Risk Assessment Data Directory

Report No. 434 – 14

March 2010

Vulnerability
of humans
International Association of Oil & Gas Producers
P ublications

Global experience
The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers has access to a wealth of technical
knowledge and experience with its members operating around the world in many different
terrains. We collate and distil this valuable knowledge for the industry to use as guidelines
for good practice by individual members.

Consistent high quality database and guidelines

Our overall aim is to ensure a consistent approach to training, management and best prac-
tice throughout the world.
The oil and gas exploration and production industry recognises the need to develop consist-
ent databases and records in certain fields. The OGP’s members are encouraged to use the
guidelines as a starting point for their operations or to supplement their own policies and
regulations which may apply locally.

Internationally recognised source of industry information

Many of our guidelines have been recognised and used by international authorities and
safety and environmental bodies. Requests come from governments and non-government
organisations around the world as well as from non-member companies.

Disclaimer
Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication,
neither the OGP nor any of its members past present or future warrants its accuracy or will, regardless
of its or their negligence, assume liability for any foreseeable or unforeseeable use made thereof, which
liability is hereby excluded. Consequently, such use is at the recipient’s own risk on the basis that any use
by the recipient constitutes agreement to the terms of this disclaimer. The recipient is obliged to inform
any subsequent recipient of such terms.
This document may provide guidance supplemental to the requirements of local legislation. Nothing
herein, however, is intended to replace, amend, supersede or otherwise depart from such requirements. In
the event of any conflict or contradiction between the provisions of this document and local legislation,
applicable laws shall prevail.

Copyright notice
The contents of these pages are © The International Association of Oil and Gas Producers. Permission
is given to reproduce this report in whole or in part provided (i) that the copyright of OGP and (ii)
the source are acknowledged. All other rights are reserved.” Any other use requires the prior written
permission of the OGP.
These Terms and Conditions shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of Eng-
land and Wales. Disputes arising here from shall be exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of
England and Wales.
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

contents
1.0 Scope and Definitions .................................................................................... 1
1.1 Application ........................................................................................................ 1
1.2 Definitions......................................................................................................... 1
2.0 Summary of Recommended Data ................................................................. 2
2.1 Fire ................................................................................................................... 2
2.1.1 Engulfment by fire .......................................................................................................3
2.1.2 Thermal radiation ........................................................................................................3
2.1.3 People inside buildings ...............................................................................................5
2.2 Explosion .......................................................................................................... 7
2.3 Toxic gases .................................................................................................... 10
2.3.1 General.....................................................................................................................10
2.3.2 Hydrogen Sulphide ...................................................................................................11
2.4 Smoke ............................................................................................................ 13
2.4.1 Smoke Inhalation ......................................................................................................13
2.4.2 Smoke Obscuration ..................................................................................................16
2.5 Vulnerability inside a Temporary Refuge ........................................................ 16
2.5.1 Smoke ingress ..........................................................................................................16
2.5.2 Heat build-up ............................................................................................................17
2.5.3 Ingress of unignited hydrocarbon gas .......................................................................17
2.5.4 Structural collapse ....................................................................................................18
2.6 Cold Water ..................................................................................................... 18
3.0 Guidance on use of data .............................................................................. 18
3.1 General validity ............................................................................................... 18
3.2 Uncertainties .................................................................................................. 18
4.0 Review of data sources................................................................................ 18
5.0 Recommended data sources for further information ................................ 19
6.0 References .................................................................................................... 19
6.1 References for Sections 2.0 to 4.0 ................................................................. 19
Appendix I – Relationship between Lethality and Probit ....................................... 20

©OGP
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Abbreviations:
API American Petroleum Institute
BLEVE Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosion
BR Breathing Rate
CIA Chemical Industries Association
CO Carbon Monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
COHb Carboxyhaemoglobin
CSTR Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor
DNV Det Norske Veritas
DTL Dangerous Toxic Load
ERPG Emergency Response Planning Guideline
HSE (UK) Health and Safety Executive
IDLH Immediate Danger to Life or Health
LCx Lethal concentration resulting in x% fatalities
LDx Lethal dose resulting in x% fatalities
LFL Lower Flammable Limit
O2 Oxygen
QRA Quantitative Risk Assessment (sometimes Analysis)
SFPE Society of Fire Protection Engineers
SLOD Significant Likelihood of Death
SLOT Specified Level of Toxicity
tdu Thermal Dose Units
TNO Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek
(Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research)
TR Temporary Refuge
VROM (Dutch) Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer

©OGP
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

1.0 Scope and Definitions

1.1 Application
This datasheet provides information on the vulnerability of humans to the consequences of
major hazard events at onshore and offshore installations, primarily those producing and/or
processing hydrocarbon fluids. The focus is on fatality criteria as QRAs generally address
fatality risks, however injury thresholds are also identified where appropriate. Information is
presented relating both to people who are out of doors and people within buildings. The
following consequences are considered:
• Fire
• Explosion
• Toxic gases
• Smoke
Information on vulnerability within a Temporary Refuge and vulnerability following entry to
water (e.g. during evacuation/escape from an offshore installation) is also presented.
For onshore installations, the information presented applies both to personnel working within
the installation and to third parties outside the installation boundary fence. It can therefore be
used for QRAs addressing onsite and offsite risks.
The focus of this datasheet is vulnerability to the consequences described in the Consequence
Modelling datasheet. Vulnerability to other potentially fatal events such as dropped loads and
vehicle impacts are not addressed here; information on these can be found in other
datasheets.

