The spatial theory of prices states that the prices of a homogeneous good vary by location due to transportation costs. This implies that location decisions are equivalent to choosing to produce or consume a different product. Spatial balance requires that interregional trade flows be compensated and that price differences between markets are less than or equal to transportation costs.
The spatial theory of prices states that the prices of a homogeneous good vary by location due to transportation costs. This implies that location decisions are equivalent to choosing to produce or consume a different product. Spatial balance requires that interregional trade flows be compensated and that price differences between markets are less than or equal to transportation costs.
Original Description:
The spatial theory of prices states that the prices of a homogeneous good vary by location due to transportation costs. This implies that location decisions are equivalent to choosing to produce or consume a different product. Spatial balance requires that interregional trade flows be compensated and that price differences between markets are less than or equal to transportation costs.
The spatial theory of prices states that the prices of a homogeneous good vary by location due to transportation costs. This implies that location decisions are equivalent to choosing to produce or consume a different product. Spatial balance requires that interregional trade flows be compensated and that price differences between markets are less than or equal to transportation costs.
The spatial theory of prices states that the prices of a homogeneous good vary by location due to transportation costs. This implies that location decisions are equivalent to choosing to produce or consume a different product. Spatial balance requires that interregional trade flows be compensated and that price differences between markets are less than or equal to transportation costs.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13
Spatial price theory
■ Competitive general equilibrium model determines a
pricing system. ■ It implies that the same good traded in different places is treated as a different product. ■ Therefore, location decisions are equivalent to choosing to produce or consume a different product. ■ This discards the need for an economic theory in a spatial context. What happens when space is incorporated into the analysis? ■ Even in eq. The prices of homogeneous goods will not be identical. ■ Prices vary depending on location. Two of the problems for the spatial determination of prices refer to: ■ Establish equilibrium conditions; ■ The discrimination.
■ Traditional price theory: Price and
production decisions in a spaceless economy. ■ What about equilibrium conditions? Spatial equilibrium: Based on the idea that the price of a homogeneous good varies throughout space due to the presence of transportation costs. The conditions of spatial equilibrium of prices require: ■ That interregional trade flows are compensated in the system. ■ That the differences in prices in the different markets, once the trade has taken place, are equal to or less than the unit costs of transportation between the markets. It is a problem that has to do with the most efficient way to transport goods between different points. It is known as the Hitchcock, Koopmans, Dantzig transportation problem: Solution to this problem Linear programming technique ■ An objective function: minimize transportation costs and optimize the flow of goods between pairs of regions. Assumptions: ■ Regional system in which regions produce and demand a homogeneous good. ■ Each region represents a market located at a fixed point spatially separated from the others. ■ In interregional trade there are only transportation costs per unit of good. ■ The unit transportation cost is known and does not depend on the volume being transported. ■ Regional supply and demand are given. ■ Total demand is equal to or less than total supply ■ Producers behave competitively. ■ Consumers are indifferent regarding the different sources of supply. The set of transactions that minimizes total transportation costs must be determined. F. EITHER. ■ This approach refers to a single asset but can be extended to the case of many assets. ■ It is a market model separated by space and is a special case of the set of situations in which producers and consumers are dispersed in the space. It is useful to illustrate general principles: ■ Trade flows reduce interregional price differences. ■ Trade flows improve spatial allocation. ■ Transportation costs set a limit to price equalization. Space monopoly and price determination Discrimination is another problem for the spatial determination of prices. In the spatial theory of prices, a basic principle is that a spatial monopolist who maximizes profits discriminates against buyers closer to him and in favor of those more distant. ■ Spatial price discrimination is possible due to the variation in transportation costs depending on the location of buyers. Assumptions: ■ Monopolist, 1 homogeneous good ■ Uniform demand distribution ■ Identical demands ■ Ctos. of transportation per unit of distance and unit of good = 1 ■ Ct. marginal cte. (c) non-negative c ≥0 ■ Monopolist maximizes profits when: IMg = CMg ■ How do prices vary with respect to distance? If the distance is large enough (large market areas) a profit-maximizing monopolist will always discriminate against nearby buyers unless there are legal or institutional reasons. Even without the existence of monopoly power, sellers can practice price discrimination if the market areas are very large. An oligopoly may exist; producers may also adopt price discrimination policies. The opportunities are greater if there are fewer competitors. Free entry Price determination model in space under conditions of free entry. ■ Producers maximize profit. ■ homogeneous product ■ Difference in the product given by the distance ■ Uniform distribution of demand. ■ Identical demands ■ Plane without borders and without physical accidents. ■ Extraordinary profits are eliminated with the incorporation of new companies.
■ Entry continues until the normal equilibrium of
monopolistic competition is reached (tangency of the average revenue and average cost curves).