Unit 1 Contd.
Unit 1 Contd.
Unit 1 Contd.
• As may have already become apparent, the Universalist and the Utilitarian
approaches are each other’s opposites in many regards. Where the
Universalist approach focuses on good intentions and discourages using
anyone as a means toward our ends, the Utilitarian approach focuses on
good outcomes. This signifies that others may have to be used as a means
toward the desired end. While the Universalist approach emphasizes
consistency at all times through its universalizability underpinning, the
Utilitarian approach supports flexibility and thus, different decisions are
based on the needs and circumstances at hand. Yet, there are some
foundational similarities in these two theories as well. Both aim to
eliminate selfish decision-making: the Universalist approach does so by
refraining from considering others as a means toward our selfish ends
while the Utilitarian approach does so by considering the greatest good
for the greatest number of people involved. Both theories perceive an
attitude of universal impartiality as a foundational requirement. “On this
view, it is irrational to cast one’s self as an exception to some universal rule
or policy without some justification, since that would involve asserting an
arbitrary difference” (Volkman, 2010, p. 384).
On a less positive note, both theories share the weakness of
undesirable outcomes. The Universalist approach does so by being
intention-based, and good intentions don’t necessarily lead to good
outcomes. The Utilitarian approach does so by focusing on
outcomes that may nonetheless turn out to be different from what
was planned due to insufficient data, unexpected turns in the
circumstances, or the uncertainty of life. Both theories remain
prominent, regardless of their weaknesses, and both have the
potential of gaining even more appeal due to the trend of
globalization and thus an increasingly interwoven world: the
Universalist approach due to its “universalizability” test, which may
not seem so far-fetched as the world continues to become a global
village, and the Utilitarian approach due to its flexibility, which may
continue to gain attraction in diversifying environments.