.............................................................................................. 4
PART II: PRELIMININARY DESIGN............................................................................5
PART III: METHODOLOGY............................................................................................ 4
PART IV: LOAD CALCULATION................................................................................. 7
PART V: DESIGN PARAMETERS............................................................................. 13
PART VI: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS.......................................................................16
PART VII: DESIGN CALCULATIONS......................................................................27

PART I: GENERAL DATA
 Introduction
This report has been prepared as a part of the structural engineering analysis and
design of the residence building.
The massive data inputs, design analysis, calculations and outputs of the result are
computer aided by the Structural analysis and design software ETABS, which is a
special purpose computer program developed specifically for building structures by
CSI America. It provides the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to
create, modify, analyze, design, and optimize the structural elements in a building
model.
Based on the final results, the designs have been performed and drawings were
prepared using AutoCAD 2007.
 Building Design Parameters
Nepal is located in boundary between the Indian and Tibetan plates, along which a
relative shear strain of about 2 cm per year has been estimated. The Indian plate is
also sub-ducting at a rate of, thought to be, about 3 cm per year. The existence of the
Himalayan range with the world’s highest peaks is evidence of continued uplift. As a
result, Nepal is very active seismically.
Reinforced concrete buildings may fail due to the either columns are overstressed
and burst due to lack of enough strength to resist the shock of the earth tremor and
vibration or failure of reinforced concrete members like beams at the poor ductile
detailing. Columns also do fail due to short column effect and splicing failure. Beams
fail due to anchorage failure, shear failure and confinement failure.
The building consists of a RCC frame structure, which is essentially an assembly of

cast-in-situ-concrete beams and columns. Floors and roof design consists of cast-in-
place concrete slabs. Therefore the member sizes or structural elements,
reinforcement details, joint details are considered during design process such that to
meet the design standards for ductile performance of the structure.
The country is subdivided into different seismic zones based on the local seismic
hazard. The seismic hazard within each zone is assumed to be constant. The
Seismic Zoning Factor (Z) represents the peak ground acceleration (PGA) for
475 year return period. The value of Z can be obtained from Table 4-5 for
selected municipalities, cities and for the rest can be obtained from Figure 4-4
(approximate interpolation between the contour lines is permitted).
For the design of the building, NBC 105-2077 have been referred for earthquake
resistant design. According to the NBC 105-2077, the Seismic Zoning Factor (Z)
represents the peak ground acceleration (PGA) for 475 year return period for
Kathmandu has been taken with very severe seismic intensity (zone factor z = 0.35)
and tremor response period or fundamental natural period (T) were calculated. After
that all design requirements such as seismic weight of building, lateral forces at
different floor levels and different column heads, base shear, distribution of design
forces to different floor levels are considered.
The characteristic compressive strength for concrete of 20 N/mm 2 (M20) was used in
all structural members and characteristic strength of 500 N/mm 2 (Fe500) was used
for reinforcing steel.
PART II: PRELIMININARY DESIGN

The tentative size of structural elements are determined through the preliminary
design so that after analysis the pre assumed dimensions might not deviated
considerably , thus making the final design both safe and economical . Tentative size
of various elements has been determined as follows:
 SLAB
For slab, preliminary design is done according to deflection criteria span /effective
depth = 40*modification factor. (IS 456-2000 Art 24.1)
From deflection criteria, we have,
(Cl.23-2.1, p.37, IS456:2000)
Where,
= Basic value of span to effective depth ratios for spans up to spans 10m.
= a factor which accounts for correction in the values of for spans greater than
10m
= a factors which depends on the stress at service and amount of steel for tension
reinforcement
For
=a factor which depends on the area of compression reinforcement.

