Introduction Sustainable Tourism
Introduction Sustainable Tourism
Introduction Sustainable Tourism
Koblenzer Str. 65
53173 Bonn, Germany
+49-(0)228-359008
+49-(0)228-359096
[email protected]
www.oete.de
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Content
Resources............................................................................................................................. 12
Resources............................................................................................................................. 24
Resources............................................................................................................................. 32
Resources............................................................................................................................. 42
2
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Introduction to tourism
Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries with an annual average growth rate about 5%, and
numbers of international travel might nearly double until 2020 compared to 2006. Having
experienced a growth of 25 % between 1995 and 2005, tourism today accounts for 10 % of the
world's economic activity and is one of the main generators of employment. Tourism is also a major
source of foreign exchange earnings for many developing countries. The tourism industry ranks
about 6th in international trade after trade in fossil fuels, telecommunications and computer
equipment, automotive products, and agriculture.
In 2007, a total of 903 million arrivals made up for US$ 856 billion of international tourism receipts.
Adding the US$ 165 billion receipts from international passenger transports (2007), tourism and
travel services account for receipts of almost US$ 3 billion per day.
In the tourism business, natural resources are intensively used and consumed, and tourism has
major impacts on environment, ecosystems, economy, societies and culture. If it is managed well,
tourism can contribute significantly to regional development, if not, it can have devastating effects
on nature and society.
Tourism is in comparison with other industries dependent on national, regional and local resources
(e.g. destinations, attractions, etc.) of a country. It is an industry which is bound to territory. Other
industries generally depend on natural resources and/or services. Furthermore tourism depends on
traditions, culture, etc. These features are incorporated into tourism businesses becoming part of
the tourism industry. This in turn creates a cross-sectoral, dynamic approach to tourism with a
corresponding management schema.
Tourism is a service industry which means that it depends strongly on human resources at all levels
(regional, national, international) and from many different service sectors, e.g. accommodation,
gastronomy, travel agencies, travel writers & publishers etc. Each of these sectors is really an
industry of its own. Human resources include all the people who work in the tourism industry at all
levels, from the cleaners who tidy the hotel rooms to the individuals who manage tourism resorts.
This dependence on human resources means that the quality of tourism fluctuates constantly. The
people employed in the tourism industry are often those employed for a shorter amount of time
than those in other industries. Skills learnt involving tourism often do not stay in one place for very
long because of this high roll over rate. Combining these resources to produce well managed
tourism that works well is often difficult. This also leads to the fluctuation in quality mentioned
above.
Tourism also undergoes continuously high fluctuations in terms of its products. This is also a big
difference in comparison with other industries. The tourism product market changes constantly
trying to keep up with tourism trends. Each year new more specialised products are introduced to
the market. Different products become in and other products out. Each year many tourism
companies fail to keep up with this change and go out of business.
3
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Behavioral
• Increased awareness for the environment
• Increased travel experience
• Higher consciousness of quality and value for money
• More selected choice of destination
• Tourists have become more physically and intellectually active
• Tourists look for new destinations and new tourism products.
• Tourists want to visit places, which are environmentally friendly and socially just.
• Older people and handicapped people are travelling more
• Increase in use of technology - internet (especially within the tourism sector)
• More tourism destinations are adopting the planned and managed approach to developing
tourism and wish to develop good quality sustainable tourism.
• More frequent but shorter holidays taken throughout the year.
In activities
• More and more tourists wish to participate in recreation, sports and adventure and to learn
about culture history and the natural areas of the places visited
• Forms of adventure tourism are expanding rapidly as are other specialised forms of
tourism including cultural, nature, ‘roots’(tourism visiting their ancestral home areas),
health and religious tourism.
• Culture and ecotourism are being increasingly developed as a way to protect the natural
beauty and cultural heritage of an area.
• Increase in health and spar tourism.
4
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Impacts of tourism
Tourism can be a lucrative source of revenue for a destination, but it can also have major negative
impacts on it. These impacts are not only physical, but also cultural. The impacts vary according to
the number and the nature of tourists as well as the characteristics of the site at which tourism
activities take place. These negative impacts can only be managed effectively if they have been
identified, measured and evaluated.
5
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
6
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Natural heritage
Natural heritage consists not only of flora and fauna, but also of every other part of the natural
environment, e.g. the inorganic nature such as rocks, geologic formations, rivers, lakes, mountains
as well as the relation between these natural components as ecosystems. The main components of
the natural heritage are vegetation and wildlife, geology, hydrology and natural phenomena. Also
‘events’, such as climate, volcanic or astrological incidents, the course of the year, evolution and the
changes in the ecosystems are part of natural heritage. Besides their importance as tourism
attractions each component of the natural heritage may be the topic for educational and scientific
interest.
Cultural heritage
Cultural heritage comprises all existing cultural phenomena from material goods to immaterial
goods. This includes immobile historical monuments (historical buildings, gardens, parks, industrial
facilities, traffic related monuments etc.), movable historical monuments (paintings and sculptures,
religious artwork, historical handicrafts, crafts equipment, agricultural and industrial tools and
machines; historical documents and objects), verbal and customs culture such as festivals, rites,
costumes, legends, behavior and habits, music, dances and culinary culture. As the name already
implies, cultural heritage is based on the past and it forms a part of tradition. However,
contemporary culture like music, theatre; literature or fine arts and the like belong to cultural
heritage as well.
Landscape
Landscape describes a region’s shape and characteristics. It is primarily a part of the natural
heritage as it is largely formed by geological, hydrological and botanical features, but it is also
7
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
strongly influenced by mankind and the society’s economic activities. The landscape is essentially
contributing to the visitor's impressions of and feelings about a region. Landscape is usually not
seen as a specific subject of interest - normally single features such as rock formations, geological
phenomena or vegetation, e.g. forests or meadows are what attract the visitor. It is, however,
experiencing these features in the context of the whole landscape of the area that makes visiting
them special. Many tourist activities are based on the experience of landscape, like all kind of
nature tourism, and nature oriented physical activities as hiking, biking, swimming, etc.
