Chapter16 CapitalStructure
Chapter16 CapitalStructure
Chapter16 CapitalStructure
SYLLABUS
If you can reduce the WACC, this results in a higher market value or NPV of the
company and therefore an increase in shareholder wealth as they own the company.
2.2 The traditional view of capital structure is that there is an optimal capital structure
and the company can increase its total value by suitable use of debt finance in its
capital structure.
2.3 Assumptions
The assumptions on which this theory is based are as follows:
(a) The company pays out all its earnings as dividends.
(b) The gearing of the company can be changed immediately by issuing debt
to repurchase shares, or by issuing shares to repurchase debt. There are no
transaction costs for issues.
(c) The earnings of the company are expected to remain constant in
perpetuity and all investors share the same expectations about these future
earnings.
(d) Business risk is also constant, regardless of how the company invests its
funds.
(e) Taxation, for the timing being, is ignored.
2.6 Conclusion – there is an optimal level of gearing – point X. At point X the overall
return required by investors (debt and equity) is minimised. It follows that at this point
the combined market value of the firm’s debt and equity securities will also be
maximised.
2.7 Company should gear up until it reaches optimal point and then raise a mix of finance
to maintain this level of gearing. However, there is no method, apart from trial and
error, available to locate the optimal point.
3.2 The net operating income approach takes a different view of the effect of gearing on
WACC. In their 1958 theory, M&M proposed that the total market value of a
company, in the absence of tax, will be determined only by two factors:
(a) the total earnings of the company.
(b) the level of operating (business) risk attached to those earnings.
3.3 The total market value would be computed by discounting the total earnings at a rate
that is appropriate to the level of operating risk. This rate would represent the WACC
of the company.
3.4 Thus M&M concluded that the capital structure of a company would have no effect
on its overall value or WACC.
3.5 Assumptions
M&M made various assumptions in arriving at this conclusion, including:
(a) A perfect capital market exists, in which investors have the same
information, upon which they act rationally, to arrive at the same
expectations about future earnings and risks.
(b) There are no tax or transaction costs.
(c) Debt is risk-free and freely available at the same cost to investors and
companies alike.
3.6 Summary
If M&M I theory holds, it implies:
(a) The cost of debt remains unchanged as the level of gearing increases.
(b) The cost of equity rises in such a way as to keep the WACC constant.
3.8 Example 1
A company has $5,000 of debt at 10% interest, and earns $5,000 a year before
interest is paid. There are 2,250 issued shares, and the WACC is 20%.
Suppose that the level of gearing is increased by issuing $5,000 more of debt at
10% interest to repurchase 562 shares (at a market value of $8.89 per share) leaving
1,688 shares in issue.
The WACC will, according to the net operating income approach, remain
unchanged at 20%. The market value of the company should still therefore be
$25,000.
Earnings $5,000
WACC 0.2
$
Market value of the company ($5,000 ÷ 0.2) 25,000
Less: market value of debt (10,000)
Market value of equity 15,000
The cost of equity has risen to and the market value per share
is still:
Conclusion:
The level of gearing is a matter of indifference to an investor, because it does not
affect the market value of the company, nor of an individual share. This is because
as the level of gearing rises, so does the cost of equity in such a way as to keep both
the weighted average cost of capital and the market value of the shares constant.
Although, in our example, the dividend per share rises from $2 to $2.37, the
increase in the cost of equity is such that the market value per share remains at
$8.89.
4.4 However, this does not happen in practice due to existence of other market
imperfections (市場的不完善) which undermine the tax advantages of debt finance.
(c) on management from disposing of any major fixed assets without the debenture
holders’ agreement.
5.5 Tax exhaustion – After a certain level of gearing, companies will discover that they
have no tax liability left against which to offset interest charges.
Kd (1 – t) simply becomes Kd.
5.6 Borrowing/debt capacity – High levels of gearing are unusual because companies run
out of suitable assets to offer as security against loans. Companies with assets which
have an active second-hand market, and with low levels of depreciation such as
property companies, have a high borrowing capacity.