= a factor for flanged beams which depends on the ratio of web width to flange
width.
We taken,
 BEAM
Thumb rule of (d=L/10 to L/12) basis is adopted to consider the preliminary design of
the beam section.
i) Depth of beam:
We have,
dbeam = ofspan
ii) Width of beam:

We have, bbeam = of d beam
 COLUMN
Preliminary design of column is done consideration and interior column. For the load
acting in the column, live load is decreased according to IS 875-1978.
Cross-section of the column is adopted considering the economy. Square column
section is adopted in this building project as per the internal aesthetic requirements.
A percentage of steel is taken as 0.8 to 6 percentage of cross section area of
column, but as taking 6% area of steel is more at a laps section so generally % of
steel is taken up to 4% only..
We have,
P= 0.4
 STAIRCASE
Stairs is designed as per drawing. Column for stairs boxes is not included in the grid
system but they are assumed to be simply tied with main frame with beam.

PART III: METHODOLOGY
The methodology adopted in the Structural Analysis and Design of Two and half Storied RCC
framed Residential Building has been described below:
1. Data Collection
All the data required for this project work have been taken from different literatures. Design
parameters have been taken from Indian Standard Code of Practice. Soil test report collect from
site.
The 3D structure is analyzed as moment resisting frames i.e. space frames.

Indian Standard Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete, i.e.IS: 456-2000 for design
of Structural Elements had been followed.
Limit State Method bases on safety and serviceability requirements associated with the design
loads and design strengths of the materials has been used. These design loads and design
strengths are obtained by applying partial safety factors for characteristic loads and strengths of
the materials concrete and steel.
Limit States
The Limit State method of design covers the various forms of failure. There are several limit
states at which the structure ceases to function, the most important among them being,
a) The limit state of collapse or total failure of structure.

It corresponds to the maximum load carrying capacity. Violation of collapse implies failure. This
limit state corresponds to Flexure, Compression, Shear and Torsion.
Ultimate Limit State Verification:
Ultimate limit states are associated with collapse or with other forms of structural failure which
might endanger the safety of people. Design for ultimate limit state represents a procedure that
ensures the probability of collapse of a structure is at an acceptable level. The ultimate limit state
performance requirements are met when the structure satisfies the following:
1. The structural system has the required resistance and energy dissipation capacity;
2. The structure as a whole shall be checked to ensure that it is stable under the design
seismic forces. Both overturning and sliding stability shall be taken into account;
3. The structural system shall continue to perform its load-bearing function;
4. Both the foundation elements and the foundation soil are able to resist the forces
resulting from the response of the superstructure without substantial permanent
deformations;
5. Non-structural systems which are essential for safe evacuation from the structure shall
continue to function;
6. The nonstructural elements do not present risks to people and does not have a
detrimental effect on the response of the structural elements.
b) The limit state of serviceability includes excessive deflection and excessive local
damage. Excessive deflection adversely affects the finishes and excessive local damage results
in cracking of concrete, which impairs the efficiency, or appearance of the structure

Serviceability Limit State Verification:
Damage limitation states are associated with damage beyond which specified service
requirements are no longer met. It represents a level of force within the structure below which
there is a high degree of assurance that the structure can continue to be used as originally
intended without repair. The serviceability limit state performance requirements are met when the
structure satisfies the following:
1. The structural system shall not experience deformations that result in structural or non-
structural damage that can prevent the structure from performing its intended original
function.
2. In structures important for civil protection, the structure shall have sufficient resistance
and stiffness to remain operational so that it can perform its function of the vital services
in the event of an earthquake.
2. Load Calculation
Load calculations have been done using the IS 875-1987 (Part 1 & Part 2) as reference.
The exact value of unit weights of the material used in the building has been extracted from the
code for the calculation. Thickness of materials was taken as per design requirement.
2.1 Vertical Load
Loads on slabs may be divided into
i. Dead load - self-weight of slab.
ii. Live load - from relevant codes.
Load on beam are:
a. Self – weight of beam.
b. Load transfer from slab.
c. Load due to wall.
d. Floor Finish load
e. Load transfer from staircase.
Load on the columns were calculated by finding out the total dead load and live loads acting on
the columns according to their coverage and adding self – weight of it.
a.) Self weight of the beam