Protection of heritage
The natural and cultural heritage is often vulnerable to the impacts of modern development,
consumer lifestyles and globalization. In addition, the use of heritage in tourism, in particular in
excessive or poorly managed forms of tourism, as well as the development of infrastructure related
to tourism may directly threaten the integrity of the heritage. The ecological setting, culture or
lifestyles of a community may also be degraded because of the visitor’s influence on the place. The
lack of environmental awareness from part of both, local people and visitors, their cultural
insensitivity, an improper management and/or insufficient legal framework and law enforcement
can lead to the deterioration of physical and immaterial natural and cultural goods. Therefore, to
provide the basis for tourism development not only in the present, but also for future generations,
natural and cultural heritage must be protected. Considering protection and making use of tourism
development as a means of conservation is a basic principle of sustainable tourism development.
8
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Conference on Responsible Tourism in Destinations, Side event preceding the World Summit
on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg in 2002)
• Québec Declaration on Ecotourism, May 2002 (The World Ecotourism Summit)
• Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD), Seventh Session 1999:
- The Global Importance of Tourism
- Workers and Trade Unions in the Web of Tourism
- Sustainable Tourism: A Local Authority Perspective
- Sustainable Tourism: An NGO Perspective
• Global Codes of Ethics for Tourism, 1999 (UNWTO)
• WSSD - Johannesburg Plan of Implementation: Sustainable Tourism, 1992 (World Summit on
Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro)
• Berlin Declaration: Biological Diversity and Sustainable Tourism, 1997 (International
Conference on Biodiversity and Tourism)
• Charter for Sustainable Tourism, 1995 (World Conference on Sustainable
Tourism, Lanzarote)
A common definition of sustainable tourism is the one of the World Tourism Organization (UNWTO):
"Sustainable tourism development meets the needs of present tourists and host regions while
protecting and enhancing opportunity for the future. It is envisaged as leading to management of
all resources in such a way that economic, social, and aesthetic needs can be fulfilled while
maintaining cultural integrity, essential ecological processes, biological diversity, and life support
system." [WTO 1998: 19]
In other words, sustainable tourism development is ecologically sustainable, economically viable as
well as ethically and socially equitable. It respects the fragile environmental balance that
characterizes many tourism destinations, particularly in environmentally sensitive areas; and it is
based on a long term perspective. The different declarations of principles for sustainable tourism
(see examples in the box above) can be summarized as following.
Sustainable tourism is characterized by:
Ü Enhancing the well-being of communities
Sustainable tourism development supports and ensures the economic, social and cultural well
being of the communities in which tourism takes place.
Ü Supporting the protection of the natural and cultural environment
Sustainable tourism allows the use of natural and cultural resources for gaining economic profit
while at the same time guaranteeing that these resources are not deteriorated or destroyed.
Additionally, tourism is expected to be a driving force with regard to the establishment or the
enhancement of nature protection and the maintenance of cultural values.
Ü Recognizing product quality and tourist satisfaction
The quality of tourism products offered by a region is a key factor for the economic success of
tourism. It is not only characterized by material criteria like the quality of transport,
9
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
accommodation and food, but also by non-material criteria like hospitality or the quality of
experiences.
Ü Applying adaptive management and monitoring
To ensure that tourism is developed in a way which is ecological, economic and socially
sustainable, adequate management and monitoring must be established, following the basic
principles of sustainable use of resources.
It is important to note that different stakeholders involved in the tourism business are responsible
for the implementation of different parts of the principles. Governments, tourism businesses, local
communities, NGOs and the tourists can all contribute to make tourism more sustainable. In order
to achieve the goals of sustainable tourism, the different actors should cooperate and stimulate
each other to put the principles into practice.
10
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
politics in the region and should be completed through a participatory process, which
should primarily include the local population.
• The Quebec Declaration, within the framework of the International Year of Ecotourism
2002, was implemented by the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD), as a
contribution to bring the different views of NGOs and the tourism industry into line in
accordance with sustainable tourism.
• The Commission for Sustainable Development adopted Decision 7/3 on tourism and
sustainable development at its 7th session in New York in 1999. This decision includes the
adoption of an international work programme on sustainable tourism development and an
invitation to the CBD to “further consider, in the context of the process of the exchange of
experience, existing knowledge and best practice on sustainable tourism development with
a view to contributing to international guidelines for activities related to sustainable
tourism development…”.
11
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Resources
Suggested reading
• CBD (Secretary of the Convention on Biological Diversity)(Ed.)(2007): User's Manual on the CBD Guidelines on
Biodiversity and Tourism Development. - http://www.cbd.int/doc/programmes/tourism/tourism-manual-
en.pdf
• Ecological Tourism in Europe/UNESCO-BRESCE (2009): Criteria for Sustainable Tourism. - Published with the
support of UNEP-GEF, UNESCO-BRESCE and MAB.
• CBD (Secretary of the Convention on Biological Diversity)(Ed.)(2004): Guidelines on biodiversity and tourism
development. - Montreal. - http://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/tou-gdl-en.pdf
• UNEP (Ed.)(2005): Forging links between protected areas and the tourism sector: How tourism can benefit
conservation.
Further reading
• Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC)/ Pacific Asia Travel Association (PATA)(2001): Environmental Code
for Sustainable Tourism. - http://www.asianlii.org/apec/other/agrmt/aecfst483/
• Christ, Costas/Hillel, Oliver/Matus, Seleni/Sweeting, Jamie (2003): Tourism and Biodiversity. Mapping
Tourism's Global Footprint. - Conservation International. - Washington D.C. -
http://www.unep.org/PDF/Tourism-and-biodiversity.pdf
• Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD)(1999): Tourism and Sustainable Development. The Global
Importance of Tourism. - Prepared by the World Travel and Tourism Organization and International Hotel and
Restaurant Association. - Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Commission on Sustainable
Development, Seventh Session, 19-30 April 1999, New York. - http://www.gdrc.org/uem/eco-tour/wttc.pdf
• Ecological Tourism in Europe/UNESCO-BRESCE (2009): Sustainable Tourism Training the Trainers Programme.
- Published with the support of UNEP-GEF, UNESCO-BRESCE and MAB.
• NWHO (Ed.)(1999): Sustainable Tourism and cultural heritage. A Review of Development Assistance and Its
Potential to Promote Sustainability. - http://www.nwhf.no/files/File/culture_fulltext.pdf
• UNEP (2008): Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation in the Tourism Sector: Frameworks, Tools and
Practices. - http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1047xPA-ClimateChange.pdf
• UNEP/CI/TOI (2007): Tourism and Mountains. A Practical Guide to Managing the Environmental and Social
Impacts of Mountain Tours. - http://www.uneptie.org/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx0957xPA-
MountainsEN.pdf
12
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
13
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
14
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Stakeholder Involvement
Resource management and sustainable development planning are commonly defined as a societal
choice - as stated in principle 1 of the ecosystem approach of the Convention on Biological
Diversity.
