Psychology - Wikipedia
Psychology - Wikipedia
Psychology - Wikipedia
Psychology is the scientific study of mind and behavior.[1][2] Its subject matter includes the
behavior of humans and nonhumans, both conscious and unconscious phenomena, and
mental processes such as thoughts, feelings, and motives. Psychology is an academic
discipline of immense scope, crossing the boundaries between the natural and social
sciences. Biological psychologists seek an understanding of the emergent properties of
brains, linking the discipline to neuroscience. As social scientists, psychologists aim to
understand the behavior of individuals and groups.[3][4]
While psychological knowledge is often applied to the assessment and treatment of mental
health problems, it is also directed towards understanding and solving problems in several
spheres of human activity. By many accounts, psychology ultimately aims to benefit
society.[6][7][8] Many psychologists are involved in some kind of therapeutic role, practicing
psychotherapy in clinical, counseling, or school settings. Other psychologists conduct
scientific research on a ide range of topics related to mental processes and beha ior
Typically the latter group of psychologists work in academic settings (e.g., universities,
medical schools, or hospitals). Another group of psychologists is employed in industrial and
organizational settings.[9] Yet others are involved in work on human development, aging,
sports, health, forensic science, education, and the media.
Ψ (psi), the first letter of the Greek word psyche from which the term psychology is derived,
is commonly associated with the field of psychology.
In 1890, William James defined psychology as "the science of mental life, both of its
phenomena and their conditions."[14] This definition enjoyed widespread currency for
decades. However, this meaning was contested, notably by radical behaviorists such as
John B. Watson, who in 1913 asserted that the discipline is a natural science, the theoretical
goal of which "is the prediction and control of behavior."[15] Since James defined
"psychology", the term more strongly implicates scientific experimentation.[16][15] Folk
psychology is the understanding of the mental states and behaviors of people held by
ordinary people, as contrasted with psychology professionals' understanding.[17]
History
The ancient civilizations of Egypt, Greece, China, India, and Persia all engaged in the
philosophical study of psychology. In Ancient Egypt the Ebers Papyrus mentioned
depression and thought disorders.[18] Historians note that Greek philosophers, including
Thales, Plato, and Aristotle (especially in his De Anima treatise),[19] addressed the workings
[20]
that mental disorders had physical rather than supernatural causes.[21] In 387 BCE, Plato
suggested that the brain is where mental processes take place, and in 335 BCE Aristotle
suggested that it was the heart.[22]
In China, psychological understanding grew from the philosophical works of Laozi and
Confucius, and later from the doctrines of Buddhism.[23] This body of knowledge involves
insights drawn from introspection and observation, as well as techniques for focused
thinking and acting. It frames the universe in term of a division of physical reality and mental
reality as well as the interaction between the physical and the mental. Chinese philosophy
also emphasized purifying the mind in order to increase virtue and power. An ancient text
known as The Yellow Emperor's Classic of Internal Medicine identifies the brain as the nexus
of wisdom and sensation, includes theories of personality based on yin–yang balance, and
analyzes mental disorder in terms of physiological and social disequilibria. Chinese
scholarship that focused on the brain advanced during the Qing dynasty with the work of
Western-educated Fang Yizhi (1611–1671), Liu Zhi (1660–1730), and Wang Qingren (1768–
1831). Wang Qingren emphasized the importance of the brain as the center of the nervous
system, linked mental disorder with brain diseases, investigated the causes of dreams and
insomnia, and advanced a theory of hemispheric lateralization in brain function.[24]
Beginning of experimental
psychology
Philosopher John Stuart Mill believed that the human mind was open to scientific
investigation, even if the science is in some ways inexact.[30] Mill proposed a "mental
chemistry" in which elementary thoughts could combine into ideas of greater complexity.[30]
Gustav Fechner began conducting psychophysics research in Leipzig in the 1830s. He
articulated the principle that human perception of a stimulus varies logarithmically
according to its intensity.[31]: 61 The principle became known as the Weber–Fechner law.
Fechner's 1860 Elements of Psychophysics challenged Kant's negative view with regard to
conducting quantitative research on the mind.[32][28] Fechner's achievement was to show
that "mental processes could not only be given numerical magnitudes, but also that these
could be measured by experimental methods."[28] In Heidelberg, Hermann von Helmholtz
conducted parallel research on sensory perception, and trained physiologist Wilhelm Wundt.
Wundt, in turn, came to Leipzig University, where he established the psychological laboratory
that brought experimental psychology to the world. Wundt focused on breaking down
mental processes into the most basic components, motivated in part by an analogy to
recent advances in chemistry, and its successful investigation of the elements and structure
of materials.[33] Paul Flechsig and Emil Kraepelin soon created another influential laboratory
at Leipzig, a psychology-related lab, that focused more on experimental psychiatry.[28]
James McKeen Cattell, a professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania and
Columbia University and the co-founder of Psychological Review, was the first professor of
psychology in the United States.
The German psychologist Hermann Ebbinghaus, a researcher at the University of Berlin, was
a 19th-century contributor to the field. He pioneered the experimental study of memory and
developed quantitative models of learning and forgetting.[34] In the early 20th century,
Wolfgang Kohler, Max Wertheimer, and Kurt Koffka co-founded the school of Gestalt
psychology of Fritz Perls. The approach of Gestalt psychology is based upon the idea that
individuals experience things as unified wholes. Rather than reducing thoughts and behavior
into smaller component elements, as in structuralism, the Gestaltists maintained that whole
of experience is important, and differs from the sum of its parts.
Psychologists in Germany, Denmark, Austria, England, and the United States soon followed
Wundt in setting up laboratories.[35] G. Stanley Hall, an American who studied with Wundt,
founded a psychology lab that became internationally influential. The lab was located at
Johns Hopkins University. Hall, in turn, trained Yujiro Motora, who brought experimental
psychology, emphasizing psychophysics, to the Imperial University of Tokyo.[36] Wundt's
assistant, Hugo Münsterberg, taught psychology at Harvard to students such as Narendra
Nath Sen Gupta—who, in 1905, founded a psychology department and laboratory at the
University of Calcutta.[25] Wundt's students Walter Dill Scott, Lightner Witmer, and James
McKeen Cattell worked on developing tests of mental ability. Cattell, who also studied with
eugenicist Francis Galton, went on to found the Psychological Corporation. Witmer focused
on the mental testing of children; Scott, on employee selection.[31]: 60
Another student of Wundt, the Englishman Edward Titchener, created the psychology
program at Cornell University and advanced "structuralist" psychology. The idea behind
structuralism was to analyze and classify different aspects of the mind, primarily through
the method of introspection.[37] William James, John Dewey, and Harvey Carr advanced the
idea of functionalism, an expansive approach to psychology that underlined the Darwinian
idea of a behavior's usefulness to the individual. In 1890, James wrote an influential book,
The Principles of Psychology, which expanded on the structuralism. He memorably
described "stream of consciousness." James's ideas interested many American students in
the emerging discipline.[37][14][31]: 178–82 Dewey integrated psychology with societal concerns,
most notably by promoting progressive education, inculcating moral values in children, and
assimilating immigrants.[31]: 196–200
American psychology gained status upon the U.S.'s entry into World War I. A standing
committee headed by Robert Yerkes administered mental tests ("Army Alpha" and "Army
Beta") to almost 1.8 million soldiers.[41] Subsequently, the Rockefeller family, via the Social
Science Research Council, began to provide funding for behavioral research.[42][43]
Rockefeller charities funded the National Committee on Mental Hygiene, which
disseminated the concept of mental illness and lobbied for applying ideas from psychology
to child rearing.[41][44] Through the Bureau of Social Hygiene and later funding of Alfred
Kinsey, Rockefeller foundations helped establish research on sexuality in the U.S.[45] Under
the influence of the Carnegie-funded Eugenics Record Office, the Draper-funded Pioneer
Fund, and other institutions, the eugenics movement also influenced American psychology.
