Lec5 Economic Growth
Lec5 Economic Growth
Lec5 Economic Growth
80 Nepal
70 Bangladesh
% of population
60 Kenya Botswana
50 China
40 Peru
Mexico
30 Thailand
20
Brazil Chile
10 Russian
S. Korea
Federation
0
$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000
Income per capita in dollars
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth
Why growth matters
Capital per
worker, k
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 12
The national income identity
▪ Y=C+I (remember, no G )
▪ In “per worker” terms:
y=c+i
where c = C/L and i = I /L
c1
y1 sf(k)
i1
k1 Capital per
worker, k
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 16
Depreciation
Depreciation = the rate of depreciation
per worker, k = the fraction of the capital stock
that wears out each period
k
1
Capital per
worker, k
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 17
Capital accumulation
k = s f(k) – k
k = s f(k) – k
▪ The Solow model’s central equation
▪ Determines behavior of capital over time…
▪ …which, in turn, determines behavior of
all of the other endogenous variables
because they all depend on k. E.g.,
income per person: y = f(k)
consumption per person: c = (1–s) f(k)
k = s f(k) – k
If investment is just enough to cover depreciation
[sf(k) = k ],
then capital per worker will remain constant:
k = 0.
Investment
and k
depreciation
sf(k)
k* Capital per
worker, k
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 21
Moving toward the steady state
k = sf(k) − k
Investment
and k
depreciation
sf(k)
k
investment
depreciation
k1 k* Capital per
worker, k
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 22
Moving toward the steady state
k = sf(k) − k
Investment
and k
depreciation
sf(k)
k
k1 k2 k* Capital per
worker, k
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 24
Moving toward the steady state
k = sf(k) − k
Investment
and k
depreciation
sf(k)
k
investment
depreciation
k2 k* Capital per
worker, k
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 25
Moving toward the steady state
k = sf(k) − k
Investment
and k
depreciation
sf(k)
k
k2 k 3 k* Capital per
worker, k
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 27
Moving toward the steady state
k = sf(k) − k
Investment
and k
depreciation
Summary: sf(k)
As long as k < k*,
investment will exceed
depreciation,
and k will continue to
grow toward k*.
k 3 k* Capital per
worker, k
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 28
Now you try:
Assume:
▪ s = 0.3
▪ = 0.1
▪ initial value of k = 4.0
Calculate:
▪ y, c, i, k, k
Year k y c i k k
1 4.000 2.000 1.400 0.600 0.400 0.200
Assu
2 4.200 2.049 1.435 0.615 0.420 0.195
3 4.395 2.096 1.467 0.629 0.440 0.189
4 4.584 2.141 1.499 0.642 0.458 0.184
…
10 5.602 2.367 1.657 0.710 0.560 0.150
…
25 7.351 2.706 1.894 0.812 0.732 0.080
…
100 8.962 2.994 2.096 0.898 0.896 0.002
…
∞Lecture 5 –9.000
Economic Growth
3.000 2.100 0.900 0.900 0.000slide 32
Exercise: Solve for the steady state
Continue to assume
s = 0.3, = 0.1, and y = k 1/2
k*
3= = k*
k*
Solve to get: k * = 9 and y * = k * = 3
s1 f(k)
k
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth
k 1* k 2*
slide 35
Prediction:
1,000
100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Investment as percentage of output
(average 1960-2000)
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 37
International evidence on investment rates
and income per person (1960-2010)
k gold
*
= the Golden Rule level of capital,
the steady state value of k
that maximizes consumption.
To find it, first express c* in terms of k*:
c* = y* − i*
= f (k*) − i*
In the steady state:
= f (k*) − k* i* = k*
because k = 0.
them is biggest.
i gold
*
= k gold
*
y gold
*
= f (k gold
*
) k gold
*
steady-state
capital per
worker, k*
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 41
Interpretation
▪ On this graph, the horizontal axis measures k*, not k. Thus, once
we have found k* using the other graph, we plot that k* on this graph
to see where the economy’s steady state is in relation to the golden
rule capital stock.
▪ On this graph, the curve measures f(k*), not sf(k).
▪ On the other diagram, the intersection of the two curves determines
k*. On this graph, the only thing determined by the intersection of
the two curves is the level of capital where c*=0, and we certainly
wouldn’t want to be there.
▪ There are no dynamics in this graph, as we are in a steady state. In
the other graph, the gap between the two curves determines the
change in capital.
c* = f(k*) − k* k*
is biggest where the
slope of the f(k*)
production function
equals
the slope of the
depreciation line: c gold
*
MPK =
k gold
*
steady-state
capital per
worker, k*
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 43
The transition to the
Golden Rule steady state
▪ The economy does NOT have a tendency to
move toward the Golden Rule steady state.
▪ Achieving the Golden Rule requires that
policymakers adjust s.
▪ This adjustment leads to a new steady state with
higher consumption.
▪ But what happens to consumption
during the transition to the Golden Rule?
If k * k gold
*
then increasing c* y
requires a fall in s.
In the transition to c
the Golden Rule,
consumption is i
higher at all points
in time.
t0 time
then increasing c*
requires an y
increase in s. c
Future generations
enjoy higher
consumption,
but the current i
one experiences
an initial drop t0 time
in consumption.
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 46
Population growth
k = s f(k) − ( + n) k
actual
break-even
investment
investment
sf(k)
k* Capital per
worker, k
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 50
The impact of population growth
Investment,
break-even ( +n2) k
investment
( +n1) k
An increase in n
causes an sf(k)
increase in break-
even investment,
leading to a lower
steady-state level
of k.
1,000
100
0 1 2 3 4 5
Population Growth
(percent per year; average 1960-2000)
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 53
The Golden Rule with population
growth
To find the Golden Rule capital stock,
express c* in terms of k*:
c* = y* − i*
= f (k* ) − ( + n) k*
In the Golden
c* is maximized when Rule steady state,
MPK = + n the marginal product
of capital net of
or equivalently, depreciation equals
MPK − = n the population
growth rate.
Lecture 5 – Economic Growth slide 54
Alternative perspectives on
population growth
The Malthusian Model (1798)
▪ Predicts population growth will outstrip the Earth’s
ability to produce food, leading to the
impoverishment of humanity.
▪ Since Malthus, world population has increased
sixfold, yet living standards are higher than ever.
▪ Malthus omitted the effects of technological
progress.
Lecture
CHAPTER 5 –7Economic Growth
Economic Growth I slide 57
Chapter Summary
Lecture
CHAPTER 5 –7Economic Growth
Economic Growth I slide 58