Catalytic Combustion For Energy Production
Catalytic Combustion For Energy Production
Catalytic Combustion For Energy Production
Abstract
In this paper, attention is focused on adiabatic lean-premixed catalytic combustion, which has attracted interest in the
last decades as an environmentally friendly and cost-effective alternative to flame combustion for power generation by gas
turbines.
The different configurations of the combustion systems for gas turbines are presented. and the results of pilot tests, full-scale
bench tests and field trials with retrofitted machines are illustrated. The relevant physico-chemical and catalytic properties
of highly active supported PdO catalysts, including reversible PdO–Pd transformation and low-temperature activity, are then
addressed. The structural and catalytic properties of highly stable metal substituted hexaaluminates are also discussed. The
use of fuel alternative to natural gas is briefly covered. The relevant features of mathematical models for both, the catalyst
section and the homogeneous section, that can be used in the design and analysis of the catalytic combustor, are described
and the major conclusions of the modelling activity are outlined. Finally, the research opportunities in the area are discussed.
©1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Gas turbine combustors; NOx reduction; Methane combustion; Palladium catalyst; Hexaaluminates; Mathematical Modelling
0920-5861/99/$ – see front matter ©1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 0 - 5 8 6 1 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 1 7 8 - 9
166 P. Forzatti, G. Groppi / Catalysis Today 54 (1999) 165–180
Table 1
The buildup of a gas turbine with a conventional
Design criteria and operating conditions of gas turbine combustors
flame combustion system and with a catalytic combus-
tion system are illustrated in Fig. 1 [18]. In a conven- Design criteria
tional flame combustion system, air enters the com- Emission targets NOx < 5 ppm
bustor at the compressor discharge temperature and, CO < 10 ppm
upon blending with fuel, the mixture is ignited and UHC < 10 ppm
<5%
burned at temperatures up to 1800◦ C. Since the turbine Pressure drops
Catalyst durability 8000 h
materials cannot withstand this temperature, part of
the compressed air is bypassed to the gas, exiting the Operating conditions
combustion chamber to reduce the temperature for de- Inlet temperature 300–450◦ C
livery to the turbine inlet. In the catalytic combustion Outlet temperature 1100–1300◦ C
system, the combustion is accomplished at lower tem- Pressure 10–20 atm.
Mass flow rate 100–200 kg/m2 s
perature, up to 1100–1300◦ C. Still, the design criteria Residence time 10–30 ms
and the operating conditions of a catalytic combustor
are very severe (see Table 1): ultra low single-digit
emissions for NOx , CO and UHC and catalyst dura-
bility exceeding 8 h must be ensured operating at very close as possible to that of compressed air, in or-
high gas velocities (in the range of 10–40 m/s referred der to minimise the temperature rise provided by
to the cross section immediately upstream of the cata- the pre-burner that is responsible for most of NOx
lyst section), with a small overall pressure drop and at formation;
very short residence times. This poses the following 2. high thermal stability of the catalytic materials
requirements: with respect to deactivation by sintering, phase
1. very high catalytic activity in methane complete transformation and volatilisation, and structural
oxidation to ensure ignition at temperatures as integrity upon thermal shocks;
P. Forzatti, G. Groppi / Catalysis Today 54 (1999) 165–180 167
Table 2
The third configuration has been developed by Cat-
Tested performances of hybrid combustor [21]
alytica in co-operation with Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo
Full scale tests at base load conditions of a 10 MW GT KK and GT manufacturers (e.g. General Electric, So-
NOx < 5 ppm (at 16% O2 ) lar Turbines, Allison Engine) [22–24]. In this configu-
CO + UHC < 9 ppm ration (see Fig. 4) ,all the fuel, except that required for
Pressure drop < 4% the pre-burner, is fed to the catalyst section consisting
of an inlet stage designed to provide high catalytic ac-
1. stable combustion is realised under a wider range tivity, low light-off temperature and low catalyst wall
of combustor operating conditions by controlling temperature and an outer stage designed to operate at
the fuel split to the catalyst; higher wall temperatures in order to provide the re-
2. a certain degree of lack of uniformity in the quired high outlet gas temperature. In a downstream
fuel/air mixture to the catalytic section is allowed homogeneous section, the combustion of the fuel is
due to the low catalyst temperature. completed, CO and hydrocarbons are burned out to
This configuration was tested by CRIEPI and Kansai the levels required to meet the emission standards and
Electric in Japan at a scale equivalent to one com- the combustor outlet temperature is raised to the lev-
bustor of a 10-MW class, multi-can type GT [21]. At els of modern high efficiency GT, i.e. 1250–1450◦ C.