Traditionally, planning was done exclusively by experts and state authorities, while the people
affected by the planned development were only, if at all, consulted towards the end of the planning
process. The local population therefore had hardly any influence on the development planning and
usually could not contribute to the decision-making process at all. Modern approaches of planning
recognize that the participation of the local population in management planning, and thus at a very
early stage of the process, is crucial for the success of the future implementation of plans. The
involvement of stakeholders, that is the members of the local society, is crucial for the
implementation of the plan, because it is them who will have to obey the rules set in the plan.
Further they may have to undertake certain activities developed in the plan and they are the ones
that may allocate resources necessary to achieve the plan's goals. The success of the plan's
implementation depends therefore on how committed the people are towards achieving its goals. If
people participate from the beginning of the planning process and can really influence its goals and
objectives, they are much more likely to identify themselves with the plan and feel responsible for
its implementation.
For sustainable tourism development, the involvement of local stakeholders and the notification
targeting the local population is an indispensable element of the planning process. The CBD
Guidelines on Biodiversity and Tourism stress the importance of local participation and thus
encourage governments and developers to provide participation opportunities and to communicate
project-related information in an adequate way to everyone who might be affected by the individual
project.
Stakeholders in sustainable tourism management planning are all the individuals who are interested
in and/or affected by tourism development and biodiversity conservation. They should participate in
the planning process from the early stage. Sustainable tourism development emphasizes in
particular the importance of considering and respecting the wishes and needs of the local
population of the tourism destination. Tourism development is usually not a primary subject of
public administration, and therefore can only be managed effectively if all the stakeholders
participate in the decision-making process.
The tourism sector includes a great variety of products and services and influences the local
economy as well as the culture and living-conditions of the tourism destination. This means that
there is a wide range of people involved in tourism, such as local tourism service providers,
retailers, hoteliers, etc. Furthermore, the whole local population is affected by tourism
development.
Stakeholders in tourism management planning:
• Neighbors and residents (local communities)
• Farmers, foresters, hunters and fishermen
• Tourism providers such as hoteliers, restaurant owners, tourist guides, etc.
• Tours operators and tourism agencies
15
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
To start with the communication and involvement process, measures should be carefully planned
and agreed upon by the experts working in the body responsible for the planning process.
Commonly, measures are developed in the scope of a communication and involvement plan (CIP).
To make it easier to select the appropriate tools for the different stages of involvement and the
different objectives within the communication process, the tools are classified into four categories
regarding the direction of the communication and the purpose of the tool:
16
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Of course, some of the tools and techniques are related to more than one of these categories. The
classification should only point out the main focus of the respective tools.
•
- E-Forums
Media relations INVOLVEMENT TOOLS
•
- Relationship with Local Media
Planning events
- Press Releases
- Public forum
- Media Events
- Public meetings
- Newspaper Ads
- Planning days / Planning weekend
•
- Newspaper Supplements
- Activity week
Public Information Display and on-site Information
•
- Workshops
- Information Repositories
•
Project Centre
- Infield Notification and information
Incentives
- Visitor Information Centre
- Award Scheme
•
- Guided Tours
•
- Competition
Meetings, Events and Personal Contacts
Look & Decide Tools
- Public Meetings
- Interactive Displays
- Public Availability Sessions
- Choice catalogue
- Local Events
- Design Games
- Mapping & Models
INTPUT TOOLS
Participatory editing
•
-
•
Written and web-based forms - Prioritizing
- Email Group activities
- FAQ programme - Community profiling
- Public comment period - Photo surveys
- Public input - Reconnaissance trips
- Surveys - Simulation
Assistance teams
•
- Polls -
Meetings and Personal Contacts - Task force
- Public meetings - Focus groups
- Field trips - Design workshop
•
- Individual consultations - Community Groups
Technical Assistance
- Funds and Trusts
- Grant schemes
17
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
SWOT Analysis
To assess the area’s potentials for sustainable tourism development and to consider the negative
impacts of tourism on the natural and cultural environment, the compilation of baseline information
should include a SWOT analysis. It examines the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats
of tourism development and the conservation of biodiversity in the area.
The following box shows questions to be considered in the SWOT analysis.
SW OT An a lysis
̇ St r e n gt h s
Ü Where are lacks of m anagem ent and good policies for conservat ion?
Ü Which are t he const raint s of t ourism developm ent in t he region?
̇ Oppor t u n it ie s
Ü What are t he opport unit ies for environm ent al conservat ion?
Ü What are t he opport unit ies for sust ainable t ourism developm ent ?
Ü What are t he current and possible posit ive im pact s of t ourism
developm ent and t ourism act ivit ies?
̇ Th r e a t s
Ü What are t he current and pot ent ial negat ive im pact s of t ourism
18
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
developm ent and t ourism act ivit ies on t he nat ural and cult ural
environm ent ?
Ü What are t he t hreat s t o conservat ion of biodiversit y caused by t ourism ?
19
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
also be used to evaluate the impacts of existing tourism infrastructure and activities. The impact
assessment should be conducted according to the national goals and the goals of the PA related to
tourism and biodiversity. Stakeholders and the general public should be consulted during the
impact assessment process to consider the interests and needs of the people living in the area who
might be affected by tourism activities.
Management of impacts
In the process of developing a sustainable tourism product one should always pay regard to the
vulnerability of natural and cultural resources to human pressures, i.e. the effect the future tourism
will have on the broad environment. Tourism in protected areas, based on natural and cultural
heritage, can by its very nature be even more disturbing than other forms of tourism. Therefore it is
obvious that the number of visitors and the tourism-related uses in a protected area theoretically
should be limited. However, determining concrete numbers that define these limits is difficult. If the
number of visiting guests is too low, the economic return may be as well, so that afforded
investments can’t be taken. If the number is too high, however, implementing tourism will end up in
destroying those sights and values the tourists are attracted to. That is why it is particularly
important to assess vulnerability at the very beginning so that the tourism can be developed in a
sustainable manner.