In the 1910s and 1920s, eugenics became a standard topic in psychology classes.[46] In
contrast to the US, in the UK psychology was met with antagonism by the scientific and
medical establishments, and up until 1939, there were only six psychology chairs in
universities in England.[47]
During World War II and the Cold War, the U.S. military and intelligence agencies established
themselves as leading funders of psychology by way of the armed forces and in the new
Office of Strategic Services intelligence agency. University of Michigan psychologist Dorwin
Cartwright reported that university researchers began large-scale propaganda research in
1939–1941. He observed that "the last few months of the war saw a social psychologist
become chiefly responsible for determining the week-by-week-propaganda policy for the
United States Government." Cartwright also wrote that psychologists had significant roles in
managing the domestic economy.[48] The Army rolled out its new General Classification Test
to assess the ability of millions of soldiers. The Army also engaged in large-scale
psychological research of troop morale and mental health.[49] In the 1950s, the Rockefeller
Foundation and Ford Foundation collaborated with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to
fund research on psychological warfare.[50] In 1965, public controversy called attention to
the Army's Project Camelot, the "Manhattan Project" of social science, an effort which
enlisted psychologists and anthropologists to analyze the plans and policies of foreign
countries for strategic purposes.[51][52]
In Germany after World War I, psychology held institutional power through the military, which
was subsequently expanded along with the rest of the military during Nazi Germany.[28]
Under the direction of Hermann Göring's cousin Matthias Göring, the Berlin Psychoanalytic
Institute was renamed the Göring Institute. Freudian psychoanalysts were expelled and
persecuted under the anti-Jewish policies of the Nazi Party, and all psychologists had to
distance themselves from Freud and Adler, founders of psychoanalysis who were also
Jewish.[53] The Göring Institute was well-financed throughout the war with a mandate to
create a "New German Psychotherapy." This psychotherapy aimed to align suitable Germans
with the overall goals of the Reich. As described by one physician, "Despite the importance
of analysis, spiritual guidance and the active cooperation of the patient represent the best
way to overcome individual mental problems and to subordinate them to the requirements
of the Volk and the Gemeinschaft." Psychologists were to provide Seelenführung [lit., soul
guidance], the leadership of the mind, to integrate people into the new vision of a German
community.[54] Harald Schultz-Hencke melded psychology with the Nazi theory of biology
and racial origins, criticizing psychoanalysis as a study of the weak and deformed.[55]
Johannes Heinrich Schultz, a German psychologist recognized for developing the technique
of autogenic training, prominently advocated sterilization and euthanasia of men considered
genetically undesirable, and devised techniques for facilitating this process.[56]
After the war, new institutions were created although some psychologists, because of their
Nazi affiliation, were discredited. Alexander Mitscherlich founded a prominent applied
psychoanalysis journal called Psyche. With funding from the Rockefeller Foundation,
Mitscherlich established the first clinical psychosomatic medicine division at Heidelberg
University. In 1970, psychology was integrated into the required studies of medical
students.[57]
After the Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks promoted psychology as a way to engineer the
"New Man" of socialism. Consequently, university psychology departments trained large
numbers of students in psychology. At the completion of training, positions were made
available for those students at schools, workplaces, cultural institutions, and in the military.
The Russian state emphasized pedology and the study of child development. Lev Vygotsky
became prominent in the field of child development.[39] The Bolsheviks also promoted free
love and embraced the doctrine of psychoanalysis as an antidote to sexual
repression.[58]: 84–6 [59] Although pedology and intelligence testing fell out of favor in 1936,
psychology maintained its privileged position as an instrument of the Soviet Union.[39]
Stalinist purges took a heavy toll and instilled a climate of fear in the profession, as
elsewhere in Soviet society.[58]: 22 Following World War II, Jewish psychologists past and
present, including Lev Vygotsky, A.R. Luria, and Aron Zalkind, were denounced; Ivan Pavlov
(posthumously) and Stalin himself were celebrated as heroes of Soviet
psychology.[58]: 25–6, 48–9 Soviet academics experienced a degree of liberalization during the
Khrushchev Thaw. The topics of cybernetics, linguistics, and genetics became acceptable
again. The new field of engineering psychology emerged. The field involved the study of the
mental aspects of complex jobs (such as pilot and cosmonaut). Interdisciplinary studies
became popular and scholars such as Georgy Shchedrovitsky developed systems theory
approaches to human behavior.[58]: 27–33
Women in psychology
1900 - 1949
Women in the early 1900s started to make key findings within the world of psychology. In
1923, Anna Freud,[61] the daughter of Sigmund Freud, built on her father's work using
different defense mechanisms (denial, repression, and suppression) to psychoanalyze
children. She believed that once a child reached the latency period, child analysis could be
used as a mode of therapy. She stated it is important focus on the child's environment,
support their development, and prevent neurosis. She believed a child should be recognized
as their own person with their own right and have each session catered to the child's
specific needs. She encouraged drawing, moving freely, and expressing themselves in any
way. This helped build a strong therapeutic alliance with child patients, which allows
psychologists to observe their normal behavior. She continued her research on the impact of
children after family separation, children with socio-economically disadvantaged
backgrounds, and all stages of child development from infancy to adolescence.
Functional periodicity, the belief women are mentally and physically impaired during
menstruation, impacted women's rights because employers were less likely to hire them due
to the belief they would be incapable of working for 1 week a month. Leta Stetter
Hollingworth wanted to prove this hypothesis and Edward L. Thorndike's theory, that women
have lesser psychological and physical traits than men and were simply mediocre, incorrect.
Hollingworth worked to prove differences were not from male genetic superiority but from
culture. She also included the concept of women's impairment during menstruation in her
research. She recorded both women and men performances on tasks (cognitive, perceptual,
and motor) for three months. No evidence was found of decreased performance due to a
woman's menstrual cycle.[62] She also challenged the belief intelligence is inherited and
women here are intellectually inferior to men. She stated that women do not reach positions
of power due to the societal norms and roles they are assigned. As she states in her article,
"Variability as related to sex differences in achievement: A Critique",[63] the largest problem
women have is the social order that was built due to the assumption women have less
interests and abilities than men. To further prove her point, she completed another
experiment with infants who have not been influenced by the environment of social norms,
like the adult male getting more opportunities than women. She found no difference
between infants besides size. After this research proved the original hypothesis wrong,
Hollingworth was able to show there is no difference between the physiological and
psychological traits of men and women, and women are not impaired during
menstruation.[64]
The first half of the 1900s was filled with new theories and it was a turning point for
women's recognition within the field of psychology. In addition to the contributions made by
Leta Stetter Hollingworth and Anna Freud, Mary Whiton Calkins invented the paired
associates technique of studying memory and developed self-psychology.[65] Karen Horney
developed the concept of "womb envy" and neurotic needs.[66] Psychoanalyst Melanie Klein
impacted developmental psychology with her research of play therapy.[67] These great
discoveries and contributions were made during struggles of sexism, discrimination, and
little recognition for their work.
