Mohanty1996 (New)
Mohanty1996 (New)
Mohanty1996 (New)
study", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20 Iss 11 pp. 1293-1312
Moshe Sharabi, (2013),"Managing and improving service quality in higher education", International Journal of Quality and
Service Sciences, Vol. 5 Iss 3 pp. 309-320
Keith Alexander, (1993),"Facilities Management as a Quality Cycle", Facilities, Vol. 11 Iss 2 pp. 25-27
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 549136 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please
visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of
more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online
products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.
• The customer participates in the process, achievement seeking behaviour and place
to a greater or lesser extent, and therefore stress on training and education.
has an impact on the quality of service. • Staff will resist total quality. To bring the
• Service quality is difficult to measure desired change (especially to introduce
because of its subjective nature. such an essentially participative approach),
it is essential to have the involvement of
The traditional definition of quality as confor-
those involved in the change in the decision
mance to standards is often not applicable to
making. Such involvement will reduce
services, since there are often no specified resistance to change.
standards and even if these are specified, they
are difficult to measure. This lack of standards Thus, many of the myths relating to the
makes it difficult to judge the quality of per- implementation of quality programmes in
formance. service organizations are unfounded.
The factors which govern the satisfaction
of the customer include such attributes as the Implementing TQM in the service sector
speed and courtesy of service, comfort and
cleanliness of the facility, courtesy and help- Some key observations:
Downloaded by ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY At 11:52 06 November 2014 (PT)
fulness of employees and other behavioural • Service quality is not synonymous with
factors. These factors offer a lot of variation customer service although customer ser-
and are difficult to standardize as they depend vice and customer relations are part of
mainly on customer expectations. As a result, service quality.
• Manufacturing-based models and tech-
mainly service organizations find it difficult to
niques for managing quality may be of
apply total quality concepts in their business.
more hindrance than help, unless a clear
However, Atkinson and Murray[4] exploded
understanding of the particular nature of
certain myths which restrict the application of
the service sector is used to re-focus the
TQM in service sector. These myths and their
model and select an appropriate set or
explanations, as outlined by the authors, are:
sequence of techniques.
• There is difficulty in identifying and pursuing
• The product-centred culture of organiza-
real goals. It is generally argued that
tion needs to be transferred to a customer-
because of the nature of work it is difficult
centred culture.
to set aims and objectives which are quan-
• Significant changes can occur if effective
tifiable and measurable. This poses a con-
education and training is used to spread the
straint on the measurement of an organiza-
“quality message”.
tion’s effectiveness. However, it is observed
that strategic planning is never a rigorous Lawton[5] outlines a six-step process for
process within a service organization. creating a customer-centred culture as:
However, asking questions such as, What is (1) Define service as tangible products.
the organizations’ mission?, Where is it (2) Identify any differentiable customers in
going?, What does it hope to achieve in the terms of their roles, power, special char-
next five years?, would help to set achiev- acteristics and need.
able targets. (3) Determine customer’s prioritized expec-
• Administrative and managerial effectiveness tations related to service product attribut-
cannot be measured. The nature of the work es as performance, perception and out-
in the service sector can make it difficult to come.
assess when someone is working effectively (4) Continuously measure the degree to
and when they are not. However, effective- which expectations are met. Manage the
ness and individual contribution can be customer’s experience by actively solicit-
measured if a goal setting strategy is adopt- ing feedback and acting on it promptly.
(5) Maintain a current description of the
ed through discussion and consensus, and
service creation and delivery process with
organizational goals are linked with indi-
charts, texts and measures.
vidual goals.
(6) Establish and maintain service product
• Old, established practices are difficult to
measures.
change. To facilitate change it is essential to
increase involvement, identify and promote Lakhe and Mohanty[6] have outlined a quali-
latent talent, develop curiosity and ty management implementation process for
15
TQM in the service sector Work Study
R.P. Mohanty and A.K. Behera Volume 45 · Number 3 · 1996 · 13–17
improving the internal quality of service should start with the top management. The
functions as: chief executive needs to maintain a direct,
• Select the area of quality management highly visible and pervasive involvement in
emphasis. quality. His/her continual involvement can be
• Define the service process or operation. expressed through various means such as
• Analyse the current system/process. persuasion, motivation, direction and direct
• Develop an “ excellence model”. involvement. In developing a strategy for
• Identify key performance areas. continuous improvement it is necessary to
• Develop process control systems. analyse:
• Integrate process control into management • the needs and expectations of the cus-
control. tomers;
• Establish an ongoing improvement • functions and project objectives;
process. • service process and operations;
Mefford[7] has proposed a “total service • measurement and control parameters;
quality” approach, for effective quality and • feedback system and evaluation.
improvement, for service organization. The Based on this analysis the quality improve-
Downloaded by ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY At 11:52 06 November 2014 (PT)
• Error dimension. The number of errors, • identifying root causes, developing action
their nature and time and cost associated in plans, testing and implementing solutions;
rectifying them decides the quality of • maintaining high management involve-
service. ment and participation throughout the
• Psychological dimension. The service organization.
