Peace education in the 21st century

An essential strategy for building lasting peace

This report provides an overview of the importance of peace education, highlighting the
challenges and opportunities for using it in efforts to bring about lasting global peace. It
reviews key research and is heavily inspired by the discussions held in the context of the
revision process of the 1974 Recommendation concerning education for international
understanding, co-operation and peace and education relating to human rights and
fundamental freedoms. More specifically, this report draws from the following notes
developed by UNESCO in 2022: “Current understandings, and threats to lasting peace”,
“New understandings of education’s contributions to peace”, and “The role of non-state
actors in the promotion of peace through education”.

This report was developed thanks to significant contributions from Tony Jenkins, Managing
Director, International Institute on Peace Education (USA).
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Published in 2024 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7 place de
Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France

© UNESCO 2024

This document is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0
IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this
document, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository
(http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en).

The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this document do not imply
the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any
country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or
boundaries.

The ideas and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors; they are not necessarily
those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.

Cover credit: Hurst Photo/Shutterstock.com

2
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Peace education in the 21st century:

An essential strategy for building lasting peace

Peace in the 21st century is challenged by unprecedented and

interdependent global threats. It requires applying all the tools of
peacebuilding, diplomacy, and conflict transformation available to us.
This report provides an overview of the transformative, yet often
overlooked role of education in fostering lasting peace. The report
examines the evidence, trends, challenges, and potential to harness
education effectively as a tool for change and explains how and why
peace education is a necessity for global, regional, national and local
strategies for peace.

Introduction
“Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men
that the defences of Peace must be constructed”
Preamble to the Constitution of UNESCO

Negative trends in inter- and intra-state conflicts and the convergence of unconventional
global threats to peace (climate change, pandemics, resource scarcity, migration, amongst
many others) present tremendous challenges to the achievement and maintenance of
international peace and security in the 21st century. Reducing violent conflict is vital to
peace, but it also requires much more than that. Peace cannot be decreed solely through
treaties. It must be nurtured through the dignity, rights, and capacities of every man and
womani.

The pursuit of peace must therefore be a holistic and comprehensive endeavour. It requires
the development of institutions that are essential for sustaining collective security,
diplomacy, international law, and peacekeeping and peacebuilding. At the same time, peace
must be rooted in normative and ethical standards, which are dependent upon democratic
participation and the presence of justice, dignity, human rights, empathy, understanding and
the assurance of basic human needs.

This report illuminates the essential role of education in upholding the institutions, norms
and standards that help constructively manage conflict and prevent violence, and sustain
peace. While education for peace has a long history as a tool and strategy for preventing
and transforming violent conflicts, this overview seeks to uplift its significance as an essential
tool within the UN framework, as well as with nation states, and non-state actors.

3
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

A holistic understanding of peace

Building lasting peace is complex, requiring a comprehensive and holistic vision of peace that
includes several dimensions.

Peace is not just about state security. It also calls for human security, a long-standing effort
pursued by the United Nations. Human security is a people-centered view that
“complements state security, enhances human rights and strengthens human development.
It seeks to protect people against a broad range of threats to individuals and communities
and, further, to empower them to act on their own behalf.” It is “an all-encompassing
condition in which individual citizens live in freedom, peace and safety and participate fully
in the process of governance.”ii As such, human security is context-specific and oriented
towards prevention.

The work pursued by the United Nations and global civil society to prioritize human rights
and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is essential to the establishment of a
human and ecologically conscious foundation for lasting peace.

Peace is therefore not just the absence of war and direct violence (“negative peace”). It
involves resolving the underlying causes of conflict that can lead to violence and war
(“positive peace”).

Finally, peace is not just a static condition. It is a dynamic process that requires the active
engagement of people and communities, and the establishment of norms and institutions
that allow human well-being to flourish.iii

Sustainable peace is holistic: it requires ending direct violence and

resolving the underlying causes of conflict

This multifaceted understanding of peace helps to identify the multiple forms of violence
that must be addressed: direct and indirect, cultural and epistemic violence, to name but a
few.

Warfare, as a direct form of violence, is visible and easy to recognize. But there are also
more hidden forms of violence, which can be just as harmful and can result in deaths.
Indirect forms of violence (or structural violence)iv deny people certain basic rights or
prevent them from accessing resources equitably. Often systemic and institutionalized,
indirect violence is typically encoded into norms, customs and laws and is exemplified by
policies and practices of discrimination based on age, gender, sex preference, race, ethnicity,
class and religion. Indirect forms of violence also often give rise to direct violence.

Cultural violence complements the structural, although it is more symbolic, rooted in social
and political assumptions, attitudes and beliefs that are typically culturally produced.
Epistemic violence, is the imposition of a dominant worldview on the other, accompanied by
the invalidation and voiding of indigenous and minority systems of knowledge, beliefs,

4
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

traditions, languages and ways of being. Addressing the legacies of epistemic violence is vital
to post-conflict peace processes and efforts of reconciliation.

Emerging understandings of threats to peace

As the first quarter of the 21 st century comes to a close, the challenges of maintaining
international peace and security have never been more complex. Collective security
arrangements have been politically strained, arms control frameworks have deteriorated,
and according to The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, new nuclear posturing has moved us
closer to global catastrophe than ever.v The global security agenda has also expanded, as
inter- and intra-state armed conflicts are now joined by the threats posed by climate change,
the rise of autocracies, gender-based violence, pandemics, organized crime, increased
inequalities within and among nations and declines in civic participation.

Evolving trends of armed conflict and their impacts

If peace is merely determined by the absence of armed conflicts between States, then the
situation could appear positive. Indeed, only 17% of countries were engaged in armed
conflict in 2019.vi However, since 1974 the absolute number of armed conflicts has
increased in all world regions. Conflicts initiated by non-state actors have risen dramatically,
more than doubling from 39 in 2000 to 82 in 2022.

Global military spending also reached an all-time high in 2022, reaching over 2.24 trillion
USD.vii The true costs of war and militarism go beyond lives lost and money budgeted.
Ecological devastation, gender-based violence, and collective trauma from armed conflict
may take generations to recover from. The internal and external displacement of people
from conflict strains economic systems that are already fragile. Such economic impacts are
compounded by lost opportunity costs: research has demonstrated that spending on
infrastructure, health and clean energy creates more and better paying jobs than spending
the same on the military.viii Furthermore, evidence shows that the increasing militarization
of domestic police forces results in increased police violence.ix The insecurity resulting from
militarism leads us to consider the trade-offs and to consider other approaches and
dimensions to security.

Emerging unconventional threats to peace

New and emerging unconventional threats to peace provide their own unique challenges.
These threats are often interrelated and cross-border, implying that a threat to one country
or region is a threat to all.x Climate change, pandemics, migration, resource scarcity, racism,
xenophobia, gender-based violence, poverty and rapidly increasing polarisation are all
obstacles to both internal and external peace.

