Guide On RTI Act, 2005
Guide On RTI Act, 2005
Guide On RTI Act, 2005
Though all possible care has been taken to ensure accuracy and
consistency, in the event of a conflict between the Guide and Government
orders/ instructions on the subject, the latter will prevail.
Any information given herein cannot be cited in any dispute or litigation, nor
is it a substitute for a legal interpretation/ evidence. The user will be solely
responsible for any consequence of the decision taken on the basis of
information contained in this Guide.
2
GUIDE ON RIGHT TO INFORMATION
ACT, 2005
3
The right to information is implicitly guaranteed by the Constitution. However,
with a view to set out a practical regime for the citizens to secure information as a
matter of right, the Indian Parliament enacted the Right to Information Act, 2005. This
law is very comprehensive and covers almost all matters of governance. This Law has a
wide reach, being applicable to Government at all levels- Union, State and Local as well
as to the recipients of substantial government funds.
2. The present guide is an updated and consolidated guide for the use of all stake-
holders. This guide contains five parts. Part I of the guide discusses some aspects of
the Act which all the stake-holders are required to know. Rest of the four parts are
specifically relevant to the public authorities, the information seekers, the public
information officers and the first appellate authorities respectively.
4
Part I
4. The basic object of the Right to Information Act is to empower the citizens, to
promote transparency and accountability in the working of the Government, to contain
corruption, and to enhance
our democracy work for the people in a real sense. It goes without saying that an
informed citizen is better equipped to keep necessary vigil on the instruments of
governance and make the government more accountable to the governed. The Act is a
big step towards making the citizens informed about the activities of the Government.
What is Information
5
Public Information Officer
8. These are the officers at sub-divisional level to whom a person can give his RTI
application or appeal. These officers send the application or appeal to the Public
Information Officer of the public authority or the concerned appellate authority. An
Assistant Public Information Officer is not responsible to supply the information.
10. A citizen has a right to seek such information from a public authority which is held
by the public authority or which is held under its control. This right includes inspection
of work, documents and records; taking notes, extracts or certified copies of documents
or records; and taking certified samples of material held by the public authority or held
under the control of the public authority. It is important to note that only such
information can be supplied under the Act that is available and existing and is held by
the public authority or is held under the control of the public authority. The Public
Information Officer is not supposed to create information that is not a part of the record
of the public authority. The Public Information Officer is also not required to furnish
information which require drawing of inference and/or making of assumptions; or to
interpret information; or to solve the problems raised by the applicants; or to furnish
replies to hypothetical questions.
11. A citizen has a right to obtain information from a public authority in the form of
diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through
print-outs provided such information is already stored in a computer or in any other
device.
12. The information to the applicant should ordinarily be provided in the form in which
it is sought. However, if the supply of information sought in a particular form would
6
disproportionately divert the resources of the public authority or may cause harm to the
safety or preservation of the records, supply of information in that form may be denied.
13. In some cases, the applicants expect the Public Information Officer to give
information in some particular proforma devised by them on the plea that they have a
right to get information in the form in which it is sought. It need be noted that the
provision in the Act simply means that if the information is sought in the form of
photocopy, it shall be provided in the form of photocopy, or if it is sought in the form of a
floppy or in any other electronic mode, it shall be provided in that form, subject to the
conditions given in the Act. It does not mean that the PIO shall re-shape the
information.
14. Some Information Seekers request the Public Information Officers to cull out
information from some document(s) and give such extracted information to them. A
control of that public authority. The Act, however, does not require the Public
17. A citizen who desires to seek some information from a public authority is required
to send, along with the application, a demand draft or a bankers cheque or an Indian
Postal Order of Rs.10/- (Rupees ten), payable to the Accounts Officer of the public
authority as fee prescribed for seeking information. The payment of fee can also be
made by way of cash to the public authority or to the Assistant Public Information
Officer, against a proper receipt. The payment of fee to the Central
7
Ministries/departments can also be made online through internet banking of State Bank
of India or through Master/Visa Debit/credit cards.
18. The applicant may also be required to pay further fee towards the cost of
providing the information, details of which shall be intimated to the applicant by the PIO
as prescribed by the Right to Information Rules, 2012. Rates of fee as prescribed in
the Rules are given below:
(a) rupees two (Rs. 2/-) for each page ( in A-3 or smaller size paper) ;
(b) actual cost or price of a photocopy in larger size paper;
(c) actual cost or price for samples or models;
(d) rupees fifty (Rs.50/-) per diskette or floppy; and
(e) price fixed for a publication or rupees two per page of photocopy for extracts from
the publication.
