Cambridge International AS Level: English General Paper 8021/22
Cambridge International AS Level: English General Paper 8021/22
Cambridge International AS Level: English General Paper 8021/22
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2023 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
the point is incorrect, perhaps factually, or the wrong word or point has been offered.
NAQ "not answering the question”; perhaps the material relates to a later question, or simply comes
from the wrong part of the material
NAR "narration”, usually used in levels-based, longer responses; information is included but no real
point is made, for example, it might not be clear whether the intended point is an advantage or a
disadvantage
REP repetition of the same/an earlier point
TV "too vague” the response is not making the required point clearly or precisely enough
Sometimes the candidate has not followed the instructions fully and this needs to be shown by red
highlighting over those words, phrases or sections which have not made sufficient use of own words
to convey a point. Also used for highlighting lifted material on own words questions to block out words
copied too closely from the text to make marking clearer. Finally, the red highlighter is used for
indicating the position of the word count on those questions.
1(a) Considering only the disadvantages, explain why Xan would be less 10
likely to choose Laurent as the presenter.
During his demo his communication skills were somewhat lacking as he spoke
in a monotonous voice which listeners might find boring/a turn-off
and such things as tone of voice are very difficult to change without extensive
training that Xan might not have the time/skill to do.
He made it very clear that he assumed that all the listeners had the same
taste in music as he did by only playing classical music.
The questionnaire results showed that he would be pleasing only 43% of the
hospital listeners, so the audience figures might be too low for Xan to achieve
his goal of appealing to the widest audience possible.
He seemed to lack people skills as his only references to the patients were
their names and ward numbers and in his private life he does not socialise so
he does not get that many chances to improve these skills.
1(a) He has a history of not doing as his producer asks/changing content without
permission, so he might turn out to be a loose cannon/too difficult to work
with.
She made lots of positive comments about meeting patients (and staff) on the
ward. (1)
She had volunteered/happily spent a lot of time at the old hospital, helping
patients (choose books from the hospital’s mobile library). (1)
1(c) Explain four disadvantages if Xan were to choose Anny as the presenter. 8
Do not refer to Laurent.
Credit any four of the following points or any other valid point.
She had ‘dead air’ issues during her demo (1), which is one of the worst
mistakes to make in broadcasting/showed her skills were not up to a
professional standard. (1)
It might mean that potential listeners might not have tuned in/stayed tuned in
(1), so that would have negatively affected audience figures (1).
1(c) She did not reference the station name (1), so people coming across her 8
programme on the internet would not know which station they were listening
to (1).
After making a mistake she was flustered (1), which would not have made
good listening for the audience if this were to continue/be repeated (1)
When she did not modulate the sound levels/the music suddenly came on
loudly (1), it might have particularly shocked the elderly patients and the new-
born babies. (1)
She made mistakes cueing up the music/had timing problems with her music
(1), so that sometimes her voice was drowned out. (1)
She forgot to name check tracks (which would annoy the station) (1) because
there would be broadcasting rights issues/the musicians would be rightly
angry with the station (as potential purchases of their music would be lost). (1)
She told the listeners that they could guess the name of the track (1), which
was a ridiculous assumption to make. (1).
She might have trouble getting into the station on time/with an hour to spare to
talk to patients/as she works across the city centre from the hospital/there are
evening rush hour traffic jams./She will not be able to do every weekday
programme (1) as she occasionally has to work late into the evening. (Any
combination = max. 6)
During her demo, her language was a bit repetitive/she kept using ‘great’ and
‘lovely’ (1), which could start to irritate listeners over the course of two hours.
(1)
Credit any two of the following points or any other valid point.
He is dependent on busy ward staff having the time/inclination to hand out his
questionnaires (1) so some wards/departments may be over-represented (1).
He has only received back some of the questionnaires, (1) so the results will
not be comprehensive/represent a true cross-section of the hospital audience.
(1)
1(e) According to the material, explain why every hospital should have its 1
own radio station.
Credit any two of the following points or any other valid point.
A volunteer might not take the job as seriously as paid employment (1), so
they might not care about upholding professional standards/may damage the
organisation’s reputation (1).
2(a)(i) With reference to lines 1 to 12, identify three activities that distract 3
Jocelyn de Kwant from work.
2(a)(ii) With reference to lines 1 to 12, identify the sound that distracts Jocelyn 1
de Kwant, even when she is not working.
2(b) In your opinion, explain why the ‘be’ in line 10 is written in italics. 1
It emphasises de Kwant felt fully present with her friends at that event/really
experienced the time she was there/was fully focused on the event and her
friends/she was fully connected to what was happening. (1)
2(c)(i) According to Mark Tigchelaar (lines 13 to 20), state the reason why 1
‘concentration levels have dropped’.
The number of stimuli every day has increased five times over since the
1980s/now equals 174 newspapers a day. (1)
(We are busier every day), but we are much less productive. (1)
2(d) With reference to lines 21 to 30, explain how our brains also distract us. 6
Answer in about 60 words.
The brain loves stimuli and constantly looks for danger. (1)
Though we are doing one thing, our brain processes everything. (1)
We even notice our name being mentioned (at a busy party). (1)
You are busy with small things but are not productive. (1)
Any relevant content above 60 words should not be considered as part of the
answer.
2(e) According to Cal Newport (lines 31 to 32), explain what ‘shallow work’ 1
means. Answer using your own words as far as possible.
and they do not give you a sense of fulfilment when completed. (1)
2(g) Identify the three different ways mentioned which can improve your 3
levels of attention.
Go and sit on your own occasionally (as an open-plan office can be disastrous
for productivity). (1)
Do a second task that requires little brainpower (to occupy your overactive
brain). (1)
2(h) According to the material, explain why ‘many people are so irritable’ in 3
the digital era.
You get information 24/7 and you manage your whole life through one device.
(1)
People are constantly looking for new information to get a hit of dopamine. (1)