Collector vs. Univ of Visayas

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Collector vs.

University of Visayas, 1 SCRA 669

FACTS:

The University of Visayas asserted its entitlement to tax exemption under Section 27(e) of the
Internal Revenue Code for the period of 1946 to 1950. The Court of Tax Appeals granted the
University’s claim, ordering the refund of taxes previously collected.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue filed a motion for reconsideration, contending that the
University does not qualify for tax exemption because it functions as a business conduit for its
controlling stockholders.

ISSUE: Whether the University of Visayas is entitled to tax exemption.

RULING:

NO.
The Court rejected the University of Visayas' claim for tax exemption, deeming it inappropriate
to uphold the separation of the university from its controlling stockholders. Instead, the Court
regarded the university as essentially an alter ego or conduit for the interests of its majority
stockholders.

In this case, the majority of the university's net income, with only a minor portion reserved for
operational expenses, was funneled into permanent assets registered under the name of the
university president and his spouse. The Court justified its decision to disregard the legal
distinction of the university as a separate entity based on the significant control exercised by the
president and his immediate family, who collectively own 85% of the university's capital stock.
Therefore, the Court emphasized the distinction between the old law and its subsequent
amendment, clarifying that tax exemption does not extend to organizations or corporations
where the income ultimately benefits individual stockholders or entities.

You might also like