Very important questions in this context are: How much people do the locals want them to visit per
year, when do they feel disturbed in their private sphere? How much guests are manageable in
terms of infrastructure, for example the public traffic, the waste disposal, or - depending on the
region - also for the drinking water disposal? Regarding a protected area it is obvious that it has to
be controlled how many tourists are allowed to enter the place without disturbing or destroying the
life of flora and fauna – without extravagating the carrying capacity. In addition to the identification
of the Carrying Capacity, a broad variety of useful methods, including Limits of Acceptable Change
(LAC), Visitor Experience Resource Protection (VERP), Visitor Impact Management (VIM) and Tourism
Optimization Management Model (TOMM) can be of help when aiming at a balanced tourism
development that benefits both, people and nature in and adjacent to protected areas.
20
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
and influential factors is conducted to help identifying and selecting effective management
responses. Another important factor in at this stage of monitoring is again the involvement of local
stakeholders and communities. As stakeholders live and work in the region, their insights are
particularly valuable for the monitoring process.
21
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
management needs exact data on the level of use (of respective resources), the status of the
habitats and the man-made impacts of visitor presence.
Visitor management deals with the assessment of direct negative, human-induced, impacts of the
visitors’ presence (and related activities) on habitats, species and natural resources (e.g. related
erosion). Based on the result of the assessment, visitor management further determines measures
to keep the identified impacts at a minimum level or to generally avoid them in the future. Measures
that belong to visitor management are for example the design of trail networks, the hardening of
surfaces, the prohibition of fireplaces and campgrounds of the measures for visitor education for
proper behavior within the protected area.
It is important to understand that visitor management is specifically targeted towards the visitor
itself and those impacts caused by humans. In order to fulfill this purpose, visitor management
includes technical management decisions (e.g. where to build a new trail) as well as value
judgments (e.g. decisions to limit use).
Trails
To provide trails for hikers, cyclists, horse-riders, skiers, climbers and other types of visitors is a
key issue of protected area management. Trails and the whole network of trails in a protected area
need to be carefully planned and monitored in order to achieve two goals:
a) To keep the negative impacts of the trails and the visitors' activities on and along these trails
to a minimum (acceptable) level.
b) To provide the visitors with an adequate infrastructure (the trails and related facilities) that
allow for a meaningful nature experience according to the expectations of the different
visitor groups mentioned above.
In general, a protected area will provide two types of trails: normal trails that basically enable
visitors to get around/to get to places of interest, and interpretative trails. The latter are an
important opportunity to communicate with the visitor and, to a certain extend, to influence his
experience and behavior. Interpretative trails have many different purposes including information,
education, recreation, safety and conservation of natural and cultural resources. Modern
interpretative trails do not only provide information, but follow the concept of actively involving the
observer in an interactive process of learning about and experiencing nature. Interpretative trails
are characterized by their structured sequence of interpretative features. Modern interpretative
trails in protected areas aim to inform the user about the ecosystem(s) the trail is located in. They
are a means to communicate natural and cultural values and to raise the visitors’ awareness for
environmental conservation issues.
Campgrounds
Campground owners can contribute decisively to the environmental performance of the
campground by obtaining some basic rules. However, aiming at a really sustainable camping site, it
22
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
is also necessary to establish rules of behavior and to communicate them to the visitors, the staff of
the campground and the local people in the vicinity.
Some basic demands campgrounds (not only) in protected areas should meet:
• Reduce and recycle waste (solid waste and sewage)
• Efficient use of water and energy
• Nature-oriented design of the campground, using local materials for construction
• Use of traditional coloring and local raw material (felt, wood) in yurta camp construction
• Processing and selling of local food and beverages
• Avoidance of negative impacts due to transport (e.g. offer local transport; shuttle services
for guest coming by trains)
• Use of environmentally-friendly detergents
• Cooperate with the protected area management for informing tourists about adequate
recreation opportunities and proper behavior in the area
23
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Resources
Suggested reading
• Ecological Tourism in Europe/UNESCO-BRESCE (2007): Sustainable Tourism Management Planning in
Biosphere Reserves – A Methodology Guide. -
http://www.tourism4nature.org/results/backdocs/Sustainable%20Tourism%20Management%20Planning.pdf
• Kohl, Jon (2007): Park Planning for Life. Manual for Public Use Managers.
• Pedersen, Arthur (2002): Managing Tourism at World Heritage Sites: A Practical Manual for World Heritage
Site Managers. - World Heritage manuals. UNESCO World Heritage Centre (Ed.). - Paris. -
http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-113-2.pdf
Further reading
• Eagles, P./McCool, S./Haynes, C. (2002): Sustainable Tourism in Protected areas. Guidelines for Management
and Planning.-IUCN- Gland, Cambridge. - http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/pag_008.pdf
• Ecological Tourism in Europe/UNESCO-BRESCE (2009): The trail planning guide. An insight into the process of
planning interpretative trails.
• Gutierrez, Eileen et al. (2005): Linking Communities, Tourism and Conservation – A Tourism Assessment
Process. - Conservation International and The George Washington University (Ed.) -
http://web.conservation.org/xp/CIWEB/downloads/TAPManual.pdf
• World Tourism Organization (UNWTO)(2004): Indicators of sustainable development for tourism destinations.
A guidebook. - Madrid.
• A Proposed Framework for the Development of Joint Cooperation On Nature Conservation and Sustainable
Tourism At World Heritage Natural sites Between The tourism industry and the UNESCO, World Heritage
Centre. - http://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-113-1.pdf
Note: Where there is no download link provided, publications are available for download
from the UNESCO-BRESCE website. All publications with download links are listed there.
24
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
2. Journey Transport from home Car, bus, train, ship, plane, bicycle, Transport companies, car and bike
to a tourist on foot. rentals, traffic infrastructure
destination operators (train stations, airports,
etc.)
25
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Shopping and local Purchase of souvenirs and local Craftsmen, producers and sellers
service products. Purchase of other of souvenirs and local products.
necessities (photo-video, Shops in the locality.
magazines, etc.). Bank and exchange service
Banks, money exchange, car providers, car repair owners, health
repairs, health care and the like. care facilities, and the like.
Transportation services. Transportation companies, taxi, car
and bike rentals.
4. Journey back Transport from Car, bus, train, ship, plane, bicycle, Transport companies, car and bike
home tourist destination on foot. rentals, traffic infrastructure
home. operators (train stations, airports,
etc.)