In ETABS, after fixing the size of beam, software calculates self-weight of beam itself. Moreover,
the self weight of the beam as uniformly distributed load over the span can be found by
multiplying cross-sectional area of beam with unit weight of reinforce concrete.
b.) Load Transfer from slab to beam

The load of the slab, dead load as well as live load, can be converted to equivalent uniformly
distributed load for beam by two ways.
 Triangulation Load Distribution
 Trapezoidal Load Distribution
c). Load due to wall

The load of wall as uniformly distributed load over the span can be found by multiplying thickness
and height of the wall with unit weight of brick work. Opening have been calculated and
deducted wherever opening such as window, door exist. Partition load has been taken as 1
kN/m2 area of the slab.
d). Floor Finish Calculation
S.N. Screeding Unit wt. Ceramic Unit wt. Ceiling finish Unit wt. Load/m2
tiles
mm kN/m3 mm kN/m3 mm kN/m3 kN/m2
1 50 20.4 0 25 3 24 1.09
e). Load transfer from staircase

Reaction produce by staircase have been calculated and this reactions have been changed into
uniformly distributed load over the beam by dividing span of beam.
2.2 Lateral Load Calculation
Lateral loads acting on building are earthquake load only. Earthquake or seismic load on a
building depends upon its geographic location, lateral stiffness and mass, and it’s reversible.
Thus its effect has been considered along both axes of the building taken one at the time. Due to
flat slab roof we have not considered wind load, also it is not practically used in our context.
Hence only seismic load analysis is carried out. For analysis and design earthquake action,
following methods can be applied.
1. Equivalent Static Method (ESM).
2. Model Response Spectrum Method (MRSM).
The Equivalent Static Method may be used for all serviceability limit state (SLS) calculations
regardless of the building characteristics. For ultimate limit state (ULS), the Equivalent Static
Method may be used when at least one of the following criteria is satisfied (Clause 3.2.1):
i. The height of the structure is less than or equal to 15 m.
ii. The natural time period of the structure is less than 0.5 secs.
iii. The structure is not categorized as irregular as per 5.5 and the height is less than 40 m.
Since the height of the building is less than 40m, equivalent static method is used.
Seismic Load calculation As Per NBC 105:2077
The Elastic site spectra for horizontal loading shall be as given by equation 4.1.1.
C (T) =Ch(T)* Z* I ........................................................................ 4.1.1
Where,
Ch(T) = Spectral Shape factor as per Clause 4.1.2
T =0.075 h^(3/4) for Moment resisting concrete frame (Clause 5.1.1)
Z = Seismic Zoning Factor = 0.35 for Kathmandu

(Clause 4.1.4 Table 4-5: Seismic Zoning factors for selected cities and
Municipalities)
I = Importance Factor =1.0 for residential Building
(Clause 4.1.5 Table 4-6 for Moment resisting concrete frame)
H = Height of the building from foundation or from top of a rigid basement
considered in analysis
Design Base Shear
VB = C(T)*Wi [10.1.1 NBC 105-2077]
Where,
C(T) =The Elastic site spectra for horizontal loading

Wi = Seismic Weight of Building, that includes total Dead load plus appropriate
amount of live load.
 Percentage of live load to be taken for calculating seismic
weight =25% for live load intensity upto and including 3.0
KN/m2 and 50% for live load intensity above 3.0 KN/m 2.[Table
6.1 NBC 105-1994].
 live load on roof need not be considered for calculating the

seismic weight of the building.
The seismic forces are applied to the model of building in Etabs automatically for the purpose of
seismic analysis; hence the manual calculation of seismic load and the seismic forces have not
been shown.
The seismic weight of the building and the distribution of the base shear to the horizontal
diaphragm are generated from the analysis in Etabs.
Inter-Story Deflections
The ratio of the inter-story deflection to the corresponding story height shall not exceed: 0.025 at
ultimate limit state 0.006 at serviceability limit state The deflections shall be obtained by using
the effective stiffness properties of the components as given in 3.4(as per NBC 105-2077)