base load conditions, the design targets on emissions The control of the maximum catalyst wall temperature
(NOx < 5 ppm, CO and UHC < 10 ppm ) and pressure is achieved by means of a proprietary catalyst design
drops (<5%) have been demonstrated for combustor based on the temperature self-moderating properties of
outlet gas temperature of 1350◦ C (see Table 2). The PdO/Pd catalysts in methane combustion, the use of a
key factors in such achievements were reported as fol- monolithic metal support with integral heat-exchange
lows: capabilities between active and passive channels, and
1. development of a highly active catalyst made of the use of a diffusion barrier over the catalyst surface.
PdO, promoted with small amounts of Pt and Rh, These features will be discussed in a following para-
and supported on an Al2 O3 /ZrO2 washcoat de- graph.
posited on honeycomb type monolith made of During bench tests at full scale, performed in a
cordierite; catalytic combustor system developed by GE for its
2. arrangement of the catalyst section and the fuel MS9001E gas turbine, NOx , CO, and UHC emissions
distribution system in a configuration suitable were documented at levels below the emission targets
to optimise the interaction between the hetero- of 5, 10, and 10 ppm, respectively, at both base load
geneous and the homogeneous sections within (100%) and part load (78%) (see Table 3) [25]. The
acceptable pressure drops. tests also documented negligible pressure dynam-
Nevertheless, the long-term performance of the cata- ics. Besides, in a field test performed on a 1.5-MW
lyst and of the combustor has to be estimated and the Kawasaki M1A-13A machine, the system demon-
control method established. strated stable performance with a negligible loss of
P. Forzatti, G. Groppi / Catalysis Today 54 (1999) 165–180 169
Table 3
3.1. Palladium-based catalysts
Tested performances of XONON combustor
Full scale tests at GE 9E GT conditions [25] Palladium oxide supported on alumina or zirconia
Emissions (15% O2 ) with various additives is the catalyst of choice for the
NOx 3.3 ppm combustion of methane primarily in view of the fol-
CO 2.0 ppm lowing properties:
UHC < 0.1 ppm
Pressure drop 2.6%
1. superior activity in the combustion reaction, which
Combustor dynamics results in low light-off temperatures;
good mechanical stability and low pressure dynamics 2. unique capability of temperature self-control as-
Field tests on 1.5 MW Kawasaki GT [10] sociated with the PdO–Pd reversible transforma-
tion;
Emissions (15% O2 )
3. low volatility of Pd species that may be present
NOx < 3 ppm
CO < 5 ppm under reaction conditions (metal, oxides, hydrox-
UHC < 5 ppm ides and oxyhydroxides).
Efficiency 23.0% (23.6%a ) The characteristics of the PdO–Pd transforma-
Load range 50–100% tion, its relevance to methane combustion and the
Durability > 1000 h
low-temperature activity of PdO catalysts are ad-
a Efficiency before introduction of the catalyst. dressed below.