Climate change represents an existential threat on par with nuclear proliferation and is a
conflict multiplier.xi The destruction of habitats that humans depend on for food and living
leads to resource scarcity (oil, water and food), which in turn produces anxiety, resentment
and hostility that can lead to social unrest, conflict and potentially war. Climate change-
related migration is a major security threat; by 2050, there is expected to be between
250 millionxii and 1.2 billionxiii climate refugees.

5
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Pandemics and health-related threats offer a similar challenge. “They have become more
global and are causing more deaths, posing considerable socioeconomic and political risks to
societies. Pandemics - and at times the strategies put in place to mitigate them - can deeply
destabilize countries and regions.”xiv

Challenges to civic participation, the curtailing of freedom of expression, government media

censorship, and a dramatic decrease in the quality of elections is closely tied to the global
rise of autocratic regimes. In 2022, 72% of the world’s population lived in autocracies.xv The
Varieties of Democracy Institute indicates that these declines correspond to backsliding in
the level of democracy in the world relative to 1986. They also observe that disinformation,
polarisation, and autocratisation reinforce each other. This autocratisation increases
domestic instability and impedes the much needed transnational cooperation essential to
addressing global threats.

Other forms of direct violence outside of armed conflict are generally overlooked as
obstacles to peace. Misogyny, gender-based violence and patriarchal institutions threaten
the lives of women, children and the LGBTQ+ community. Women and children are
disproportionately impacted by conflict and rarely participate in peace processes. Rates of
homicide far outpace the rates of those who die in armed conflict xvi and more than
700,000 people die due to suicide every year (approximately 1 in every 100 deaths). xvii
A growing sense of insecurity and lack of safety: The case of Africa
Global monitoring data on conflicts suggests an increase in the number of conflicts and the
population affected in recent years, especially in Africa. This affects the perceptions of the
population in a variety of ways. Analysis of Afrobarometer surveys by UNESCO’s
International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa xviii suggests an increase, amongst
others, in the share of respondents who feel unsafe in their own home and walking in their
neighborhood. The share of respondents who state that dealing with crime and insecurity is
a top priority has also increased. In some countries, dealing with crime and security has
become by far the top priority of the population, yet governments are perceived to be
dealing with these issues less often with decreasing security over time.

While all the above threats are unique in their nature and impacts, they are inherently
linked. For example, wars or violent conflicts can be triggered by threats posed by climate
change, and growing inequalities within countries. All of these disproportionately impact
women, children and minorities.

Addressing these interrelated threats requires a holistic, rather than piecemeal approach.
As these threats to peace transcend borders, they require a global response and the
development of a global mindset. Our strategies also need to incorporate an understanding
that violence is contextual, requiring culturally, politically and socially relevant responses.

6
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Peace education
What is peace education?
Peace education is learning both about and for peace. It promotes knowledge about the
“requirements of, the obstacles to, and the possibilities for achieving and maintaining
peace”.xix It supports the development of skills, capacities, attitudes and values necessary to
prevent violence, to resolve and transform conflict, and to “create the conditions conducive
to peace, whether at an intrapersonal, interpersonal, intergroup, national or international
level.”xx

The early origins of peace education were connected to informal, cultural practices and
community-based education strategies and the influence of activist movements.
Throughout most of the 20th century, peace education was viewed as a response to global
issues, particularly violent conflicts and wars, bringing attention to the achievement of
negative peace.xxi Peace education emerged as an academic field around the time the Peace
Education Commission of the International Peace Research Association was formed in
1973.xxii It incorporated a critical and gendered analysis that led researchers to probe the
possibilities of peace education contributing to positive peace with an emphasis on
addressing structural and cultural violence.

Given the many forms of violence, interrelated with contemporary challenges, what role(s)
then can education play in fostering and sustaining global peace?

UNESCO’s Member States recently adopted the Recommendation on Education for Peace,
Human Rights and Sustainable Development. It establishes a normative framework and
blueprint for education to bring about lasting peace, reaffirm human rights, and promote
sustainable development in the face of contemporary threats and challenges. The
Recommendation provides an update to its 1974 predecessor, reflecting an evolution of
understanding of education’s role in the context of the 21st century. It is built upon 50 years
of experience in education for peace pursued by UNESCO, its Member States and global civil
society. The Recommendation affirms the integral link between education and the
achievement of peace, and recognizes the important role that education plays in
“empowering individuals, communities and societies to address global challenges and to
take transformative action.”xxiii

Purposes, goals and practices

In the 21st century, scholars and practitioners generally agree that the social and political
purposes of peace education are directed toward the elimination of violence in all its various
forms and manifestations (negative peace), and the nurturing and establishment of the
conditions necessary for peace to flourish (positive peace) at intrapersonal, interpersonal,
intergroup, national and/or international levels.

There are wide-ranging learning goals and objectives of peace education practiced around
the world in various contexts. Most efforts begin with a foundation focused on education
“about” peace, imparting relevant knowledge and critical thinking on the conditions of
sustainable peace and how to achieve them, and developing a critical understanding of
violence in all its multiple forms and manifestations.

7
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Peace education is also transformative and futures oriented: it seeks to nurture attitudes
and capacities for pursuing peace personally, interpersonally, socially and politically. As
Loreta Navarro-Castro & Jasmin Nario-Galace from the Philippines observe:

“[Peace education] cultivates the knowledge base, skills, attitudes and values that seek to
transform people’s mindsets, attitudes and behaviors that, in the first place, have either
created or exacerbated violent conflicts. It seeks this transformation by building
awareness and understanding, developing concern and challenging personal and social
action that will enable people to live, relate and create conditions and systems that
actualize nonviolence, justice, environmental care and other peace values.” xxiv

The transformative goals of peace education involve personal, relational, political, structural,
cultural and ecological dimensions. These dimensions of learning are generally cross-cutting
and interrelated, each shaping and informing the other. These goals and objectives are
pursued through a diversity of transformative learning approaches and practices.

Goals, objectives, and transformative practices of peace education

Transformative learning
Dimension Learning goals and objectives
approaches/practices

Personal Develop capacities for managing internal conflicts, ▪ self-reflection

biases, and ethical/moral decision-making; engage ▪ ethical/moral reflection
in critical self-awareness and introspection; nurture ▪ journaling
social-emotional intelligence and creativity; engage ▪ perspective taking
in worldview reflection; and foster political agency. ▪ critical thinking
▪ social-emotional learning
Relational Develop empathy and understanding of others, as ▪ social-emotional learning
well as appreciation of cultural, ethnic, and national ▪ conflict transformation and resolution
differences; foster global citizenship, developing ▪ reflective listening
awareness of interdependence & interconnection ▪ dialogue
across cultures and amongst and between members ▪ education for health and well-being
of nation states; and develop skills and capacities for ▪ cooperative & collaborative learning
resolving & transforming conflicts without violence. ▪ restorative and circle processes
▪ peer mediation
Political Develop understanding of basic principles of rights ▪ critical thinking
and responsibilities; foster civic engagement, ▪ cooperative & collaborative learning
political agency and develop advocacy skills; ▪ dialogue and deliberation
experience and practice collective and democratic ▪ experiential and place-based learning
decision-making processes; and learn to dialogue ▪ nonviolent direct action
across differences. ▪ human rights learning

Structural Develop awareness of the systems in which ▪ restorative justice

relationships are embedded and the institutions ▪ history education
through which norms and values are established and ▪ historical narratives
maintained; develop awareness of structural ▪ futures thinking
violence (the conditions, processes, and root causes ▪ systems thinking
that give rise to direct violence); understand equity ▪ critical/analytic thinking
and justice and how to pursue them; engage in ▪ designing institutions & systems
systems and institutional analysis & design.