5.7 Difference risk tolerance levels between shareholders and directors – Business
failure can have a far greater impact on directors than on a well-diversified investor. It
may be argued that directors have a natural tendency to be cautious about borrowing.
5.8 Restrictions in the articles of association may specify limits on the company’s ability
to borrow.
5.9 The cost of borrowing increases as gearing increases.
6.1.1 Pecking order theory has been developed as an alternative to traditional theory. It
states that firms will prefer retained earnings to any other source of finance, and then
will choose debt, and last of all equity. The order of preference will be:
(a) Retained earnings
(b) Straight debt
(c) Convertible debt
(d) Preference shares
(e) Equity shares
6.1.2 Internally-generated funds – i.e. retained earnings
(a) Already have the funds.
(b) Do not have to spend any time persuading outside investors of the merits of the
project.
(c) No issue costs.
6.1.3 Debt
(a) The degree of questioning and publicity associated with debt is usually
significantly less than that associated with a share issue.
(b) Moderate issue costs.
6.1.4 New issue of equity
6.2.1 Myers has suggested asymmetric information as an explanation for the heavy reliance
on retentions. This may be a situation where managers, because of their access to more
information about the firm, know that the value of the shares is greater than the current
market value (based on the weak and semi-strong market information).
6.2.2 In the case of a new project, managers' forecasts may be higher and more realistic than
that of the market. If new shares were issued in this situation, there is a possibility that
they would be issued at too low a price, thus transferring wealth from existing
shareholders to new shareholders. In these circumstances there might be a natural
preference for internally-generated funds over new issues. If additional funds are
required over and above internally-generated funds, then debt would be the next
alternative.
6.2.3 If management is averse to making equity issues when in possession of favourable
inside information, market participants might assume that management will be more
likely to favour new issues when they are in possession of unfavourable inside
information which leads to the suggestion that new issues might be regarded as a
signal of bad news! Managers may therefore wish to rely primarily on internally-
generated funds supplemented by borrowing, with issues of new equity as a last resort.
6.2.4 Myers and Majluf (1984) demonstrated that with asymmetric information, equity
issues are interpreted by the market as bad news, since managers are only motivated to
make equity issues when shares are overpriced. Bennett Stewart (1990) puts it
differently: ‘Raising equity conveys doubt. Investors suspect that management is
attempting to shore up the firm’s financial resources for rough times ahead by selling
over-valued shares.’
6.2.5 Asquith and Mullins (1983) empirically observed that announcements of new equity
issues are greeted by sharp declines in stock prices. Thus, equity issues are
comparatively rare among large established companies.
2. A Co’s gearing is 1:1 Debt:equity. The industry average is 1:5. A Co are looking to
raise finance for investment in a new project and they are wondering whether to raise
debt or equity.
3. Why do Modigliani-Miller (with tax) assume increased gearing will reduce the
weighted average cost of capital (‘WACC’)?
According to both the traditional view and the Modigliani and Miller (including taxes)
view of capital structure:
1. the point at which the weighted average cost of capital is minimised provides the
optimal capital structure for a company
2. the weighted average cost of capital is minimised at the maximum level of
gearing
Which one of the following combinations (true/false) concerning the above statements
is correct?
Statement 1 Statement 2
A True True
B True False
C False True
D False False
5. The Modigliani and Miller (with taxes) proposition concerning capital gearing states
that as the level of capital gearing of a business increases from zero, there will be an
initial increase in the:
A 1 and 2
B 1 and 4
C 2 and 3
D 3 and 4
6. Three views concerning the effect of loan capital on the capital structure of a business
are:
According to each view, what will be the effect (rise/fall/stay constant) on the cost of
equity when the level of loan capital increases?
7. The Modigliani and Miller (no taxes) proposition concerning capital gearing states
that, as the level of capital gearing increases from zero:
According to the Modigliani and Miller (ignoring taxes) view of capital structure
1. the market value of a geared business is equal to the market value of a similar,
ungeared (all-equity financed) business.
2. the cost of equity in a geared company is equal to the cost of equity in a similar,
ungeared (all equity financed) business.
Which one of the following combinations (true/false) concerning the above statements
is correct?