(f) so much of postal charges involved in supply of information that exceeds fifty
rupees.
19. A citizen has a right to inspect the records of a public authority. For inspection of
records, the public authority shall charge no fee for the first hour. But a fee of rupees
five (Rs.5/-) for each subsequent hour (or fraction thereof) shall be charged.
20. If the applicant belongs to the below poverty line (BPL) category, he is not
required to pay any fee. However, he should submit a proof in support of his claim as
belonging to the below poverty line category. The application not accompanied by the
prescribed fee of Rs.10/- rty line
category, as the case may be, shall not be a valid application under the Act. It may be
pointed out that there is no bar on the public authority to supply information in response
to such applications. However, provisions of Act would not apply to such cases.
Format of Application
22. The information seeker is not required to give reasons for seeking information.
23. Sub-section (1) of section 8 and section 9 of the Act enumerate the types of
information which is exempt from disclosure. Sub-section (2) of section 8, however,
provides that information exempted under sub-section (1) or exempted under the
Official Secrets Act, 1923 can be disclosed if public interest in disclosure overweighs
the harm to the protected interests.
8
24. The information which, in normal course, is exempt from disclosure under sub-
section (1) of Section 8 of the Act, would cease to be exempted if 20 years have lapsed
after occurrence of the incident to which the information relates. However, the following
types of information would continue to be exempt and there would be no obligation,
even after lapse of 20 years, to give any citizen-
(i) Information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and
integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interest of the
State, relation with foreign state or lead to incitement of an offence;
(ii) Information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of privilege of
Parliament or State Legislature; or
(iii) cabinet papers including records of deliberations of the Council of Ministers,
Secretaries and other Officers subject to the conditions given in proviso to
clause (i) of sub-section(1) of Section 8 of the Act.
Appeals
28. If an applicant is not supplied information within the prescribed time of thirty days
or 48 hours, as the case may be, or is not satisfied with the information furnished to him,
he may prefer an appeal to the first appellate authority who is an officer senior in rank to
the Public Information Officer. Such an appeal should be filed within a period of thirty
days from the date on which the limit of 30 days of supply of information is expired or
from the date on which the information or decision of the Public Information Officer is
received. The appellate authority of the public authority shall dispose of the appeal
9
within a period of thirty days or in exceptional cases within 45 days of the receipt of the
appeal.
29. If the first appellate authority fails to pass an order on the appeal within the
prescribed period or if the appellant is not satisfied with the order of the first appellate
authority, he may prefer a second appeal with the Information Commission within ninety
days from the date on which the decision should have been made by the first appellate
authority or was actually received by the appellant.
Complaints
30. If any person is unable to submit a request to a Public Information Officer either
by reason that such an officer has not been appointed by the concerned public
authority; or the Assistant Public Information Officer has refused to accept his or her
application or appeal for forwarding the same to the Public Information Officer or the
appellate authority, as the case may be; or he has been refused access to any
information requested by him under the RTI Act; or he has not been given a response to
a request for information within the time limit specified in the Act; or he has been
required to pay an amount of fee which he considers unreasonable; or he believes that
he has been given incomplete, misleading or false information, he can make a
complaint to the Information Commission.
31. Third party in relation to the Act means a person other than the citizen making a
request for information. The definition of third party includes a public authority other
than the public authority to which the request has been made.
33. In regard to a third party information which the third party has treated as
confidential, the Public Information Officer should follow the procedure as given in part
IV viz. FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICERS
opportunity to put his case for non-disclosure if he desires that the information should
not be disclosed.
10
RTI ONLINE
34. Department of Personnel & Training has launched a web portal namely RTI
online with URL www.rtionline.gov.in for all Central Ministries/Departments. This is a
facility for the Indian citizens to file RTI applications and first appeals online to all
Central Ministries/Departments. The prescribed RTI fees can also be paid online. Reply
to the RTI applications and first appeals received online can also be given online by the
respective PIOs/FAAs.
35. Department of Personnel and Training has launched an online compilation of its
Office Memorandums and Notifications on Right to Information Act, 2005, with topic
based search facility. This compilation is available on the website of the Department
namely www.persmin.nic.in and is beneficial to all the stake holders.
11
Part II
3. Every public authority should provide as much information suo motu to the public
through various means of communications so that the public have minimum need to use
the Act to obtain information. Internet being one of the most effective means of
communication, the information may be posted on the website.