ACCIDENTAL ECCENTRICITY
For the analysis for torsional effects, the applied torsion at each level shall use either the forces
calculated by the Equivalent Static Method or the combined story inertial forces found in a
Modal Response Spectrum Method. The accidental eccentricity can be taken as ±0.1b.
PART IV: LOAD CALCULATION

Design loads (imposed and earthquake) standard are referred to Indian Standard Code of
Practice IS: 875 (Part 2) 1987 for design loads for building and structures. Reduction in Imposed
Loads on Floors as allowed by the IS Code has been also applied. Dead loads are calculated as
per the mass and density of the structural and other building elements. The dead loads and live
loads are calculated as indicated below to start with for general guidance.
Loading assumption:
A. Dead Load
Assuming slab thickness of 125 mm
Self Load of slab = 125*25/1000
= 3.125 kN/m2
50mm thick screed + punning on floor
Intensity = 1.00 kN/m2
Total Dead Load = 4.125 kN/m2
B. Live Load
IS: 875 (Part 2)-1987
Normal Residential building: 2 kN/m2
Roof:
LL = 1.5 kN/ m2
C. Column assuming size, C1 =355mmx355mm
D. Grid Beam & Secondary assuming size of 230mmx350mm
F. Exterior Wall assuming wall thickness of 230mm

Wall Load = 0.23(W)*2.5(H)*19.20
= 11 kN/m
Deducting 30% for openings,
Wall Load = 0.23(W)*2.5(H)*19.20* 0.7
= 7.73 kN/m
G. Partition Wall,
Wall Load = 0.115(W)*2.5(H)*19.20
= 5.52 kN/m
H. Parapet Wall
Load = 0.115(W)*1(H)*19.20
= 2.21 kN/m
 Static Load Cases
Name Type
Dead Linear Static
Live Linear Static
WALL Linear Static
FF Linear Static

Name Type
Ex Linear Static
Ey Linear Static
E Linear Static
ROOF LL Linear Static
Seismic Load Calculation

Base Shear Calculation:
As Per NBC 105-2077:
Total Horizontal Base Shear V= C(T)  W
Where, C(T) = Ch(T)* Z* I
Where,
Basic Shear Factor Ch(T) = According to time period of vibration and Soil type
Seismic Zoning Factor (Z) = 0.35 for Kathmandu
Importance Factor (I) = According to the type of building
Distribution of design seismic force:
Fi = Design Seismic Force at floor Level I
Wi = seismic wt. at ith floor level
hi = height of floor i measured from base
According to NBC 105:2077

Height of building (h) = 8.6106 m
Soil type = D
Time period (T) =0.075x H0.75
= 0.3769 sec
Fundamental Time Period (T1) =1.25*T
=1.25*0.3769
= 0.4712 sec

Where,
α - peak spectral acceleration normalized by PGA
Ta and Tc - the lower and upper periods of the flat part of the spectrum
K=0.8 – Building Height Exp. (Coefficient that controls the descending branch
of the spectrum
Z = 0.35 -(for Lalitpur, NBC105:2077)
I = 1.0 -(Importance Factor =1.0 for residential Building
(Clause 4.1.5 Table 4-6 for Moment resisting concrete frame)

Here, the value of T is T<Ta so
Ch(T)= 1+(2.25-1)x (0.471/0.5)
=2.1775
C(T) = Ch(T)* Z* I
= 2.1775*0.35*1
=0.762125
Figure 1: Spectral Shape Factor, Ch(T) for Equivalent Static Method

