Cambridge International A Level: English Language 9093/33 October/November 2020
Cambridge International A Level: English Language 9093/33 October/November 2020
Cambridge International A Level: English Language 9093/33 October/November 2020
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the October/November 2020 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE™, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Examiners need to be flexible in considering holistically what the candidates write in part (a) in
relation to their analysis in part (b). What may at first appear to be inappropriate choices of lexis
and register in (a) may turn out to be explained in (b).
There should be evidence that linguistic concepts have been understood and are being applied in
helpful ways. Knowledge and understanding of spoken/written language should be made explicit in
the comparative commentary (b), but there is likely to be evidence of its informed application in the
directed writing task (a).
Band 1 9–10 Discriminating sense and understanding of audience, form, purpose, conventions
and effects, underpinned by a fluent, highly accurate reworking of the material in a
highly appropriate style.
Band 2 7–8 Proficient grasp and appreciation of audience, form, purpose, conventions and
effects, supported by an informed and engaged reworking of the material in a
consistent, appropriate and generally fluent style.
Band 3 5–6 Competent understanding of audience, form, purpose conventions and effects,
supported by an adequately engaged reworking of the material in a measured
style, perhaps containing a few lapses in accuracy and expression.
Band 4 3–4 Essentially sound but uneven sense and understanding of audience, form,
purpose conventions and effects, supported by some engagement in reworking
the material but marked by several lapses in accuracy and expression.
Band 5 1–2 Basic and limited sense and understanding of audience, form, purpose,
conventions and effects; limited engagement with reworking the material, and
marked by frequent lapses in accuracy and expression and/or an inappropriate
grasp of intent and style.
Band 6 0–1 Wholly inappropriate sense of audience, form, purpose, conventions and effects;
brief or confused work and/or marked by very limited accuracy and expression.
NB: These must not be seen as a prescriptive or ‘finite’ list. Candidates should
be rewarded positively for any valid response to the task which relates to the
Assessment Objectives.
Candidates should write clearly, accurately, creatively and effectively for the
prescribed purpose and audience.
Band 1 13–15 Discriminating, detailed and highly informed appreciation and awareness of
spoken and/or written language; highly focused comparison of effects created by
conventions, form and style, purpose; thoughtfully selective use of and close
reference to texts.
Band 2 10–12 Proficient, consistent appreciation and awareness of spoken and/or written
language; comparative analysis of texts with good degree of awareness of
conventions, form and style, purpose; selective and relevant use of and reference
to texts.
Band 3 8–9 Steady and mainly focused appreciation and awareness of spoken and/or written
language; comparisons of and comments on texts are measured if at times not
fully developed, and show understanding of conventions, form and style, purpose;
some relevant use of and reference to texts.
Band 4 6–7 Some engagement and partial appreciation and awareness of spoken and/or
written language; occasional but undeveloped comparisons/comments on some
aspects of conventions, form and style, purpose; partial use of and reference to
texts.
Band 5 3–5 Basic appreciation and awareness of spoken and/or written language; generalised
and limited comparisons of conventions, form and style, purpose; listing of
features without further comment; limited textual reference.
Band 6 0–2 Very limited appreciation and awareness of spoken and/or written language;
tendency to focus on content or engage in unfocused, fragmented ideas; brief or
confused work.
1(b) Candidates should select and analyse specific textual detail in both the 15
original text and the directed writing.
• the second person is used to relate to the reader: if you hack; look about
you.
• onomatopoeia: chug; throb-throb; roar of waves
• repeated use of complex sentences
• metaphor: unending quest for treasure
• use of ellipsis to suggest that the writer is stopping to think and reminisce:
or a by-lane ... lonely emblems
• use of similes: perched like nests of eagles
• repetition of the adverb perhaps to suggest that the writer is imagining life
for the miners.
2
Band 1 22–25 Discriminating and sophisticated comparative appreciation of forms and
conventions of texts, including spontaneous speech; detailed and incisive
understanding of effects; highly sensitive to how purpose, context and audience
shape meaning; highly perceptive grasp of voice and linguistic techniques.
Band 2 18–21 Engaged and consistent response, demonstrating very informed comparative
appreciation of forms and conventions of texts, including spontaneous speech;
proficient awareness of effects; focused grasp of how purpose, context and
audience shape meaning; detailed appreciation of voice and linguistic techniques.
Band 3 14–17 Relevant and steady comparative awareness of forms and conventions of texts,
including spontaneous speech; controlled and measured awareness of effects;
generally informed understanding of how purpose, context and audience shape
meaning; competent appreciation of voice and linguistic techniques.
Band 4 10–13 Sound, generally relevant and mainly comparative awareness of forms and
conventions of texts, including spontaneous speech; adequate awareness of
effects; generally steady understanding of how purpose, context and audience
shape meaning; some appreciation of voice and linguistic techniques.
Band 5 6–9 Basic awareness of forms and conventions of texts, including spontaneous
speech, but lacking a fully comparative approach; basic awareness of effects;
some informed understanding of how purpose, context and audience shape
meaning; limited appreciation of voice and linguistic techniques.
Band 6 2–5 Rather limited and partial awareness of forms and conventions of texts, including
spontaneous speech; a small degree of awareness of effects; general
understanding of how purpose, context and audience shape meaning; very limited
appreciation of voice and linguistic techniques.
Below 0–1 Minimal awareness of forms and conventions of texts, including spontaneous
Band 6 speech; little awareness of effects; sparse understanding of how purpose, context
and audience shape meaning; little appreciation of voice and linguistic technique;
very brief / fragmented; very unfocused.
NB: These must not be seen as a prescriptive or ‘finite’ list. Candidates should
be rewarded positively for any valid response to the task which relates to the
Assessment Objectives.