efficiency and with ultra-low emissions of NOx , CO 3.1.1. Characteristics of the PdO–Pd transformation
and UHC during the 1000-h operation [10]. The PdO–Pd transformation has been investigated
As shown in Fig. 5, stable operation with low emis- in the literature primarily by means of TG analysis
sions are achieved within an operation window that is [27]. Fig. 6 shows the TGA profiles collected by heat-
bounded by the following conditions [25,26]: ing and cooling a PdO-on-alumina catalyst, previously
1. the inlet gas temperature must be high enough to calcined at 1000◦ C for 10 h. Above 800◦ C, PdO de-
ignite the catalyst; composition to Pd metal occurs and is complete at
2. the gas temperature at the catalyst exit must be around 900◦ C. The observed weight loss corresponds
high enough to stabilise homogeneous combustion well to the calculated value for the amount of PdO
and the adiabatic combustion temperature must be present. During the cooling ramp re-oxidation of pal-
high enough to ensure complete burnout of HC ladium metal occurs at about 680◦ C and is complete
and CO within the available contact time; at 550◦ C. However, the weight increase is lower than
3. the maximum catalyst wall temperature must be that observed during the decomposition. Different ex-
low enough to ensure long-term catalyst durabil- tents of re-oxidation of Pd metal have been reported
ity. in the literature, ranging from 30 to 80% by weight
Notice that all portion of the catalytic reactor must [26,27]. Such variations possibly depend on differ-
be within the operating window; accordingly, a good ent catalyst pre-treatment. The temperature difference
uniformity of inlet fuel-to-air ratio (e.g. ±5%) and of between decomposition and re-oxidation represents a
inlet catalyst temperature (e.g. 1T = 18◦ C) has to be hysteresis of about 150◦ C. In the second, and the fol-
ensured. Catalytica has recently announced the com- lowing cycles, PdO decomposes in two distinct steps
mercialisation of this technology. at 800–850◦ C and 850–900◦ C and re-oxidises below
650◦ C and its magnitude is comparable to those of the
first cycle. A third cycle provides essentially the same
3. Combustion catalysts results as the second one. It has been demonstrated
that re-oxidation is not simply a time–temperature rate
The catalysts that have been most extensively inves- process, but requires a specific temperature. Indeed no
tigated for GT applications are Pd-supported materials re-oxidation was observed when the sample, after de-
and metal-substituted hexaaluminates. composition, was hold for 30 min slightly above the
170 P. Forzatti, G. Groppi / Catalysis Today 54 (1999) 165–180
Fig. 7. TG and DTG profiles of bulk PdO during heating and cooling cycles.
accordingly, the extent of hysteresis (TD–TR) is also to 980◦ C at 16 atm. The kinetics of the decomposition
strongly influenced by the support. process and the related mechanism have been stud-
Fig. 7 has been generated according to data col- ied so far under conditions far from those of interest
lected in our laboratory in similar TG cycles using un- for GT applications, e.g. at low temperatures and un-
supported PdO powder. During the first heating ramp, der vacuum or reducing atmospheres containing H2
PdO decomposes to Pd metal with only one sharp or CH4 [36,41,42]. Accordingly, these points deserve
weight loss between 810◦ C and 870◦ C. In the cooling further investigation.
curve, only a small weight gain is observed at about The mechanism of Pd metal particle re-oxidation
780◦ C with a magnitude of about 10% of the ini- at low temperatures is believed to occur through
tial weight loss. In the second cycle, only one weight oxygen chemisorption to form a PdOx surface layer
loss is observed between 810 and 840◦ C correspond- followed by bulk oxidation of the metallic core
ing to reduction of the reformed PdOx . These results characterised by a high activation energy of about
closely resemble those previously obtained by Far- 100 kJ/mol [27,29–32,36,37,41,42]. The kinetics of
rauto et al. [27], but for the magnitude of the weight the re-oxidation process has been ascribed either to
gain in the first cooling stage that amounted to about electric field-driven transport of oxygen anions till
1% of the initial weight loss. However, the charac- the oxide layer is sufficiently thick and, thereafter, to
teristic of PdO/Pd transformation in bulk palladium the diffusion of oxygen through the oxide layer or to
oxide markedly deviates from those observed in sup- lattice rearrangement needed for the formation of the
ported catalysts, indicating a key role of the support oxide layer at the oxide-metal interface.