Cultural Develop awareness of the cultural roots of ▪ experience different cultures

knowledge creation and meaning construction; ▪ cross-cultural and intercultural dialogue

8
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

cultural assumptions related to communication, ▪ global citizenship education

expression of emotion, ways of settling differences, ▪ creative thinking and expression
& approaches to dialogue; nurture appreciation of
cultural differences and develop intercultural
competencies; and explore cultures of peace.

Ecological Nurture respect for all life and ecological thinking ▪ systems thinking
and awareness; foster systems and future thinking in ▪ futures thinking
support of sustainability; develop awareness of ▪ education for sustainable development
interdependence and interconnection amongst and ▪ experiencing nature
between peoples and the broader web of life; and
nurture ecological responsibility; develop awareness
of relationship of self to others and all living systems.
Source: UNESCO. (2023). The Role of non-state actors (NSA) in the promotion of peace through education: technical
note

Formal, nonformal, informal and lifelong learning for peace

Formal education is one of the most influential institutions of cultural production and
reproduction in any given society. As such, including peace education into formal schools is
an essential strategy of peacebuilding. Peace education can be integrated into schools to
support the learning goals necessary for addressing global threats and their local
manifestations, and is a particularly effective support strategy in state-led efforts in post
conflict settings. An example is the work being done in Colombia (see further down) or in
Kenya where a peace education programme was introduced in 2008 against the backdrop of
disputed presidential elections and subsequent post-election violence.xxv
Formal peace education as a tool of peacebuilding in the Philippines
Peace education efforts in the Philippines address various forms of violence including the
direct/physical, structural, socio-cultural and ecological. The work is supported by the Office
of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process (OPAPP), which helps establish partnerships
with public and private schools and non-governmental organizations in promoting and
implementing peace education. Several formal mandates have supported these efforts,
including the Department of Education Order No. 44 (2005), “Declaration of Schools as Zones
of Peace.” Executive Order No. 570 (2006), supports the “Institutionalization of Peace
Education in Basic Education and Teacher Education in the Philippines.” In 2019 the
“Bangsamoro Organic Law” was established, stipulating that peace education shall be
integrated in all levels of education in the Bangsamoro territory. Also in 2019, the Commission
on Higher Education issued a memorandum that called upon higher education institutions to
offer peace studies and peace education either as an elective or integrated in relevant higher
education subjects.xxvi

9
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

The work in schools must also be complemented by non-formal, informal, and lifelong
learning efforts. Non-formal educational efforts conducted by non-state actors, NGOs, and
grassroots community groups are rooted in direct knowledge and experience of conflict-
affected areas and apply approaches and pedagogies that are culturally relevant. Non-
formal education is vital to reach those outside formal education settings, including children,
young people and adults. Additional strategies should be devised to support informal
learning for peace that takes place in the family, the workplace and community settings.
Establishing lifelong learning strategies and infrastructures are essential to support the full
development of the person, and for nurturing capacity development throughout life to
respond to emergent threats in a changing world.
Lifelong learning
Lifelong learning, as explored through the work of the UNESCO Institute for Lifelong
Learning, brings focus to adult learning with a particular emphasis “on furthering educational
equity for disadvantaged groups and in the countries most afflicted by poverty and
conflict.”xxvii By supporting continuing education, lifelong learning contributes to equitable
and sustainable development. However, lifelong learning is more than vocational training; it
is the foundation for an educational cultural shift fostering an ethos of a learning society that
supports learners in achieving their full potential and providing them with the means to
address threats and challenges in an ever-evolving world and at all stages of life.

Diverse and complementary approaches to peace education

While education for peace is global in scope, its practices should be culturally and
contextually specific. Effective practices identify and acknowledge the intersections and
interdependencies between global threats to peace and local manifestations of violence and
injustice. They are culturally contextualized and emerge from the concerns, motivations, and
experiences of a given population, within a particular historical, social or political context.
While establishing holistic peace programmes is the ideal for the long-term goals of global
peace, considering people’s present situation and supporting their immediate needs is an
important strategy and best practice.

A variety of approaches have emerged over the past 50+ years offering different entry points
to the promotion of peace and human rights. Many of these approachesxxviii are not explicitly
identified as “peace education” nonetheless their implicit social purposes and learning goals
contribute directly to the development of cultures of peace.

Given the complexity of threats to peace, establishing lasting peace requires a diversity of
peacebuilding and peace education strategies that build and strengthen social ties at the
family and community levels.

The following overview introduces a diversity of complementary and interrelated best

practices and approaches to peace education and the relevant contexts in which they might
emerge and be practiced.xxix

10
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Post-conflict peacebuilding
Peace education makes critical contributions to peacebuilding efforts in and between
countries emerging from protracted violent contexts. Post-conflict peacebuilding education
addresses the disproportionate impact of armed conflict on children and the disruption to
educational activities, and it supports the processes of reconciliation, truth-telling, and post-
conflict justice.

Colombia: Embracing the truth

While peacebuilding is a political and social process, the Final Report of the Truth Commission
(2022) of Colombia also acknowledges that at its core it is a personal process, and therefore a
process of learning. The Report recognises that peacebuilding requires reflection and
acknowledgement of a shared violent past, developing capacities of dialogue and conflict
transformation for mending broken relationships and fostering reconciliation, and, most
significant to peace education, nurturing new ways of thinking to overcome worldview
obstacles to change, as well as fostering thinking about and planning preferred futures. The
report further calls for cultural transformation to become a national level project. The
National Ministry of Education is exploring opportunities to implement the Report’s
recommendations into curricula and schools with the input of teachers. xxx The Report also
calls for partnerships between the government and civil society. On the first anniversary of
the Report, more than 1300 educational institutions came together to open a path of
dialogue and reflection on the value of truth in coexistence and the history of the Colombian
armed conflict.xxxi

Global citizenship education

Global citizenship education (GCED) has been particularly central to UNESCO’s educational
mission, providing a framework well suited to addressing global threats. GCED emphasizes
values of interdependence and interconnection (from the local to the global) and prepares
learners to be active citizens within a broader global community. While not impinging on
state sovereignty or other superseding identities, GCED fosters the development of a global
mindset in understanding how the world works and supports learners in actively finding
solutions to challenges that extend beyond borders. GCED integrates components of civic
education, education for international understanding, global education, human rights and
multicultural education.xxxii

Conflict resolution education

Conflict resolution education (CRE) provides learners with the knowledge, skills and
capacities to resolve and transform conflict without violence. CRE has been integrated into
schools around the world by incorporating learning which addresses anti-bullying education,
violence prevention, conflict transformation, dialogue, mediation, negotiation and peer
mediation. It focuses primarily on building and sustaining healthy relationships. Research
shows that these and other interventions to prevent violence in schools tend to have a high
return on investment.

