SET Tool Buildings No Income Banguitan
SET Tool Buildings No Income Banguitan
SET Tool Buildings No Income Banguitan
DATE OF EVALUATION:
I. SP UTILIZATION Degree of
Responsiveness2
1) a. Number of beneficiaries
Actual ___________
Planned___________
Why were these (needed amenities) not included in the approved proposal/Program
of Work?
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Why were these (needed amenities) not included in the approved proposal/Program
of Work?
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
For Lighthouse:
Why were these (needed amenities) not included in the approved proposal/Program
of Work?
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Version 1/2017
I. SP UTILIZATION Degree of
Responsiveness
For Lighthouse:
2. Were there instances of related accidents after the installation of the facility? ___ Yes
____ No
What actions were undertaken by the O&M group to prevent such accidents from
occurring?
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
3. List down the top three benefits derived from the completed project
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
4. Does the O&M group have plans for expansion/improvement/construction of
additional structures? ___ Yes ___ No
5. Has the project produced new problems for the community/barangay?__ Yes __ No
If yes, write down (by order of importance) the top three problems that project has
produced.
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
4
Example: A potential user was refused access to the facility as proposed activity is against the uses identified by
the O&M group (for multi-purpose buildings).
Version 1/2017
Key Areas Yes Degree of Remarks 5
or Responsiveness /
No Impact
II. ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
1. O&M organization formed and
recognized/subsumed into appropriate
institutions (e.g., BDC, DepEd, DOH)
5
Comment on the responsiveness and overall quality of indicators/key areas. Include other observations as maybe
appropriate.
Version 1/2017
Key Areas Yes Degree of Remarks
or Responsiveness /
No Impact
Conduct of periodic organizational
assessments and planning
Bonus:
Awards and Recognitions received (Recipient of
awards (local, regional, national)
OVERALL NUMERICAL RATING
(Organization and Management 20%)
III. INSTITUTIONAL LINKAGE
1. O&M group is able to establish linkages with
BLGU, MLGU and other organizations or
institutions for support
Buildings-No Income
V. PHYSICAL/TECHNICAL RATIN REMARKS
G
A. O&M PLAN, TOOLS & EQUIPMENT
1) O&M Plan Implementation
Implementation of planned activities
Activities conducted as scheduled
O&M group maintains the subproject
2) Maintenance Tools/equipment
Proof of purchase/ownership/rental/
access from other sources (tools
available)
Tools are functional and on-site
B. SUB-PROJECT STRUCTURES
(Note: Consider only applicable
structures/components; include other components not
indicated in the tool but funded by NCDDP)
1. Building Structures (including lighthouse
tower)
a. Columns, Beams, walls
Structural stability; cracks on structures
Condition of painting
Vandalism
Deflections and deformations
b. Doors and Windows
Functionality of door knobs
Conditions of doors & Jambs, fittings
Condition of window frames, panels, hinges,
locks
Accessibility
c. Roofing
Condition of painting
Condition of roofing panels
Condition of Gutters, ridge rolls
Deformations
d. Ceiling
Condition of painting
Condition of ceiling panels
Deformations
Stability of joist and hangers
e. Flooring
Condition of floor, tiles
Cleanliness
e. Electrical System
Availability of Power Supply
Serviceability of Lights
Condition of Switches and outlets
Safe electrical wiring system
f. Plumbing and sanitation
Version 1/2017
Availability of Potable water supply
Condition of lavatory and pantry
Condition of comfort room
Condition of water pipes and drain pipes
Condition of septic tank
g. Amenities (enumerated in Part I- SP Utilization)
Condition of amenities and accessories
h. Environmental sanitation
Observed cleanliness
Proper waste disposal
2. Additional Features
OVER-ALL FINDINGS:
1. Functionality
In summary, the subproject physical status is (please check):
Well-maintained/in good condition
Needs minor repairs
Needs major repairs
Structure not functional
In terms of services provided, the subproject:
Provides services beyond target beneficiaries
Serves target beneficiaries
Serves less than the target beneficiaries
Provides no benefits
2. Sustainability
The following components/areas are properly attended to:
________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
2.
3.
4.
____________________________________ _________________________________
O&M Organization Representative BLGU Representative
Version 1/2017
____________________________________ _________________________________
MIAC Representative SB Representative
____________________________________ _________________________________
ACT Representative Mayors Office Representative
____________________________________ _________________________________
RPMT Representative (if available) MSIT Team Leader (MPDC/ME)
____________________________________ _________________________________
NPMO Representative (if available)
____________________________________ _________________________________