Lab Report Cem
Lab Report Cem
Lab Report Cem
TO
Local Brick Factory & United Cement Factory
By
Suchana Adhikari
Upendra Tamang
Suresh DC
TO
DATE: 2081/03/10
Acknowledgment
We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all those who contributed to the successful completion of
this field visit report to the local brick factory and United Cement Factory.
First and foremost, We extend our heartfelt thanks to Er. Gokul Dev Joshi, for their invaluable guidance, support, and
expertise throughout the planning and execution of the field visit. Their insights and encouragement were
instrumental in shaping the scope and objectives of this report.
We are thankful to the management and staff of Brick Factory and United Cement for their warm hospitality and
cooperation during the visit. Their openness in sharing information and facilitating our observations greatly enriched
the depth of our study.
Furthermore, we acknowledge the contributions of the workers and personnel at both factories who generously spared
their time to provide us with detailed explanations of their processes and operations. Their dedication to their work
and willingness to engage in discussions were crucial in gaining firsthand insights into the production methods and
environmental practices.
Lastly, would like to thank our colleagues and peers who accompanied me on this field visit, as well as those who
assisted in data collection and analysis. Their collaborative efforts and enthusiasm significantly enhanced the quality
and comprehensiveness of this report.
This field visit provided invaluable learning experiences and insights into industrial operations, environmental
considerations, and community impacts. We are grateful for the opportunity to undertake this study and contribute to
our understanding of sustainable practices in the manufacturing sector.
Sonam Basnet
Suchana Adhikari
Suresh DC
Upendra Tamang
Table of Content
1 Introduction
The field visit was conducted to assess the operations, environmental impact, and
community interaction of a local brick factory and United Cement Factory located in
Naubise. The visit aimed to understand their production processes, environmental
compliance, and socio-economic contributions to the region.
1. Local Brick Factory
Overview
Raw Material Handling: The factory sources clay from nearby deposits, which is
excavated and transported to the site.
Molding and Shaping: Clay is mixed, molded into brick shapes, and arranged for
drying.
Firing: Bricks are fired in traditional kilns using coal as fuel, a process observed
to emit smoke and particulate matter.
Quality Control: Limited automation observed in quality control processes, with
manual inspection of finished bricks.
2. Environmental Impact
Based on the observations and findings from the visit, the following recommendations
are proposed to improve operations and mitigate environmental impacts:
The visit to Brick provided valuable insights into its manufacturing processes,
environmental practices, and socio-economic contributions. By implementing the
recommended measures, the factory can improve sustainability, minimize
environmental impacts, and strengthen its relationship with the local community.
Continued dialogue and collaboration between stakeholders will be essential in
achieving these objectives and fostering responsible industrial practices.
Objectives
Raw Material Handling: Limestone and other raw materials are quarried and
transported to the factory.
Processing: Raw materials are crushed, ground into fine powder, and blended to
form the raw meal.
Clinker Production: Raw meal is heated in a rotary kiln to produce clinker, a
primary ingredient in cement.
Cement Grinding: Clinker is mixed with gypsum and additives, ground into fine
cement powder, and stored in silos.
Packaging: Cement is packaged in bags or bulk for distribution.
2. Environmental Impact
Air Emissions: Controlled emissions observed from the kiln stack, complying
with environmental regulations. Efforts to reduce dust and particulate matter
emissions were noted.
Waste Management: Effective management of by-products, such as fly ash and
slag, utilized in cement production or sold for other industrial uses.
Water Usage: Efficient water management practices observed, with recycling and
conservation measures in place.
3. Community Engagement and Socio-Economic Impact
Recommendations
Based on the observations and findings from the visit, the following recommendations
are proposed to enhance sustainability and community relations:
The visit to the United Cement Factory provided valuable insights into its operations,
environmental practices, and socio-economic contributions. By implementing the
recommended measures, the factory can reinforce its commitment to sustainable
development, mitigate environmental impacts, and enhance its positive influence on the
local community. Continued collaboration and communication with stakeholders will be
essential in achieving these objectives and maintaining industry leadership in
responsible cement production.
Conclusion
The field visit provided valuable insights into the operations and impacts of the local
brick factory and United Cement Factory. While both facilities contribute to local
economic development through employment and production, environmental
management practices vary significantly. It is crucial for the brick factory to adopt
cleaner technologies, whereas the cement factory should continue its sustainable
practices. Enhancing community engagement and social responsibility efforts will
further strengthen their positive impact on the region.
This report summarizes the key findings, observations, and recommendations from the
field visit to the local brick factory and United Cement Factory.