For Vertical Distribution of Seismic Forces,
The lateral seismic force (Fi) induced at each level ‘i’ shall be calculated as:
xV
Where,
Wi=seismic weight of the structure assigned to level ‘i’;
hi= height (m) from the base to level ‘i’;
n= total number of floors/levels
V= horizontal seismic base shear calculated as per 6.2
K= an exponent related to the structural period as follows:
 for structure having time period T≤0.5sec, k=1
 for structure having time period T≥2.5sec, k=2
 for structure having period between 0.5 sec and 2.5 sec, k shall be
determined by linear interpolation between 1 and 2.
Calculation of Ultimate Limit State

For the ultimate limit state, the horizontal base shear coefficient (design coefficient),
Cd (T), shall be given by:
Cd(𝑇) =C(𝑇)/(Rμ x Ωu) ……………………………..6.1.1
Where,
C(T) = Elastic Site Spectra as per 4.1.1
Rμ =4 (Ductility Factor as per Table 5-2)
𝛀u =1.5 (Over strength Factor for ULS as per 5.4 Table 5-2)
Cd(𝑇) =C(𝑇)/(Rμ x Ωu)

=0.762125/(4*1.5)
=0.127
Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = Cd(T)x W =0.127*2731.2839 KN
Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = 346.8731 KN
Calculation of Serviceability Limit State

ELASTIC SITE SPECTRA FOR SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE The elastic site spectra
for Serviceability Limit State shall be given by:
Cs (T1) = 0.20 C (T)…………………………………………….4.2.1
=0.20*0.762125
=0.1524
Where C (T) = elastic site spectra for horizontal loading determined from clause 4.1.1
For the serviceability limit state, the horizontal base shear coefficient (design coefficient),
Cd (T1), shall be given by:
Cd(𝑇1) =Cs(𝑇1)/Ωs …………………………………….6.1.2
Where,
Cs(T1) = Elastic Site Spectra determined for Serviceability Limit State as per 4.2
𝛀s = Over strength Factor for SLS as per 5.4
Cd(𝑇) =Cs(𝑇1)/Ωs
=0.1524/1.25
=0.12194
Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = Cd(T)x W =0.12194*2731.2839 KN
Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = 333.0528 KN
PART V: DESIGN PARAMETERS

 ARCHITECTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Types of building Residential Building
Types of structural system Reinforced Concrete Frame
Number of stories Two & Half Storey
Design provision for future extension No
Story Height 2.84 m
Height of parapet wall 1.0 m
Total height of the Building 8.6106 m
External wall/ some internal wall 230 mm
Few internal wall 115 mm
Plaster thickness 12 mm
 CONSTRUCTION SITE
Soil type Type D
Bearing capacity 120 KN/m2
 DIMENSIONS AND MATERIALS

Slab thickness125mm
Beam size (mm) 230x350
Column size (mm) 355x355
 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS
Cement Ordinary Portland cement
Grade of concrete M20 for the entire member
Grade of steel Fe500 for both main and shear
Reinforcement
 ASSESSMENT OF UNIT LOADS OF MATERIALS

DENSITY OF MATERIALS
Reinforced concrete 25.0KN/m3
Brick masonry 19.20KN/m3
Partition wall 1.00KN/m2
Floor finishes 1.00KN/m2
 ASSESSMENT OF LIVE LOAD

Unit loads on floor
Bed Rooms 2.0KN/m2
Shop 4.0KN/m2
Corridors 3.0 KN/m2
Stairs 3.0 KN/m2
Roof (accessible) 1.5 KN/m2
Roof (Non accessible) 0.75 KN/m2
 METHOD OF ANALYSIS
Analysis method adopted for EQ resistant design : Equivalent Static Method (ESM)
Level of design : Professionally engineered structure
Total number of design load cases considered :5
Seismic zoning factor : 0.35
Modal time period and mass participation