1.2 Definitions
• Fatality is used to refer to qualitative effect
• Lethality refers to the quantitative effect, namely the fraction/percentage of the exposed
population who would suffer fatality on exposure to a given consequence level.
• Radiation is here always used to refer to thermal radiation. The effects of ionising
radiation are not considered in this datasheet.
• Probit: a function that relates lethality to the intensity or concentration of a hazardous
effect and the duration of exposure. It typically takes the form:
Pr = a + b ℓn V
where: Pr = probit
a, b are constants
V = “dose”, typically:
For toxic materials:
V = (cnt) where c = concentration, n = constant, t = exposure duration
For thermal radiation:
V = (I4/3t) where I = thermal radiation, t = exposure duration
Lethality is related to probit as shown in Appendix I.

©OGP 1
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

2.0 Summary of Recommended Data

The data presented in this section are set out as follows:
• Fire (engulfment, thermal radiation, and exposure of buildings): Section 2.1
• Explosion (effects of overpressure): Section 2.2
• Toxic gases (excluding smoke): Section 2.3
• Smoke: Section 2.4
• Vulnerability inside a Temporary Refuge (including smoke and unignited gas): Section 2.5
• Cold water immersion: Section 2.6

2.1 Fire
Depending on the duration, intensity and area of exposure, the effects of fire range from pain,
through 1st, 2nd and 3rd degree burns, to fatality. 2nd degree burns may result in fatality in a
small number of cases (1% lethality for average clothing); 3rd degree burns are likely to result
in fatality (50% lethality for average clothing).
As identified in the Consequence Modelling datasheet, several different types of fire are
potentially of concern depending on the release material and scenario:
• Flash fire • Pool fire
• Jet fire • Fireball/BLEVE
Humans are vulnerable to fire in the following ways:
• Engulfment by the fire
• Thermal radiation from the fire (outside the fire)
• Inside a building that is exposed to fire/radiation
The relationship between fire type and potential vulnerability can be illustrated thus as shown
in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1 Relationships between Fire Types and Potential Vulnerabilities

Fire type Potential Vulnerability

Engulfment Radiation Inside Building
Flash fire   possibly
Jet fire   
Pool fire   
Fireball/BLEVE   possibly

2 ©OGP
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

2.1.1 Engulfment by fire

A person momentarily and only partially exposed directly to fire is most likely to suffer pain and
non-fatal burns.
A person fully or substantially engulfed by fire can be considered to suffer fatality.
For the purposes of QRA, the following lethality levels are recommended:
• 100% lethality for people outdoors engulfed by a jet fire, pool fire or fireball
• 100% lethality for members of the public outdoors engulfed by a flash fire
• 50% to 100% lethality, depending on ease of escape, for workers wearing fire
resistant clothing made from fabrics meeting the requirements of NFPA 2112 [11] or
equivalent
People indoors are considered separately in Section 2.1.3

2.1.2 Thermal radiation

The effects of thermal radiation depend strongly on the thermal radiation flux, the duration of
exposure, the type of clothing worn, the ease of sheltering, and the individual exposed. Hence
the information provided below provides guidance on the range of effects rather than exact
relationships between thermal radiation and effects valid in all circumstances.
Table 2.2 summarises thermal radiation exposure effects over a range of radiation fluxes.
Table 2.3 sets out thermal radiation criteria applicable to longer fire durations, i.e. to jet fires
and pool fires, for which the exposure duration is more dependent on the ability to esc ape
than on the fire duration. Figure 2.1 shows exposure times to the pain threshold and 2nd
degree burns for different thermal radiation levels. ANSI/API Standard 521 [3] sets out
permissible design levels for thermal radiation exposure to flares.

Table 2.2 Thermal Radiation Exposure Effects [1]

Thermal Radiation Effect

(kW/m2)
1.2 Received from the sun at noon in summer
2 Minimum to cause pain after 1 minute
Less than 5 Will cause pain in 15 to 20 seconds and injury after 30 seconds’ exposure
Greater than 6 Pain within approximately 10 seconds; rapid escape only is possible
12.5 • Significant chance of fatality for medium duration exposure.
• Thin steel with insulation on the side away from the fire may reach thermal
stress level high enough to cause structural failure.
• Wood ignites after prolonged exposure.
25 • Likely fatality for extended exposure.
• Spontaneous ignition of wood after long exposure.
• Unprotected steel will reach thermal stress temperatures that can cause
failure.
35 • Significant chance of fatality for people exposed instantaneously.
• Cellulosic material will pilot ignite within one minute’s exposure.

