Spatial Neglect - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Spatial Neglect - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Spatial Neglect - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Spatial Neglect
Ayesha Sarwar; Prabhu D. Emmady.
Objectives:
Outline the appropriate evaluation process for a patient exhibiting signs of spatial neglect.
Review some interprofessional team strategies for improving care coordination regarding
spatial neglect is given in this article.
Introduction
Spatial neglect syndrome, a behavioral disorder, also known as unilateral or hemineglect
syndrome, is a disabling condition that often presents with diagnostic difficulties even for
specialists familiar with this condition.[1] This hemineglect syndrome classically presents as
non-dominant (often left-sided) spatial disorientation after a pathological event in the right
cerebral hemisphere, classically the right posterior parietal cortex. Spatial neglect does not
necessarily limit involvement to sensory and motor impairment, but can also affect other
components like perceptual, representational, visuospatial, behavioral deficits, etc. The most
challenging aspect of this illness is the frequent abnormal awareness of the patient regarding the
deficit termed anosognosia and the presence of emotional dysfunction.[2]
Neglect is a heterogeneous syndrome due to variations in the location and extent of brain
damage. This interhemispheric imbalance causes the left hemisphere to become more active after
the right hemisphere lesion, which results in attention diversion and eye movements towards the
right side. The presence of spatial neglect indicates a severe prognosis in terms of the long-term
independent functioning of the patient.[3]
Clinicians can estimate the severity of this unilateral neglect using the Kessler Foundation
Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP) or Conley Scale scores.
Etiology
A structural and functional disturbance in the brain cause spatial biasing.[4] The primary
pathological process responsible for this neuropsychological disorder is a hemispheric stroke,
particularly involving the non-dominant cerebral hemisphere, which is often the right cerebral
hemisphere. Neglect is mainly due to the occlusion in the right middle cerebral artery territory
that can cause disorientation in around 80% of the patients in the acute stage.[5]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562184/ 1/7
10/1/23, 9:47 PM Spatial Neglect - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Other common causes are traumatic brain injury, neoplasia, and aneurysms formation in the
cerebral circulation. Neurodegenerative diseases rarely cause hemineglect syndrome.[6]
Epidemiology
Although the incidence rate of left-hemispheric strokes is 54%, greater than right-hemispheric,
which is 43%, the occurrence of spatial neglect is disproportionately more following a right-
sided stroke.[7] The overall incidence of hemineglect disorder is up to 82% in post-stroke
patients, with the involvement of around 50% of the individuals on average.[8][9] Age shows a
correlation in patients with neglect following a stroke, unlike the handedness or the gender
differences.[2]
A case study reported the majority of patients of neglect above 65 years of age and fewer patients
of neglect below the age of 65 years. Individuals with low socioeconomic status and White race
reportedly show a strong association with spatial neglect.
Pathophysiology
Neglect disorder usually develops due to occlusion of cerebral blood flow, especially the main
trunk of a right middle cerebral artery, the primary source of blood supply for the right-sided
cerebral cortex. Commonly responsible areas of the right hemisphere are the right posterior
parietal cortex with particular involvement of the inferior parietal lobe (IPL) or temporoparietal
junction(TPJ). Gaze disturbance and anosognosia usually involve the perisylvian regions of the
right hemisphere; however, biased line bisection and extinction are due to the involvement of
posterior-inferior damage and the temporoparietal junction involvement.[10]
Less commonly involved areas of the cerebral cortex are the superior temporal cortex and frontal
lobe. In damage to subcortical regions, neglect can develop through indirect effects on cortical
regions. Predominantly involved part of subcortex in causing neglect disorder is superior
longitudinal fasciculus, while basal ganglia, thalamus, and cingulate cortex are least commonly
involved.[11] The heterogenous symptoms present due to varying involvement of posterior
cortical, frontal, subcortical, and white matter damage.
1. Perception-attention neglect: People with neglect having no disorder of sensation may still
fail to perceive events on the neglected side.