NBC105:2020 clause 7.3 states that number of modes to be used in the analysis should be such
that the sum total of modal masses of all modes considered is at least 90 percent of the total
seismic mass of the structure. All modes that are not part of the horizontal load resisting systems
shall be ignored in Modal Combination. The modal combination shall be carried out only for
modes with natural frequency less than 33Hz; the effect of modes with natural frequencies more
than33 Hz shall be included by the missing mass correction procedure following established
principles of structural dynamics.
Table 1 : Modal Participation Mass Ratios
Sum Sum
` Mode Period UX UY Sum UX Sum UY RZ RX Sum RY RZ
sec
Modal 1 0.581 0.1366 0.4584 0.1366 0.4584 0.146 0.1628 0.059 0.246
Modal 2 0.533 0.6524 0.1594 0.789 0.6178 0.0041 0.2095 0.2356 0.2501
Modal 3 0.401 0.0276 0.2103 0.8165 0.8281 0.5643 0.2253 0.2357 0.8144
Modal 4 0.197 0.0578 0.0399 0.8743 0.868 0.0264 0.4393 0.4926 0.8408
Modal 5 0.19 0.0662 0.0453 0.9405 0.9133 0.0136 0.6881 0.8098 0.8544
Modal 6 0.166 0.0034 0.039 0.9439 0.9523 0.076 0.8616 0.8287 0.9305
Modal 7 0.116 0.0247 0.0123 0.9686 0.9646 0.0186 0.8912 0.9103 0.9491
Modal 8 0.111 0.028 0.0223 0.9965 0.9869 0.0005 0.9546 0.9927 0.9496
Modal 9 0.099 0.0035 0.0131 1 1 0.0504 1 1 1
Modal 10 0.006 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1
Modal 11 0.006 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1
Modal 12 0.006 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1
Table 2: Modal Periods and Frequencies
Circular
Case Mode Period Frequency Frequency Eigenvalue
Sec cyc/sec rad/sec rad²/sec²
Modal 1 0.581 1.72 10.8055 116.758
Modal 2 0.533 1.876 11.7846 138.8768
Modal 3 0.401 2.495 15.6765 245.7513
Modal 4 0.197 5.068 31.8403 1013.803
Modal 5 0.19 5.259 33.0444 1091.9326
Modal 6 0.166 6.032 37.8997 1436.3837
Modal 7 0.116 8.591 53.982 2914.0523
Modal 8 0.111 9.008 56.5989 3203.4328
Modal 9 0.099 10.077 63.3156 4008.8664
Modal 10 0.006 166.213 1044.346 1090658.5082
Modal 11 0.006 169.459 1064.7413 1133673.9618
Modal 12 0.006 170.812 1073.2404 1151844.959
CG AND ECCENTRICITY
Torsional Irregularity Check

The torsional irregularity calculation based on structural component is as shown below:
TABLE: Story Max/Avg Displacements
Load Maximu
Story Case/Combo Direction m Average Ratio
mm mm
Story3 EQy 3 Y 21.4 16.5 1.243
Story3 EQy SLS 3 Y 20.5 15.9 1.243
Story3 EQy 1 Y 18.8 15.6 1.201
Story3 EQy SLS 1 Y 18 15 1.201
Story2 EQx 2 X 12.7 10.8 1.169
Story2 EQx SLS 2 X 12.2 10.4 1.169
Story2 EQy 2 Y 11.6 10.1 1.152