that deserves further investigation. On the other hand, the Pd metal re-oxidation dur-
The temperature of onset of PdO decomposition as ing the cooling cycles at high temperatures, that is of
a function of the oxygen partial pressure is plotted interest for GT applications, is a complex and poorly
in Fig. 8 for both, unsupported and supported PdO. understood process. The hysteresis between PdO de-
A good agreement is observed between experimental composition and Pd metal re-oxidation has been ten-
data and predictions provided by the relationship that tatively associated with the capability of Pd metal to
can be derived, assuming that the process is governed chemisorb O2 only below TD [27] or to the formation
by the thermodynamics of the decomposition of bulk of a passive layer of chemisorbed oxygen [43]. How-
PdO, namely PdO → Pd + (1/2)O2 . This implies that ever, the first explanation can hardly account for the
TD in air shifts from 790◦ C at atmospheric pressure large difference in the extent of hysteresis observed for
172 P. Forzatti, G. Groppi / Catalysis Today 54 (1999) 165–180
Table 5
catalysts are widely scattered. Indeed, the conversion
Turnover rates (TOR) of CH4 combustion over palladium catalysts
levels depend on several critical factors that, in many
TOR (s−1 )a Crystal size (nm) Reference cases, have not been taken into consideration: e.g. the
7 × 10−3 –1 × 10−1 1.4–5.6 [50] catalyst pre-treatment procedures, the nature of the Pd
1 × 10-4 –2 × 10−2 1–30 [34] precursor, the presence of water in the reaction mix-
3 × 10−3 3 [51] ture, and several features of the PdO–Pd transforma-
3 × 10−2 16 [52]
tion. Ribeiro et al. [54] noticed that, provided that
1 × 10−4 –2 × 10−2 2–80 [53]
2 × 10−2 –8 × 10−2 2–110 [54] these factors are properly accounted for, the turnover
3 × 10−2 –1.8 × 10−1 3–10 [47] rate (TOR) of the reaction is only marginally affected
1 × 10−2 –1 × 10−1 10–15 Our laboratory when the support, Pd precursor, and Pd particle sizes
a At 550 K and 2% of CH4 . are changed. On the other hand, for PdO/ZrO2 , a slight
increase of TOR with PdO crystal size in the 3–10 nm
range has been recently reported [47].
A diffusion barrier added on the top of the catalyst A relevant feature of commercial Pd catalysts for
layer to limit the supply of fuel and/or oxidant to the GT application is represented by the high Pd load-
catalyst, which decreases the apparent activation en- ing, that is usually in the 10–15% w/w range. Table 6
ergy of the combustion reaction, is also recommended shows the temperatures where 20% conversion has
[49]. Besides, metal monoliths are preferred and the
catalyst is applied to only one side of the monolith
structure, as depicted in Fig. 10. In this way, the heat Table 6
generated inside the active channel is transferred to Effect of Pd loading on an La2 O3 /Al2 O3 support on PdO crystal
the nearby inactive channel by conduction through size and CH4 combustion activitya
the washcoat and the metal [23,24]. Pd load (w/w) T20% (◦ C) τ PdO (nm)
2.5 350 12
3.1.3. Low-temperature activity of Pd catalysts 5 340 10
The low-temperature activity represents an impor- 10 320 13
tant issue of PdO catalysts, since it affects the light-off 15 300 13
performances of the system. As shown in Table 5, the 20 300 12
activity data of methane combustion over PdO based a Test conditions: GHSV = 210,000 Ncc/gh; YCH4 = 0.005.
174 P. Forzatti, G. Groppi / Catalysis Today 54 (1999) 165–180
Fig. 12. Crystal structure of -Al2 O3 and magnetoplumbite phases. (䊉), Alkali, alkali-earth or rare-earth ions; (䊊), oxygen ions; and ( ),
aluminium ions.
