IAC Yuri

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 23

Teorı́as de gravedad modificadas

Una clasificación sistemática

Yuri Bonder

Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares


Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Seminario hı́brido
Instituto Avanzado de Cosmologı́a

30 de abril de 2024
Motivation

• GR is our current theory of gravity.


• Gravity is the result of spacetime curvature (geometry!).
• It works really well...
Motivation

• GR is our current theory of gravity.


• Gravity is the result of spacetime curvature (geometry!).
• It works really well...

until it does not!


• Dark matter and dark energy.
• Singularities.
• Incompatible with quantum matter.
Proposal

• A new theory could solve some of these issues.


• Expect small deviations from a geometrical
description.
• Construct new theories within the geometrical
paradigm.
• Usually, only the GR action is modified [e.g.,
f (R)].
• Alternative theories can be put forward more
systematically.
Principles

• Use GR’s principles:


1. Spacetime is a 4-dim. pseudo-Riemannian differential manifold.
2. Gravity is completely described by a metric tensor.
3. Minimum coupling.
4. Lorentz invariance and (active) diffeomorphisms.
5. The theory is local.
6. The EOM are, at most, 2nd-order differential equations.
Principles

• Use GR’s principles:


1. Spacetime is a 4-dim. pseudo-Riemannian differential manifold.
2. Gravity is completely described by a metric tensor.
3. Minimum coupling.
4. Lorentz invariance and (active) diffeomorphisms.
5. The theory is local.
6. The EOM are, at most, 2nd-order differential equations.
• These principles lead to GR with a cosmological constant
(Lovelock, 1971).
• Another set of principles for the matter sector.
When is ∇a T ab = 0?

• To define Tab , we need

1
S[g , {ψ}] = SG [g ] + SM [g , {ψ}].

• We are implicitly using hypothesis 1, 2, 3, and 5.
• Diff. invariance (hypothesis 4) ⇒
Z Z
δSM δSM
0 = δdiff SM [g , {ψ}] = d 4x δdiff g ab + d 4x δdiff ψ.
δg ab δψ
When is ∇a T ab = 0?

• To define Tab , we need

1
S[g , {ψ}] = SG [g ] + SM [g , {ψ}].

• We are implicitly using hypothesis 1, 2, 3, and 5.
• Diff. invariance (hypothesis 4) ⇒
0
Z Z
4 δSM δSM
7
0 = δdiff SM [g , {ψ}] = d x δdiff g ab + 4
d x  δdiff ψ.
δg ab | {z } δψ
| {z } −2∇(a ξb)

−g
− 2 Tab

• This is valid on shell (i.e., δSM /δψ = 0 assuming hyp. 3).


When is ∇a T ab = 0?

• Integrating by parts (neglecting boundary terms):


Z
0 = − d 4 x −g ξ b ∇a Tab

• This is valid ∀ ξ a ⇒ ∇a Tab = 0.


• We can still relax hypothesis 6 and have ∇a T ab = 0.
• In particular, in f (R) gravity ∇a T ab = 0.
• We could also change the dimension of spacetime.
• Sometimes ∇a T ab = 0 is considered unremovable.
• GR:
D Eno local gravitational energy.
• Ĥ jumps during measurements [measuring apparatus cannot
compensate ∀ cases (Maudlin+Okon+Sudarsky 2019)].
Principle negation

• GR’s principles:
1. Spacetime is a 4-dim. pseudo-Riemannian differential manifold.
2. Gravity is completely described by a metric tensor.
3. Minimum coupling.
4. Lorentz invariance and (active) diffeomorphisms.
5. The theory is local.
6. The EOM are, at most, 2nd-order differential equations.
• Negation of the first principle leads to nongeometric (e.g.,
discrete theories) and theories in higher dimensions.
Principle negation

• GR’s principles:
1. Spacetime is a 4-dim. pseudo-Riemannian differential manifold.
2. Gravity is completely described by a metric tensor.
3. Minimum coupling.
4. Lorentz invariance and (active) diffeomorphisms.
5. The theory is local.
6. The EOM are, at most, 2nd-order differential equations.
• Negation of the second principle leads to additional
gravitational DOFs (e.g., scalar, nonmetric connections,...).
• Torsion: Einstein–Cartan theory.
• In principle, can be tested with polarized neutrons
(Arderucio+Bonder 2024).
• Currently: studying semiclassically and proposing
configurations for quantum interference.
Principle negation

• GR’s principles:
1. Spacetime is a 4-dim. pseudo-Riemannian differential manifold.
2. Gravity is completely described by a metric tensor.
3. Minimum coupling.
4. Lorentz invariance and (active) diffeomorphisms.
5. The theory is local.
6. The EOM are, at most, 2nd-order differential equations.
• Theories with nonminimal couplings include the well-known
Brans–Dicke theory (1961).
Principle negation

• GR’s principles:
1. Spacetime is a 4-dim. pseudo-Riemannian differential manifold.
2. Gravity is completely described by a metric tensor.
3. Minimum coupling.
4. Lorentz invariance and (active) diffeomorphisms.
5. The theory is local.
6. The EOM are, at most, 2nd-order differential equations.
• Requires nondynamical fields (Corral+Bonder 2019)
⇐⇒ principle of general covariance (Wald’s terminology).
• Nondynamical fields ↔ more fundamental DOFs.
Unimodular gravity
Basic aspects

• Action:
1 √ √
Z
d 4x
 
S= −g R + λ −g − F + LM (g , {ψ})

where λ is Lagrange mult., F nondynamical scalar density.