1950 - 1999
Women in the second half of the 20th century continued to do research that had large-scale
impacts on the field of psychology. Mary Ainsworth's work centered around attachment
theory. Building off fellow psychologist John Bowlby, Ainsworth spent years doing fieldwork
to understand the development of mother-infant relationships. In doing this field research,
Ainsworth developed the Strange Situation Procedure, a laboratory procedure meant to
study attachment style by separating and uniting a child with their mother several different
times under different circumstances. These field studies are also where she developed her
attachment theory and the order of attachment styles, which was a landmark for
developmental psychology.[68][69] Because of her work, Ainsworth became one of the most
cited psychologists of all time.[70] Mamie Phipps Clark was another woman in psychology
that changed the field with her research. She was one of the first African-Americans to
receive a doctoral degree in psychology from Columbia University, along with her husband,
Kenneth Clark. Her master's thesis, "The Development of Consciousness in Negro Pre-
School Children," argued that black children's self-esteem was negatively impacted by racial
discrimination. She and her husband conduced research building off her thesis throughout
the 1940s. These tests, called the doll tests, asked young children to choose between
identical dolls whose only difference was race, and they found that the majority of the
children preferred the white dolls and attributed positive traits to them. Repeated over and
over again, these tests helped to determine the negative effects of racial discrimination and
segregation on black children's self-image and development. In 1954, this research would
help decide the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision, leading to the end of legal
segregation across the nation. Clark went on to be an influential figure in psychology, her
work continuing to focus on minority youth.[71]
As the field of psychology developed throughout the latter half of the 20th century, women in
the field advocated for their voices to be heard and their perspectives to be valued. Second-
wave feminism did not miss psychology. An outspoken feminist in psychology was Naomi
Weisstein, who was an accomplished researcher in psychology and neuroscience, and is
perhaps best known for her paper, "Kirche, Kuche, Kinder as Scientific Law: Psychology
Constructs the Female." Psychology Constructs the Female criticized the field of psychology
for centering men and using biology too much to explain gender differences without taking
into account social factors.[72] Her work set the stage for further research to be done in
social psychology, especially in gender construction.[73] Other women in the field also
continued advocating for women in psychology, creating the Association for Women in
Psychology to criticize how the field treated women. E. Kitsch Child, Phyllis Chesler, and
Dorothy Riddle were some of the founding members of the organization in 1969.[74][75]
The latter half of the 20th century further diversified the field of psychology, with women of
color reaching new milestones. In 1962, Martha Bernal became the first Latina woman to
get a Ph.D. in psychology. In 1969, Marigold Linton, the first Native American woman to get a
Ph.D. in psychology, founded the National Indian Education Association. She was also a
founding member of the Society for Advancement of Chicanos and Native Americans in
Science. In 1971, The Network of Indian Psychologists was established by Carolyn Attneave.
Harriet McAdoo was appointed to the White House Conference on Families in 1979.[76]
2000 - Current
Babette Rothschild, a clinical social worker, invented Somatic Trauma Therapy. Somatic
Trauma Therapy utilizes the body to experience, process, and heal from traumatic
i T dh h i h lb k h i b i
The Body Remembers: The Psychophysiology of Trauma, Trauma, and Trauma Treatment[77],
which was published in 2000.[78]
Dr. Tara Brach has written several bestselling books that combine Western and Eastern
psychology. She founded the Insight Meditation Community of Washington in 1998 and co-
founded two teaching programs, Banyan, and the Mindfulness Mediation Teacher Training
Program. The latter has served people from 74 different countries.[79]
Dr. Kay Redfield Jamison, named one of Time Magazine's "Best Doctors in the United States"
is a lecturer, psychologist, and writer. She is known for her vast modern contributions to
bipolar disorder and her books An Unquiet Mind[80] (Published 1995) and Nothing Was the
Same[81] (Published in 2009). Having Bipolar Disorder herself, she has written several
memoirs about her experience with suicidal thoughts, manic behaviors, depression, and
other issues that arise from being Bipolar.[78]
Dr. Angela Neal-Barnett views psychology through a Black lens and dedicated her career to
focusing on the anxiety of African American women. She founded the organization Rise
Sally Rise which helps Black women cope with anxiety. She published her work Soothe Your
Nerves: The Black Woman's Guide to Understanding and Overcoming Anxiety, Panic and
Fear[82] in 2003.[78]
In 2003 Kristin Neff founded the Self Compassion Scale, a tool for therapists to use to
measure their compassion for themselves. In addition to this, she has written several books
the most relevant being Self Compassion: The Proven Power to Being Kind to Yourself[83]
(Published in 2011) and Fierce Self-Compassion: How Women Can Harness Kindness to
Speak Up, Claim Their Power and Thrive[84] (Published in 2021).[78]
In 2002 Dr. Teresa LaFromboise, former president of the Society of Indian Psychologists,
received the APA's Distinguished Career Contribution to Research Award from the Society
for the Psychological Study of Culture Ethnicity, and Race for her research on suicide
prevention. She was the first person to lead an intervention for Native American children and
adolescents that utilized evidence-based suicide prevention. She has spent her career
dedicated to aiding racial and ethnic minority youth cope with cultural adjustment and
pressures.[85]
Dr. Shari Miles-Cohen, a psychologist and political activist has applied a black, feminist, and
class lens to all her psychological studies. Aiding progressive and women's issues, she has
been the executive director for many NGOs. In 2007 she became the Senior Director of the
Women's Programs Office of the American Psychological Association. Therefore, she was
one of the creators of the APA's "Women in Psychology Timeline" which features the
accomplishments of women of color in psychology. She is well known for co-editing
Eliminating Inequities for Women with Disabilities: An Agenda for Health and Wellness[86]
(published in 2016), her article published in the Women's Reproductive Health Journal about
women of color's struggle with pregnancy and postpartum (Published in 2018), and co-
authoring the award-winning "APA Handbook of the Psychology of Women" (published in
2019).[87]
Disciplinary organizations
Institutions
In 1920, Édouard Claparède and Pierre Bovet created a new applied psychology organization
called the International Congress of Psychotechnics Applied to Vocational Guidance, later
called the International Congress of Psychotechnics and then the International Association
of Applied Psychology.[35] The IAAP is considered the oldest international psychology
association.[88] Today, at least 65 international groups deal with specialized aspects of
psychology.[88] In response to male predominance in the field, female psychologists in the
U.S. formed the National Council of Women Psychologists in 1941. This organization
became the International Council of Women Psychologists after World War II and the
International Council of Psychologists in 1959. Several associations including the
Association of Black Psychologists and the Asian American Psychological Association have
arisen to promote the inclusion of non-European racial groups in the profession.[88]
IUPsyS recognizes 66 national psychology associations and at least 15 others exist.[88] The
American Psychological Association is the oldest and largest.[88] Its membership has
increased from 5,000 in 1945 to 100,000 in the present day.[37] The APA includes 54
divisions, which since 1960 have steadily proliferated to include more specialties. Some of
these divisions, such as the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues and the
American Psychology–Law Society, began as autonomous groups.[88]
In some places, governments legally regulate who can provide psychological services or
represent themselves as a "psychologist."[90] The APA defines a psychologist as someone
with a doctoral degree in psychology.[91]
Boundaries
Early practitioners of experimental psychology distinguished themselves from
parapsychology, which in the late nineteenth century enjoyed popularity (including the
interest of scholars such as William James). Some people considered parapsychology to be
part of "psychology." Parapsychology, hypnotism, and psychism were major topics at the
early International Congresses. But students of these fields were eventually ostracized, and
more or less banished from the Congress in 1900–1905.[35] Parapsychology persisted for a
time at Imperial University in Japan, with publications such as Clairvoyance and
Thoughtography by Tomokichi Fukurai, but it was mostly shunned by 1913.[36]
As a discipline, psychology has long sought to fend off accusations that it is a "soft"
science. Philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn's 1962 critique implied psychology overall
was in a pre-paradigm state, lacking agreement on the type of overarching theory found in
mature hard sciences such as chemistry and physics.[92] Because some areas of
psychology rely on research methods such as self-reports in surveys and questionnaires,
critics asserted that psychology is not an objective science. Skeptics have suggested that
personality, thinking, and emotion cannot be directly measured and are often inferred from
subjective self-reports, which may be problematic. Experimental psychologists have devised
a variety of ways to indirectly measure these elusive phenomenological entities.[93][94][95]