26
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
27
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
28
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Capacity building
The use of incentives should not be administered without a broader approach that provides for an
enabling framework. Incentives have to be prepared and accompanied by awareness raising and
educational activities in order to obtain the private tourism businesses’ interest and enable them to
participate in a meaningful way. Especially when addressing small and medium local tourism
providers, their capacities of understanding the systems, estimating the cost and benefits and
taking the necessary steps to chance their operations should be carefully evaluated and technical
assistance and capacity building should be provided wherever needed. While this will increase the
costs of establishing the incentive instrument it will surely pay off regarding the success and rate of
participation of businesses.
29
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Different incentives
Contests and awards
Contest and awards are a relatively easy way to stimulate sustainability in tourism. The concept of
an award is that an independent institution gives a prize to a tourism business or a specific tourism
product (e.g. a holiday package) that is selected because of its outstanding sustainability
performance. A contest invites tourism businesses to enter a competition on the best sustainability
performance. As many awards do not select the awarded businesses from the whole range of
tourism enterprises but issue a call for applications and then select among the applicants, contest
and awards are quite similar.
30
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
• The scheme includes the assessment and auditing of the certified companies and a
verification system guaranteeing that standards are met.
• The scheme administers periodic follow up audits to renew the certification; and it fosters
continual improvement;
• Certification requires the transparency of criteria and evaluation;
• The scheme is based on a participatory approach involving tourism stakeholders to define
the standards and the design of the scheme.
• In many cases, a fee structure is set up to provide basic funding of the operation of the
system.
Grants
Grant schemes used to foster sustainable tourism development are a form of direct investment
assistance that is tied to conditions related to sustainability aspects of tourism providers. A funding
body, e.g. the national government, a local authority, an international donor organization, an NGOs,
a business association or a consortium of institutions, provides a program giving grants in form of
a donation, a loan (possibly interest-free) or other financial support to businesses that invest in the
improvement of their sustainability performance. These can be the installation of new technical
equipment, e.g. solar panels, but also measures that improve the management, built capacities or
enhance the range of sustainable products and services offered to the customers.
Promotional activities
Marketing and promotion are crucial for the success of any business. While this is well understood
for the tourism industry as a whole, sustainable tourism projects tend to neglect the importance of
marketing or allocate insufficient funds for it. The idea that a sustainable tourism product or
ecotourism product should sell itself just because it has an outstanding environmental performance
is very common but wrong. Just like any other product it needs a business plan, a marketing
strategy and promotion to be successful at the market.
For small local tourism providers it is often difficult to engage in marketing due to the lack of
awareness, expertise, funds and access to distribution channels. Therefore, one important support
that may be offered to such enterprises is to develop a program of marketing and promotion that is
executed either free of charge or at a low price that is affordable for small local businesses.
31
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Resources
Suggested reading
• UNEP/TOI (Eds.) (2005): Integrating Sustainability into Business. A management guide for responsible tour
operators. - http://www.toinitiative.org/fileadmin/docs/publications/Sustainability_in_Business_-
_Management.pdf
Further reading
• Center for Ecotourism and Sustainable Development (CESD)(Ed.): A Simple User’s Guide to Certification for
Sustainable Tourism and Ecotourism. - http://www.rainforest-
alliance.org/tourism/documents/users_guide.pdf
• Center for Ecotourism and Sustainable Development (CESD)(Ed.): Practical Steps for Marketing Tourism
Certification. - http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/tourism/documents/practical_steps.pdf
• European Commission. Directorate-General for Enterprise. Tourism Unit (Ed.)(2002): Using Natural and
Cultural Heritage to develop sustainable tourism in non-traditional tourist destinations. - Brussels.
• The International Ecotourism Society (Ed.) (2005): Marketing Strategy for Sustainable Tourism Certification. -
http://www.responsibletravel.org/resources/documents/reports/Ecotourism_Handbook_III.pdf
• Tour Operators Initiative: A Practical Guide to Good Practice: Managing Environmental and Social Issues in the
Accommodations Sector. - In cooperation with the Center for Environmental Leadership in Business,
Conservation International and the Ford Motor Company. -
http://www.toinitiative.org/fileadmin/docs/publications/HotelGuideEnglish.pdf
• Tour Operators Initiative: Center for Environmental Leadership in Business /Coral Reef Alliance: A Practical
Guide to Good Practice: Managing Environmental Impacts in the Marine Recreation Sector. - In cooperation
with the Center for Environmental Leadership in Business and the Coral Reef Alliance. -
http://www.toinitiative.org/fileadmin/docs/publications/MarineRecreationGuide.pdf
• Tour Operators Initiative: Supply Chain Engagement for Tour Operators. Three Steps towards Sustainability. -
In cooperation with the Center for Environmental Leadership in Business, Conservation International and the
Ford Company. - http://www.toinitiative.org/fileadmin/docs/publications/SupplyChainEngagement.pdf
• UNEP (2001): Sowing the Seeds of Change: An Environmental Teaching Pack for the Hospitality Industry.
• WWF (Ed.) (2000): Tourism Certification. An analysis of Green Globe 21 and other tourism certification
programs. - http://www.wwf.org.uk/filelibrary/pdf/tcr.pdf
32
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
1) Territorial Diagnostic of the Tara River Basin Biosphere Reserve and the Durmitor World Heritage
Site in Montenegro; UNESCO-BRESCE, 2008.
By: Davide Poletto
Survey conducted with a mixture of residents and tourists, most people surveyed were residents. Note: most
residents in the surrounding municipalities do not live within park boundaries, and rarely visit the park itself.
