LearnEnglish-Business-magazine-Negotiating - Activity

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

BUSINESS ENGLISH

Business magazine
Negotiating
For some, negotiating is about winning. For others, it’s about compromise. But if we think
about it as a collaboration, often both sides can get what they want.

Before reading
Do the preparation task first. Then read the article and do the exercises.

Preparation task
Match the definitions (a–h) with the vocabulary (1–8).

Vocabulary Definitions
1. G
…… to clash a. a situation where people work together to achieve
2. D
…… to get your (own) way the same thing
3. E to compromise
…… b. the capacity to make a profit
4. A
…… collaboration c. a wrong idea that is based on a failure to understand
C a misconception a situation
5. ……
H a foundation d. to get what you want, even though other people
6. ……
disagree
7. B profitability
……
e. to reduce your demands in order to reach an
8. F a quarrel
…… agreement
f. an argument
g. to be in conflict
h. a base or starting point

Negotiating
Whether you’re negotiating a multimillion dollar deal, agreeing on your role in a project or
simply persuading your colleagues to go for Chinese food for lunch, effective negotiation
skills can help you to motivate other people, get the best results and improve profitability.
There is often a misconception that negotiating is about insisting on our point of view to get
our own way. Conversely, others assume that negotiation is all about compromise and that we
have to be ready to forget 50 per cent of what we want.
But thinking of negotiating as either insisting or compromising can damage relationships and
leave both sides feeling as if they’ve lost. According to Fisher and Ury in their best-selling
book Getting to Yes, there is another way. They argue that collaboration is the key to
negotiating successfully, and they illustrate this by telling the story of the Orange Quarrel. It
goes like this:

© 2019 British Council www.britishcouncil.org/learnenglish


Joey and Jenny are arguing over an orange. In a win–lose situation, Joey might simply take
the orange from Jenny. Joey would then be satisfied but Jenny would be upset and frustrated.
Alternatively, Joey might find dishonest ways of convincing Jenny that she didn’t want that
orange after all. Using this method, Joey might get his way, but he might damage their
relationship in the long run.
If they focus on compromise, Joey and Jenny might decide to cut the orange in half. Their
effort to share means that each of them now has half of what they wanted but neither of them
is fully satisfied.
However, if Joey and Jenny spent some time talking to each other, they might find out that
Jenny in fact wants the orange peel to make a cake. Joey, on the other hand, loves eating
oranges and doesn’t want the peel. In this collaborative scenario, Joey and Jenny are both
able to achieve 100 per cent satisfaction when they realise that Jenny can have all the peel
and Joey all the fruit. Yet, according to Fisher and Ury, too many negotiations end up with half
an orange for each side instead of the whole fruit for one and the whole peel for the other.
The first step to understanding the role of collaboration in negotiations is to realise that it is
not always a competitive situation. One person’s ‘win’ doesn’t have to equal another person’s
loss. Exploring the interests and needs of both parties can help us see solutions we didn’t
consider before.
Here are five things we can do to collaborate when negotiating.

1. Know your objectives.


What are your interests in this? Make a list of the results you’d like to achieve. What are your
priorities? Remember that maintaining a good relationship might be one of your objectives.

2. Separate the people from the issue.


Understand the difference between the content of the negotiation and the people who are
negotiating. Try to be objective and manage your negative emotions.

3. Ask questions and listen.


Some people enter a negotiation prepared with a speech about what they want. But as seen in
the Orange Quarrel, it is important to also understand your negotiation partner’s interests and
objectives. So, ask questions, listen and get an overview of everyone’s situation.

4. Find shared interests.


How different are your interests from your negotiating partner’s? Get to know which interests
clash and which ones are shared. An understanding of shared interests will help you see this
as an opportunity to work together rather than a competitive situation.

5. Look at creative options.


The first solution you think of, for example splitting the orange in half, might not always be the
best one. Think creatively and discuss different alternatives that might work for everyone.
Most people have positive intentions and they do want to get along, even in potentially tense
situations. By showing that we are professionals capable of collaborating, we can not only
please everyone involved but also set a strong foundation for future negotiations.

© 2019 British Council www.britishcouncil.org/learnenglish


Tasks

Task 1
Match the situation (1–3) with the type of negotiation (a–c).

Situation Negotiation
B Joey takes the whole orange and
1. …… a. Negotiating by compromise
Jenny gets nothing. b. Win–lose negotiation
A Joey and Jenny split the orange
2. …… c. Collaborative negotiation
and each of them gets half.
3. C
…… Joey and Jenny find out that they
each need different parts of the
orange. Jenny takes the peel and Joey
takes the fruit.

Task 2
Are the sentences true or false?

Answer
1. Negotiating is about how we can insist on our point of view and get True False
what we want.
2. If we don’t want to compromise, then we can’t negotiate. True False
3. The moral of the Orange Quarrel is that both sides can achieve 100 per True False
cent satisfaction if they understand each other’s needs and think
creatively.
4. One objective in negotiation could be to keep a good relationship with True False
the negotiation partner.
5. We should spend most of our negotiation time telling others about what True False
we want.
6. It is important to understand which of your objectives are shared with True False
the other party as well as which objectives could be in conflict.
7. We might have the same goals and objectives as our negotiation True False
partner.
8. We should follow our instincts and take the first solution that comes to True False
mind.

WRITING
Discussion
When would collaboration be the best negotiating strategy? When might other strategies work
better?
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Collaboration works best when both parties have aligned or complementary interests and seek mutually
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
beneficial outcomes. It’s particularly effective when maintaining long-term relationships is crucial, such as
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
in business partnerships, team projects, or community initiatives. For example, departments within a
©_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
company collaborating
2019 British Council on a budget can achieve more balanced and supportive outcomes than if they
www.britishcouncil.org/learnenglish
compete. In situations where creative solutions are needed, like in joint product development,
collaboration fosters innovation by allowing parties to brainstorm and integrate diverse ideas.

You might also like