4. Section 4(1)(b) of the Act, in particular, requires every public authority to publish
following sixteen categories of information:
12
and as to whether meetings of those boards, councils, committees and other
bodies are open to the public, or the minutes of such meetings are
accessible for public;
(ix) directory of its officers and employees;
(x) the monthly remuneration received by each of its officers and employees,
including the system of compensation as provided in its regulations;
(xi) the budget allocated to each of its agency, indicating the particulars of all
plans, proposed expenditures and reports on disbursements made;
(xii) the manner of execution of subsidy programmes, including the amounts
allocated and the details of beneficiaries of such programmes;
(xiii) particulars of recipients of concessions, permits or authorisations granted by
it;
(xiv) details in respect of the information, available to or held by it, reduced in an
electronic form;
(xv) the particulars of facilities available to citizens for obtaining information,
including the working hours of a library or reading room, if maintained for
public use;
(xvi) the names, designations and other particulars of the Public Information
Officers.
13
7. Proactive disclosure should be done in the local language so that it remains
accessible to public. It should be presented in a form that is easily understood and if
technical words are used they should be carefully explained. As provided in section 4,
disclosure should be made in as many mediums as feasible such as notice boards,
newspapers, public announcements, media broadcast, the internet or any other means.
The disclosures should be kept up to date. The disclosure of Information may be made
keeping in mind the provisions of Section 8 to 11 of the RTI Act.
8. Every public authority should keep in view that Proactive disclosures on its
website are complete, easily accessible, technology and platform neutral and in a form
which conveys the desired information in an effective and user-friendly manner.
9. Each Central Ministry/ Public Authority should get its proactive disclosure
package audited by third party every year. Such audit should be communicated to the
Central Information Commission annually through publication on their own websites. All
Public Authorities should proactively disclose the names of the third party auditors on
their website. For carrying out third party audit through outside consultants also,
Ministries/Public Authorities should utilize their plan/non-plan funds.
10. Each Central Ministry/ Public Authority should appoint a senior officer not below
the rank of a Joint Secretary and not below rank of Additional HOD in case of attached
offices for ensuring compliance with the proactive disclosure guidelines.
12. Sub-section (8) of Section 7 of the RTI Act provides that where a request for
information is rejected, the Public Information Officer shall, inter-alia, communicate the
particulars of the Appellate Authority to the person making the request. Thus, the
applicant is informed about the particulars of the Appellate Authority when a request for
information is rejected but there may be cases where the Public Information Officer
does not reject the application, but the applicant does not receive a decision within the
time as specified in the Act or he is aggrieved by the decision of the Public Information
Officer. In such a case the applicant may like to exercise his right to appeal. But in
absence of the particulars of the appellate authority, the applicant may face difficulty in
making an appeal. All the public authorities should also designate the First Appellate
Authorities and publish their particulars alongwith the particulars of the Public
Information Officers.
14
Acceptance of Fee
13. According to the Right to Information Rules, 2012, an applicant can make
payment of fee in cash to the public authority or CAPIO
cheque or Indian Postal Order payable to the Accounts Officer of the public authority.
The payment of fee to the Central Ministries/departments can also be made online
through internet banking of State Bank of India or through Master/Visa Debit/credit
cards. The public authority should ensure that payment by any of the above modes is
not denied or the applicant is not compelled to draw IPO etc. in the name of any officer
other than the Accounts Officer. If any public authority does not have any Accounts
Officer, it should designate an officer as such for the purpose of receiving fee under the
RTI Act and Rules made thereunder.
14. The decisions of the Commission are binding. The public authority should
ensure that the orders passed by the Commission are implemented. If any public
authority or a PIO is of the view that an order of the Commission is not in consonance
with the provisions of the Act, it may approach the High Court by way of a Writ Petition.
15. Sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 mandates all
public authorities to designate as many Public Information Officers as necessary to
provide information under the Act. Where a public authority designates more than one
Public Information Officer (PIO), an applicant is likely to face difficulty in approaching
the appropriate Public Information Officer. The applicants would also face problem in
identifying the officer senior in rank to the Public Information Officer to whom an appeal
under sub-section (1) of Section 19 of the Act can be made. Therefore all public
authorities with more than one PIO should create a RTI Cell within the organisation to
receive all the RTI applications and first appeals and to route them to the concerned
PIOs/FAAs. Detailed instructions regarding setting up of RTI Cell, its functions and
financial assistance in setting up RTI Cell have been issued by the Department.