©OGP 3
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Table 2.3 Thermal Radiation Criteria (use for jet/pool fires)

Thermal Radiation Effect

(kW/m2)
35 Immediate fatality (100% lethality)
20 Incapacitation, leading to fatality unless
rescue is effected quickly
12.5 Extreme pain within 20 s; movement to shelter
is instinctive; fatality if escape is not possible.
Outdoors/offshore: 70% lethality
Indoors onshore: 30% lethality*
6 Impairment of escape routes
4 Impairment of TEMPSC embarkation areas
* People indoors are only vulnerable if they have line-of-sight exposure to
thermal radiation, hence a lower lethality than for people outdoors.

Figure 2.1 Times to Pain Threshold and 2nd Degree Burns [2]

700

600

500

400
Time (s)

300

200

100

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Thermal Radiation (kW/m2)

Time to pain threshold Time to 2nd degree burns

For short exposures (up to a few tens of seconds, typical of fireballs), thermal radiation dose
units (tdu) should be used:
Dose (tdu) = (I4/3)t
where: I = incident thermal flux (kW/m2)
t = duration of exposure (s)
Thermal dose units thus have the units (kW/m2)4/3s.

4 ©OGP
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Table 2.4 sets out thermal dose criteria, which should be used for fireballs.

Table 2.4 Thermal Dose Fatality Criteria (use for fireballs)

Thermal Dose Units Effect

((kW/m2)4/3s)
1000 1% lethality
1800 50% lethality, members of the public
2000 50% lethality, offshore workers
3200 100% lethality

2.1.3 People inside buildings

Besides being vulnerable to thermal radiation if they have a direct line of sight to a jet or pool
fire, people inside buildings may be vulnerable to the building catching fire if combustible
building material is exposed to the fire (either to a directly impinging fire or to radiation).
Two types of ignition are recognised:
• Piloted ignition, resulting from the flame impinging directly on a surface
• Spontaneous ignition, resulting from exposure to thermal radiation from a fire
Table 2.2 indicates thermal radiation levels for ignition of wood and cellulosic material. Figure
2.2 shows, as an example, the relationship between thermal radiation and time to ignition (both
piloted and spontaneous) for oak.
Personnel inside a building are vulnerable to the building catching fire if they cannot escape in
sufficient time. This will depend on the time to ignition as compared to the time to alert the
people inside to the source fire and evacuate them.
People inside a building are also vulnerable if escape routes are exposed to thermal radiation:
in this case the criterion of 6 kW/m2 given in Table 2.3 can be applied.

©OGP 5
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Figure 2.2 Example Times to Ignition of Oak

70.0

60.0
Thermal Radiation (kW/m2)

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0
0 30 60 90 120
Time to Ignition (s)
Piloted Ignition Spontaneous Ignition

6 ©OGP
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

2.2 Explosion
Explosions generate overpressures and drag forces that in turn result in damage to buildings
and structures, and generate missiles (fragments of damaged structures, window glass shards,
or loose objects). The effects of overpressure on humans are normally categorised as follows:
• Direct or Primary: injury to the body as a result of the pressure change
• Secondary: injury as a result of fragments or debris produced by the overpressure
impacting on the body
• Tertiary: injury as a result of the body (especially the head) being thrown by the
explosion drag and impacting on stationary objects or structures
For QRA, lethality is not typically estimated independently for these effects; instead, an
overall lethality is estimated based on the combination of these effects.
Casualties requiring medical treatment from direct blast effects are typically produced by
overpressures between 1.0 and 3.4 bar. However, other effects (such as secondary effects
and thermal injuries) are so predominant that casualties with only direct blast injuries make
up a small part of an exposed group.
For people onshore, outdoors and in the open, the following lethality levels are
recommended:
• 0.35 bar overpressure: 15% lethality for people outdoors, in the open
• 0.5 bar overpressure: 50% lethality for people outdoors, in the open
For people onshore, outdoors but adjacent to buildings or in unprotected structures (e.g.
process units), the following lethality levels are recommended:
• 0.35 bar overpressure: 30% lethality for people outdoors
• 0.5 bar overpressure: 100% lethality for people outdoors
For people indoors, the lethality level depends on the building type as well as the
overpressure. Two frequently used sets of relationships between lethality level and over-
pressure are presented below: Figure 2.3 shows that from API RP 752 [4], Figure 2.4 that from
the CIA Guidance [6]. Both differentiate between building construction types.
For personnel offshore in modules affected by an explosion, the following approach is
suggested:
• 100% lethality for personnel in the module where the explosion occurs, if the
explosion overpressure exceeds 0.2 to 0.3 barg
• 100% lethality in adjacent modules if the intervening partition (wall or deck) is
destroyed by the explosion.
A more sophisticated approach could involve more detailed study of other explosion
characteristics: overpressure phase duration and impulse. A probabilistic approach is
recommended to estimate the likelihood of exceeding overpressures that could result in
immediate fatality, escalation within the module, and escalation to adjacent areas.