•
Survey results show the top three symbols of the territory as:
•
Tara Canyon
•
Tara River
Landscapes
•
Questions posed regarding opinions and orientations towards local development show:
•
major confidence in tourism (especially in private hospitality and translation)
•
agriculture
hydroelectric damn rated least favorable, at bottom of the survey, demonstrating a general
link between concept of environment and nature protection as a positive in the Durmitor
area
•
Interviewees point to:
•
a desire for more participation in the decision-making process
•
confidence in municipalities as the best conduit for improvements in Durmitor
very little local trust shown in inter-governmental organizations and non governmental
organizations as catalysts for change
Poletto recommends partnering and avoiding top-down decisions, instead suggests using the park entity itself
and municipalities as the building blocks for international cooperation
Operational recommendations: better planning for both internal and external borders,
capacity building with rural mountain communities needed, supply assistance to the park authority (who is at
the same time accused of incapacity and exploitation)
•
Major problems in Durmitor’s management and public use plan:
•
floral and faunal assessment lacking, thus it is impossible to track changes
•
major waste management issues
•
a complete lack of urban planning (especially Zabljak)
•
no management body
management plan not published in English (only Serbian documents exist)
2) A Sustainable Tourism Destination Management Approach for Durmitor National Park and
Surrounding Local Communities
George Washington University
Donald E Hawkins
•
Positive Factors:
fastest growing tourism market in the world
33
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
•
•
10.2 % annual growth
•
proximity to Eastern and Western Europe
•
historic tourism strength
•
inter-regional travel on the rise, following cease of conflict
growth of foreign tourists- primarily from Scandinavia, Germany, France and Spain
•
Negative Factors:
•
weak roads and airport infrastructure
•
language abilities and tourism skills lacking
general trend of de-population, aging population
*Katun (Kolibe)
Seasonal settlements for shepherds in the mountains, normally used during the summer. There is a
possibility for renovation of Katuns and creation of a Katun network for tourists in Durmitor. A
network of this kind would require a corporate sponsor in order reconstruct the houses and organize
the Katun network.
*Eco lodges
Environmentally responsible accommodation units that would also provide translation and
interpretation functions, using a community-based model. Plans for an outside investor to build the
eco-lodges and make them operational with an ultimate goal of transferring management of the eco-
lodges to local residents.
* Eco-villages
Using a FTIZ (free tourism investment zone) retro fit an existing village, such as the old wooden
village of Zabljak is a promising possibility which would serve to offset the modern urban
development of Zabljak.
3) Report of the International Mission to Durmitor National Park and Tara River Basin, Serbian and
Montenegro, and to Bosnia and Herzegovina
January 2005
Background information:
The mission was sent mainly in response to the proposed damn Buk Bjela, to analyze the
prospective impacts of the damn. Buk Bjela was ultimately not built, in accordance with the recommendations
given by the International Mission. Buk Bjela was a proposed hydro –electric damn that would split electric
output: 25%/75% between Serbia and Montenegro respectively. Tara River marks the border between
Montenegro and Bosnia/Herzegovina beyond the national park borders, an extension of the parks boundaries
was recommended by the commission. A serial World Heritage Site was recommended with and extension
into Bosnia-Herzegovina. Creating a serial site which would require the international cooperation of the two
countries. Tara River Basin is part of Danube Watershed via its tributary system, thus technically the Danube
Convention applies, as does the international Sava River Basin Commission regulations.
•
The mission recommends possible future partner ships with:
•
IUCN office Belgrade
•
UNESCO National Commission for Serbia and Montenegro
Man and the Biosphere Committee
•
Major problems sited by the mission:
•
illegal construction activities
•
poor legal enforcement
•
logging (main source of income, aside from tourism for park managers)
•
illegal construction in environs of landscape, especially ski facilities
•
dangerous mine tailings which will require 7.5 million EU to clean and contain:
no report has been filed on current state of clean-up process.
34
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
•
Negative trends:
•
depopulation
•
local job placement offers on decline
•
weak infrastructure and facilities
social services for local population lacking, or viewed as poor or insufficient
•
Positive Trends:
Durmitor national park could be used as a complementary territory aimed to then offset coastal
•
development
•
A growing demand for local products is exhibited by tourists
Montenegro's government’s written claim that Montenegro is an ecological state can be used to gain
support for projects at Durmitor.
Declaration of Ecological State of Montenegro cited as important first step. Signs of successful mountain
tourism are marked by strong linkages between local communities and national parks, with good
programmes for interpretation and training of local inhabitants of rural mountain communities. Today the
mountains of Montenegro are marked by the unique selling point of its unspoilt nature in Europe, but are
conversely marked by poor standards of accommodation, lack of interpretation skills, risks of de-population,
difficult access and its uncompetitive status by European standards. For Durmitor, the author recommends
developing and improving these gaps through meetings and smaller scale conferences. Additionally,
Bennet recommends an increase in local events, sports, recreation, cultural and historical tourism, wellness,
and health focused activities.
•
Montenegro’s potential in the European ski market:
•
serious ski tourism in Montenegro would depend on chartered flights
skiing needs to be cheap in order to compete with other East European ski slopes
•
(Romania, Bulgaria)
also needs to be high-quality in order to compete with higher-end European markets
•
(France, Italy)
•
substantial investments would be required to build an internationally competitive ski resort
a new ski resort would produce relatively low revenues per room, thus low revenues per
job, and the surrounding area would only see low income levels (even taking into account
•
multiplier effect)
•
the resort would run at an operational loss for years
substantial environmental impacts of ski construction need an environmental impact
•
assessment before any new construction commences
Bennet proposes more modest development, focusing on local and regional markets that
would incur lower environmental and financial risks
•
Montenegro’s plan for sustainable mountain tourism:
•
build tourism steadily from the current small base
•
improvements in accommodation
exploration of small scale enterprises where visitors can meet local residents and engage
•
in cultural tourism activities
accommodation improvements and infrastructure linked with a certification scheme,
•
accommodation brand, and a central booking system for local hotels
additional support for the development of visitor activities such as: river rafting, waking,
trekking, interpretation, work as guides
5) United Nations Development Progamme: Opportunities and barriers for the private sector in the
development of sustainable tourism in Montenegro
35
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
•
Opportunities and Challenges (general description of the state of tourism)
•
reflective of Yugoslavian past- now in a re-discovery stage
•
emphasis on domestic markets of Serbia and Montenegro
•
peak of 11 million tourists in 1989, compared to 703,000 tourist in 2004
•
all but 5% of tourism is concentrated on the sea coast
room for expansion of market base of large coastal tour operators to include and partner with
•
mountain groups
•
marketing through foreign operators
marketing directly to consumers.
Zabljak:
The resort hub of Durmitor, population 5,000, has nice wooden housing, and three small inbound tour
operators mainly bring in day trippers form the coast. Of the three mountain municipalities Zabljak attracts
the greatest visitor numbers; this only represents 2% of national total for Montenegro. Zabljak has only one
bank, which is consistently sited as an obstacle to investment and loans (interest rate 27%)
•
The major gap in Zabljak:
•
customer service
•
physical improvements
•
acceptance and use of credit cards, debit cards
•
creation of web sites
linked services and events
Strategic Framework Goal: Durmitor nature based tourism that benefits local people, creating poverty
alleviation and a center for the involvement of locals in future development through consensus and co-
operation. Zabljak also has great potential to benefit from a twinning relationship with region or town
abroad.