Transfer of Applications
16. The Act provides that if an application is made to a public authority requesting for
an information, which is held by another public authority; or the subject matter of which
is more closely connected with the functions of another public authority, the public
authority, to which such application is made, shall transfer the application or relevant
part of it to that other public authority within five days from the receipt of the application.
15
The public authority should sensitize its officers about this provision of the Act lest the
public authority is held responsible for delay.
19. The Information Commissions, after the end of each year, are required to
prepare reports on the implementation of the provisions of the Act during that year.
Each Ministry or Department is required, in relation to the public authorities within its
jurisdiction, to collect and provide information to the concerned Information Commission
for preparation of the report. The report of the Commission, inter-alia, contains following
information in respect of the year to which the report relates
(b) the number of decisions where applicants were not entitled to access to the
documents pursuant to the requests, the provisions of the Act under which
these decisions were made and the number of times such provisions were
invoked;
(c) particulars of any disciplinary action taken against any officer in respect of the
administration of the Act;
(e) the amount of charges collected by each public authority under the Act; and
(f) any facts which indicate an effort by the public authorities to administer and
implement the spirit and intention of the Act.
16
20. Every public authority should send necessary material to its administrative
Ministry/Department soon after the end of the year so that the Ministry/Department may
send the information to the Commission and the Commission may incorporate the same
in its report.
www.cic.gov.in through
which public authorities are required to upload requisite reports on quarterly basis. It is
important that all public authorities should get themselves registered with CIC for the
purpose of this report and also upload their quarterly returns regularly and on time.
17
Part III
A citizen, who desires to obtain any information under the Act, should make an
application to the Public Information Officer of the concerned public authority in writing
in English or Hindi or in the official language of the area in which the application is
made. The application should be precise and specific. He should make payment of
application fee at the time of submitting the application as prescribed in the RTI Rules,
2012. The applicant can send the application by post or through electronic means or
can deliver it personally in the office of the public authority. The application can also be
sent through an Assistant Public Information Officer.
3. The applicant should not list out his grievances in the RTI application but should
clearly mention which information or record he would like to seek. Further, if the drafting
of the application is such that it pin points towards the specific documents required in
relation to the information sought, there would be less scope of ambiguity, thereby
resulting in less chances of denial of information by the Public Information Officer. For
example instead of simply asking why my area is not being cleaned, cleaning schedule
of the area should be asked. Similarly, instead of asking when we will get water supply,
water supply planning of the area should be asked.
4. Along with the application, the applicant should send application fee to the Public
Information Officer. In case of Government of India, the prescribed application fee is
Rs. 10/-
Postal Order payable to the Accounts Officer of the public authority. The payment of fee
18
can also be made by way of cash to the public authority or to the Assistant Public
Information Officer against proper receipt. In case of online applications to Central
Ministries/departments, fee can be paid online through internet banking of State Bank of
India or through Master/Visa credit/debit cards.
5. The applicant may also be required to pay further fee towards the cost of
providing the information, details of which shall be intimated to the applicant by the
Public Information Officer. The fee so demanded can be paid the same way as
application fee.
6. If the applicant belongs to below poverty line (BPL) category, he is not required
to pay any fee. However, he should submit a proof in support of his claim as belonging
to the below poverty line category. The application not accompanied by the prescribed
category, as
the case may be, shall not be a valid application under the Act.
Format of Application
Filing of Appeal
8. An applicant can file an appeal to the first appellate authority if the information is
not supplied to him within the prescribed time of thirty days or 48 hours, as the case
may be, or is not satisfied with the information furnished to him. Such an appeal should
be filed within a period of thirty days from the date on which the limit of 30 days of
supply of information is expired or from the date on which the information or decision of
the Public Information Officer is received. The first appellate authority of the public
authority shall dispose of the appeal within a period of thirty days or in exceptional
cases within 45 days of the receipt of the appeal.
9. If the first appellate authority fails to pass an order on the appeal within the
prescribed period or if the appellant is not satisfied with the order of the first appellate
authority, he may prefer a second appeal with the Information Commission within ninety
days from the date on which the decision should have been made by the first appellate
authority or was actually received by the appellant.
10. The appeal made to the Central Information Commission should contain the
following information: -
19
(ii) Name and address of the Public Information Officer to whom the application was
addressed;
(iii) Name and address of the Public Information Officer who gave reply to the
application;
(iv) Name and address of the First Appellate Authority who decided the first appeal;
(v) Particulars of the application;
(vi) Particulars of the order including number, if any, against which the appeal is
preferred;
(vii) Brief facts leading to the appeal;
(viii) Prayer or relief sought;
(ix) Grounds for prayer or relief;
(x) Any other information relevant to the appeal;
(xi) Verification/authentication by the appellant.