11
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Preventing violence in schools

Preventing violence in and around schools is essential to ensuring children’s well-being and
supporting safe spaces for learning. Unfortunately, violence in schools remains widespread
in many countries, contributing to learning poverty and leading some children to drop out.
According to global data gathered by UNESCO xxxiii, almost one in three students (32%) has
been bullied by peers at school at least once in the last month. Recent studies by UNESCO-
IICBAxxxiv and The World Bankxxxv suggest that interventions to end violence in schools tend
to have high benefit-to-cost ratios and are also often affordable. Preventing violence in
schools represents a smart investment in the development of children’s human capital.

Education for democracy

Education for democracy has been a significant approach in countries transitioning from
autocratic governments. It supports the development of democratic values and citizen
participation, and fosters the knowledge, dispositions, and capacities necessary for
participation in public deliberation on basic questions of justice. Democratic education is
also prevalent in existing democracies and is characterized in practice by equality between
students and teachers, the active participation of learners and teachers in every aspect of
school life, and student autonomy and choice. Democratic education incorporates themes
and practices of civic engagement, public education about peace processes, public
deliberation, public reason and transitional justice.

Disarmament education
“Disarmament education, an essential component of peace education, implies both
education about disarmament and education for disarmament.”xxxvi Disarmament education
is particularly prevalent in post-conflict contexts where there is need for education for
demilitarization, small arms reduction, and child soldier and ex-combatant reintegration.
Disarmament education also addresses broader transformative goals of global security,
including nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament. The 2002 United
Nations Study on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Education (A/57/124)xxxvii provides a
list of 34 recommendations for action for governments, regional organizations, the UN and
other international organizations to undertake. It also emphasizes that the goals of
disarmament education should be directed towards how to think, rather than what to think.
Nuclear disarmament education – Learning from the experience of Japan
Japan, as the only nation ever to have suffered a nuclear attack, has played a significant and
visionary role in developing nuclear disarmament education. Hibakusha (atomic bomb
survivors) have been leading efforts in Japan, and around the world, to keep their stories
alive while also educating for a world without nuclear weapons. The United Nations Office
for Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) and the government of Japan recently launched the
“Youth Leader Fund for a World Without Nuclear Weapons”xxxviii which provides training in
general principles of nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation, and arms control through
online courses. A selected cohort attends a week-long in-person study tour of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki. The aim of the programme is to equip future leaders to bring together global
efforts to eliminate nuclear weapons.

12
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Interethnic/intercultural education and education in divided societies

Interethnic/intercultural education encourages critical perspective-taking, meaning
understanding alternative points of views, of ethnic and cultural differences and promotes
mutual understanding of the functioning of pluralistic societies. These approaches are
common in post-conflict settings shaped by ethnic, cultural, and religiously motivated
conflicts. Specific education approaches have also been developed to help overcome
longstanding divisions, where communities have been separated. This work integrates
perspectives from history education, historical memory, intercommunal education,
reconciliation and transitional justice.

Cyprus: Bridging the divide

When the border crossing between the north and south was closed and contact was not
possible, youth were brought together out of the country for intercommunal and cross-
cultural experiences, providing many teenagers with their first opportunity to meet
someone from the other side. When border crossings became possible, new intercommunal
programmes emerged, many of which took place in the UN controlled Buffer Zone at the
Home for Cooperation, which was established by the Association for Historical Dialogue and
Research (AHDR) in 2011. Direct peace education efforts, including the groundbreaking
“Imagine” Programme, have introduced anti-racism education and education promoting a
culture of peace. Indirect peace programmes also exist, promoting peace through communal
interaction, bringing Greek and Turkish Cypriot children and youth together through sports,
scientific exploration, and music.xxxix

Education for sustainable development

Education for sustainable development (ESD) “empowers learners to take informed
decisions and responsible actions for environmental integrity, economic viability and a just
society, for present and future generations, while respecting cultural diversity”, as defined in
the Education 2030 Framework for Action. Its foci span the Agenda’s 17 goals, many of
which comprise of challenges rooted in manifestations of structural violence, including
poverty, lack of ecological security, inequitable economic development, environmental
racism, decolonization, and lack of access to education.

Human rights education (HRE)

The United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Education and Training xl defines human
rights education as comprising “all educational, training, information, awareness-raising and
learning activities aimed at promoting universal respect for and observance of all human
rights and fundamental freedoms and thus contributing to, inter alia, the prevention of
human rights violations and abuses by providing persons with knowledge, skills and
understanding and developing their attitudes and behaviors, to empower them to
contribute to the building and promotion of a universal culture of human rights.” Thus, HRE
empowers citizens to “understand human rights, value human rights, and take responsibility
for respecting, defending, and promoting human rights.” xli Human rights are rooted in
human dignity and are the foundation of civil, political, social, economic and cultural peace.

13
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Restorative practices
Restorative justice (RJ) provides a holistic framework towards reparative justice through
dialogue involving victims, offenders, and community members. RJ operates on the premise
that all beings are connected and crime, or violence, represents a rupture in the web of
relationships. Similar to GCED and HRE, RJ notions of interconnection and interrelationship
imply mutual obligations and responsibilities. RJ practices are incorporated into schools and
have been used to support the development of healthy school climates, to address conflicts,
and build community. RJ practices have also been incorporated into mechanisms of post-
conflict transitional justice. Restorative practices incorporate anti-bias and anti-racist
education, perspective taking, and community building work.

Addressing discrimination against indigenous persons through restorative practices in

Bolivia (Plurinational State Of)
Bolivia has experienced a long history of discrimination against the country’s indigenous
people. Restorative practices such as dialogue circles and storytelling aligning with more
traditional forms of indigenous practices. These have effectively been implemented via pilot
projects in public schools and the juvenile justice system in the department of La Paz.xlii

Gender education
Violence and discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, gender identity and
expression, as well as misogyny,xliii and the prevalence of patriarchal power structures
prevent many women, men, girls and boys from living with dignity and achieving their full
human potential.xliv Promoting the Women, Peace and Security Agenda through educationxlv
works to assure the full and equal political participation of women, promotes awareness of
the disproportionate impact of conflict and war on women and girls, and supports women’s
economic empowerment.