Pluzine:
Lies on the shore of an artificial lake; there is one hotel, which is described in the UNDP report as
essentially an antiquated communist toss back. Additional accommodation in private homes and self
catering chalets exist, but the quality in unknown. The main hotel, Hotel Durmitor, which is currently closed,
lies in close proximity to the artificial lake, next to National Park headquarters. There is potential
development for the hotel to become an eco-lodge and the National Park headquarters to serve in tandem
with the eco-lodge as a future conservation project, a training center-or a field study center (research
programmes, outreach training, education, and publication services) Opportunities and challenges in Pluzine
include the lack of physical development guidelines and an assured mechanism for enforcement of
guidelines. The municipality needs to improve market knowledge and marketing of individual enterprises
within a regional framework.
•
General challenges to private investment in Montenegro:
uncertainty (low property costs, low potential earnings)
36
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
•
•
poor access (roads, air)
•
bad corruption rating, which in turn effects opinions abroad
•
financing: high capital costs for accommodation, with a long payback period
worries about instability, such as political or economic difficulties which would threaten investments,
•
i.e. hotels, tied to fixed location
weak asset base of tour operators and travel companies
Solutions:
Tax incentives for mountain development: could include discounted building plots, tax credits, tax
exemptions, tax-free capital investment reserves, for the purchase and installation of utilities.
•
Suggestions specific to Northern Montenegro:
•
determination of potential markets
•
product development
•
physical planning guidelines and physical development control
creation of a roadmap for potential investors
•
distribution of rescores, production.
•
53% of the total Montenegrin territory
•
31.45% of population
•
Least developed region of Montenegro
poverty rate -19.3%
o Durmitor, and the municipalities of Zabljak, Savnik, and Pluzine
o Comprise 1, 852 km2, 13.4 % of the total national territory
o 1.84% of Montenegrin population
Strategy for Northern region: The northern region should operate as a functionally planned zone,
containing Durmitor and the three surrounding municipalities of Zabljak, Savnik, and Pluzine.
Currently the GDP in the region revolves around trade, tourism, transmission and production of
electricity and agriculture.
Traffic and infrastructure are the major limiting factors, with weak communication between towns,
villages, and rural mountain communities. Another major difficulty is population retention.
Phase 1. agriculture sector projects, private construction of collection centre for the distribution of health
foods in Zabljak, agro-tourism
37
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Phase 2. concentrate on agricultural goals in primary tourism zone of Zabljak: construct 92 farms,
reconstruct and revitalize existing farms, construct a hotel, sports hall, apartments. For the secondary
tourism zone (Savnik and Pluzine) an increase in tourist and sports capabilities are suggested with a
focus on tourism of villages.
•
Prospective tourist offers on Tara River:
•
Rafting
•
Sports fishing (fly fishing)
•
Bird watching
•
Horse riding
•
Hiking
•
Mountain Biking
•
Canyon exploration
Canoeing
Currently Rafting and Fishing are the only functioning tourist offers
Fishing- most of the economic benefits of fishing in Durmitor come in the form of purchased fishing
licenses, additionally these tourists are almost exclusively Montenegrin.
o Direct financial impact of fishing tourism
o License cost: 15 € per day
o 324 permissions sold in 2004= 4,860 €
o 30 licenses sold to foreigners in 2004
o Foreign fishers stay on average two days in Durmitor
Rafting: most rafting on the Tara River is organized by private tourist agencies.
These associations, most of which are registered as non-governmental organizations, generally
underreport their profits and tourist numbers in order to avoid higher taxes.
(These companies work on a cash basis)
o Estimates: average 11,500 tourists in 2004, 50% of which were foreign
o one day rafting Tara trips are almost exclusively foreigners, 70 % of whom are brought by
tourist agencies from the coast
o One day rafters spend on average 50 €
o Two and three day rafting trips are estimated at 80 % foreign and 20 % domestic with
Tourists spending 225 € over the course of a 2/3 day trip
Complete Economic Evaluation: Mrdak estimates roughly 1 million Eu spent by 12 663 tourists in 2004. It
should be noted that tourists from Bosnia Herzegovina and Serbia were counted as foreign tourists in this
survey and as such were probably assumed to have spent much more than they actually did. Mrdak
undertakes no analysis of where the money spent by tourists goes or whether it stays in the Tara River area.
8) Implementing Sustainable Winter and Summer Tourism in Northern and Central Montenegro:
An assessment of Current Strategies and Next Steps
A report to the Rockefeller Brother’s Fund and the UNDP
38
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
November, 2005
•
Major problems for Durmitor ski development:
•
environmental impacts
•
jeopardizing of world Heritage status
•
likely affects of global warming (Durmitor as a mid-elevation resort)
Inability to manufacture snow in a municipality where water shortages exist
Assessing Summer Tourism: Human and Physical Capacity, Nature- and Agricultural-Based
•
Suggestions for ways to focus on summer tourism
Create a network of the local homes offering accommodation (currently between 800-1500 beds)
•
along with an increase in speed of hotel privatization
•
Marketing of Durmitor as a part of the “slow foods” movement
Combining nature and agro-tourism with visits to monasteries/historic towns
•
center follow paying domestic and regional tourists to higher end European and North American Market.
•
developing tourism circuits and website development
•
Promotion of tours to European and North American markets
•
Assisting the national parks
•
Strengthening university programs and distance learning
•
The World heritage Sites designation should be more prominently displayed at Park entrance
Development of a certification scheme for hotels and the implantation of pilot business models.
The Viability of Ski Area Development in the Zabljak-Durmitor Region (Arthur DeJong)
•
Ski Area Planning: Problems
Physical Reality: no studies exist on the current and future reliabilities of snow, potentially not enough
•
suitable ski terrain, or high elevation terrain
Environmental Reality: no environmental inventory of flora and fauna exists with which to measure
potential impacts. Dejong points out that Durmitor doesn’t need spend significant capital in ski
•
developments when it has other attractions, such as an ecologically rich and intact alpine ecosystem.