These materials, containing transition metal ions reaction occurs via a redox mechanism with variation
in the structure, were prepared by hydrolysis of the of the oxidation state of the metal. A volcano-type
alkoxides [23,60–62] or by co-precipitation from the correlation has been observed between catalytic ac-
nitrates of the constituents by using (NH4 )2 CO3 as tivity and difference of standard formation enthalpies
a precipitating agent [63–66]. Monophasic samples of trivalent and divalent metal-oxides, where Mn is
with a layered alumina structure and surface areas in the most active element. Mn was demonstrated to
the range of 10–15 m2 /g were obtained upon calci- enter the structure at low concentrations (x ≤ 1 in
nation at 1300◦ C. The sintering resistance of hexaa- BaMnx Al12−x O19 ), preferentially in tetrahedral Al(2)
luminates is strictly related to their layered structure sites with dominant oxidation state 2+, with con-
[58] that can be classified into two types: magneto- comitant reduction of the Ba vacancies in the mirror
plumbite and -Al2 O3 . As shown in Fig. 12, they plane due to a charge compensation mechanism, and
both consist of closely packed spinel blocks separated at high concentrations (2 ≤ x ≤3 in BaMnx Al12−x O19 )
by mirror planes that contain large cations of alkali, in octahedral Al(1) sites with the dominant oxidation
alkali-earth and rare-earth ions and loosely packed state 3+ [67]. Introduction of even higher Mn amount
oxygen ions. Spinel blocks and mirror planes are al- results in the segregation of extra phases (BaAl2 O4 )
ternatively stacked, originating a hexagonal structure and in a marked drop of surface area.
with the c-axis parallel to the direction of stacking. The The catalytic activity of substituted hexaaluminates
two structures differ in the composition of the mirror has been investigated in the literature mainly over
plane. These materials crystallise as hexagonal planar powder catalysts in a lab scale micro-reactor [60–66].
particles with marked anisotropic shape because the Methane conversion curves are reported in Fig. 13 for
crystal growth along the c-axis is suppressed due to in- BaMnx Al12−x O19 catalysts with different Mn content.
hibition of ions diffusion along the stacking direction. The catalytic activity increases with Mn loading up
In view of close similarity of ionic radii, transi- to x = 2, keeps constant for x = 3 and then decreases:
tion metal ions (M = Mn, Cu, Fe, Cr, Co, Ni) can the temperature at which 20% conversion is obtained
partially substitute Al ions. The transition metal ions shifts from 660◦ C for x = 0.5 to 560◦ C for x = 2 and
provide significant activity in combustion, since this x = 3, and then back to 700◦ C for x = 4. The conversion
176 P. Forzatti, G. Groppi / Catalysis Today 54 (1999) 165–180
Further work must be performed at conditions of ing simulation results of progressively simplified mod-
real interest for industrial applications to assess the els with those of a rigorous one under laminar flow
feasibility of the dual fuel catalytic combustor. conditions [71,76–78]. Such conditions correspond to
the lowest limit of operation of hybrid catalytic com-
bustors and to standard conditions of pilot catalytic
5. Mathematical models of catalytic combustors combustor operated at atmospheric pressure.
1. Inlet effects associated with the development of
Mathematical models represent a powerful tool for temperature and concentration profiles must be
the design, analysis and operation of catalytic com- accounted for due to the short axial length of the
bustor for gas turbines. In the following, the major catalyst segments.
features of mathematical models of the catalyst and 2. The temperature dependence of the gas proper-
homogeneous sections, that have been extensively re- ties must be included since it markedly affects the
viewed in [11,75], are briefly addressed. performances of the combustor.
3. The contribution of axial heat conduction in ce-
5.1. Modelling of the catalyst section ramic monoliths can be neglected as compared to
the extremely high convective transport.
Single channel models are customarily used since 4. For similar reasons and also in view of typical high
assuming global adiabaticity and uniform distribu- aspect ratios, the contribution of heat radiation can
tion of the variables at the catalyst inlet section, all be neglected, but for heat dispersion effects at the
the channels operate under identical conditions. Both catalyst ends [79].
these multi-dimensional models, accounting for the 5. Intra-phase diffusion has to be accounted for since
variable distribution over the channel cross section it does affect the ignition behaviour. E.g. diffusion
and periphery (distributed models), and 1-D models, barriers are used to control catalyst temperature
based on lumping of the cross section and peripheral runaway in methane combustion [49].
distributed variables into appropriate average values 6. The relevance of homogeneous reaction within the
(lumped models), of the monolith single channel have catalyst section depends markedly on the type of
been developed in the literature. fuel, and appears to be negligible for methane.