1. The patient may have anosognosia, which is the unawareness of the deficit.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562184/ 2/7
10/1/23, 9:47 PM Spatial Neglect - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
2. Self-neglect: The patient will perform all tasks from the non-neglected right side due to
unawareness of his left side of the body, e.g., asymmetric shaving, grooming, etc.
1. After the stroke, the bed-ridden patients look away from the right side. The patient in a
wheelchair will have difficulty in navigating towards the left side.
2. Allochiria: This is an illusory visual phenomenon in which patients with neglect will only
respond to stimuli presented to the right side of their body as if it had been to the other side
while neglecting the left sided-stimuli. When one approaches such patients from the left
side, they respond looking at the right side; a phenomenon also labeled as allesthesia.[12]
3. Somatoparaphrenia: The patient develops a delusional belief that the neglected side of the
body belongs to someone else.[5] At times, it can cause grave consequences when such
patients deny life-threatening conditions, e.g., left-sided chest pain due to myocardial
infarction.
4. The patient may have peripersonal or extrapersonal neglect, depending on the inability to
reach out in the space within the reaching distance or outside that distance.
Evaluation
Evaluation of patients with suspected hemineglect syndrome consists of complete neurological
examination, lab evaluation, and imaging studies.
Any of the following bedside methods can provide a neurological examination of these patients:
1) Cancellation Test: This is a visual stimulation test in which patients view a piece of paper
having scattered lines all over, and they are asked to cross or circle all the lines. In the end, the
patient will only cross lines on the non-neglected side, leaving behind the affected side.[13]
2) Line Bisection Test (LBT): A long line is drawn on the paper, and the patient is asked to mark
the center of the line. Instead of the center, the patient will direct the line more towards the right
side, ignoring the left side of the line. The performance time of the line bisection test has a
significant association with hemispatial neglect prognosis.[14]
3) Drawing/Copying Test: Ask the patient either to draw something from his memory or to copy
the given task.
5) Reading Test: A person with spatial neglect will read only the right side, which is the non-
neglected side, while ignoring the left side, e.g., ask the patient to read "460225", the patient will
read-only "225".
Lab investigations can help to exclude other causes of dementia, depression, and stroke include
vitamin-B12 level, homocysteine level, Thyroid function tests (TSH, T3, T4), complete blood
counts (CBC), comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
Structural brain abnormalities like acute ischemic stroke, brain tumor, subdural hematoma, must
be evaluated with computed tomography (CT) head or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562184/ 3/7
10/1/23, 9:47 PM Spatial Neglect - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
brain. CT head is readily available and is the first-line test in an emergency. A brain MRI is more
sensitive and can provide more details of the etiology and is necessary when available, especially
when the CT head is non-diagnostic.
Treatment / Management
Management of patients with neglect is via a combination of different rehabilitation therapies
and medications.
1) Prism Adaptation Treatment: An economically feasible and highly effective restorative therapy
in which patients ideally have ten sessions in 14 days according to standardized criteria.[17] This
treatment makes the individual move the healthy side of the body repeatedly while wearing
binocular optical prisms during the sessions only that also make the patient have unconscious
movement on the neglected side. The primary role of prisms is to shift the visual image around
11 degrees towards the lesional field.
2) Other strategies include limb activation and optokinetic stimulation. In limb activation
therapy, which consists of 1 or 2 sessions per week for three months, the patient moves his
affected limb towards the neglected side after receiving sensory or verbal stimuli. This strategy
will analyze spatial motor systems directly and, perception-attention function indirectly.
5) The use of stimulants e.g., methylphenidate, has proven to be useful in neglect patients
according to a randomized clinical trial.[19]
Differential Diagnosis
Following differentials must be considerations in a patient with spatial neglect.
1. Ataxic hemiparesis which presented with weakness and ataxia on the same side
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562184/ 4/7
10/1/23, 9:47 PM Spatial Neglect - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
2. Gerstmann syndrome which presents with acalculia, finger agnosia, agraphia, and left-right
disorientation
3. Balint syndrome presents with an inability to visualize more than one object in the visual
field simultaneously and failure to reach an item with his right hand but able to do so with
the left hand.