Statement 1 Statement 2
A True True
B True False
C False True
D False False
ungeared company.
2. The cost of debt will remain the same, irrespective of the level of gearing.
Which one of the following combinations (true/false) relating to the above statements
is correct?
Statement 1 Statement 2
A True True
B True False
C False True
D False False
10. Which of the following statements concerning capital structure theory is correct?
A In the traditional view, there is a linear relationship between the cost of equity
and financial risk
B Modigliani and Miller said that, in the absence of tax, the cost of equity would
remain constant
C Pecking order theory indicates that preference shares are preferred to convertible
debt as a source of finance
D Business risk is assumed to be constant
(ACCA F9 Financial Management Pilot Paper 2014)
11. A company incorporates increasing amounts of debt finance into its capital structure,
while leaving its operating risk unchanged.
Assuming that a perfect capital market exists, with corporation tax (but without
personal tax), which of the following correctly describes the effect on the company’s
costs of capital and total market value?
12. SD Co increased its gearing and its weighted average cost of capital reduced.
A 1, 2 and 3 only
B 1 and 4 only
C 1 and 2 only
D 2 and 4 only
13. Pecking order theory suggests finance should be raised in which order?
Question 1
Below is a series of graphs. Identify those that reflect:
(a) the traditional view of capital structure
(b) M&M without tax
(c) M&M with tax.
Question 2
Answer the following questions:
A If a company, in a perfect capital market with no taxes, incorporates increasing
amounts of debt into its capital structure without changing its operating risk, what
will the impact be on its WACC?
B According to M&M why will the cost of equity always rise as the company gears
up?
C In a perfect capital market but with taxes, two companies are identical in all
respects, apart from their levels of gearing. A has only equity finance, B has 50%
debt finance. Which firm would M&M argue was worth more?
D In practice a firm which has exhausted retained earnings, is likely to select what
form of finance next?
When an investment has differing business and finance risks from the existing
business, geared betas may be used to obtain an appropriate required return.
7.1.2 The gearing of a company will affect the risk of its equity. If a company is geared and
its financial risk is therefore higher than the risk of an all-equity company, then the
β value of the geared company’s equity will be higher than theβ value of a similar
ungeared company’s equity.
7.1.3 The CAPM is consistent with the propositions of M&M. M&M argue that as gearing
rises, the cost of equity rises to compensate shareholders for the extra financial risk of
investing in a geared company. This financial risk is an aspect of systematic risk, and
ought to be reflected in a company’s beta factor.
7.2.1 The connection between M&M theory and the CAPM means that it is possible to
establish a mathematical relationship between the β value of an ungeared company and
the β value of a similar, but geared, company. The β value of a geared company will be
higher than the β value of a company identical in every respect except that it is all-
equity financed. This is because of the extra financial risk. The mathematical
relationship between “ungeared” (or asset) and “geared” betas is as follows.
7.2.3 Example 2
Two companies are identical in every respect except for their capital structure.
Their market values are in equilibrium, as follows.
Geared Ungeared
$000 $000
Annual profit before interest and tax 1,000 1,000
Less: Interest (4,000 x 8%) 320 0
680 1,000
Less: Tax @30% 204 300
Profit after tax = dividends 476 700
The total value of Geared is higher than the total value of Ungeared, which is
consistent with M&M.
All profits after tax are paid out as dividends, and so there is no dividend growth.
The beta value of Ungeared has been calculated as 1.0. The debt capital of Geared
can be regarded as risk-free.
Calculate:
Solution:
(a) Since its market value (MV) is in equilibrium, the cost of equity in Geared
can be calculated as:
(b) The beta value of Ungeared is 1.0, which means that the expected returns
from Ungeared are exactly the same as the market returns, and R m =
700/6,600 = 10.6%
(c)
The beta of Geared, as we would expect, is higher than the beta of Ungeared.
7.3 Using the geared and ungeared beta formula to estimate a beta factor
7.3.1 Another way of estimating a beta factor for a company’s equity is to use data about the
returns of other quoted companies which have similar operating characteristics: that is,
to use the beta values of other companies’ equity to estimate a beta value for the
company under consideration.