In principle, many phenomena have to be included However in order to quantify more precisely its
in the model: contribution detailed kinetic schemes have to be
1. heterogeneous reactions at the catalyst wall and considered.
homogeneous reactions in the gas phase; 7. Lumped models, incorporating correlations for lo-
2. heat, mass and momentum transfer by convection cal heat and mass gas-solid transfer coefficients
and diffusion in the gas phase and at the gas-solid that take into appropriate account boundary con-
interface, that are markedly affected by entrance ditions and channel geometry, can be adequate
effects; but for the accurate prediction of the light-off be-
3. mass and heat diffusion in the active catalyst haviour.
phase; and Under turbulent or transitional-flow conditions, that
4. peripheral and axial heat transfer in the solid phase prevail under most operation regimes of GT combus-
through active washcoat and substrate by conduc- tors, modelling of monolithic channels suffers from
tion and radiation. the great complexity of the hydrodynamic phenom-
In view of the number of complex phenomena to be ena. In particular, for a transitional regime neither ac-
accounted for and considering strong non-linearity as- curate correlations for heat/mass transfer coefficients
sociated with temperature effects, the computational in 1-D models, nor rigorous distributed descriptions
labour for solution of the governing equations of rig- are available.
orous models is tedious so as to make any adequate In addition to theoretical investigations on the rela-
approximation quite attractive. tive importance of the several physico-chemical phe-
The following aspects on the relative importance of nomena that might affect the combustor performances,
the above phenomena have been assessed by compar- some practical applications of mathematical models of
178 P. Forzatti, G. Groppi / Catalysis Today 54 (1999) 165–180
specifically designed for this purpose, such as the [12] H. Sadamori, Catal. Today 47 (1999) 325.
annular reactor mentioned in the text. [13] J. Saint-Just, J. Der Kinderen, Catal. Today 29 (1996) 387.
[14] S. Ro, A. Scholten, Catal. Today 47 (1999) 415.
6. More sophisticated modelling of the catalyst sec-
[15] Buderus Heiztechnik, EP Appl. 93110601.9 (12.1.94).
tion, and of the homogeneous section, can be at- [16] G. Saracco, I. Cerri, V. Specchia, R. Accornero, Proceedings
tempted to provide an improved description of the of ISCRE15, Newport Beach, 13–16 September 1998, p. 290.
several complex phenomena that govern the pro- [17] Z.R. Ismagilov, M.A. Kenzhentsev, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 31
cess. In any case, model validation by comparison (1990) 51.
[18] I. Stambler, Gas Turbine World, March (1993) p. 23.
of model predictions and experimental results is [19] H. Sadamori, T. Tanioka, T. Matsuhisa, Catal. Today 26
rather scarce so far. This is mainly due to the lack (1995) 337.
of detailed experimental data at full scale and to [20] M. Machida, K. Eguchi, H. Arai, Chem. Letts. (1987) p 767.
the fact that experimental and modelling works [21] Y. Ozawa, Y. Tochihara, N. Mori, I. Yuri, T. Kanazawa, K.
are carried out by different research groups. Joint Sagimori, ASME Paper 98-GT-381, 1998.
[22] R.A. Dalla Betta, N. Ezawa, K. Tsurumi, J.C. Schlatter, S.G.
efforts from experimental and theoretical research Nickolas, US Patent 5183401, 2 February 1993.
groups are strongly recommended. [23] R.A. Dalla Betta, K. Tsurumi, N. Ezawa, US Patent 5232257,
Other aspects that have not been addressed in this 3 August 1993.
paper need further study. These include investigation [24] R.A. Dalla Betta, F.H. Ribeiro, T. Shoji, K. Tsurumi, N.
on structural and catalytic durability of combustion Ezawa, S.G. Nickolas, US Patent 5250489, 5 October 1993.
[25] J.C. Schlatter, R.A. Dalla Betta, S.G. Nicholas, M. B. Cutrone,
catalysts at high temperatures and also development K.W. Beebe, T. Tsuchiya, ASME Paper 97-GT-57, 1997.
of improved pre-burned designs with lower formation [26] R.A. Dalla Betta, J.C. Schlatter, S.G. Nicholas, M.B. Cutrone,
of NOx . K.W. Beebe, Y. Furuse, T. Tsuchiya, ASME Paper 96-GT-485,
1996.