Prognosis
The prognosis of neglect patients greatly depends on the timely identification of this disorder in
patients because about 80% of patients are reportedly initially undiagnosed.[1] Hence the most
important aspect step in having a better outcome is the accurate diagnosis of neglect in patients,
especially in post-stroke individuals.
Identification tests can also give a clue regarding prognostic index of such candidates, for
instance, the cancellation test can predict the mortality and functional activity of neglect patients
six months after the stroke according to the results of Albert's experiment.[20]
Patients with neglect can often recover from the post-stroke acute phase due to reperfusion and
resolution of cerebral edema, increasing the activity of left prefrontal and right parietal regions.
[21] At the end of 12 weeks, neglect is present in 17% of right-brain lesioned patients and 5% of
left-brain lesioned patients according to the NIH scale.[22] This 23% of the affected individuals
have increase duration for a hospital stay along with increase morbidities due to repeated falls.
Occupational functioning also significantly decline in patients having neglect with anosognosia.
Complications
Hemispatial Neglect(HSN) results in multiple complications not only for the patients but for the
caretakers as well.
1. Occupational insufficiency. HSN makes patients unable to perform their duties because of
visual and motor perception deficits in the contralesional field.
3. Safety issues can arise because of the inability of a patient to articulate properly or to act
spontaneously in emergency situations making such individuals unable to drive on the
road.
4. Spatial neglect lengthens the stroke survivors' recovery time to be an independent person
again that results in increasing caregivers' stress levels.[24]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562184/ 5/7
10/1/23, 9:47 PM Spatial Neglect - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Review Questions
References
1. Chen P, McKenna C, Kutlik AM, Frisina PG. Interdisciplinary communication in inpatient
rehabilitation facility: evidence of under-documentation of spatial neglect after stroke.
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jun;35(12):1033-8. [PMC free article: PMC3660412] [PubMed:
23072734]
2. Kortte K, Hillis AE. Recent advances in the understanding of neglect and anosognosia
following right hemisphere stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2009 Nov;9(6):459-65. [PMC
free article: PMC2810613] [PubMed: 19818233]
3. Vossel S, Weiss PH, Eschenbeck P, Fink GR. Anosognosia, neglect, extinction and lesion site
predict impairment of daily living after right-hemispheric stroke. Cortex. 2013 Jul-
Aug;49(7):1782-9. [PubMed: 23321249]
4. Siegel JS, Ramsey LE, Snyder AZ, Metcalf NV, Chacko RV, Weinberger K, Baldassarre A,
Hacker CD, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. Disruptions of network connectivity predict
impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul
26;113(30):E4367-76. [PMC free article: PMC4968743] [PubMed: 27402738]
5. Li K, Malhotra PA. Spatial neglect. Pract Neurol. 2015 Oct;15(5):333-9. [PMC free article:
PMC4602245] [PubMed: 26023203]
6. Kas A, de Souza LC, Samri D, Bartolomeo P, Lacomblez L, Kalafat M, Migliaccio R,
Thiebaut de Schotten M, Cohen L, Dubois B, Habert MO, Sarazin M. Neural correlates of
cognitive impairment in posterior cortical atrophy. Brain. 2011 May;134(Pt 5):1464-78.
[PubMed: 21478188]