Story2 EQy SLS 2 Y 11.2 9.7 1.152
Story1 EQx 2 X 5.4 4.7 1.148
Story1 EQx SLS 2 X 5.2 4.5 1.148
Story1 EQy 2 Y 5.1 4.5 1.132
Story1 EQy SLS 2 Y 4.9 4.3 1.132
Story3 EQy 2 Y 16.1 14.7 1.098
Story3 EQy SLS 2 Y 15.5 14.1 1.098
Story3 EQx 2 X 17.9 16.3 1.094
Story3 EQx SLS 2 X 17.2 15.7 1.094
Story2 EQx 1 X 11.7 10.9 1.076
Story2 EQx SLS 1 X 11.2 10.5 1.076
Story1 EQx 1 X 5 4.7 1.052
Story1 EQx SLS 1 X 4.8 4.5 1.052
Story1 EQx 3 X 5 4.8 1.044
Story1 EQx SLS 3 X 4.8 4.6 1.044
Story3 EQx 1 X 16.6 16 1.037
Story3 EQx SLS 1 X 15.9 15.4 1.037
Story3 EQx 3 X 16 15.6 1.022
Story3 EQx SLS 3 X 15.4 15 1.022
Story2 EQx 3 X 11.1 11 1.017
Story2 EQx SLS 3 X 10.7 10.5 1.017
Allowable displacement ratio=1.5
Form above table, Torsional irregularity is within the limiting value as per
NBC Clause 5.5.2.1.

PART VI: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
 Load Combinations taken in Analysis
The load combinations are based on NBC 105: 2077 Clause 3.6.1
Static Load Combination:
1.2 DL + 1.5 LL
Seismic Load Combinations:
1.0 DL + 0.3 LL EQ ULS
1.0 DL + 0.3 LL EQ SLS
For seismic loading, mass equivalent to the load that composed of 100% of Dead load and 30%
& 60% of Live load is taken into consideration.
The Earthquake lateral loads were used in the combination from the Self-Generated Load on the
Equivalent Static Method (ESM).
Following effective stiffness for flexure and shear is used as per NBC-105-2020.
Column Beam

Analysis Detail:
Fig : Typical Floor Plan

Fig : ELEVATIONAL VIEW
Fig : 3D VIEW

Fig : Dead Load (Floor Finish)
Fig : Dead Load (Wall load)

Fig : Live Load
RESULT OUTPUT
 Support Reactions

Lateral Forces
Lateral seismic loads for load pattern SLS using the user input coefficients
Lateral Force EQX SLS Lateral Force EQY SLS
Story Elevation X-Dir Y-Dir

m kN kN
m kN kN
Story3 8.6106 0 104.8671
Story3 8.6106 104.8671 0
Story2 5.7404 0 150.4733
Story2 5.7404 150.4733 0
Story1 2.8702 0 91.5326
Story1 2.8702 91.5326 0
Base 0 0 0
Base 0 0 0

Lateral seismic loads for load pattern ULS using the user input coefficients
Lateral Force EQx ULS Lateral Force EQy,ULS

m kN kN
m kN kN
Story3 8.6106 0 100.689
Story3 8.6106 100.689 0
Story2 5.7404 0 144.4781
Story2 5.7404 144.4781 0
Story1 2.8702 0 87.8857
Story1 2.8702 87.8857 0
Base 0 0 0
Base 0 0 0
Axial Force Diagram (Sample)

Shear Force Diagram (Sample)
Bending Moment Diagram (Sample)

Story Response - Maximum Story Displacement
Load Case EQx

Load Case EQy

Load Case EQx SLS

Load Case EQy SLS
 STORY DRIFT

PART VII: DESIGN CALCULATIONS
 COLUMN DESIGN RESULT
Fig: Column rebar along grid 1


ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 Column Section Design
Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 C4 92 C16*16 envelop 0 2870.2 0.598
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
400 400 60 30
Material Properties

Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3
Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
279.4595 91.1599 81.4213 5.5892 5.5892 2241 1.4
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors
K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.797717 2514.6 39.683 0 5.5892
Minor Bend(M2) 0.781249 2514.6 39.5752 0 5.5892
Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3
Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 41.496 117.8509 54.4003 37.6889 443.37
Minor, Vu3 51.2852 117.8509 54.4003 36.9223 443.37
Joint Shear Check/Design
Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear

Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio
Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A
Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)
Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
1600 22.4 2280.2188 615.3316 279.4595 1
Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) (Part 1 of 2)
Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.876 400 5.015 12 No
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.876 400 4.911 12 No
Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) (Part 2 of 2)
Ma
Moment (kN-m)
0
0
Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed

 BEAM DESIGN RESULT
Fig: Beam rebar in GF

Fig: Beam rebar in First Floor
Fig: Beam rebar in Second Floor

ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design
Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
Story1 B11 55 B9*14 envelop 175 4394.2 1
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
228.6 355.6 228.6 0 16 16
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
Design Code Parameters
ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15
Factored Forces and Moments
Factored Factored Factored Factored

Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-36.1981 15.6222 40.2875 -0.4719
Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt
Factored Factored Positive Negative

Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-36.1981 23.4843 0 -59.6824
Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu
Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required

-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -59.6824 448 1 448 174
Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 224 218 0 224
Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu
Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
65.3524 29.3921 145.3017 30.1063 1185.64
Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2
Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
15.6222 40.2875 216.6 343.6 981.11

Standards and Codes of Practice:
1. Indian Standards Code of Practice For Plain &

Reinforced Concrete IS: 456-2000; Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), July 2000,
New Delhi
2. Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete IS: 456-1978
Special Publication: 16 Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi
3. Nepal National Building Code, NBC 105: 2077,
Department of Housing and Physical Planning.
4. Handbook on Concrete reinforcement and
Detailing, Special Publication: 34
[SP: 34 –1987].
5. Explanatory Handbook on Code for Earthquake
Engineering IS: 1893 –2002, Beau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
6. Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures
subjected to Seismic forces- Indian Code of Practice IS 13920: 1993, Beau of
Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
ANNEX


Report of ANUPAM 2 & Half (Using NBC) .

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report of ANUPAM 2 & Half (Using NBC) .

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Report of ANUPAM 2 & Half (Using NBC) .

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

A Report on

Structural Analysis and Design

Designed by:- Er. Mahesh Timilsina Owner:

This report comprises the summary of the residential building of

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

PART I: GENERAL DATA.............................................................................................. 4

PART II: PRELIMININARY DESIGN............................................................................5

PART III: METHODOLOGY............................................................................................ 4

PART IV: LOAD CALCULATION................................................................................. 7

PART V: DESIGN PARAMETERS............................................................................. 13

PART VI: STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS.......................................................................16

PART VII: DESIGN CALCULATIONS......................................................................27

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

 Building Design Parameters

The building consists of a RCC frame structure, which is essentially an assembly of

PART II: PRELIMININARY DESIGN

From deflection criteria, we have,

(Cl.23-2.1, p.37, IS456:2000)

=a factor which depends on the area of compression reinforcement.

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

The 3D structure is analyzed as moment resisting frames i.e. space frames.

a) The limit state of collapse or total failure of structure.

Ultimate Limit State Verification:

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

a.) Self weight of the beam

b.) Load Transfer from slab to beam

c). Load due to wall

e). Load transfer from staircase

2.2 Lateral Load Calculation

i. The height of the structure is less than or equal to 15 m.

C (T) =Ch(T)* Z* I ........................................................................ 4.1.1

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

VB = C(T)*Wi [10.1.1 NBC 105-2077]

C(T) =The Elastic site spectra for horizontal loading

 live load on roof need not be considered for calculating the

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

PART IV: LOAD CALCULATION

C. Column assuming size, C1 =355mmx355mm

D. Grid Beam & Secondary assuming size of 230mmx350mm

F. Exterior Wall assuming wall thickness of 230mm

 Static Load Cases

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

Seismic Load Calculation

According to NBC 105:2077

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

Figure 1: Spectral Shape Factor, Ch(T) for Equivalent Static Method

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

Calculation of Ultimate Limit State

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

Calculation of Serviceability Limit State

PART V: DESIGN PARAMETERS

 DIMENSIONS AND MATERIALS

Er. Mahesh Timilsina Mr. Anupam Sthapit

 ASSESSMENT OF UNIT LOADS OF MATERIALS

 ASSESSMENT OF LIVE LOAD

Modal time period and mass participation

Torsional Irregularity Check