Divisions still exist within the field, with some psychologists more oriented towards the
unique experiences of individual humans which cannot be understood only as data points
within a larger population. Critics inside and outside the field have argued that mainstream
psychology has become increasingly dominated by a "cult of empiricism", which limits the
scope of research because investigators restrict themselves to methods derived from the
physical sciences.[96]: 36–7 Feminist critiques have argued that claims to scientific objectivity
obscure the values and agenda of (historically) mostly male researchers.[41] Jean Grimshaw,
for example, argues that mainstream psychological research has advanced a patriarchal
agenda through its efforts to control behavior.[96]: 120
Biological
False-color representations of
cerebral fiber pathways affected, per
Van Horn et al.[V]: 3
Psychologists generally consider biology the substrate of thought and feeling, and therefore
an important area of study. Behaviorial neuroscience, also known as biological psychology,
involves the application of biological principles to the study of physiological and genetic
mechanisms underlying behavior in humans and other animals. The allied field of
comparative psychology is the scientific study of the behavior and mental processes of non-
human animals.[97] A leading question in behavioral neuroscience has been whether and
how mental functions are localized in the brain. From Phineas Gage to H.M. and Clive
Wearing, individual people with mental deficits traceable to physical brain damage have
inspired new discoveries in this area.[98] Modern behavioral neuroscience could be said to
originate in the 1870s, when in France Paul Broca traced production of speech to the left
frontal gyrus, thereby also demonstrating hemispheric lateralization of brain function. Soon
after, Carl Wernicke identified a related area necessary for the understanding of
[99] 20 2
The contemporary field of behavioral neuroscience focuses on the physical basis of
behavior. Behaviorial neuroscientists use animal models, often relying on rats, to study the
neural, genetic, and cellular mechanisms that underlie behaviors involved in learning,
memory, and fear responses.[100] Cognitive neuroscientists, by using neural imaging tools,
investigate the neural correlates of psychological processes in humans. Neuropsychologists
conduct psychological assessments to determine how an individual's behavior and
cognition are related to the brain. The biopsychosocial model is a cross-disciplinary, holistic
model that concerns the ways in which interrelationships of biological, psychological, and
socio-environmental factors affect health and behavior.[101]
The history of the biological foundations of psychology includes evidence of racism. The
idea of white supremacy and indeed the modern concept of race itself arose during the
process of world conquest by Europeans.[103] Carl von Linnaeus's four-fold classification of
humans classifies Europeans as intelligent and severe, Americans as contented and free,
Asians as ritualistic, and Africans as lazy and capricious. Race was also used to justify the
construction of socially specific mental disorders such as drapetomania and dysaesthesia
aethiopica—the behavior of uncooperative African slaves.[104] After the creation of
experimental psychology, "ethnical psychology" emerged as a subdiscipline, based on the
assumption that studying primitive races would provide an important link between animal
behavior and the psychology of more evolved humans.[105]
Behaviorist
Skinner's teaching machine, a
mechanical invention to automate the
task of programmed instruction
CC
3:21
A tenet of behavioral research is that a large part of both human and lower-animal behavior
is learned. A principle associated with behavioral research is that the mechanisms involved
in learning apply to humans and non-human animals. Behavioral researchers have
developed a treatment known as behavior modification, which is used to help individuals
replace undesirable behaviors with desirable ones.
Clark L. Hull, Edwin Guthrie, and others did much to help behaviorism become a widely used
paradigm.[37] A new method of "instrumental" or "operant" conditioning added the concepts
of reinforcement and punishment to the model of behavior change. Radical behaviorists
avoided discussing the inner workings of the mind, especially the unconscious mind, which
they considered impossible to assess scientifically.[108] Operant conditioning was first
described by Miller and Kanorski and popularized in the U.S. by B.F. Skinner, who emerged
as a leading intellectual of the behaviorist movement.[109][110]
Noam Chomsky published an influential critique of radical behaviorism on the grounds that
behaviorist principles could not adequately explain the complex mental process of language
acquisition and language use.[111][112] The review, which was scathing, did much to reduce
the status of behaviorism within psychology.[31]: 282–5 Martin Seligman and his colleagues
discovered that they could condition in dogs a state of "learned helplessness", which was
not predicted by the behaviorist approach to psychology.[113][114] Edward C. Tolman
advanced a hybrid "cognitive behavioral" model, most notably with his 1948 publication
discussing the cognitive maps used by rats to guess at the location of food at the end of a
maze.[115] Skinner's behaviorism did not die, in part because it generated successful
practical applications.[112]
The Association for Behavior Analysis International was founded in 1974 and by 2003 had
members from 42 countries. The field has gained a foothold in Latin America and
Japan.[116] Applied behavior analysis is the term used for the application of the principles of
operant conditioning to change socially significant behavior (it supersedes the term,
"behavior modification").[117]
Cognitive
The Müller–Lyer illusion.
Psychologists make inferences about
mental processes from shared
phenomena such as optical illusions.
Starting in the 1950s, the experimental techniques developed by The Stroop effect is
Wundt, James, Ebbinghaus, and others re-emerged as experimental the fact that naming
psychology became increasingly cognitivist and, eventually, the color of the first
constituted a part of the wider, interdisciplinary cognitive set of words is easier
science.[119][120] Some called this development the cognitive and quicker than the
revolution because it rejected the anti-mentalist dogma of second.
[120]
behaviorism as well as the strictures of psychoanalysis.
Albert Bandura helped along the transition in psychology from behaviorism to cognitive
psychology. Bandura and other social learning theorists advanced the idea of vicarious
learning. In other words, they advanced the view that a child can learn by observing the
immediate social environment and not necessarily from having been reinforced for enacting
a behavior, although they did not rule out the influence of reinforcement on learning a
behavior.[121]
Technological advances also renewed interest in mental states and mental representations.
English neuroscientist Charles Sherrington and Canadian psychologist Donald O. Hebb used
experimental methods to link psychological phenomena to the structure and function of the
brain. The rise of computer science, cybernetics, and artificial intelligence underlined the
value of comparing information processing in humans and machines.
A popular and representative topic in this area is cognitive bias, or irrational thought.
Psychologists (and economists) have classified and described a sizeable catalog of biases
which recur frequently in human thought. The availability heuristic, for example, is the
tendency to overestimate the importance of something which happens to come readily to
mind.[122]
Social
Social psychology is concerned with how behaviors, thoughts, feelings, and the social
environment influence human interactions.[124] Social psychologists study such topics as
the influence of others on an individual's behavior (e.g. conformity, persuasion) and the
formation of beliefs, attitudes, and stereotypes about other people. Social cognition fuses
elements of social and cognitive psychology for the purpose of understanding how people
process, remember, or distort social information. The study of group dynamics involves
research on the nature of leadership, organizational communication, and related
phenomena. In recent years, social psychologists have become interested in implicit
measures, mediational models, and the interaction of person and social factors in
accounting for behavior. Some concepts that sociologists have applied to the study of
psychiatric disorders, concepts such as the social role, sick role, social class, life events,
culture, migration, and total institution, have influenced social psychologists.[125]
Psychoanalytic
Psychologists such as Hans Eysenck and philosophers including Karl Popper sharply
criticized psychoanalysis. Popper argued that psychoanalysis was not falsifiable (no claim it
made could be proven wrong) and therefore inherently not a scientific discipline,[131]
whereas Eysenck advanced the view that psychoanalytic tenets had been contradicted by
experimental data. By the end of the 20th century, psychology departments in American
universities mostly had marginalized Freudian theory, dismissing it as a "desiccated and
dead" historical artifact.[132] Researchers such as António Damásio, Oliver Sacks, and
Joseph LeDoux; and individuals in the emerging field of neuro-psychoanalysis have
defended some of Freud's ideas on scientific grounds.[133]
Existential-humanistic
Austrian existential psychiatrist and Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl drew evidence of
meaning's therapeutic power from reflections upon his own internment.[145] He created a
variation of existential psychotherapy called logotherapy, a type of existentialist analysis
that focuses on a will to meaning (in one's life), as opposed to Adler's Nietzschean doctrine
of will to power or Freud's will to pleasure.[146]
Themes
Personality
Personality psychology is concerned with enduring patterns of behavior, thought, and
emotion. Theories of personality vary across different psychological schools of thought.