involves dealing with people and thus the
extent to which they are satisfied with the Concluding remarks
quality of service depends on understand-
ing, courteous and efficient service. This paper is a brief summary of the concepts
and applicability of TQM in the service
In establishing quality measures organizations sector. Since the service sector is growing at
should review existing measures, documenta- an accelerating pace, there is a strong demand
tion and reporting systems and establish new for improvement in the quality of services.
effective measures involving customer satis- This paper suggests a framework for imple-
faction feedback. menting TQM in such systems. The success
or failure of service systems largely depends
Step 3. Establish process control system on the initiative and enthusiasm of the human
Downloaded by ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY At 11:52 06 November 2014 (PT)
For continuous monitoring of the service beings constituting the service organization.
process, it is essential to establish process To manage a service process with a quality-
controls. For this, it is essential to analyse the focus is a complex affair. Therefore, the man-
existing process to determine key perfor- agers of service systems need to commit
mance areas, collect data and develop a trial themselves to a concept of “management by
control system. The focus should be on quality first” rather than a specific ideology.
understanding what needs to be measured With such a commitment, and a suitable
and controlled to meet customer require- framework to guide implementation, TQM
ments. can be successfully applied to service organi-
zations.
Step 4. Investigate the process to identify
improvement opportunities References
The focus of this step is to identify internal
process problems affecting customer satisfac- 1 Lakhe, R.R. and Mohanty, R.P., “Understanding TQM”,
tion and costs and explore process improve- Production Planning and Control, Vol. 5 No. 5, 1994,
pp. 426-41.
ment opportunities. This can be done
2 Kaneko, N., “TQM promotion in service industries”,
through:
in Chase, R.L. (Ed.), TQM : An IFS Executive Briefing,
• collecting and reviewing data on process IFS Publication, Springer Verlag, London, 1988,
operations; pp.189-94.
• developing cause and effect diagrams to 3 Jessome, P., “The application of total quality control in
identify causes of waste or poor quality; hospital setting”, in Chase, R.L. (Ed.), An IFS Executive
• prioritizing causes to determine areas of Briefing, IFS Publications/Springer Verlag, London,
greatest opportunity; 1988, pp. 175-80.
• determining chronic problem areas; 4 Atkinson and Murray, B. (1988), “Striving for excel-
• documenting potential problem areas; lence of the service sector”, in Chase, R.L. (Ed.), TQM:
• reviewing improvement opportunities and An IFS Executive Briefing, IFS Publications/Springer-
Verlag, London.
deciding on improvement projects.
5 Lawton, R.L., “Creating a customer centred culture”,
Quality Forum, Vol. 17 No. 1, 1991, pp. 5-9.
Step 5. Improve process quality
6 Lakhe, R.R. and Mohanty, R.P. (1995), “Understanding
The goal of the involvement stage is to achieve
TQM in service systems”, International Journal of
and sustain a new level of process perfor- Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 12 No. 9,
mance. This requires: pp. 139-53.
• regular reviewing of quality improvement 7 Mefford,R.N., “Improving service quality: learning
opportunities and quality management from manufacturing”, International Journal of
performance with all employees; Production Economics, Vols 30/31, 1993, pp. 399-413.
17
This article has been cited by:
1. Mohammad Shamsuddin Alaraki. 2014. The Impact of Critical Total Quality Management Practices on Hospital Performance
in the Ministry of Health Hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Quality Management in Health Care 23, 59-63. [CrossRef]
2. A. Prakash, R.P. Mohanty. 2013. Understanding service quality. Production Planning & Control 24, 1050-1065. [CrossRef]
3. Voon-Hsien Lee, Keng-Boon Ooi, Amrik S. Sohal, Alain Yee-Loong Chong. 2012. Structural relationship between TQM
practices and learning organisation in Malaysia's manufacturing industry. Production Planning & Control 23, 885-902.
[CrossRef]
4. Siew‐Yong Lam, Voon‐Hsien Lee, Keng‐Boon Ooi, Kongkiti Phusavat. 2012. A structural equation model of TQM, market
orientation and service quality. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 22:3, 281-309. [Abstract] [Full Text]
[PDF]
5. Daniel Jiménez‐Jiménez, Micaela Martínez‐Costa. 2009. The performance effect of HRM and TQM: a study in Spanish
organizations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 29:12, 1266-1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
6. Wen‐Yi Sit, Keng‐Boon Ooi, Binshan Lin, Alain Yee‐Loong Chong. 2009. TQM and customer satisfaction in Malaysia's
service sector. Industrial Management & Data Systems 109:7, 957-975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
7. Jitesh Thakkar, S.G. Deshmukh, Anil Shastree. 2006. Total quality management (TQM) in self‐financed technical
institutions. Quality Assurance in Education 14:1, 54-74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Downloaded by ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY At 11:52 06 November 2014 (PT)