•
Social Reality: greater community needs for road improvement exist over ski lifts
Economic reality: ski development is a poor means of growing and rebuilding tourism for local
economy
•
Turning strategy into Sustainable Development: MSDP has identified three key strategic areas:
•
Sustainable tourism
•
Renewable energy
Sustainable forestry
•
And two cross-cutting institutional support mechanisms:
•
NCSD
Spatial Planning of 14 municipalities
The MSDP Project began with south-south cooperation and the visit of Dr. Rene Castro, former Costa Rican
Minister for the Environment. Dr Castro’s visit was meant to transfer the procedures, methods, and
experiences of Costa Rica’s transition and implementation of socio-economic reforms, democracy, and
sustainable development. These are the recommendations he made for “re-vitalizing” the “Ecological State
Concept of Montenegro”
39
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
•
formulate a new sustainable development strategy
re-launch the concept of Montenegro as an ecological state
Re-definition of the term “sustainable state” as a longer-term strategy, “ecologically
appropriate, healthy, socially beneficial and fair, economically viable, and responsible state
•
which maintains its ecological dimension by adding economic and social ones”
Create a publication of “early success” cases in framework of long-term development
•
Potential future cooperation for MSDP was identified with:
UNDP , SIDA, USAID , REC
Potential fields for cooperation with other donors include: the establishment of a tourist route connecting World
Heritage Sites in the Balkans through UNDP’s global initiative “Growing Sustainable Businesses” along with
preparation of a Balkan UNESCO World Heritage Sites Tour package
• Montenegro’s Tourism Master Plan represents a threat to sustainability as Montenegro does not
•
have the infrastructure in place to cope with event the current number of tourists
MSDP recommends education of relevant stakeholders and promotion of sustainable tourism
concept by drawing attention of government, media, and public to the difference between sustainable
tourist development and more traditional tourist development
The ultimate objective of the MSDP project is to create a model for public-private partnerships, including
capacity building of local stakeholders, and the
•
Creation of employment opportunities though:
•
Facilitating and assisting n linking European tour operators with local service providers
Identifying local leaders, support the establishment of their own associations, thereby becoming more
•
professional, and gaining the ability to satisfy higher European standards (training of trainers)
•
Assist local service providers to focus on future product creation, development, and marketing
•
Provide equipment to National Park (photo, video, surveillance cameras) for documentation purposes
Assist in establishment of information and visitor centers with promotional material available to the
•
public
Establish a small credit and loan guarantee scheme for the local SMEs along with a business
•
advisory office
Create a website to function as a bulletin board for local businesses and entrepreneurs
40
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
Conclusions
The evaluation makes the point tat Montenegro is a small country, and as such small interventions
and improvements will be visible and can produce significant changes.
Overall qualitative and quantitative description of the situation: the report found few functioning environmental
networks in Montenegro, but profiled the Zeleny Krug, which it felt to be the most important/most capable of
future cooperation.
•
General Character and Scale of Operation: (topics dealt with)
•
Climate change, renewable energy, energy efficiency
•
urban environment, water issues, sustainable development
•
environmental legislation, nature protection, environmental policy making
environmental education, education for sustainable development
•
Activities:
•
advisory services, awareness raising, campaigns
•
meetings, conferences, networking, training/capacity building,
•
environmental impact assessments, environmental management
•
lobbying, negotiation and dialogue facilitation
watchdoging, policy implantation ,public meetings
Financial Setup:
Annual budget upwards of 100,000 €. The foundation claims it has sufficient funding for the projects it is
currently undertaking, but prospective programs are lacking financing:
Financial breakdown:
50 % foreign. /international foundations
25 % foreign governments/ international public sector grants and donations.
5-15 % fees and charges for mission related services
•
Other environmental networks in Montenegro:
•
The Tara River Coalition
•
Green Home
•
MOST
•
MANS
•
Mogul
•
AHA (Asocijacia Hercegnovska Alternitiva)
•
Green Resource Center
Friends of Public Services
Resource challenges for environmental NGOs in Montenegro include: overcoming strong individualism,
garnering public support, finding individuals without personal interest, lack of training, and funding.
41
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
12) UNDP
Unleashing Sustainable Tourism Entrepreneurship in the Area of Durmitor National Park, Montenegro
(Savnik, Zabljak, Pluzine)
Project Action Plan
April 2005
Workshop for public private partnership for sustainable tourism development among stakeholders in the area
of Durmitor National Park held in 2005:
•
UNDP Recommendations:
Improvement of the rafting product through capacity building in hospitality, interpretation, and safety
•
training of rafting guides
•
Upgrading of hiking trail services
Improvements of interpretation infrastructure along hiking trails, currently signs are in Montenegrin or
•
are lacking altogether
Raising public awareness for local people and Durmitor Tradition
•
UNDP Activities:
Production of a bilingual leaflet and promotional flyer for rafting in Durmitor – in English and
•
Montenegrin
•
Production of a flyer for hiking trail services
A marketing event for the opening of the upgraded rafting and hiking attractions
Resources
• Poletto, Davide: Territorial Diagnostic of the Tara River Basin Biosphere Reserve and the Durmitor World
Heritage Site in Montenegro. - UNESCO-BRESCE. - 2008.
• Hawkins, Donald E.: A Sustainable Tourism Destination Management Approach for Durmitor National Park
and Surrounding Local Communities. - George Washington University.
• Report of the International Mission to Durmitor National Park and Tara River Basin, Serbian and Montenegro,
and to Bosnia and Herzegovina. - January 2005.
• Bennet, Oliver: Programme for the Development of Mountain Tourism in Montenegro. - A review written in
response report by the International Institute of Tourism of Ljubljana.
• United Nations Development Progamme: Opportunities and barriers for the private sector in the development
of sustainable tourism in Montenegro.
• Reaching balanced regional development in Montenegro: Problems and Solutions. - South-East Europe
Review.
• Mrdak, M. Sc. Danilo (2005): Economic Evaluation of the Tara River. - Podgorica.
• Implementing Sustainable Winter and Summer Tourism in Northern and Central Montenegro: An assessment
of Current Strategies and Next Steps. - A report to the Rockefeller Brother’s Fund and the UNDP. - November,
2005.
• UNDP: Unleashing Sustainable Tourism Entrepreneurship in the Area of Durmitor National Park, Montenegro
(Savnik, Zabljak, Pluzine). Project Action Plan. - April 2005.
42
UNESCO Office in Venice
UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science
and Culture in Europe (BRESCE)
43