11. The appeal made to the Central Information Commission should be accompanied
by the following documents, duly authenticated and verified by the appellant, namely:
Filing of Complaints
20
Part IV
2. Soon after receiving the application, the Public Information Officer should check
whether the applicant has made the payment of application fee or whether the applicant
is a person belonging to a Below Poverty Line (BPL) category. If application is not
accompanied by the prescribed fee or the BPL Certificate, it cannot be treated as an
application under the RTI Act. It may, however, be noted that the Public Information
Officer should consider such an application sympathetically and try to supply
information sought by way of such an application.
3. A public authority may designate as many Public Information Officers for it, as it
may deem necessary. It is possible that in a public authority with more than one Public
Information Officer, an application is received by the Public Information Officer other
than the concerned Public Information Officer. In such a case, the Public Information
Officer receiving the application should transfer it to the concerned Public Information
Officer immediately, preferably the same day. Time period of five days for transfer of
the application applies only when the application is transferred from one public authority
to another public authority and not for transfer from one Public Information Officer to
another in the same public authority.
6. The Public Information Officer may seek the assistance of any other officer as he
or she considers necessary for the proper discharge of his or her duties. The officer,
whose assistance is so sought by the Public Information Officer, would render all
assistance to him. Such an officer shall be deemed to be a Public Information Officer
and would be liable for contravention of any provisions of the Act the same way as any
other Public Information Officer. It would be advisable for the Public Information Officer
to inform the officer whose assistance is sought, about the above provision, at the time
of seeking his assistance.
7. Some Public Information Officers, on the basis of above referred provision of the
Act, transfer the RTI applications received by them to other officers and direct them to
send information to the applicants as deemed Public Information Officer. Thus, they
use the above referred provision to designate other officers as Public Information
Officer. According to the Act, it is the responsibility of the officer who is designated as
the Public Information Officer by the public authority to provide information to the
applicant or reject the application for any reasons specified in Sections 8 and 9 of the
Act. The Act enables the Public Information Officer to seek assistance of any other
officer to enable him to provide information to the information seeker, but it does not
give him authority to designate any other officer as Public Information Officer and direct
him to send reply to the applicant. The import of the provision is that, if the officer
whose assistance is sought by the Public Information Officer, does not render
necessary help to him, the Information Commission may impose penalty on such officer
or recommend disciplinary action against him the same way as the Commission may
impose penalty on or recommend disciplinary action against the Public Information
Officer.
Supply of Information
8. The answering Public Information Officer should check whether the information
sought or a part thereof is exempt from disclosure under Section 8 or Section 9 of the
Act. Request in respect of the part of the application which is so exempt may be
rejected and rest of the information should be provided immediately or after receipt of
additional fees, as the case may be.
22
9. Where a request for information is rejected, the Public Information Officer should
communicate to the person making the request
10. If additional fee is required to be paid by the applicant as provided in the Fee
and Cost Rules, the Public Information Officer should inform the applicant:
11. Though there is no hard and fast rule as to when exactly intimation about
additional fees is to be given to the applicant, such intimation should be given soon after
receipt of RTI application.
12. Where a request is received for access to information which is exempt from
disclosure but a part of which is not exempt, and such part can be severed in such a
way that the severed part does not contain exempt information then, access to that part
of the information/record may be provided to the applicant. Where access is granted to
a part of the record in such a way, the Public Information Officer should inform the
applicant that the information asked for is exempt from disclosure and that only part of
the record is being provided, after severance, which is not exempt from disclosure.
While doing so, he should give the reasons for the decision, including any findings on
any material question of fact, referring to the material on which those findings were
based.
13. The following table shows the maximum time (from the receipt of application)
which may be taken to dispose off the applications in different situations:
23
at Sr. No. 1
3. Supply of information if it concerns the life or 48 hours
liberty of a person
4. Transfer of application to other public 05 days
authority under section 6(3) of the Act
5. Supply of information if application/request is
received after transfer from another public
authority:
(a) In normal course (a) Within 30 days of the
receipt of the
application by the
concerned public
(b) In case the information concerns the life authority.
or liberty of a person. (b) Within 48 hours of
receipt of the
application by the
concerned public
authority.
6. Supply of information where the applicant is The period intervening
asked to pay additional fee. between informing the
applicant about additional
fee and the receipt of such
fee by the public authority
shall be excluded for
calculating the period of
reply.