Global Network of Women Peacebuilders: Bridging the global policy gap

In an effort to bridge the gap between global policy and local action on gender justice, the
Global Network of Women Peacebuilders (GNWP) initiated the Localization of the United
Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSCR) 1325 and 1820 programme. xlvi This people-
based, bottom-up approach to policy-making complements the efforts of national
governments, ensuring that the resolutions on Women, Peace and Security are making a
positive difference in conflict affected communities. The programme fosters direct
engagement with local authorities, traditional leaders, local women and youth leaders,
educators, internally displaced persons (IDPs) and other vulnerable groups in the
implementation of UNSCR 1325 and 1820. The Localization programme has been
implemented in several countries with remarkable results. In Nepal, UNSCR 1325 and 1820
have been integrated into school curricula and training for police and the army. In the
Philippines, a traditional peace council in Kalinga province (called Bodong) made up of 24
members appointed by tribal elders have for the first time included four women to
deliberate with the men. In Uganda, communities are beginning to know and respect
women’s rights, thus reducing the incidence of gender based violence.

14
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Social emotional learning (SEL)

Developing social and emotional skills and constructively managing intrapersonal conflicts
are foundational goals of peace education and many related approaches. Research
conducted by the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) xlvii
documents the positive impact of SEL on academic performance, healthy relationships, and
mental wellness. SEL also supports the development of the whole person: mind, body and
spirit. It acknowledges humans as autonomous beings, worthy of dignity, well-being and
flourishing.
What works? Examining the evidence and best practices
The evaluation of education for peace yields generally positive results, but longitudinal
research is limited. Several studies substantiate the effectiveness of short-term formal
peace education efforts. Research analysing 79 studies of peace education programmes in
relatively tranquil states from 1981-2000, “found that 80-90% were effective or at least
partially effective.”xlviii Other research has shown similar positive effects, particularly related
to sense of self, and attitudinal and behavior change. Participants are generally able to apply
the knowledge and skills they learn in their daily lives. However, it is undetermined if short-
term interventions are able to “affect deeply held cultural convictions” xlix or transform
worldview assumptions, particularly in contexts of intractable and enduring conflict. In other
words, short term interventions are observed to be generally effective at transmitting
fundamental knowledge and developing relational and conflict skills, yet it is difficult to
determine if these efforts are achieving enduring behavioural change and the more
longitudinal and transformative relational, structural and cultural changes that result from
human agency.

Peer reviewed research from around the world

There is an ever-increasing body of qualitative research conducted in nearly
all world regions evaluating the impacts and effectiveness of peace
education contributing to lasting peace.l This research is conducted and
reviewed by professional scholarly organizations and published in several
academic journals,
this QR code including
to access the flagship
a sampling of peer Journal
reviewedof peace
Peace education
Education.research
Scan from all world
regions.

Some research suggests that efforts designed to support personal and interpersonal change
may be ineffective in contexts of enduring direct and structural violence, where inter-group
relations should be given greater priority. li Many theorize that deeper social and cultural
transformation is not possible without the comprehensive and sustained integration of
context-specific educational interventions into the whole of society, through formal, non-
formal and lifelong learning efforts. Such an integrative approach leads to the legitimization
and acceptance of new ideas, norms and values by society in general.lii The lack of evidence
of the effectiveness of peace education at scale is correlated with the fact there are few
systemic, long-term programmes to study. This is further compounded by a lack of funding
to support the necessary educational research.

Beyond measuring the extent to which students acquire new knowledge and skills, and
change their attitudes and behaviors, there remains the question of efficacy. “How does the
learning contribute to social change? What actions do participants take due to their new

15
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

learning and experiences?”liii These outcomes are much more difficult to measure as they
are less easily observable, more longitudinal in nature, and are impacted by culture,
collective histories and traumas, as well as concurrent and evolving social, political and
cultural realities.

General observations support the conclusion that using transformative and holistic methods
can effectively nurture learners’ motivations to contribute to the building of a more just
world. Transformative pedagogies incorporate cognitive, social and emotional, and active
dimensions of learning. Metaphorically speaking, transformative learning integrates the
head, heart, hands and feet of the learner. Cognitive learning explores the roots of conflict
through critical thinking and critical reflection and encourages the exploration of
alternatives. Social and emotional learning invites students to reflect upon and consider
values, engage in perspective taking, and nurture empathy for others. Active learning invites
learners to consider practical personal and social action to pursue change. Theory suggests
that learning must provide opportunities for reflection on the interdependence between
personal and political realities for it to lead to human agency liv and that learning from and
reflecting upon experiencelv is foundational to all transformative learning processes. The
integration of transformative education across the education sector was one of the final
recommendations of the 5th UNESCO Forum on transformative education for sustainable
development, global citizenship, health and well-being.lvi

Preventing the spread of violent extremism through transformative pedagogies

Transformative pedagogy is an innovative pedagogical approach that moves away from
merely informing learners with knowledge towards shaping their behaviors, inspiring them
to become responsible and active citizens who take action to address injustices around
them, and empowering them to respond to ethical dilemmas in their local contexts. Under
this approach, learners make sense of the dynamics in their communities and understand
discrimination, injustice, and violent conflict around them. Teachers support learners in
understanding the root causes of grievances and cleavages in communities, equipping them
with competencies to identify why there are situations of conflict and how to solve them.
The approach has been used to prevent the rise of violent extremism, among others by
UNESCO’s International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa (IICBA) under a series of
projects implemented over five years in 28 countries with funding from the Government of
Japan. An independent evaluation of the projects suggests positive impacts, as do interviews
with key participants available on IICBA’s website lvii.

Beyond pedagogy, the content, form and structure of education all have significant
influences on learning outcomes within schools and should reflect the needs of the learners
and the local context. The content of the learning should be meaningful and relevant to the
context in which it takes place, rooted in an understanding that such needs, while local, are
also global in scope. Local social justice concerns should be reflected in the curricula. For
example, anti-bias, anti-racist, and inter-ethnic/intercultural education are particularly
relevant to places experiencing migration crises caused by conflict, climate change, health,
and other factors. In countries emerging from protracted violent contexts, disarmament and
post-conflict peacebuilding education can be utilized to addresses the disproportionate
impact of armed conflict on children and the disruption to educational activities. Post-
conflict peacebuilding education also supports processes of reconciliation, truth-telling, and
post-conflict justice.

16
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Research also shows that whole school approacheslviii are a particularly effective strategy for
integrating peace values school-wide and in the community. Whole school approaches bring
integrity and holism into the curriculum, school culture, disciplinary policies, student-teacher
relations and management practices. Whole school approaches also encourage parent
participation in learning and integrate the voices and needs of the local community.

Challenges
It is well documentedlix that certain practices, policies, curricula, and pedagogies utilized in
formal schools can be impediments to peace, often contributing to the continuation of
violence and the perpetuation of harmful stereotypes and ideologies. Certain pedagogical
approaches can normalize violence, racism and exclusionary practices, which have a
detrimental impact on learners and their ability to become agents of peace. Ensuring peace
education is embedded in the ethos of education systems is a key challenge.