©OGP 7
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Figure 2.3 Overpressure – Lethality Relationships from API 752* [4]

15
14
13
12
11
Overpressure (psi)

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Lethality

B5 B1, B2, B4 B3

Building Types
B1: Wood-frame trailer or shack.
B2: Steel-frame/metal siding or pre-engineered building.
B3: Unreinforced masonry bearing wall building.
B4: Steel or concrete framed with reinforced masonry infill or cladding.
B5: Reinforced concrete or reinforced masonry shear wall building.
* Note that API RP 753 [5] has superseded API RP 752 [4] with regard to locating portable
buildings (building type B1). However, it does not give any overpressure-lethality relationship
for such buildings, for which API RP 753 [5] should be followed rather than using the curve on
the above graph.

8 ©OGP
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Figure 2.4 Overpressure – Lethality Relationships from CIA Guidance [6]

1
Lethality

0.1

0.01
0.01 0.1 1

Overpressure (bar)
CIA1 CIA2 CIA3 CIA4

Building Types
CIA1: Hardened structure building: special construction, no windows
CIA2: Typical office block: four storey, concrete frame and roof, brick block wall panels
CIA3: Typical domestic building: two-storey, brick, walls, timber floors
CIA4: ‘Portacabin’ type timber construction, single storey

Note that the presentations of the graphs in Figure 2.3 and Figure 2.4 follow those of the
original publications and no attempt has been made to convert either or both to a common set
of axes.

©OGP 9
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

2.3 Toxic gases

2.3.1 General
Various approaches are used to determine the consequences of toxic gases (not including
smoke, which is addressed separately in Section 2.4):
• IDLH
• ERPG
• Probit
• SLOT & SLOD DTLs

Of these, the IDLH (“Immediate Danger to Life or Health”) is the maximum concentration from
which escape is possible within 30 minutes without any escape-impairing symptoms or
irreversible health effects. Its use as the limiting value for the onset of fatalities has several
disadvantages, chief amongst them as regards QRA is significant conservatism. IDLHs are
more suitable for use as a workplace risk management tool rather than in a major accident risk
assessment. In most cases, exposure to the IDLH concentration would be extremely unlikely
(<< 1%) to result in fatalities.
ERPGs – Emergency Response Planning Guidelines – are precisely what their name implies,
i.e. they are used (in the USA) to plan emergency response to an incident, knowing the likely
ranges of health effects resulting from the incident and consequent numbers of casualties.
Neither IDLH nor ERPG values are therefore recommended for major hazard QRAs, however
both are useful as indicators of the hazard effects of toxic materials.
The probit approach has been used for at least 30 years, with probit functions being developed
for a wide range of toxic materials. They have been used especially, but not exclusively, in the
Netherlands. They enable the lethality to be estimated for any combination of concentration
and duration of exposure, including time dependent concentrations (resulting from time varying
release rates). They can be used to provide fine resolution in fatality estimates, especially for
third party (offsite) risks onshore, using the results of atmospheric dispersion models (see
Consequence Modelling datasheet). Probits recommended below are those published by
recognised bodies (TNO and the UK HSE) and used by regulators.
The SLOT and SLOD DTLs technique has been proposed and developed by the UK HSE as
an alternative to the probit approach.
The SLOT (Specified Level Of Toxicity) DTL (Dangerous Toxic Load) is usually defined as the
dose that results in highly susceptible people being killed and a substantial portion of the
exposed population requiring medical attention and severe distress to the remainder exposed.
As such it represents the dose that will result in the onset of fatality for an exposed population
(commonly referred to as LD1 or LD1-5).
The SLOD (Significant Likelihood of Death) DTL is defined as the dose to typically result in
50% lethality (LD50) within an exposed population and is the value typically used for group risk
of death calculation onshore.
Both the SLOT and SLOD DTLs are calculated as:
DTL = cnt
where: c = concentration in ppm
t = exposure duration in minutes

10 ©OGP
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Table 2.6 gives SLOT and SLOD values, and both HSE and TNO probits, for selected toxic
materials. See Section 5.0 for references to data sources for other materials.
Table 2.7 gives the resulting concentrations that give 1% and 50% lethality for 10 minutes and
30 minutes exposure. There is no clear pattern regarding whether the HSE or TNO probits
indicate higher or lower concentrations for a given lethality level.
• For studies of facilities falling under the UK regulatory regime, the HSE probits or
SLOT/SLOD values are recommended.
• In other regulatory regimes that have specified probits, the use of those probits is
recommended.
• For all other studies, the TNO probit is recommended.

2.3.2 Hydrogen Sulphide

Other than toxic products from combustion of hydrocarbons (see Section 2.4) the most likely
toxic gas present in oil and gas production hydrocarbon fluids is Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S). The
effects likely to be experienced by humans exposed to various concentrations of H2S are
described in Table 2.5.