• EOM: {δLM /δψ} = 0, −g = F ,

1 TL 1 TL
Gab − λgab = κTab ⇐⇒ Rab ≡ Rab − Rgab = κTab .
2 4
• Semiclassically: VEVs of fields do not gravitate.
• If ∇a T ab = 0, ∃ integration constant Λ ⇒ possible solution to
the cosmological constant problem.
• Despite having different constraints w.r.t. GR, well posed
initial value formulation (Herrera+Bonder in press).
Unimodular gravity
Modified conservation law

• F reduces diffeo inv. to volume preserving diffeos: δSG ∝

 √ :0 √ √   0
Z
d 4 x 2 −g ξ b a 
Gab + −g λ∇a ξ a + δλ−g
:

∇  −F ,

which requires ∇a ξ a = 0 ⇒ ξ a = ϵabcd ∇b αcd .


|{z}
arbitrary
• Invariance of SM under volume preserving diffeos:

Z
δSM = d 4 x −g αde ϵbcde ∇c ∇a Tab ⇒ ∇[b ∇a Tc]a = 0.

• Includes ∇a Tab = 0.
• Ja ≡ ∇b Tab (1-form) ⇒ dJ = 0 ⇒ Ja = −∇a Φ
(Poincaré Lemma, trivial top.).
• Proposal for Φ that produces additional contributions to Λ of
right size and sign (Josset+Perez+Sudarsky 2017).
Unimodular gravity
Other results

• Test Φ with test part./light (Bonder+Herrera+Rubiol 2023).


• Using Papapetrou’s method (1951):

u b ∇b u a = J b (δba + u a ub ) ≡ J⊥
a
.
TL = 0 + spherical symm. ⇒
• Gen. Birkhoff theorem: Rab

dr 2 2M
ds 2 = −fdt 2 + + r 2 dΩ2 , f =1− + Λr 2 .
f r
• Static!
• Assuming Φ = Φ(r ), reduce the problem to 1 DOF:

f l2
 
1 1
E − Φ(r ) = r˙2 + − κ ⇐⇒ E = r˙2 + Veff (r ; l)
2 2 r2 2
• E = integration constant, not conserved quantity.
Empirical limits

c2 1 M ℓ2 ℓ2 M 1
E− = r˙2 + Veff (r ; ℓ), Veff = − + 2 − 2 3 + 2 Φ.
2 2 r 2r c r c

t t t
• Consider Φ = br1 + br 22 + br 33 to keep the form of Veff .
• Orbits = bounded trajectories: Veff (rmin ) ≤ E − c 2 /2 < 0,
other restrictions for M, ℓ, and bit .

Veff
r1 r2
c2
E− 2 r
Empirical limits
• Deflexion angle in terms of semi-major axis (a) and
eccentricity (ϵ) (c = 1):
b2t 6πb3t
 
6πM
δϕ ≈ 1 − − .
a(1 − ϵ2 ) 3M 2 Ma2 (1 − ϵ2 )2
| {z }
43′′ (Mercury)

• PPN bounds from MESSENGER mission (NASA, 2011)


 
PPN ′′ 2(γ − 1) − (β − 1)
δϕ = 43 1 + .
3

where γ − 1 = (2.1 ± 2.3) × 10−5 (light bending)


β − 1 = (−4.1 ± 7.8) × 10−5 (Mercury)
b2t b3t
⇒ −6.8 < (3.3 × 104 ) 2
+ 1.1 3
< 1.4.
M⊙ M⊙
• Similar bounds on null curves.
Lorentz and diffeomorphisms noninvariance

Examples:
• Scalar/tensors nonminimally coupled to Riemann.
• I worked with the “t term”: t abcd Cabcd .
• For many years, thought to be unphysical. No reason found
(Bonder 2015).
• Effects/bounds in inflation (Bonder+Leon 2017) and in static
+ spherical-symmetry (Bonder+Peterson 2020).
• Indication that it is incompatible with any asymptotically flat
solution (Bonder+Peterson 2021).
• A nondynamical tensor coupled to a quantum scalar field
leads to unitarily inequivalent inertial vacua
(Arderucio+Bonder+Juárez 2023).
• It does not excite an Unruh-De Witt detector.
Principle negation
• GR’s principles:
1. Spacetime is a 4-dim. pseudo-Riemannian differential manifold.
2. Gravity is completely described by a metric tensor.
3. Minimum coupling.
4. Lorentz invariance and (active) diffeomorphisms.
5. The theory is local.
6. The EOM are, at most, 2nd-order differential equations.
• Tensor fields depend on one spacetime point: local objects.
• Trivial generalization: bitensors.
• We study a bitensorial connection (Bonder+Morales 2022).
• Hints of nonlocality:
• Bell’s theo. (1964) + experiments (e.g., Aspect et al. 1981).
• Expectation value of energy-momentum operator.
Principle negation

• GR’s principles:
1. Spacetime is a 4-dim. pseudo-Riemannian differential manifold.
2. Gravity is completely described by a metric tensor.
3. Minimum coupling.
4. Lorentz invariance and (active) diffeomorphisms.
5. The theory is local.
6. The EOM are, at most, 2nd-order differential equations.
• Leads to f (R) theories and other generalizations.
Conclusions

• Relaxing GR’s principles leads to interesting gravity theories.


• Generically: energy-momentum nonconservation.
• Proposal: negate one principle at a time.
• Sometimes interesting to negate more than one
(e.g., Bonder+Corral 2018).

• Understand the role of each principle within GR.


• Motivates new empirical and mathematical tests.
• Potential to uncover features of a more fund. theo. of gravity.

You might also like