Fundamental Rights
Fundamental Rights
Fundamental Rights
The Indian Constitution, 1950 contains certain provisions which guarantee the
basic human rights of all the citizens of India. There are six Fundamental Rights
in the constitution of India. Fundamental Rights are included in Part-III of the
Indian Constitution, it is also known as the ‘Magna Carta’ of the Indian
Constitution.
There are six fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution, they are
as follows –
The right to property was one of the fundamental rights in the Constitution.
However, the right to property was extracted from the schedule of fundamental
rights by the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1978. Thus, at present, the
right to property is a legal right under Article 300A and not a fundamental
right.
Article 14 considers all individuals the same in the eyes of the law.
This Article states that all citizens of India must be treated equally
before the law.
The said Article further states that the law protects everybody
equally.
Article 17 – Untouchability
The said Article abolishes titles. It states that the State shall not
confer any titles. However, those titles which are academic or military
in nature shall be allowed.
The said article further prohibits the citizens of India from accepting
any kind of titles from a foreign country. The titles that were awarded
by the then British government such as Rai Bahadur, Khan Bahadur
are also abolished by virtue of this article.
Awards such as Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan, Padma Vibhushan,
Bharat Ratna and military honours like Ashok Chakra, Param Vir
Chakra shall not be considered under this category.
Right to Freedom
The following articles of the Constitution deal with the fundamental Right to
Freedom –
Article 19
This provision states that the citizens of India can move freely throughout the
territory of India. However, this freedom may be restricted on the grounds of
security, public order or for safeguarding the interests of the Scheduled Tribes.
This provision states that all the citizens of India have the right to reside in
any part of the country. However, this freedom may be restricted on the
grounds of security, public order or for safeguarding the interests of the
Scheduled Tribes.
This provision states that all citizens have the right to carry on any trade or
profession or occupation, provided that such trade or profession or occupation
is not illegal or immoral. Also, the law does not prohibit the State from making
laws related to technical or professional qualifications that are required for
practising the occupation or trade.
This provision deals with the protection of citizens in respect of conviction for
offences. It mentions three kinds of protections to the individual against the
State, they are retrospective criminal legislation, double jeopardy and
prohibition against self-incrimination.
This provision states that no individual must be deprived of his life and personal
liberty by the State except as per the procedure laid down by law. Right to life
does not mean merely living, it states that an individual must lead a dignified
life. The said article has a very wide scope and its interpretation has been
moulded continuously over the decades.
Article 22(1)
This provision states that any individual who is in custody has to be informed
as to why they have been arrested. Also, they must not be denied the right to
consult a lawyer.
Article 22(2)
This provision states that the arrested individual should be produced before a
judicial magistrate within 24 hours of their arrest. This provision further states
that no individual who has been arrested can be held in custody for more than
the period fixed by the judicial magistrate.
Article 23(1) – Human trafficking and ‘begar’ and other such forms of forced
labour are prohibited by virtue of this provision and any kind of violation of
this provision shall be a punishable offence under the law.
Article 23(2) – Nothing in this article shall prevent the state from imposing
compulsory service for public purposes, and in imposing such service the state
shall not make any discrimination based on the grounds of religion, race, caste
or class or any of them.
This provision states that no child below the age of fourteen years must be
employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other such
hazardous employment.
This provision states that subject to morality, health, and public order, every
religious denomination has the following rights –
The right to form and maintain institutions for religious and charitable
intents.
The right to manage its own affairs in the matter of religion.
The right to acquire immovable and movable property.
The right to administer such property according to the law.
As per this provision, no taxes shall be imposed on such proceeds which are
directly used for the promotion and/or maintenance of any particular
religion/religious denomination.
Article 29(1)
This provision states that any section of the citizens residing in India having a
distinct culture, language, or script, have the right to conserve their culture,
language and script.
Article 29(2)
This provision mentions that the state must not deny admission into
educational institutes maintained by it or those that receive aid from it to any
person based on the grounds of race, religion, caste, language, or any of them.
This right is provided to minorities to form and govern their own educational
institutions. This is why the said provision is also known as the ‘Charter of
Education Rights’.
Article 30(1)
This provision states that all religious and linguistic minorities have the right
to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.
Article 30(2)
This provision provides that the state, when granting aid to educational
institutions, shall not discriminate against any educational institution based on
the reason that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on
religion or language.
Habeas Corpus
The term ‘Habeas Corpus’ means “to have the body of”. As per this writ, the
court has the authority to call upon any person who is being detained to assess
the legality of their detention.
Certiorari
The term ‘Certiorari’ means “to be certified”. By the virtue of this writ, a higher
court reviews a case that has been tried in a lower court. It is basically
employed to seek judicial review of a decision given by a court or a government
authority.
Prohibition
The term ‘Mandamus’ means “We command”. This writ is employed by the
court to direct a public official who has failed or refused to do his duty, to
resume his work. The writ of Mandamus is also issued against a public body,
an inferior court, a corporation, a tribunal, or a government.
Quo Warranto
The term ‘Quo Warranto’ means “By what authority or warrant”. The Supreme
Court or high courts employ this writ to avoid illegal usurpation of a public
office by an individual. The writ of Quo Warranto authorises the court to
examine the legality of a person’s claim to a public office.
In this case, Golak Nath and his family claimed an excess of 500 sections of
land in Punjab. Meanwhile, the state government made an enactment
namely, Punjab Securities and Land Tenures Act, 1950 by virtue of which Golak
Nath and his family were only allowed to keep an excess of 30 sections of land
and not more than that. As a result, Golak Nath filed a writ petition under
Article 32 of the Indian Constitution questioning the legitimacy of the
enactment and further stating that his fundamental right to property was being
violated. The question before the Supreme Court was whether the Parliament
had the ability to revise the Fundamental Rights mentioned under Part III of
the Constitution of India or not. The Court ruled that Parliament does not have
the power to curtail any of the Fundamental Rights in the Constitution.
In this case, the aforementioned Golaknath case was reviewed. It was held by
the Court that the “basic structure” of the Constitution cannot be amended.
The Supreme Court through its 7:6 judgement had ruled that the Parliament
has no powers or the authority to alter the basic structure of the constitution.