[27] R.J. Farrauto, M.C. Hobson, T. Kennelly, E.M. Waterman,
Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 81 (1992) 227.
Acknowledgements [28] Unpublished results from our laboratory.
[29] J. Chen, E. Ruckenstein, J. Catal. 69 (1981) 254.
The authors acknowledge the financial support of [30] J. Chen, E. Ruckenstein, J. Phys. Chem. 85 (1981) 1606.
MURST (Rome, Italy). Thanks are also due to Drs. [31] E. Ruckenstein, J. Chen, J. Catal. 70 (1981) 233.
[32] E. Ruckenstein, J. Chen, J. Coll. Interface Sci. 86 (1982) 1.
Dalla Betta and McCarty of Catalytica Inc. and to [33] H. Lieske, J. Volter, J. Phys. Chem. 89 (1985) 1841.
Dr. Sadamori of Osaka Gas for providing valuable [34] R.F. Hicks, H. Qi, M.L. Young, R.G. Lee, J. Catal. 122 (1990)
unpublished material. 295.
[35] E. Garbowski, C. Feumi-Jantou, N. Mouaddid, M. Primet,
Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 109 (1994) 277.
References [36] R. Burch, F.J. Urbano, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 124 (1995) 121.
[37] K. Otto, C. Hubbard, W. Weber, G. Graham, Appl. Catal. B:
Environm. 1 (1992) 317.
[1] D.L. Trimm, Appl. Catal. 7 (1983) 249. [38] A. Ogata, A. Obuchi, K. Mizuno, A. Ohi, H. Obuchi, J. Catal.
[2] R. Prasad, L.A. Kennedy, R.E. Ruckenstein, Catal. Rev. Sci. 144 (1993) 452.
Eng. 26 (1984) 1. [39] J.W.M. Jacobs, D. Schryvers, J. Catal. 103 (1987) 436.
[3] J.P. Kesserling, in: F.J. Winberg (Ed.), Advanced Combustion [40] T. Fleish, R. Kicks, A. Bell, J. Catal. 87 (1984) 398.
Methods, Academic Press, London, 1986. [41] S.C. Su, J.N. Carstens, A.T. Bell, J. Catal. 176 (1998) 125.
[4] L.D. Pefferle, W.C. Pfefferle, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 29 (1987) [42] E. Voogt, PhD Thesis, University of Utrecht, 1997.
219. [43] J. McCarty, Catal. Today 26 (1995) 283.
[5] M. Zwinkels, S. Jaras, P.G. Menon, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 35 [44] M Lyubovski, R. Weber, L. Pfefferle, 26th International
(1993) 319. Symposium on Combustion, 1779, 1996.
[6] S.T. Kolaczkowski, Trans. I. Chem. Epart A 73 (1995) 168. [45] J.N. Carstens, S.C. Su, A.T. Bell, J. Catal. 176 (1998) 136.
[7] K. Eguchi, H. Arai, Catal. Today 29 (1996) 379. [46] M. Lyubovsky, L. Pfefferle, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 173 (1998)
[8] R.A. Dalla Betta, Catal. Today 35 (1997) 129. 107.
[9] J.G. McCarty, M. Gusman, D.M. Lowe, D.L. Hildenbrand, [47] K. Fujimoto, F.H. Ribeiro, M. Avalos-Borja, E. Iglesia, J.
K.N. Lau, Catal. Today 47 (1999) 5. Catal. 179 (1998) 431.
[10] J.G. McCarty. 3rd Europacat, Krackow, September 1997, [48] T. Griffin, W. Weisenstein, V. Scherer, M. Fowles, Combust.
Plenary lecture. Flames 101 (1995) 81.
[11] G. Groppi, E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. [49] R.A. Dalla Betta, K. Tsurumi, T. Shoji, R.L. Garten, US
41(2) (1999) 227. Patent 5405260, 11 April 1995.
