8D CAPA Plastic Under Cover

Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

8D CAPA

Title: Plastic Under Cover Deep Cut. CAPA No.

East India Technologies Pvt Vendor Name & Vendor


Customer: EPACK Durable
Ltd. Location : Code :

D1 Establish the team


Owner : Ajayveer Chaudhary Start Date: 14.05.2024 End date: 15.05.2024

Team members: Ajayveer Chaudhary,Rajesh Choudhary,Vikash Gupta,Shambhavi,,Abhay Mishra

(D2) Describe the problem


Problem statement Picture, drawing or graph
What:Deep Cut found in Under cover.
Why:1.During the production inproper deflashing by semi skilled manpower on
machine.
2.Flash generate in lock area due to mold running contionus .
When: During production.
Where:- ,Operator Negligency During the 100 % Inspection & Marking.
Who: Inspector & Operator.
How: During the 100 % Inspection Operator packed the parts.
How many: 12 out of 5400 parts.
What is the GAP: Ng part not kept at the time of sampling.

(D3) Develop containment and correction


Containment action plan Resp. Date completed

Training given to concern operators day & night shift for deflasing on parts properly and marking in locks area 100 %
Epack 15.05.2024

Start
Correction action plan Resp. Plan completed Status
date

1.All parts to be segration at our end.


Epack OK
2.Mold sent to tool room for rectification Now ok.

(D4) Cause-and-effect relationship


Potential Factor Standard ? Actual ? Gap : Yes / No

1M (material) : Should be OK OK No

2M (man) : Should be aware of Work Semi skilled manpower Yes

3M (machine) : Should be OK OK No

4M (method) : Should be OK OK No

5M (measurement) : Should be OK Lock area flash Yes

(D4) Cause-Confirmation
Occurrence : Non-detection :
(How did you verify the real RC (last Why) ? (How did you verify the real RC (last Why) ?

1st Why : Deep Cut found at supplier 1st Why : Part not kept in Sampling

OJT given to machine operators & OPL Display on


machine.
2nd Why : Lack of awareness during PDI & inspection 2nd Why :

3rd Why : During the production inproper deflashing by semi 3rd Why : Operator Negligency During the 100 % Inspection &
skilled manpower on machine. Marking.

4th Why : Part check with master sample. 4th Why : Now part running ok as per sample.
5th Why : 5th Why :
(D5 / D6) Corrective action Plan (Occurance & Detection)
Start Status
Implementation action plan Resp. Plan completed
date (Open / Close)

Countermeasure for Occurance:- Training provided to all the related Operators engaged in
Epack 14.05.2024 15.05.2024 Close
inspection.

Countermeasure for Detection:- Parts check visually at sampling basis. Epack 14.05.2024 15.05.2024 Close

(D7 / D8) Preventive Action to Sustain and Expand Benefits / Lesson learned
Start Status
Implementation action plan Resp. Plan completed
date (Open / Close)

Training provide to all the related operators and explained them regarding the severity of the
Epack 14.05.2024 15.05.2024 Close
issue.

Amendments / Revised the following documents (Where as applicable)?


SOP (Standard operating procedure) _____________
Inspection standard or QAP _________________
Control plan ________________________
Training plan ________________________
Preventive maintenance : ______________
Any procedure related : ________________
KPIVs & KPOVs : ____________________
Design : ___________________________

Lesson learned: Will give Proper Training to unskilled and low skilled and semi skilled
operators before work asigned at machine.

You might also like