7. Hedna VS, Bodhit AN, Ansari S, Falchook AD, Stead L, Heilman KM, Waters MF.
Hemispheric differences in ischemic stroke: is left-hemisphere stroke more common? J Clin
Neurol. 2013 Apr;9(2):97-102. [PMC free article: PMC3633197] [PubMed: 23626647]
8. Buxbaum LJ, Ferraro MK, Veramonti T, Farne A, Whyte J, Ladavas E, Frassinetti F, Coslett
HB. Hemispatial neglect: Subtypes, neuroanatomy, and disability. Neurology. 2004 Mar
09;62(5):749-56. [PubMed: 15007125]
9. Chen P, Hreha K, Kong Y, Barrett AM. Impact of spatial neglect on stroke rehabilitation:
evidence from the setting of an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015
Aug;96(8):1458-66. [PMC free article: PMC4519421] [PubMed: 25862254]
10. Karnath HO, Rorden C. The anatomy of spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 2012
May;50(6):1010-7. [PMC free article: PMC3348466] [PubMed: 21756924]
11. Rousseaux M, Allart E, Bernati T, Saj A. Anatomical and psychometric relationships of
behavioral neglect in daily living. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Apr;70:64-70. [PubMed:
25676676]
12. Baumeler D, Born S, Burra N, Ptak R. When Left is One and Right is Double: An
Experimental Investigation of Visual Allesthesia after Right Parietal Damage. Vision
(Basel). 2020 Mar 01;4(1) [PMC free article: PMC7157701] [PubMed: 32121533]
13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562184/ 6/7
10/1/23, 9:47 PM Spatial Neglect - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Albert ML. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology. 1973 Jun;23(6):658-64. [PubMed:
4736313]
14. Kwon S, Park W, Kim M, Kim JM. Relationship Between Line Bisection Test Time and
Hemispatial Neglect Prognosis in Patients With Stroke: A Prospective Pilot Study. Ann
Rehabil Med. 2020 Aug;44(4):292-300. [PMC free article: PMC7463114] [PubMed:
32752577]
15. Bonato M. Neglect and extinction depend greatly on task demands: a review. Front Hum
Neurosci. 2012;6:195. [PMC free article: PMC3398353] [PubMed: 22822394]
16. Brandt T, Welfringer A. [Treatment of neglect: new therapy approaches]. Nervenarzt. 2016
Oct;87(10):1068-1073. [PubMed: 27695885]
17. Frassinetti F, Angeli V, Meneghello F, Avanzi S, Làdavas E. Long-lasting amelioration of
visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain. 2002 Mar;125(Pt 3):608-23. [PubMed:
11872617]
18. Management of Stroke Rehabilitation Working Group. VA/DOD Clinical practice guideline
for the management of stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(9):1-43. [PubMed:
21213454]
19. Luauté J, Villeneuve L, Roux A, Nash S, Bar JY, Chabanat E, Cotton F, Ciancia S, Sancho
PO, Hovantruc P, Quelard F, Sarraf T, Cojan Y, Hadj-Bouziane F, Farné A, Janoly-Dumenil
A, Boisson D, Jacquin-Courtois S, Rode G, Rossetti Y. Adding methylphenidate to prism-
adaptation improves outcome in neglect patients. A randomized clinical trial. Cortex. 2018
Sep;106:288-298. [PubMed: 29703446]
20. Fullerton KJ, McSherry D, Stout RW. Albert's test: a neglected test of perceptual neglect.
Lancet. 1986 Feb 22;1(8478):430-2. [PubMed: 2868349]
21. Umarova RM, Nitschke K, Kaller CP, Klöppel S, Beume L, Mader I, Martin M, Hennig J,
Weiller C. Predictors and signatures of recovery from neglect in acute stroke. Ann Neurol.
2016 Apr;79(4):673-86. [PubMed: 26873402]
22. Ringman JM, Saver JL, Woolson RF, Clarke WR, Adams HP. Frequency, risk factors,
anatomy, and course of unilateral neglect in an acute stroke cohort. Neurology. 2004 Aug
10;63(3):468-74. [PubMed: 15304577]
23. Klimiec E, Dziedzic T, Kowalska K, Slowik A, Klimkowicz-Mrowiec A. Knowns and
Unknowns About Delirium in Stroke: A Review. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2016 Dec;29(4):174-
189. [PubMed: 27984255]
24. Chen P, Fyffe DC, Hreha K. Informal caregivers' burden and stress in caring for stroke
survivors with spatial neglect: an exploratory mixed-method study. Top Stroke Rehabil.
2017 Jan;24(1):24-33. [PubMed: 27216085]
25. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher
B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards
LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD., American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on
Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality
of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery:
A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American
Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. [PubMed: 27145936]
Disclosure: Ayesha Sarwar declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
Disclosure: Prabhu Emmady declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562184/ 7/7