Table 2.5 Effects of Exposure to Hydrogen Sulphide [1]

H2S Effect
Concentration
20 – 30 ppm Conjunctivitis
50 ppm Objection to light after 4 hours exposure. Lacrimation
150 - 200 ppm Objection to light, irritation of mucous membranes, headache
200 - 400 ppm Slight symptoms of poisoning after several hours
250 - 600 ppm Pulmonary edema and bronchial pneumonia after prolonged exposure
500 - 1000 ppm Painful eye irritation, vomiting.
1000 ppm Immediate acute poisoning
1000 - 2000 ppm Lethal after 30 to 60 minutes
> 2000 ppm Rapidly lethal

©OGP 11
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Table 2.6 SLOT & SLOD DTL Values and Probit Constants (concentration in ppm, duration in minutes)

Material HSE SLOT & SLOD HSE Probit TNO Probit

SLOT SLOD “n” a b n a b n
1.09 ×
Ammonia 3.78 × 108 2 -43.24 2.32 2 -16.33 1 2
109
Carbon Monoxide 40125 57000 1 -67.68 6.64 1 -7.26 1 1
4.84 ×
Chlorine 1.08 × 105 2 -15.33 1.55 2 -4.89 0.5 2.75
105
1.5 ×
Hydrogen Sulphide 2 × 1012 4 -30.08 1.16 4 -10.87 1 1.9
1013
7.45 ×
Sulphur Dioxide 4.66 × 106 2 -10.23 0.84 2 -16.89 1 2.4
107
Hydrogen Fluoride 12000 41000 1 -36.44 4.16 1 -8.70 1 1.5
96000 6.24 × 2
Nitrogen Dioxide -11.61 1.24 2 -16.26 1 3.7
105

Table 2.7 Example Concentrations (ppm) to give 1% and 50% Lethality for 10 minute and 30 minute Exposures

Material 10 minutes, 1% lethality 30 minutes, 1% lethality 10 minutes, 50% lethality 30 minutes, 50% lethality
HSE SLOT TNO Probit HSE SLOT TNO Probit HSE SLOD TNO Probit HSE SLOD TNO Probit
Ammonia 6148 4218 3550 2435 10149 13523 5859 7808
Carbon Monoxide 4013 2063 1338 688 5700 21203 1900 7068
Chlorine 104 105 60 71 220 573 127 384
Hydrogen Sulphide 669 371 508 208 1107 1265 841 709
Sulphur Dioxide 683 1327 394 840 2729 3504 1576 2217
Hydrogen Fluoride 1200 422 400 203 4100 1996 1367 960
Nitrogen Dioxide 9600 90 3200 67 62400 168 20800 125

12 ©OGP
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

2.4 Smoke
Smoke from hydrocarbon fires contains carbon monoxide, which is toxic, and carbon dioxide,
which contributes to the physiological effects of smoke in various ways. Smoke is also
deficient in oxygen, hence its inhalation will result in oxygen depletion. Hence the direct effect
of smoke needs to consider the combined effects of these constituents: see Section 2.4.1.
Smoke also obscures vision and hence may prevent personnel from reaching the TR or
lifeboat embarkation points on an offshore installation, or muster location onshore: see Section
2.4.2.
Once personnel are mustered in the TR offshore, they continue to be vulnerable through
smoke ingress to the TR; this is addressed separately in Section 2.5.

2.4.1 Smoke Inhalation

2.4.1.1 Effects of carbon monoxide exposure
Table 2.8 Effects of Carbon Monoxide Exposure [1]

CO concentration Effects
1500 ppm Headache after 15 minutes, collapse after 30 minutes, death after 1 hour
2000 ppm Headache after 10 minutes, collapse after 20 minutes, death after 45 minutes
3000 ppm Maximum "safe" exposure for 5 minutes, danger of collapse in 10 minutes,
danger of death in 15 to 45 minutes
6000 ppm Headache and dizziness in 1 to 2 minutes, danger of death in 10 to 15
minutes
12800 ppm Immediate effect, unconscious after 2 to 3 breaths, danger of death in 1 to 3
minutes

The toxicity of carbon monoxide is due to the formation of blood carboxyhaemoglobin. This
results in a reduction of the supply of oxygen to critical body organs and is referred to as
anaemic anoxia. The affinity of haemoglobin for CO is extremely high (over 200 times
higher than O2), so that the proportion of haemoglobin in the form of carboxyhaemoglobin
(COHb) increases steadily as CO is inhaled. There is little doubt that CO is the most
important toxic agent formed in hydrocarbon fires because:
• It is always present in fires, often at high concentrations.
• It causes confusion and loss of consciousness, thus impairing or, preventing escape.
The rate of change (per second) of the carboxyhaemoglobin level (COHb, %) is given by:
dCCOHb (100 - CCOHb )
dt
=
100
(
3.37 × 10 - 5 × 10 4 CO )
1.036
× BR × 1000

where CO is in %, BR is in m3/s and is the actual breathing rate (approximately 3 × 10-3 m3/s for
an average individual). The cumulative effect of CO can be calculated by integrating this
expression.
The actual breathing rate may exceed the nominal breathing rate because of the effects of CO2
and is estimated as follows:
exp [0.2496.CO2 (%) + 1.9086 ]
BR (actual) = × BR (nominal)
6.8

©OGP 13
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Table 2.9 shows the effects of COHb in blood. From this table it can be concluded that COHb
levels in the range 10-20% represent a range of values where there is a reduced potential of
ability to escape or carry out functions requiring dexterity or conscious effort. Above 20%
COHb impairment and death become more certain within a relatively short period and recovery
may not be possible. It is suggested that the upper limit for survivability without significant
impairment is 15% COHb with a cautious best estimate of 10% COHb to be used where
exposure is followed by intense physical activity such as escape or evacuation under harsh
conditions.