180 P. Forzatti, G. Groppi / Catalysis Today 54 (1999) 165–180
[50] Y.Y. Yao, Ind. Eng. Chem Prod. Res. Dev. 19 (1980) 293. [68] G. Groppi, A. Belloli, E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, Catal. Today
[51] S.H. Oh, P.J. Mitchell, R.M. Siewert, J. Catal. 132 (1991) 29 (1996) 403.
287. [69] C. Cristiani, G. Groppi, P. Forzatti, E. Tronconi, G. Busca,
[52] P. Briot, M. Primet, Appl. Catal. 68 (1991) 301. M. Daturi, Studies Surf. Sci. Catal. 101 (1996) 473.
[53] T.R. Baldwin, R. Burch, Appl. Catal. 66 (1990) 337. [70] M. Machida, K. Eguchi, H. Arai, J. Catal. 123 (1990) 477.
[54] F.H. Ribeiro, M. Chow, R.A. Dalla Betta, J. Catal. 146 (1994) [71] G. Groppi, E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, Appl. Catal. A 138 (1996)
537. 177.
[55] J.C. van Giezen, PhD Thesis, the University of Utrecht, [72] G. Groppi, L. Lietti, E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, Catal. Today
1997. 45 (1998) 159.
[56] R.A. Dalla Betta, J.C. Schlatter, D.Y. Kee, D.G. Loffler, T. [73] M. Johansson, PhD Thesis, KTH, Sweden, 1998.
Shoji, Catal. Today 26 (1995) 329. [74] J.H. Legal, G. Martin, D. Durand, ASME paper 98-GT-294,
[57] A. Beretta, P. Baiardi, D. Prina, P. Forzatti, Chem. Eng. Sci. 1998.
54 (1999) 765. [75] R.E. Hayes, S.T. Kolackzowski, Introduction to Catalytic
[58] H. Arai, US Patent 4788174, 29 November 1988. Combustion, Gordon and Breach, 1997.
[59] G. Groppi, C. Cristiani, P. Forzatti, Catal. 13 (1997) 85. [76] G. Groppi, A. Belloli, E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, A.I.Ch.E. J.
[60] M. Machida, K. Eguchi, H. Arai, J. Catal. 103 (1987) 385. 41 (1995) 2250.
[61] M. Machida, K. Eguchi, H. Arai, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 61 [77] G. Groppi, A. Belloli, E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, Chem. Eng.
(1988) 3659. Sci. 50 (1995) 2705.
[62] M. Machida, K. Eguchi, H. Arai, J. Catal. 120 (1989) 377. [78] E. Tronconi, P. Forzatti, A.I.Ch.E. J. 38 (1992) 201.
[63] G. Groppi, M. Bellotto, C. Cristiani, P. Forzatti, P.L. Villa, [79] R.E. Hayes, S.T. Kolackzowski, W.J. Thomas, Comp. Chem.
Appl. Catal. A 104 (1993) 101. Eng. 16 (1992) 645.
[64] G. Groppi, M. Bellotto, C. Cristiani, P. Forzatti, J. Mat. Sci. [80] Y. Tsujikawa, S. Fujii, H. Sadamori, S. Ito, S Katsura, ASME
29 (1994) 3441. Paper, 95-GT-351, 1995.
[65] G. Groppi, F. Assandri, M. Bellotto, C. Cristiani, P. Forzatti, [81] D. Leung, R.E. Hayes, S.T. Kolackzowski, Can. J. Chem.
J. Sol. Stat. Chem. 114 (1995) 326. Eng. 74 (1996) 94.
[66] G. Groppi, C. Cristiani, P. Forzatti, J. Catal. 168 (1997) 95. [82] R.A. Dalla Betta, D.G. Loffler, ACS Symp. Ser. Hetero-
[67] M. Bellotto, G. Artioli, C. Cristiani, P. Forzatti, G. Groppi, geneous Hydrocarbon Oxidation, 638 (1996) 36
J. Catal. 179 (1998) 597. [83] H. Kleykamp, Z. Physik. Chem. N.F. 71 (1970) 142.