Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Term 3 Marks Criteria

    Uploaded by

    Intza Elizalde Larrarte

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Term 3 Marks Criteria

    Uploaded by

    Intza Elizalde Larrarte
    6 views3 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    6 views3 pages

    Term 3 Marks Criteria

    Uploaded by

    Intza Elizalde Larrarte

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    WORLD LITERATURE: TERM 3 MARKS CRITERIA

    As I said at the beginning of the year, this subject was not static and it
    could change according to how the people in class got involved.

    We have carried out 3 different tasks, but not all of them can have the
    same percentage in the overall mark of the term. Taking into account that
    2 of the tasks have been done in teams and the last one was individual
    and the end of the year project, this is the one with a higher percentage.

    You have all had enough time in class to do your tasks.

    While task 1, the podcast, has been produced fairly OK, tasks 2, the
    transformation of the end of the Metamorphosis, has been very
    disappointing as there has been very little effort and lots of the work is
    not original(I have been able to get the same ideas, in same cases the
    same sentences, from Chat GPT).

    Task 3, the end project, I have only taken into account how you did your
    presentation.

    This is the way your marks have been calculated:

    1. Podcast: 4 marks
    2. Transformation of the Metamorphosis: 1 mark(for the reasons
    explained above)
    3. End of the year project: 5 marks
    POINTS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT for the marking in each task

    1. Edgar Allan Poe & Oscar Wilde podcast:


    Your marks were calculated on how you fulfilled the criteria.

    TEAMS: 4 members(one team of 3)

    - Presenter: some more active than others


    - Allan Poe expert: some you had the author as a guest, impossible
    as he is dead
    - Oscar Wilde expert: some you had the author as a guest, impossible
    as he is dead
    - Psychologist: some of you only made a few comments, but didn’t
    give explanations

    CONTENT:

    - The presenter will introduce the guests, guide the interview, thank
    them at the end
    - The expert will give information about their author and work
    - The plots of the stories will be summarised (you decide who is going
    to do it)
    - The psychologist will analyse the authors and the characters of the
    stories

    FORMAT:
    - The podcast must have a name and a tune
    - Active, everybody talks: lots of you just read(sometimes with
    difficulty) and there was no inter-action.
    - Informal but correct English and grammar: sometimes it was just
    copied and you could tell the reader did not understand what was
    being said

    DURATION and DUE DATE:


    - 5-10 minutes: everybody fine.
    2. The transformation of the end of the Metamorphosis:

    I initially meant to give more marks but I was quite disappointed


    when I looked at the final work. I suppose that some of your work is
    more genuine than others, but there is no guarantee. Therefore, all
    of you will get the same mark, just a pass 0,5 out of 1 mark.

    3. End of the year project:

    - Information about the author: 1 mark


    - Information about the chosen book: 1 mark
    - Reason why you chose that particular book: 1 mark
    - Information about about the fragment from the book
    - Feeling the fragment supposed for you: 2 marks
    - Connection with another art expression: 2 marks
    - Communication: 2 marks
    *We understand by communication how natural you were, if
    you only read or explained, if you looked and interacted with
    the class. Some of you used language which was too informal,
    but I did not take this into account.

    You might also like