Table 2.9 Effects of COHb in Blood [1]

% COHb in Blood Physiological and Subjective Symptoms

2.5-5 No symptoms
5-10 Visual light threshold slightly increased
10-20 Tightness across forehead and slight headache, dyspnoea on moderate
exertion, occasional headache, signs of abnormal vision
20-30 Definite headache, easily fatigued, Impaired judgment, possible dizziness and
dim vision, impaired manual dexterity
30-40 Severe headache with dizziness, nausea and vomiting
40-50 Headache, collapse, confusion, fainting on exertion
60-70 Unconsciousness, convulsions, respiratory failure and death
80 Rapidly fatal
80+ Immediately fatal

2.4.1.2 Effects of carbon dioxide exposure

Table 2.10 Effects of Carbon Dioxide Exposure [1]

CO2 Concentration Responses

45 000 ppm / 4.5% Reduced concentration capability for more than 8 hours exposure, adaptation
possible
55 000 ppm / 5.5% Breathing difficulty, headache and increased heart rate after 1 hour
65 000 ppm / 6.5% Dizziness, and confusion after 15 minutes exposure
70 000 ppm / 7.0% Anxiety caused by breathing difficulty, effects becoming severe after 6
minutes exposure
100 000 ppm / 10% Approaches threshold of unconsciousness in 30 minutes
120 000 ppm / 12% Threshold of unconsciousness reached in 5 minutes
150 000 ppm / 15% Exposure limit 1 minutes
200 000 ppm / 20% Unconsciousness occurs in less than 1 minute

While carbon dioxide is not considered to be particularly toxic, at levels normally observed
in fires, a moderate concentration does stimulate the rate of respiration. This would be
expected to cause accelerated uptake of any toxic and/or irritant gasses present during an
incident involving fire and fume as breathing rate increases 50% for 20 000 ppm (2% v/v)
carbon dioxide and doubles for 30 000 ppm (3% v/v) carbon dioxide in air. At 50 000 ppm
(5%v/v), breathing becomes laboured and difficult for some individuals as it represents a
significant level of oxygen depletion.

14 ©OGP
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

The effect of CO2 can be expressed as the fraction, FCO2, of the incapacitating dose by
integrating the following expression:
dF CO2 1
=
dt (60 exp [6.1623 - 0.5189.CO2 ] )
where CO2 is the concentration of CO2(%) in air, which can be estimated using the approach
suggested in Section 2.5.1 of the Consequence Modelling datasheet.. Concentrations of less
than 3% are considered to have no effect.

2.4.1.3 Effects of oxygen depletion

Table 2.11 Effects of Oxygen Depletion [1]

% Oxygen in Air Symptoms

21-20 Normal
18 Night vision begins to be impaired
17 Respiration volume increases, muscular coordination diminishes, attention
and thinking clearly requires more effort
12 to 15 Shortness of breath, headache, dizziness, quickened pulse, effort fatigues
quickly, muscular coordination for skilled movement lost
10 to 12 Nausea and vomiting, exertion impossible, paralysis of motion
6 to 8 Collapse and unconsciousness occurs
6 or below Death in 6 to 8 minutes

Oxygen constitutes approximately 21% v/v in clean air. Oxygen concentrations below 15%
by volume produce oxygen starvation (hypoxia) effects such as increased breathing, faulty
judgment and rapid onset of fatigue. Concentrations below 10% cause rapid loss of
judgment and comprehension followed by loss of consciousness, leading to death within a
few minutes. This is taken to be the limiting oxygen concentration where escape needs
only a few seconds. If escape is not possible within few seconds, incapacitation and death
is assumed to occur.
The effect of oxygen depletion can be expressed as the fraction, FO2, of the incapacitating
dose by integrating the following expression:
dF O2 1
=
dt (60 exp [8.13 - 0.54 (20.9 - O2 )] )
where O2 is the oxygen concentration (%) in air.

2.4.1.4 Combined effects of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and oxygen depletion
The combined effect of these smoke constituents can be considered to give an incapacitating
dose, FTot, calculated as follows:
CCOHb
FTot = FCO2 + FO2 +
0.3
If FTot > 1.0, impairment is considered to result.

©OGP 15
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

2.4.2 Smoke Obscuration

A visibility of 4-5 m is about the threshold of diminished performance, and this is the smoke
level that should be considered in smoke ventilation system design. It is suggested that there
should be a minimum of 3 m vision for escape from a primary compartment and at least 10 m
for an escape route.
Important factors to consider in a risk analysis with regard to obscuration of vision (and time to
escape) are:
• Exposure to smoke
• Arrangements of escape ways (layout, sign, illumination, railing, etc.)
• Training of personnel
• Familiarity with the installation

Where an escape way is well laid out and provided with high visibility marking or illumination
(including effective provision of torches / light-sticks), then the 3 m criterion may be applied.
Alternatively, impairment of escape ways or of the TR can be considered to occur when the
particulate concentration exceeds that giving a visibility reduction of 1 dB/m. This can be
estimated using the approach suggested in Section 2.5.1 of the Consequence Modelling
datasheet.