Each theory carries different assumptions about such features as the role of the
unconscious and the importance of childhood experience. According to Freud, personality is
based on the dynamic interactions of the id, ego, and super-ego.[147] By contrast, trait
theorists have developed taxonomies of personality constructs in describing personality in
terms of key traits. Trait theorists have often employed statistical data-reduction methods,
such as factor analysis. Although the number of proposed traits has varied widely, Hans
Eysenck's early biologically based model suggests at least three major trait constructs are
necessary to describe human personality, extraversion–introversion, neuroticism-stability,
and psychoticism-normality. Raymond Cattell empirically derived a theory of 16 personality
factors at the primary-factor level and up to eight broader second-stratum
factors.[148][149][150][151] Since the 1980s, the Big Five (openness to experience,
conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) emerged as an important
trait theory of personality.[152] Dimensional models of personality are receiving increasing
support, and a version of dimensional assessment has been included in the DSM-V.
However, despite a plethora of research into the various versions of the "Big Five"
personality dimensions, it appears necessary to move on from static conceptualizations of
personality structure to a more dynamic orientation, acknowledging that personality
constructs are subject to learning and change over the lifespan.[153][154]
An early example of personality assessment was the Woodworth Personal Data Sheet,
constructed during World War I. The popular, although psychometrically inadequate, Myers–
Briggs Type Indicator[155] was developed to assess individuals' "personality types" according
to the personality theories of Carl Jung. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
(MMPI), despite its name, is more a dimensional measure of psychopathology than a
personality measure.[156] California Psychological Inventory contains 20 personality scales
(e.g., independence, tolerance).[157] The International Personality Item Pool, which is in the
public domain, has become a source of scales that can be used personality
assessment [158]
Unconscious mind
Study of the unconscious mind, a part of the psyche outside the individual's awareness but
that is believed to influence conscious thought and behavior, was a hallmark of early
psychology. In one of the first psychology experiments conducted in the United States, C.S.
Peirce and Joseph Jastrow found in 1884 that research subjects could choose the minutely
heavier of two weights even if consciously uncertain of the difference.[159] Freud popularized
the concept of the unconscious mind, particularly when he referred to an uncensored
intrusion of unconscious thought into one's speech (a Freudian slip) or to his efforts to
interpret dreams.[160] His 1901 book The Psychopathology of Everyday Life catalogs
hundreds of everyday events that Freud explains in terms of unconscious influence. Pierre
Janet advanced the idea of a subconscious mind, which could contain autonomous mental
elements unavailable to the direct scrutiny of the subject.[161]
The automaticity model of John Bargh and others involves the ideas of automaticity and
unconscious processing in our understanding of social behavior,[163][164] although there has
been dispute with regard to replication.[165][166] Some experimental data suggest that the
brain begins to consider taking actions before the mind becomes aware of them.[167] The
influence of unconscious forces on people's choices bears on the philosophical question of
free will. John Bargh, Daniel Wegner, and Ellen Langer describe free will as an
illusion.[163][164][168]
Motivation
Some psychologists study motivation or the subject of why people or lower animals initiate
a behavior at a particular time. It also involves the study of why humans and lower animals
continue or terminate a behavior. Psychologists such as William James initially used the
term motivation to refer to intention, in a sense similar to the concept of will in European
philosophy. With the steady rise of Darwinian and Freudian thinking, instinct also came to be
seen as a primary source of motivation.[169] According to drive theory, the forces of instinct
combine into a single source of energy which exerts a constant influence. Psychoanalysis,
like biology, regarded these forces as demands originating in the nervous system.
Psychoanalysts believed that these forces, especially the sexual instincts, could become
entangled and transmuted within the psyche. Classical psychoanalysis conceives of a
struggle between the pleasure principle and the reality principle, roughly corresponding to id
and ego. Later, in Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Freud introduced the concept of the death
drive, a compulsion towards aggression, destruction, and psychic repetition of traumatic
events.[170] Meanwhile, behaviorist researchers used simple dichotomous models
(pleasure/pain, reward/punishment) and well-established principles such as the idea that a
thirsty creature will take pleasure in drinking.[169][171] Clark Hull formalized the latter idea
with his drive reduction model.[172]
Hunger, thirst, fear, sexual desire, and thermoregulation constitute fundamental motivations
in animals.[171] Humans seem to exhibit a more complex set of motivations—though
theoretically these could be explained as resulting from desires for belonging, positive self-
image, self-consistency, truth, love, and control.[173][174]
Developmental psychology is the scientific study of how and why the thought processes,
emotions, and behaviors of humans change over the course of their lives.[177] Some credit
Charles Darwin with conducting the first systematic study within the rubric of developmental
psychology, having published in 1877 a short paper detailing the development of innate
forms of communication based on his observations of his infant son.[178] The main origins
of the discipline, however, are found in the work of Jean Piaget. Like Piaget, developmental
psychologists originally focused primarily on the development of cognition from infancy to
adolescence. Later, developmental psychology extended itself to the study cognition over
the life span. In addition to studying cognition, developmental psychologists have also come
to focus on affective, behavioral, moral, social, and neural development.
Developmental psychologists who study children use a number of research methods. For
example, they make observations of children in natural settings such as preschools[179] and
engage them in experimental tasks.[180] Such tasks often resemble specially designed
games and activities that are both enjoyable for the child and scientifically useful.
Developmental researchers have even devised clever methods to study the mental
processes of infants.[181] In addition to studying children, developmental psychologists also
study aging and processes throughout the life span, including old age.[182] These
psychologists draw on the full range of psychological theories to inform their research.[177]
Genes and environment
All researched psychological traits are influenced by both genes and environment, to varying
degrees.[183][184] These two sources of influence are often confounded in observational
research of individuals and families. An example of this confounding can be shown in the
transmission of depression from a depressed mother to her offspring. A theory based on
environmental transmission would hold that an offspring, by virtue of their having a
problematic rearing environment managed by a depressed mother, is at risk for developing
depression. On the other hand, a hereditarian theory would hold that depression risk in an
offspring is influenced to some extent by genes passed to the child from the mother. Genes
and environment in these simple transmission models are completely confounded. A
depressed mother may both carry genes that contribute to depression in her offspring and
also create a rearing environment that increases the risk of depression in her child.[185]
Behavioral genetics researchers have employed methodologies that help to disentangle this
confound and understand the nature and origins of individual differences in behavior.[102]
Traditionally the research has involved twin studies and adoption studies, two designs
where genetic and environmental influences can be partially un-confounded. More recently,
gene-focused research has contributed to understanding genetic contributions to the
development of psychological traits.
Applications
Psychology encompasses many subfields and includes different approaches to the study of
mental processes and behavior.
Psychological testing
Psychological testing has ancient origins, dating as far back as 2200 BC, in the
examinations for the Chinese civil service. Written exams began during the Han dynasty
(202 BC – AD 200). By 1370, the Chinese system required a stratified series of tests,
involving essay writing and knowledge of diverse topics. The system was ended in
1906.[191]: 41–2 In Europe, mental assessment took a different approach, with theories of
physiognomy—judgment of character based on the face—described by Aristotle in 4th
century BC Greece. Physiognomy remained current through the Enlightenment, and added
the doctrine of phrenology: a study of mind and intelligence based on simple assessment of
neuroanatomy.[191]: 42–3
When experimental psychology came to Britain, Francis Galton was a leading practitioner. By
virtue of his procedures for measuring reaction time and sensation, he is considered an
inventor of modern mental testing (also known as psychometrics).[191]: 44–5 James McKeen
Cattell, a student of Wundt and Galton, brought the idea of psychological testing to the
United States, and in fact coined the term "mental test".[191]: 45–6 In 1901, Cattell's student
Clark Wissler published discouraging results, suggesting that mental testing of Columbia
and Barnard students failed to predict academic performance.[191]: 45–6 In response to 1904
orders from the Minister of Public Instruction, One example of an observational study was
run by Arthur Bandura. This observational study focused on children who were exposed to
an adult exhibiting aggressive behaviors and their reaction to toys versus other children who
were not exposed to these stimuli. The result shows that children who had seen the adult
acting aggressively towards a toy, in turn, were aggressive towards their own toy when put in
a situation that frustrated them.[192] psychologists Alfred Binet and Théodore Simon
developed and elaborated a new test of intelligence in 1905–1911. They used a range of
questions diverse in their nature and difficulty. Binet and Simon introduced the concept of
mental age and referred to the lowest scorers on their test as idiots. Henry H. Goddard put
the Binet-Simon scale to work and introduced classifications of mental level such as
imbecile and feebleminded. In 1916, (after Binet's death), Stanford professor Lewis M.