The overall coherence of education systems is also of critical importance. Meaningful

learning is jeopardized when students receive messages in the classroom that are
disconnected from, or contradicted by, other institutional practices, such as the artificial
separation of knowledge into isolated subjects, disciplinary practices, the relations between
students, teachers and administrators, and the connection between the school and
community. All these aspects of education have an influence on learning outcomes and can
present obstacles if not geared towards transformative learning.

In both peacebuilding and peace education practice and research, trauma, mental health
and well-being remain inadequately addressed. Individual, collective, and structurally
induced trauma are barriers to learning. Trauma can shatter one’s worldview and
assumptions about humanity, and create feelings of humiliation, guilt, and self-blame. In the
short-term, if trauma is left unattended it can lead to a victim/aggressor cycle. Unaddressed
in the long term, it can be passed on to future generations. Investments and research are
needed to support trauma-informed peace education.

More generally, peace education isn’t a viable strategy unless we invest in it. Unfortunately,
there is no clear data on national funding for formal or non-formal peace education, making
it difficult to measure the funding gap. We do however know that only $457.2 million out of
$33 billion provided by the 1000 largest US foundations supported peace and security
funding in 2019. In the landscape of US philanthropy, this represented just 1.2% of global
grantmaking.lx Unless peace education is made a funding priority, it will remain an add-on.

Finally, it must be acknowledged that living in a world of converging global crises breeds
hopelessness and apathy. The enormity and complexity of the challenges, and the often
slowness of formal response mechanisms fosters fear. Under these conditions, fears for the
future are considered realistic and hopes for peace are considered unrealistic. Peace
education deals with these challenges by emphasizing histories of successful social change,
fostering skills of the imagination, and developing capacities for futures thinking.

17
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Policy and practice recommendations

The following recommendations, aligned with those outlined in the recently adopted
“Recommendation on Education for Peace, Human Rights and Sustainable Development”,
are proposed towards improving and strengthening the effectiveness and prevalence of
peace education and its related approaches (as described above) in both formal and
nonformal contexts.

Adopt laws, norms, policies, and strategies supportive of peace education

The formal adoption of supportive measures is essential to mainstreaming peace education
as a strategy for peace and as a whole-institution and whole-of-society approach. Such
efforts should be explored at global, regional, state, local, and school levels. Whole school
approaches, and the comprehensive and sustained integration of educational interventions
into the whole of society, through formal, non-formal and lifelong learning efforts are more
likely to yield more transformative results.

For example:
• governments should develop comprehensive legislation in support of peace education
• ministries of education should develop curricula, teacher training and learning materials
• encourage the development of whole-school educational policies that promote inclusion,
respect for diversity, and actively challenge racism, all forms of violence and
discrimination

Support teacher participation, development, preparation and training in peace

education
Educational policy and legislation efforts that are not accompanied by teacher training are
generally ineffective. The mandating of pre- and in-service peace education programmes
into teacher training institutions is necessary for formal and non-formal educators to acquire
knowledge of peace education content and develop skills and capacities to facilitate
transformative pedagogies.

Teacher training should introduce a wide array of pedagogical frameworks and approaches
(such as those outlined in this report), emphasizing how they complement each other and
how they intersect. Special attention should be afforded to training in transformative
pedagogies – these are the essential building blocks of pedagogies that support peace. These
pedagogies should be derived from local cultural and indigenous practices and should
incorporate learner-centered practiceslxi that elicit the interests, needs and motivations of
the students to support more meaningful learning.

Teacher participation in the design of teacher policies at the system and school level is also
critical. Educators who have first-hand knowledge of local experience with violence, should
have a direct role in the development of curricula and pedagogies that shape learner
outcomes.

18
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

For example:
• prioritise investments in pre- and in-service teacher training in peace education at all
levels (country, state, city)
• incorporate peace education into basic teacher training certification
• introduce diverse and context relevant approaches to peace education, prioritizing local
and indigenous knowledge and pedagogies
• incorporate transformative pedagogies into all teacher training and lifelong learning
• assure the meaningful participation of teachers in educational policy decision-making
processes

Prioritize funding and support of peace education and peace education research
Education for peace requires substantial investment from governments, and other sources
of funding. These investments should take a long-term view and support capacity
development for evidence-based research. These investments should include public schools,
higher education institutions, and non-formal partners. Special priority should be given to
investing in research supporting the development and research of trauma-informed
approaches to peace education.

For example:
• support peace education with long-term investments, with a recommended minimum
10-year commitment
• establish partnerships between governments and other donors to support long-term
financial investments
• prioritise funding support for the research and development of trauma-informed peace
education

Nurture strong partnerships between formal and non-formal education sectors

In the pursuit of lasting peace, formal and non-formal education must be seen as symbiotic
partners. While institutionalised education can formally prescribe social learning goals, non-
formal and grassroots education often challenges and extends the aims of education. Non-
formal education can also be viewed as complementary, helping to legitimize educational
aims and support social and cultural adoption.

For example:
• states should provide increased support for complementary non-formal education
efforts
• pursue opportunities to bring non-formal learning into formal spaces, and vice versa

Support youth engagement, participation, and empowerment

Youth are generally seen as the recipients of education, but their concerns are rarely part of
the education agenda.lxii For education to be transformative, it must be learner-centered
and prioritise the concerns and motivations of youth. Young people should have a say in
matters that affect them, particularly in the context of their formal educational experiences
and the content of their learning.

19
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

For example:
• assure the meaningful participation of youth in educational policy decision-making
processes
• conduct research to assure learners’ present and future concerns are reflected in the
curricula

Invest in early childhood and lifelong learning for peace

Early childhood education is formative and can support the development of peace values
and an appreciation for learning that contributes to a culture of peace. Lifelong learning for
adults offers a strategic pathway for changing the culture of learning and for nurturing
societies more capable of responding to emerging threats.

For example:
• assure adequate investment in early childhood peace education that takes place both
inside and outside of schools
• provide affordable, and where and when possible, free lifelong learning opportunities for
adults to support the development of knowledge and skills needed to address threats to
peace
• early childhood and lifelong learning should be directed toward the full development and
empowerment of the human person

20
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Resources and organizations

Following is a brief sampling of organizations and resources focused on peace education
research, advocacy, training, and development.