2.5 Vulnerability inside a Temporary Refuge

Personnel inside a Temporary Refuge continue to be vulnerable to the consequences of an
incident that has caused them to muster there. They are vulnerable to:
• Smoke ingress to the TR
• Heat build-up in the TR
• Ingress to the TR of unignited hydrocarbon gas
• Delayed explosion or structural collapse resulting in the TR being breached or otherwise
ceasing to be habitable

2.5.1 Smoke ingress

Smoke ingress to the TR also results in heat build-up. CO2 build-up and oxygen depletion are
also enhanced through respiration. Hence application of a simple model for gas build-up in the
TR such as the CSTR model suggested in Section 2.5.1 of the Consequence Modelling
datasheet will under-estimate the effects of smoke ingress.
It can be assumed that the smoke plume totally engulfs the TR at a uniform concentration. It is
further assumed that any smoke that enters the TR will be rapidly and evenly dispersed around
the relevant interior space.
The CO and particulates concentrations, Conc, in the TR are evaluated as:

= (Concout - Concin )(Vent Rate )

d Conc
dt
where: Concin is the concentration of CO/particulate inside the TR
Concout is the concentration of CO/particulates outside the TR

16 ©OGP
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Vent Rate is the TR ventilation rate (air changes per second)

The CO2 concentration, Conc, in the TR is calculated as:

C × N × BR
= (Concout - Concin )(Vent Rate ) +
d Conc
dt V
where: C is the concentration of CO2 in exhaled air, assumed to be 3%
N is the number of persons in the TR
BR is an average individual’s breathing rate (m3/s)
V is the TR volume (m3)

The O2 concentration in the TR is calculated as:

P × N × BR
= (Conc out - Concin )(Vent Rate ) +
d Conc
dt V
where P is the percentage of inhaled air that is converted from O2 to CO2, usually 3%.
The initial concentrations are all taken to be zero, except O2 which is taken to be 20.9%.
The internal temperature (neglecting any changes in humidity level) is calculated by integrating
the following function:
dT Q1 + Q 2
= + (Tin - Tout )(Vent Rate )
dt VρC
where Q1 is the heat conducted through the TR fabric (assumed zero)
Q2 is the heat generated by the TR occupants (350 W per person at normal
temperatures)
and VρC is the heat capacity of the TR air (volume × density × specific heat).

Impairment of the TR is then taken to occur if either:

• The particulate concentration exceeds that giving a visibility reduction of 1 dB/m, or,
• The total incapacitating dose of COHb, CO2, O2, and temperature effects exceeds 1.0. The
total dose FTot is calculated as:
CCOHb
FTot = FCO2 + FO2 + FTemp +
0.3
2.5.2 Heat build-up
Besides heat build-up through smoke ingress, the TR may also be heated by an externally
impinging fire. However, on many modern installations there is at least an H60 rated firewall
protecting the TR from fire. Hence, provided the integrity of the firewall is not breached (e.g.
by an explosion), the TR should not be impaired solely by the effects of heat build-up due to
external radiation within its expected endurance time.

2.5.3 Ingress of unignited hydrocarbon gas

As discussed in Section 2.5.1 of the Consequence Modelling datasheet, a gas concentration
inside the TR exceeding 60% of LFL can be assumed to cause TR impairment.

©OGP 17
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

2.5.4 Structural collapse

Structural collapse and/or breach of the TR is addressed in the Structural Vulnerability
datasheet.

2.6 Cold Water

The survival of people immersed in cold water (e.g. as a result of escape to water from an
offshore installation) depends on a range of variables:
• Environmental factors: temperature, sea state, visibility
• Clothing: survival suit, lifejacket
• Personal factors, e.g. body fat, fitness
An HSE offshore safety report [7], published in 1996 but still referenced by the HSE, presents
a comprehensive discussion of the subject and a recommended approach.

3.0 Guidance on use of data

3.1 General validity
The criteria set out in Section 2.0 should be used where no equivalent criteria are specified
either by the regulatory authority or by the party commissioning the QRA. They should
generally be considered valid for most studies related to onshore and offshore facilities.
Where the combustion products in smoke include other toxic materials besides CO, their
effects should be incorporated in the analysis, e.g. by using the probits for those materials.

3.2 Uncertainties
Individuals’ vulnerabilities to all the potential causes of injury/fatality discussed in Section 2.0
vary widely, depending on many factors such as:
• Personal factors: physical (e.g. fitness), psychological, training
• Clothing (applies to thermal radiation, exposure to fire, cold water immersion)
• Ability to escape (e.g. ease of egress, availability of escape routes/means)
• Availability and ongoing integrity of shelter (e.g. TR)
• Availability of means of breathing assistance (applies to toxic gases and smoke)
In addition, factors such as warning time, the reliability of HVAC shutdown systems and TR
fabric integrity will impact on the dose received. All of these factors should be considered for
their relevance and impact when using the criteria.