Terman modified the Binet-Simon scale (renamed the Stanford–Binet scale) and introduced
the intelligence quotient as a score report.[191]: 50–56 Based on his test findings, and
reflecting the racism common to that era, Terman concluded that intellectual disability
"represents the level of intelligence which is very, very common among Spanish-Indians and
Mexican families of the Southwest and also among negroes. Their dullness seems to be
racial."[193]
Following the Army Alpha and Army Beta tests, which was developed by psychologist
Robert Yerkes in 1917 and then used in World War 1 by industrial and organizational
psychologists for large-scale employee testing and selection of military personnel.[194]
Mental testing also became popular in the U.S., where it was applied to schoolchildren. The
federally created National Intelligence Test was administered to 7 million children in the
1920s. In 1926, the College Entrance Examination Board created the Scholastic Aptitude
Test to standardize college admissions.[191]: 61 The results of intelligence tests were used to
argue for segregated schools and economic functions, including the preferential training of
Black Americans for manual labor. These practices were criticized by Black intellectuals
such a Horace Mann Bond and Allison Davis.[193] Eugenicists used mental testing to justify
and organize compulsory sterilization of individuals classified as mentally retarded (now
referred to as intellectual disability).[46] In the United States, tens of thousands of men and
women were sterilized. Setting a precedent that has never been overturned, the U.S.
Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of this practice in the 1927 case Buck v.
Bell.[195]
Today mental testing is a routine phenomenon for people of all ages in Western
societies.[191]: 2 Modern testing aspires to criteria including standardization of procedure,
consistency of results, output of an interpretable score, statistical norms describing
population outcomes, and, ideally, effective prediction of behavior and life outcomes outside
f i i i [191]: 4–6 P h l i l i i l l di f i
aid legal judgments and decisions.[196] Developments in psychometrics include work on test
and scale reliability and validity.[197] Developments in item-response theory,[198] structural
equation modeling,[199] and bifactor analysis[200] have helped in strengthening test and scale
construction.
Credit for the first psychology clinic in the United States typically goes to Lightner Witmer,
who established his practice in Philadelphia in 1896. Another modern psychotherapist was
Morton Prince, an early advocate for the establishment of psychology as a clinical and
academic discipline.[201] In the first part of the twentieth century, most mental health care in
the United States was performed by psychiatrists, who are medical doctors. Psychology
entered the field with its refinements of mental testing, which promised to improve the
diagnosis of mental problems. For their part, some psychiatrists became interested in using
psychoanalysis and other forms of psychodynamic psychotherapy to understand and treat
the mentally ill.[41][203]
Psychotherapy as conducted by psychiatrists blurred the distinction between psychiatry and
psychology, and this trend continued with the rise of community mental health facilities.
Some in the clinical psychology community adopted behavioral therapy, a thoroughly non-
psychodynamic model that used behaviorist learning theory to change the actions of
patients. A key aspect of behavior therapy is empirical evaluation of the treatment's
effectiveness. In the 1970s, cognitive-behavior therapy emerged with the work of Albert Ellis
and Aaron Beck. Although there are similarities between behavior therapy and cognitive-
behavior therapy, cognitive-behavior therapy required the application of cognitive constructs.
Since the 1970s, the popularity of cognitive-behavior therapy among clinical psychologists
increased. A key practice in behavioral and cognitive-behavioral therapy is exposing patients
to things they fear, based on the premise that their responses (fear, panic, anxiety) can be
deconditioned.[204]
Mental health care today involves psychologists and social workers in increasing numbers.
In 1977, National Institute of Mental Health director Bertram Brown described this shift as a
source of "intense competition and role confusion."[41] Graduate programs issuing
doctorates in clinical psychology emerged in the 1950s and underwent rapid increase
through the 1980s. The PhD degree is intended to train practitioners who could also conduct
scientific research. The PsyD degree is more exclusively designed to train practitioners.[91]
Some clinical psychologists focus on the clinical management of patients with brain injury.
This subspecialty is known as clinical neuropsychology. In many countries, clinical
psychology is a regulated mental health profession. The emerging field of disaster
psychology (see crisis intervention) involves professionals who respond to large-scale
traumatic events.[205]
Education
Educational psychology is the study of how humans learn in educational settings, the
effectiveness of educational interventions, the psychology of teaching, and the social
psychology of schools as organizations. Educational psychologists can be found in
preschools, schools of all levels including post secondary institutions, community
organizations and learning centers, Government or private research firms, and independent
or private consultant.[214] The work of developmental psychologists such as Lev Vygotsky,
Jean Piaget, and Jerome Bruner has been influential in creating teaching methods and
educational practices. Educational psychology is often included in teacher education
programs in places such as North America, Australia, and New Zealand.
Work
Industrial and organizational (I/O) psychology involves research and practices that apply
psychological theories and principles to organizations and individuals' work-lives.[216] In the
field's beginnings, industrialists brought the nascent field of psychology to bear on the study
of scientific management techniques for improving workplace efficiency. The field was at
first called economic psychology or business psychology; later, industrial psychology,
employment psychology, or psychotechnology.[217] An influential early study examined
workers at Western Electric's Hawthorne plant in Cicero, Illinois from 1924 to 1932. Western
Electric experimented on factory workers to assess their responses to changes in
illumination, breaks, food, and wages. The researchers came to focus on workers' responses
to observation itself, and the term Hawthorne effect is now used to describe the fact that
people's behavior can change when they think they are being observed.[218] Although the
Hawthorne research can be found in psychology textbooks, the research and its findings
were weak at best.[219][220]
The name industrial and organizational psychology emerged in the 1960s. In 1973, it
became enshrined in the name of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
Division 14 of the American Psychological Association.[217] One goal of the discipline is to
optimize human potential in the workplace. Personnel psychology is a subfield of I/O
psychology. Personnel psychologists apply the methods and principles of psychology in
selecting and evaluating workers. Another subfield, organizational psychology, examines the
effects of work environments and management styles on worker motivation, job
satisfaction, and productivity.[221] Most I/O psychologists work outside of academia, for
private and public organizations and as consultants.[217] A psychology consultant working in
business today might expect to provide executives with information and ideas about their
industry, their target markets, and the organization of their company.[222][223]
Organizational behavior (OB) is an allied field involved in the study of human behavior within
organizations.[224] One way to differentiate I/O psychology from OB is that I/O psychologists
train in university psychology departments and OB specialists, in business schools.