Global peace education promoting networks and organizations

• UNESCO Chairs and UNITWIN Networks. unesco.org/en/unitwin
• UNESCO Associated Schools Network (ASPnet) unesco.org/en/aspnet
• UNESCO International coalition of Inclusive and Sustainable Cities – ICCAR
unesco.org/en/no-racism-no-discrimination/iccar
• UNESCO Global Network of Learning Cities unesco.org/en/learning-cities
• Global Campaign for Peace Education. peace-ed-campaign.org
• International Institute on Peace Education. i-i-p-e.org
• Peace Education Working Group of the Global Partnership for the Prevention of Armed
Conflict (GPPAC). gppac.net/what-we-do/peace-education
• Quaker Council for European Affairs Peace Programme. qcea.org/peace/peace-education
• University for Peace. upeace.org
• The Berghof Foundation. berghof-foundation.org/themes/peace-education
• The Georg Arnhold Program. gei.de/en/institute/career/georg-arnhold-program
• The Comparative and International Education Society Peace Education Special Interest
Group. sigs.cies.us/peace
• The Peace Education Commission of the International Peace Research Association.
iprapeace.org

UNESCO frameworks & declarations

• Recommendation on Education for Peace and Human Rights, International
Understanding, Cooperation, Fundamental Freedoms, Global Citizenship and Sustainable
Development (42 C/40). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386924
• Declaration and integrated framework of action on education for peace, human rights
and democracy. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000112874

Other resources
• UNESCO’s programme on Global Citizenship and Peace Education, unesco.org/en/global-
citizenship-peace-education
• UNESCO Clearinghouse on Global Citizenship Education. gcedclearinghouse.org
• GCED Online Campus. gcedonlinecampus.org
• Education for sustainable development: a roadmap.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802
• Peace Education Global Knowledge Clearinghouse. peace-ed-
campaign.org/clearinghouse
• Mapping Peace Education. map.peace-ed-campaign.org
• Humans of Peace Education. humansofpeaceeducation.org

21
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

Endnotes
i Peace Means Dignity, Well-Being for all, Not Just Absence of War –UN Officials. (2014). UN News.
https://news.un.org/en/story/2014/09/476992-peace-means-dignity-well-being-all-not-just-absence-war-un-officials
ii Commission on Human Security. (2003). Human Security Now. See also: General Assembly resolution 66/290
iii Galtung J., Fischer D. (2013) Positive and Negative Peace. In Johan Galtung. Springer Briefs on Pioneers in Science and Practice, vol 5.
iv Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 1969.
v Mecklin, J. (2023, January 24). A Time of Unprecedented Danger: It Is 90 Seconds to Midnight. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/current-time/
vi UCDP. (2019). UCDP - Uppsala Conflict Data Program. Ucdp.uu.se. https://ucdp.uu.se/
vii SIPRI. (2023). SIPRI Military Expenditure Database. Sipri.org. https://milex.sipri.org/sipri
viii Garrett-Peltier, H. (2017). Job Opportunity Cost of War. https://www.brown.edu/news/2017-05-25/jobscow
ix Tiscornia, L. (2023). Police reform in the aftermath of armed conflict: How militarization and accountability affect police violence. Journal
of Peace Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433221128846
x Swain, A. (2013) Understanding emerging security challenges: Threats and opportunities.
xi Klare, M. (2001). Resource wars: The new landscape of global conflict.
xii UNHCR. (2008). Top UNHCR official warns about displacement from climate change. https://www.unhcr.org/us/news/stories/top-
unhcr-official-warns-about-displacement-climate-change
xiii Institute for Economics and Peace. (2023). Ecological threat report 2023. https://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp-
content/uploads/2023/11/ETR-2023-web-261023.pdf
xiv UNESCO. (2022). Technical note: Current understandings of, and threats to, lasting peace.
xv Varieties in Democracy Institute. (2023). Democracy report 2023: Defiance in the face of autocratization.
xvi United Nations. (2019). Global study on homicide. Unodc.org; United Nations. https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-
analysis/global-study-on-homicide.html
xvii World Health Organization. (2023, August 28). Suicide. World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-
sheets/detail/suicide
xviii
Tsimpo, C., & Wodon, Q. (2024). Perceptions of crime, conflict, and security in Africa: Estimates from the Afrobarometer and
implications for education for peace. UNESCO IICBA.
xix Reardon, B. (2000). Peace education: A review and a projection. In B. Moon, M. Ben-Peretz & S. Brown (Eds.), Routledge international

companion to education.
xx Fountain, S. (1999). Peace education in UNICEF. UNICEF

xxi Harris, I., & Morrison, M. L. (2013). Peace education: 3rd edition.
xxii Pervical, M. (1989). An intellectual history of the Peace Education Commission of the International Peace Research Association.
xxiii UNESCO. (2023). Recommendation on Education for Peace and Human Rights, International Understanding, Cooperation,
Fundamental Freedoms, Global Citizenship and Sustainable Development (42 C/40).
xxiv Navarro-Castro, L. & Nario-Galace, J. (2019). Peace education: A pathway to a culture of peace, (3rd Edition)
xxv Wanjiru Kangethe, M. (2015). The Peace Education Programme in Kenya. https://www.peace-ed-campaign.org/the-peace-education-
programme-in-kenya/
xxvi Navarro-Castro, L. (2021). Philippines. In Jenkins, T., & Segal de la Garza, M. (Eds.), Mapping Peace Education. https://map.peace-ed-
ncampaign.org/view/mapping-peace-education/entry/310/
xxvii Our mission. (2021). Unesco.org. https://www.uil.unesco.org/en/unesco-institute/mandate
xxviii For example, global citizenship education, education for sustainable development, and human rights education (outlined below) are all

critical educational approaches to foster human and planetary rights, duties and responsibilities for present and future gene rations
xxix This overview of approaches is adapted from the global research project “Mapping Peace Education.” https://map.peace-ed-
campaign.org/approaches-themes/
xxx En Cartagena, se llevó a cabo el Encuentro de Educación para la Paz. (2021). Mineducacion.gov.co.
https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/portal/salaprensa/Comunicados/412374:En-Cartagena-se-llevo-a-cabo-el-Encuentro-de-Educacion-
para-la-Paz
xxxi Education, G. C. for P. (2023). The School Embraces the Truth (Colombia). Global Campaign for Peace Education. https://www.peace-
ed-campaign.org/the-school-embraces-the-truth-colombia/
xxxii See: The UNESCO Clearinghouse on Global Citizenship Education hosted by APCEIU. https://www.gcedclearinghouse.org/
xxxiii UNESCO. (2019). Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366483.
The report brings together for the first time in one place a wealth of quantitative data from two large-scale international surveys, the
Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS) and the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study, which cover 144
countries and territories in all regions of the world, and from a wide range of other global and regional surveys
xxxiv Nayihouba. A., & Wodon, Q. (2023). Violence in schools in Africa: Prevalence, impacts, and potential solutions. IICBA Discussion Paper
2023-1. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: UNESCO IICBA.
xxxv Wodon, Q., Fèvre, C., Malé, C., Nayihouba, A., & Nguyen, H. (2021). Ending violence in schools: An investment case. The World Bank, The

Global Partnership to End Violence against Children, and Safe to Learn.