4.0 Review of data sources

For all of the impact criteria except cold water, an HSE document [1] provides a good general
summary of vulnerabilities and physical effects of the hazards discussed in Section 2.0. It
draws on a range of other published studies referenced within it. This document accordingly
forms the basis of the recommended data.

18 ©OGP
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Supplementary references are as follows:

• Fire API [3]
• Explosion API [4] (but see note below Figure 2.3), CIA [6]
• Toxic gases Dutch “Purple Book” [8], [12]
• Smoke SFPE [9]
• TR Purser [10]
• Cold Water HSE [7]

5.0 Recommended data sources for further information

HSE SLOD and SLOT values for a wide range of materials additional to those presented in
Section 2.3 are given in [12]. The “Purple Book” [8] likewise gives probits for a wide range of
materials.

6.0 References
6.1 References for Sections 2.0 to 4.0
[1] HSE, 2008. Indicative Human Vulnerability to the Hazardous Agents Present Offshore for
Application in Risk Assessment of Major Accidents, HID Semi Permanent Circular no.
SPC/Tech/OSD/30, http://www.hse.gov.uk/foi/internalops/hid/spc/spctosd30.pdf.
[2] FEMA, 1989. Handbook of Chemical Hazard Analysis Procedures, Washington, D.C:
Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[3] American Petroleum Institute (API), 2007. Pressure-Relieving and Depressuring Systems,
ANSI/API STD 521, 5th ed., Washington, D.C: API.
[4] American Petroleum Institute (API), 2003. Management of Hazards Associated with
Location of Process Plant Buildings, 2nd. ed., API RP 752, Washington, D.C: API.
[5] American Petroleum Institute (API), 2007. Management of Hazards Associated with
Location of Process Plant Portable Buildings, 1st. ed., API RP 753, Washington, D.C: API.
[6] Chemical Industries Association (CIA), 2003. Guidance for the location and design of
occupied buildings on chemical manufacturing sites, 2nd. ed., London: Chemical Industires
Association, ISBN 1 85897 114 4.
[7] HSE, 1996. Review of Probable Survival Times for Immersion in the North Sea, Offshore
Technology Report OTO 95 038,
http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/otopdf/1995/oto95038.pdf.
[8] VROM, 1999/2005. Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment, Publication Series on
Dangerous Substances, PGS 3 (formerly CPR18, “Purple Book”), Ministerie van Volkshuis-
vesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, http://www.vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=20725.
[9] SFPE, 2002. The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 3rd. ed., ch. 2-6, Quincy,
MA: National Fire Protection Association.
[10] Purser, D, 1992. Toxic Effects of Fire Cases, Offshore Fire and Smoke Hazards,
Aberdeen.
[11] NFPA 2007. Standard on Flame-Resistant Garments for Protection of Industrial
Personnel against Flash Fire, NFPA 2112.

[12] HSE, 2008. Assessment of the Dangerous Toxic Load (DTL) for Specified Level of
Toxicity (SLOT) and Significant Likelihood of Death (SLOD),
http://www.hse.gov.uk/hid/haztox.htm.

©OGP 19
 RADD – Vulnerability of humans

Appendix I – Relationship between Lethality and Probit

The following table shows the percentage affected (lethality) for a given probit value.

Lethality (%)

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0 - 2.67 2.95 3.12 3.25 3.36 3.45 3.52 3.59 3.66

10 3.72 3.77 3.82 3.87 3.92 3.96 4.01 4.05 4.08 4.12

20 4.16 4.19 4.23 4.26 4.29 4.33 4.36 4.39 4.42 4.45

30 4.48 4.50 4.53 4.56 4.59 4.61 4.64 4.67 4.69 4.72

40 4.75 4.77 4.80 4.82 4.85 4.87 4.90 4.92 4.95 4.97

50 5.00 5.03 5.05 5.08 5.10 5.13 5.15 5.18 5.20 5.23

60 5.25 5.28 5.31 5.33 5.36 5.39 5.41 5.44 5.47 5.50

70 5.52 5.55 5.58 5.61 5.64 5.67 5.71 5.74 5.77 5.81

80 5.84 5.88 5.92 5.95 5.99 6.04 6.08 6.13 6.18 6.23

90 6.28 6.34 6.41 6.48 6.55 6.64 6.75 6.88 7.05 7.33

% 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

99 7.33 7.37 7.41 7.46 7.51 7.58 7.65 7.75 7.88 8.09

Examples:
• 1% is equivalent to 2.67 probits.
• 42% is equivalent to 4.80 probits.
• 50% is equivalent to 5.00 probits.
• 75% is equivalent to 5.67 probits.
• 99.9% is equivalent to 8.09 probits.

20 ©OGP
 For further information and publications,
please visit our website at

www.ogp.org.uk
209-215 Blackfriars Road
London SE1 8NL
United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 (0)20 7633 0272
Fax: +44 (0)20 7633 2350

165 Bd du Souverain
4th Floor
B-1160 Brussels, Belgium
Telephone: +32 (0)2 566 9150
Fax: +32 (0)2 566 9159

Internet site: www.ogp.org.uk

e-mail: [email protected]