Psychologists may also work on a diverse set of campaigns known broadly as psychological
warfare. Psychological warfare chiefly involves the use of propaganda to influence enemy
soldiers and civilians. This so-called black propaganda is designed to seem as if it
originates from a source other than the Army.[229] The CIA's MKULTRA program involved
more individualized efforts at mind control, involving techniques such as hypnosis, torture,
and covert involuntary administration of LSD.[230] The U.S. military used the name
Psychological Operations (PSYOP) until 2010, when these activities were reclassified as
Military Information Support Operations (MISO), part of Information Operations (IO).[231]
Psychologists have sometimes been involved in assisting the interrogation and torture of
suspects, staining the records of the psychologists involved.[232]
Social change
An example of the contribution of psychologists to social change involves the research of
Kenneth and Mamie Phipps Clark. These two African American psychologists studied
segregation's adverse psychological impact on Black children. Their research findings
played a role in the desegregation case Brown v. Board of Education (1954).[233]
The impact of psychology on social change includes the discipline's broad influence on
teaching and learning. Research has shown that compared to the "whole word" or "whole
language" approach, the phonics approach to reading instruction is more efficacious.[234]
Medical applications
Medical facilities increasingly employ psychologists to perform various roles. One aspect of
health psychology is the psychoeducation of patients: instructing them in how to follow a
medical regimen. Health psychologists can also educate doctors and conduct research on
patient compliance.[235][236] Psychologists in the field of public health use a wide variety of
interventions to influence human behavior. These range from public relations campaigns
and outreach to governmental laws and policies. Psychologists study the composite
influence of all these different tools in an effort to influence whole populations of
people.[237]
Industrial psychology became interested in worker fatigue during World War I, when
government ministers in Britain were concerned about the impact of fatigue on workers in
munitions factories but not other types of factories.[245][246] In the U. K. some interest in
worker well-being emerged with the efforts of Charles Samuel Myers and his National
Institute of Industrial Psychology (NIIP) during the inter-War years.[247] In the U. S. during the
mid-twentieth century industrial psychologist Arthur Kornhauser pioneered the study of
occupational mental health, linking industrial working conditions to mental health as well as
the spillover of an unsatisfying job into a worker's personal life.[248][249] Zickar accumulated
evidence to show that "no other industrial psychologist of his era was as devoted to
advocating management and labor practices that would improve the lives of working
people."[248]
Research methods
Quantitative psychological research lends itself to the statistical testing of hypotheses.
Although the field makes abundant use of randomized and controlled experiments in
laboratory settings, such research can only assess a limited range of short-term
phenomena. Some psychologists rely on less rigorously controlled, but more ecologically
valid, field experiments as well. Other research psychologists rely on statistical methods to
glean knowledge from population data.[255] The statistical methods research psychologists
employ include the Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient, the analysis of
variance, multiple linear regression, logistic regression, structural equation modeling, and
hierarchical linear modeling. The measurement and operationalization of important
constructs is an essential part of these research designs.
Although this type of psychological research is much less abundant than quantitative
research, some psychologists conduct qualitative research. This type of research can
involve interviews, questionnaires, and first-hand observation.[256] While hypothesis testing
is rare, virtually impossible, in qualitative research, qualitative studies can be helpful in
theory and hypothesis generation, interpreting seemingly contradictory quantitative findings,
and understanding why some interventions fail and others succeed.[257]
Controlled experiments
Flowchart of the four phases,
enrollment, intervention allocation,
follow-up, and data analysis, of a
parallel randomized trial of two
groups modified from the CONSORT
2010 Statement[258]
A quasi-experiment is a situation in which different conditions are being studied, but random
assignment to the different conditions is not possible. Investigators must work with
preexisting groups of people. Researchers can use common sense to consider how much
the nonrandom assignment threatens the study's validity.[260] For example, in research on
the best way to affect reading achievement in the first three grades of school, school
administrators may not permit educational psychologists to randomly assign children to
phonics and whole language classrooms, in which case the psychologists must work with
preexisting classroom assignments. Psychologists will compare the achievement of
children attending phonics and whole language classes and, perhaps, statistically adjust for
any initial differences in reading level.
Experimental researchers typically use a statistical hypothesis testing model which involves
making predictions before conducting the experiment, then assessing how well the data
collected are consistent with the predictions. These predictions are likely to originate from
one or more abstract scientific hypotheses about how the phenomenon under study actually
works.[261]
One example of an observational study was run by Arthur Bandura. This observational study
focused on children who were exposed to an adult exhibiting aggressive behaviors and their
reaction to toys versus other children who were not exposed to these stimuli. The result
shows that children who had seen the adult acting aggressively towards a toy, in turn, were
aggressive towards their own toy when put in a situation that frustrated them.[192]
Exploratory data analysis includes a variety of practices that researchers use to reduce a
great many variables to a small number overarching factors. In Peirce's three modes of
inference, exploratory data analysis corresponds to abduction.[262] Meta-analysis is the
technique research psychologists use to integrate results from many studies of the same
variables and arriving at a grand average of the findings.[263]
Direct brain
observation/manipulation
An EEG recording setup
A classic and popular tool used to relate mental and neural activity is the
electroencephalogram (EEG), a technique using amplified electrodes on a person's scalp to
measure voltage changes in different parts of the brain. Hans Berger, the first researcher to
use EEG on an unopened skull, quickly found that brains exhibit signature "brain waves":
electric oscillations which correspond to different states of consciousness. Researchers
subsequently refined statistical methods for synthesizing the electrode data, and identified
unique brain wave patterns such as the delta wave observed during non-REM sleep.[264]
Interventions such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and drugs also provide information
about brain–mind interactions. Psychopharmacology is the study of drug-induced mental
effects.
Computer simulation
Computational modeling is a tool used in mathematical psychology and cognitive
psychology to simulate behavior.[268] This method has several advantages. Since modern
computers process information quickly, simulations can be run in a short time, allowing for
high statistical power. Modeling also allows psychologists to visualize hypotheses about the
functional organization of mental events that could not be directly observed in a human.
Computational neuroscience uses mathematical models to simulate the brain. Another
method is symbolic modeling, which represents many mental objects using variables and
rules. Other types of modeling include dynamic systems and stochastic modeling.
Animal studies
Comparative psychology is the scientific study of the behavior and mental processes of non-
human animals, especially as these relate to the phylogenetic history, adaptive significance,
and development of behavior. Research in this area explores the behavior of many species,
from insects to primates. It is closely related to other disciplines that study animal behavior
such as ethology.[270] Research in comparative psychology sometimes appears to shed light
on human behavior, but some attempts to connect the two have been quite controversial, for
example the Sociobiology of E.O. Wilson.[271] Animal models are often used to study neural
processes related to human behavior, e.g. in cognitive neuroscience.
Qualitative research
Phineas P. Gage survived an
accident in which a large
iron rod was driven
completely through his
head, destroying much of
his brain's left frontal lobe,
but the injury altered his
personality and
behavior.[272]
Qualitative research is often designed to answer questions about the thoughts, feelings, and
behaviors of individuals. Qualitative research involving first-hand observation can help
describe events as they occur, with the goal of capturing the richness of everyday behavior
and with the hope of discovering and understanding phenomena that might have been
missed if only more cursory examinations are made.
Just as Jane Goodall studied chimpanzee social and family life by careful observation of
chimpanzee behavior in the field, psychologists conduct naturalistic observation of ongoing
human social, professional, and family life. Sometimes the participants are aware they are
being observed, and other times the participants do not know they are being observed. Strict
ethical guidelines must be followed when covert observation is being carried out.
Program evaluation
Program evaluation involves the systematic collection, analysis, and application of
information to answer questions about projects, policies and programs, particularly about
their effectiveness.[275][276] In both the public and private sectors, stakeholders often want to
know the extent which the programs they are funding, implementing, voting for, receiving, or
objecting to are producing the intended effects. While program evaluation first focuses on
effectiveness, important considerations often include how much the program costs per
participant, how the program could be improved, whether the program is worthwhile,
whether there are better alternatives, if there are unintended outcomes, and whether the
program goals are appropriate and useful.[277]
Contemporary issues
Metascience
Metascience involves the application of scientific methodology to study science itself. The
field of metascience has revealed problems in psychological research. Some psychological
research has suffered from bias,[278] problematic reproducibility,[279] and misuse of
statistics.[280] These findings have led to calls for reform from within and from outside the
scientific community.[281]
Confirmation bias
In 1959, statistician Theodore Sterling examined the results of psychological studies and
discovered that 97% of them supported their initial hypotheses, implying possible
publication bias.[282][283][284] Similarly, Fanelli (2010)[285] found that 91.5% of
psychiatry/psychology studies confirmed the effects they were looking for, and concluded
that the odds of this happening (a positive result) was around five times higher than in fields
such as space science or geosciences. Fanelli argued that this is because researchers in
"softer" sciences have fewer constraints to their conscious and unconscious biases.