xxxvi UNESCO. (1980). Final Document of UNESCO’s World Congress on Disarmament Education. https://bit.ly/1980disarmamented
xxxvii United Nations General Assembly. (2002). United Nations study on disarmament and non-proliferation education. Report of the
Secretary-General. (A/57/124)
xxxviii UNODA. (n.d.). “Youth Leader Fund for a World without Nuclear Weapons.”
https://www.disarmamenteducation.org/index.php?go=education&do=training-ylf
xxxix Aşik, K., Loukaidis, L., & Segal de la Garza, M. (2021). Cyprus. In Jenkins, T., & Segal de la Garza, M. (Eds.), Mapping Peace Education.
https://map.peace-ed-campaign.org/view/mapping-peace-education/entry/1/
xl United Nations. (n.d.). United Nations Declaration on Human Rights Education and Training.
https://www.ohchr.org/en/resources/educators/human-rights-education-training/united-nations-declaration-human-rights-education-
and-training

22
 Peace education in the 21st century: an essential strategy for lasting peace

xli Human Rights Educators USA. (2017). About human rights. https://hreusa.org/hre-guide/about-hre/
xlii Gittins, P., & Riemann, A. & Castedo, V. (2022). Bolivia. In Jenkins, T., & Segal de la Garza, M. (Eds.), Mapping Peace Education.
https://map.peace-ed-campaign.org/view/mapping-peace-education/entry/358/
xliii UNESCO. (2016). Out in the open: education sector responses to violence based on sexual orientation or gender identity/expression:

summary report - UNESCO Digital Library

xliv UNESCO. (2022). Leave no child behind: global report on boys’ disengagement from education - UNESCO Digital Library

xlv Reardon, B. (2001). Education for a culture of peace in a gender perspective. UNESCO.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000124850
xlvi Ikpeh, P. (2017). “Localized training efforts on implementing the UNSCR 1325: Lessons learned and emerging possibilities.
https://www.peace-ed-campaign.org/localized-training-efforts-implementing-unscr-1325-lessons-learned-emerging-possibilities/
xlvii Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2022). Fundamentals of SEL. CASEL.
https://casel.org/fundamentals-of-sel/
xlviii Nevo, B., & Brem, I. (2002). Peace education programs and the evaluation of their effectiveness. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Peace education:
The concept, principles and practices around the world (pp. 271-282). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
xlix Salomon, G. (2004). Does peace education make a difference in the context of an intractable conflict? Peace and Conflict: Journal of
Peace Psychology, 10 (3), 257-274.
l An index of peer-reviewed research and reports, representing a sample from all world regions, can be found here:
https://bit.ly/peaceedresearch
li Salomon, G. (2004). Does peace education make a difference in the context of an intractable conflict? Peace and Conflict: Journal of
Peace Psychology, 10 (3), 257-274.
lii Bar-Tal, D. (2002). The elusive nature of peace education. In Salomon, G., & Nevo, B. (Eds.), Peace education: The concept, principles,
and practices around the world (pp. 27–36). Lawrence Earlbaum.
liii Wisler, A., del Felice, C., & Karako, A. (Eds.). (2015). Peace education evaluation: Learning from experience and exploring prospects.
Information Age Publishing.
liv Bajaj, M., & Brantmeier, E. J. (2011). The politics, praxis, and possibilities of critical peace education. Journal of Peace Education, 8(3),

221–224. doi:10.1080/17400201.2011.621356
Bajaj, M. (2018). Conceptualizing transformative agency in education for peace, human rights, and social justice. International Journal of
Human Rights Education, 2(1). https://repository.usfca.edu/ijhre/vol2/iss1/13
Jenkins, T. (2021). Critical comprehensive peace education: finding a pedagogical nexus for personal, structural and cultural change. In:
Abdi, A. & Misiaszek, G. (Eds.) (2021). Palgrave Handbook on Critical Theories of Education.
Reardon, B. (2013). Meditating on the barricades: Concerns, cautions, and possibilities for peace education for political efficacy. In P. P.
Trifonas & B. Wright (Eds.), Critical peace education: Difficult dialogues. Springer.
Reardon, B., & Snauwaert, D. T. (2011). Reflective pedagogy, cosmopolitanism, and critical peace education for political efficacy: A
discussion of Betty A. Reardon’s assessment of the field. In Factis Pax, 5(1), 1–14.
lv Hullender, R., Hinck, S., Wood-Nartker, J., Burton, T., and Bowlby, S. (2015). Evidences of transformative learning in service-learning

reflections. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 15, No. 4.
Marsick, V., & Saugeut, A. (2000). Learning through reflection. In M. Deustch & P. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution.
Jossey-Bass.
Jenkins, T. (2016). Transformative peace pedagogy: Fostering a reflective, critical, and inclusive praxis for peace studies. In Factis Pax, 10(1).
lvi UNESCO. (2021). Teachers, youth and education leaders call for concrete steps to ensure transformative education for all. UNESCO.

https://en.unesco.org/news/teachers-youth-and-education-leaders-call-concrete-steps-ensure-transformative-education-all
lvii Azmeraw, E., E. Mura, K. Moritani, and Q. Wodon. (2024). Transformative Pedagogy for Peace, Resilience, and the Prevention of Violent

Extremism: Lessons from Recent UNESCO IICBA Projects, IICBA Study No. 2024-1, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: UNESCO International Institute for
Capacity Building in Africa
lviii Sellman, E., Cremin, H. & McCluskey G. (2013). Restorative approaches to conflict in schools: Interdisciplinary perspectives on whole

school approaches to managing relationships. Routledge.

Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012). Social and emotional learning in schools: From programs to strategies. Society for Research in Child
Development Social Policy Report. 26(4), 1-33.
Shafer, L. (2016). What makes SEL work? An effective social-emotional learning program has to be a whole-school initiative. Usable
Knowledge – Harvard Graduate School of Education.
UNESCO. (2012). Education for sustainable development sourcebook. UNESCO
Jones, S., Bailey, R., Brush, K., and Kahn, J. (2018). Preparing for effective SEL implementation. Harvard Graduate School of Education.
lix Hajir, B., & Kester, K. (2020). Toward a decolonial praxis in critical peace education: Postcolonial insights and pedagogic possibilities.
Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(5), 515–532.
lx Only $457.2 million out of $33 billion provided by the 1000 largest US foundations supported peace and security funding in 2019. Peace
and Security Funders Group. (2019). 2019 Peace and Security Funding Index Vol. II. https://www.peaceandsecurity.org/reports
lxi Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.

Vincent Ignacio, J. (2020). Beyond the classroom: Reconsidering the role of learner-centered teaching using Paulo Freire’s philosophy of
education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences,12 (2).
lxii Villanueva, M., Solheim, L., van der Velde, I., & van Esch, E. (2015). How do we know we are building peace? A reflection on what is
good youth peace monitoring and evaluation. In Del Felice, C., Karako, A. & Wisler, A. (Eds.), Peace education evaluation: Learning from
experience and exploring prospects. Information Age Press.

23
Peace education in the 21st century

An essential strategy for building lasting

Stay in touch

[email protected]

https://www.unesco.org/en/global-citizenship-peace-
education/recommendation

Follow @UNESCO on social media

ED/PSD/GCP/2024/02

Sustainable
Development
Goals