7. Supply of information by organizations
specified in the Second Schedule:
(a) If information relates to allegations of (a) 45 days from the
violation of human rights (after approval receipt of application.
of the Central Information Commission)
14. If the Public Information Officer fails to give decision on the request for
information within the prescribed period, he shall be deemed to have refused the
request. It is pertinent to note that if a public authority fails to comply with the specified
time limit, the information to the concerned applicant would have to be provided free of
charge.
16. If an applicant seeks any information which relates to or has been supplied by a
third party and that third party has treated that information as confidential, the Public
Information Officer shall consider whether the information should be disclosed or not.
The guiding principle in such cases is that except in the case of trade or commercial
secrets protected by law, disclosure may be allowed if the public interest in disclosure
outweighs in importance any possible harm or injury to the interests of such third party.
However, the Public Information Officer would have to follow the following procedure
before disclosing such information.
17. If the Public Information Officer intends to disclose the information, he shall
within five days from the receipt of the application, give a written notice to the third party
that the information has been sought by the applicant under the RTI Act and that he
intends to disclose the information. He shall request the third party to make a
submission in writing or orally, regarding whether the information may be disclosed.
The third party shall be given a time of ten days, from the date of receipt of the notice by
him, to make representation against the proposed disclosure, if any.
18. The Public Information Officer shall make a decision regarding disclosure of the
information keeping in view the submission of the third party. Such a decision should
be taken within forty days from the receipt of the request for information. After taking the
decision, the Public Information Officer should give a notice of his decision to the third
party in writing. The notice given to the third party should include a statement that the
third party is entitled to prefer an appeal under section 19 against the decision.
19. The third party can prefer an appeal to the First Appellate Authority against the
decision made by the Public Information Officer within thirty days from the date of the
receipt of notice. If not satisfied with the decision of the First Appellate Authority, the
third party can prefer a second appeal to the Information Commission.
20. If an appeal has been filed by the third party against the decision of the Public
Information Officer to disclose the third party information, the information should not be
disclosed till the appeal is decided.
Imposition of Penalty
21. An applicant under the Act has a right to appeal to the Information Commission
and also to make complaint to the Commission. Where the Information Commission at
the time of deciding any complaint or appeal is of the opinion that the Public Information
Officer has without any reasonable cause, refused to receive an application for
information or has not furnished information within the time specified or malafidely
denied the request for information or knowingly given incorrect, incomplete or
misleading information or destroyed information which was the subject of the request or
obstructed in any manner in furnishing the information, it shall impose a penalty of two
hundred and fifty rupees each day till application is received or information is furnished
25
subject to the condition that the total amount of such penalty shall not exceed twenty-
five thousand rupees. The Public Information Officer shall, however, be given a
reasonable opportunity of being heard before any penalty is imposed on him. The
burden of proving that he acted reasonably and diligently and in case of denial of a
request that such denial was justified shall be on the Public Information Officer.
23. Section 21 of the Act provides that no suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding
shall lie against any person for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be
done under the Act or any rule made thereunder. A Public Information Officer should,
however, note that it would be his responsibility to prove that his action was in good
faith.
26
Part V
The first Appellate Authority has a very important role under the RTI Act, 2005. The
independent and judicious examination of appeals by the First Appellate Authorities
would lead to higher satisfaction to the appellants. This would, in turn, result in less
number of second appeals to the Information Commission.
First Appeal
4. The First Appellate Authority may admit the appeal after expiry of the period of
thirty days if he or she is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause
from filing the appeal in time.
5. A third party can also prefer an appeal to the First Appellate Authority against the
order of the Public Information Officer to disclose third party information. Such an
appeal shall be made within thirty days from the date of the order.
Disposal of Appeal
6. While disposing off first appeals, the first Appellate Authorities should act in a fair
and judicious manner. It is very important that the order passed by the first appellate
authority should be a detailed and speaking order, giving justification for the decision
arrived at.
8. If, in any case, the Public Information Officer does not implement the order
passed by the appellate authority and the appellate authority feels that intervention of
higher authority is required to get his order implemented, he should bring the matter to
the notice of the officer in the public authority competent to take action against the
Public Information Officer. Such competent officer shall take necessary action so as to
ensure implementation of the provisions of the RTI Act.
9. The first appellate authority should dispose off the appeal within 30 days of
receipt of the appeal. In some exceptional cases, the Appellate Authority may take 45
days for its disposal. However, in such cases, the Appellate Authority should record, in
writing, the reasons for not deciding the appeal within 30 days.
28