Replication
A replication crisis in psychology has emerged. Many notable findings in the field have not
been replicated. Some researchers were even accused of publishing fraudulent
results.[286][287][288] Systematic efforts, including efforts by the Reproducibility Project of the
Center for Open Science, to assess the extent of the problem found that as many as two-
thirds of highly publicized findings in psychology failed to be replicated.[289] Reproducibility
has generally been stronger in cognitive psychology (in studies and journals) than social
psychology[289] and subfields of differential psychology.[290][291] Other subfields of
psychology have also been implicated in the replication crisis, including clinical
psychology,[292][293][294] developmental psychology,[295][296][297] and a field closely related to
psychology, educational research.[298][299][300][301][302]
Focus on the replication crisis has led to other renewed efforts in the discipline to re-test
important findings.[303][304] In response to concerns about publication bias and data
dredging (conducting a large number of statistical tests on a great many variables but
restricting reporting to the results that were statistically significant), 295 psychology and
medical journals have adopted result-blind peer review where studies are accepted not on
the basis of their findings and after the studies are completed, but before the studies are
conducted and upon the basis of the methodological rigor of their experimental designs and
the theoretical justifications for their proposed statistical analysis before data collection or
analysis is conducted.[305][306] In addition, large-scale collaborations among researchers
working in multiple labs in different countries have taken place. The collaborators regularly
make their data openly available for different researchers to assess.[307] Allen and
Mehler[308] estimated that 61 per cent of result-blind studies have yielded null results, in
contrast to an estimated 5 to 20 per cent in traditional research.
Misuse of statistics
Some critics view statistical hypothesis testing as misplaced. Psychologist and statistician
Jacob Cohen wrote in 1994 that psychologists routinely confuse statistical significance with
practical importance, enthusiastically reporting great certainty in unimportant facts.[309]
Some psychologists have responded with an increased use of effect size statistics, rather
than sole reliance on p-values.[310]
WEIRD bias
In 2008, Arnett pointed out that most articles in American Psychological Association
journals were about U.S. populations when U.S. citizens are only 5% of the world's
population. He complained that psychologists had no basis for assuming psychological
processes to be universal and generalizing research findings to the rest of the global
population.[311] In 2010, Henrich, Heine, and Norenzayan reported a bias in conducting
psychology studies with participants from "WEIRD" ("Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich,
and Democratic") societies.[312][313] Henrich et al. found that "96% of psychological samples
come from countries with only 12% of the world's population" (p. 63). The article gave
examples of results that differ significantly between people from WEIRD and tribal cultures,
including the Müller-Lyer illusion. Arnett (2008), Altmaier and Hall (2008) and Morgan-
Consoli et al. (2018) view the Western bias in research and theory as a serious problem
considering psychologists are increasingly applying psychological principles developed in
WEIRD regions in their research, clinical work, and consultation with populations around the
world.[311][314][315] In 2018, Rad, Martingano, and Ginges showed that nearly a decade after
Henrich et al.'s paper, over 80% of the samples used in studies published in the journal
Psychological Science employed WEIRD samples. Moreover, their analysis showed that
several studies did not fully disclose the origin of their samples; the authors offered a set of
recommendations to editors and reviewers to reduce WEIRD bias.[316]
STRANGE bias
Similar to the WEIRD bias, starting in 2020, researchers of non-human behavior have started
to emphasize the need to document the possibility of the STRANGE (Social background,
Trappability and self-selection, Rearing history, Acclimation and habituation, Natural
changes in responsiveness, Genetic makeup, and Experience) bias in study conclusions.[317]
Ethics
Ethical standards in the discipline have changed over time. Some famous past studies are
today considered unethical and in violation of established codes (the Canadian Code of
Conduct for Research Involving Humans, and the Belmont Report). The American
Psychological Association has advanced a set of ethical principles and a code of conduct
for the profession.[321]
The most important contemporary standards include informed and voluntary consent. After
World War II, the Nuremberg Code was established because of Nazi abuses of experimental
subjects. Later, most countries (and scientific journals) adopted the Declaration of Helsinki.
In the U.S., the National Institutes of Health established the Institutional Review Board in
1966, and in 1974 adopted the National Research Act (HR 7724). All of these measures
encouraged researchers to obtain informed consent from human participants in
experimental studies. A number of influential but ethically dubious studies led to the
establishment of this rule; such studies included the MIT-Harvard Fernald School
radioisotope studies, the Thalidomide tragedy, the Willowbrook hepatitis study, and Stanley
Milgram's studies of obedience to authority.
Humans
Universities have ethics committees dedicated to protecting the rights (e.g., voluntary nature
of participation in the research, privacy) and well-being (e.g., minimizing distress) of
research participants. University ethics committees evaluate proposed research to ensure
that researchers protect the rights and well-being of participants; an investigator's research
project cannot be conducted unless approved by such an ethics committee.[322]
The ethics code of the American Psychological Association originated in 1951 as "Ethical
Standards of Psychologists". This code has guided the formation of licensing laws in most
American states. It has changed multiple times over the decades since its adoption. In 1989,
the APA revised its policies on advertising and referral fees to negotiate the end of an
investigation by the Federal Trade Commission. The 1992 incarnation was the first to
distinguish between "aspirational" ethical standards and "enforceable" ones. Members of
the public have a five-year window to file ethics complaints about APA members with the
APA ethics committee; members of the APA have a three-year window.[323]
Some of the ethical issues considered most important are the requirement to practice only
within the area of competence, to maintain confidentiality with the patients, and to avoid
sexual relations with them. Another important principle is informed consent, the idea that a
patient or research subject must understand and freely choose a procedure they are
undergoing.[323] Some of the most common complaints against clinical psychologists
include sexual misconduct.[323]
Other animals
Research on other animals is governed by university ethics committees. Research on
nonhuman animals cannot proceed without permission of the ethics committee, of the
researcher's home institution. Ethical guidelines state that using non-human animals for
scientific purposes is only acceptable when the harm (physical or psychological) done to
animals is outweighed by the benefits of the research.[324] Psychologists can use certain
research techniques on animals that could not be used on humans.
Comparative psychologist Harry Harlow drew moral condemnation for isolation experiments
on rhesus macaque monkeys at the University of Wisconsin–Madison in the 1970s.[325] The
aim of the research was to produce an animal model of clinical depression. Harlow also
devised what he called a "rape rack", to which the female isolates were tied in normal
monkey mating posture.[326] In 1974, American literary critic Wayne C. Booth wrote that,
"Harry Harlow and his colleagues go on torturing their nonhuman primates decade after
decade, invariably proving what we all knew in advance—that social creatures can be
destroyed by destroying their social ties." He writes that Harlow made no mention of the
criticism of the morality of his work.[327]
Animal research is influential in psychology, while still being debated among academics.
The testing of animals for research has led to medical breakthroughs in human medicine.
Many psychologists argue animal experimentation is essential for human advancement, but
must be regulated by the government to ensure ethicality.
References
2. "psychology" (https://www.oed.com/sear
ch/dictionary/?scope=Entries&q=psychol
ogy&tl=true) . Oxford English Dictionary.
Oxford University Press. Retrieved
23 June 2024.
3. Fernald LD (2008). Psychology: Six
perspectives (https://books.google.com/
books?id=Q7p-J4-SWuQC) Archived (htt
ps://web.archive.org/web/202006080516
54/https://books.google.com/books?id=
Q7p-J4-SWuQC&printsec=frontcover) 8
June 2020 at the Wayback Machine
(pp.12–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications.
External links
Portals: Psychology
Philosophy
Psychology at Wikipedia's sister projects: Definitions
from
Wiktionary
Media from
Commons
News from
Wikinews
Quotations
from
Wikiquote
Texts from
Wikisource
Textbooks
from
Wikibooks
Resources
from
Wikiversity
Data from
Wikidata
Retrieved from
"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
title=Psychology&oldid=1230511057"