7.3.2 The beta values estimated for the firm under consideration must be adjusted to allow
for differences in gearing from the firms whose equity beta values are known. The
formula for geared and ungeared beta values can be applied.
7.3.3 If a company plans to invest in a project which involves diversification into a new
business, the investment will involve a different level of systematic risk from that
applying to the company’s existing business.
7.3.4 A discount rate should be calculated which is specific to the project, and which
takes account of both the project’s systematic risk and the company’s gearing level.
The discount rate can be found using the CAPM.
Step 1 Get an estimate of the systematic risk characteristics of the project’s
operating cash flows by obtaining published beta values for companies in
the industry into which the company is planning to diversify.
Step 2 Adjust these beta values to allow for the company’s capital gearing level.
This adjustment is done in two stages.
(a) Convert the beta values of other companies in the industry to ungeared
Step 3 Having estimated a project-specific geared beta, use the CAPM to estimate:
(a) A project-specific cost of equity, and
(b) A project-specific cost of capital, based on a weighting of this cost of
equity and the cost of the company’s debt capital.
7.3.5 Example 3
A company’s debt : equity ratio, by market values, is 2 : 5. The corporate debt,
which is assumed to be risk-free, yields 11% before tax. The beta value of the
company’s equity is currently 1.1. The average returns on stock market equity is
16%.
The rate of corporation tax is 30%. What would be a suitable cost of capital to
apply to the project?
Solution:
(b) Convert this ungeared industry beta back into a geared beta, which
Step 3 (a) This is a project-specific beta for the firm’s equity capital, and so
using the CAPM, we can estimate the project-specific cost of equity
as:
Keg = 11% + (16% – 11%) × 1.51 = 18.55%
(b) The project will presumably be financed in a gearing ratio of 2 : 5
debt to equity, and so the project-specific cost of capital ought to be:
[5/7 × 18.55%] + [2/7 × 70% × 11%] = 15.45%
Ignoring taxation and using the capital asset pricing model, what is the risk-adjusted
cost of equity for the new project?
A 8.6%
B 9.8%
C 11.0%
D 13.0%
(ACCA F9 Financial Management December 2015)
15. Shyma Co is a company that manufactures ships and has an equity beta of 1.6 and a
debt-equity ratio of 1:3. It is considering a new project to manufacture farm vehicles.
Trant Co is a manufacturer of farm vehicles and has an asset beta of 1.1 and a debt-
equity ratio of 2:3.
The risk free rate of return is 5%, the market risk premium is 3% and the corporation
tax rate is 40%.
Using CAPM, what would be the suitable cost of equity for Shyma to use in its
appraisal of the farm machinery project (to one decimal place)?
(ACCA F9 Financial Management December 2017)
Question 3
Backwoods is a major international company with its head office in the UK, wanting to
raise $150 million to establish a new production plant in the eastern region of Germany.
Backwoods evaluates its investments using NPV, but is not sure what cost of capital to use
in the discounting process for this project evaluation.
The company is also proposing to increase its equity finance in the near future for UK
expansion, resulting overall in little change in the company’s market-weighted capital
gearing.
The summarized financial data for the company before expansion are shown below.
Notes on borrowings
These include $75m 14% fixed rate bonds due to mature in five years time and redeemable
at par. The current market price of these bonds is $120.00 and they have an after-tax cost of
debt of 9%. Other medium and long-term loans are floating rate UK bank loans at LIBOR
plus 1%, with an after-tax cost of debt of 7%.
Company rate of tax may be assumed to be at the rate of 30%. The company’s ordinary
shares are currently trading at $3.76.
The equity beta of Backwoods is estimated to be 1.18. The systematic risk of debt may be
assumed to be zero. The risk free rate is 7.75% and market return 14.5%.
The estimated equity beta of the main German competitor in the same industry as the new
proposed plant in the eastern region Germany is 1.5, and the competitor’s capital gearing is
35% equity and 65% debt by book values, and 60% equity and 40% debt by market values.
Required:
Estimate the cost of capital that the company should use as the discount rate for its proposed
investment in eastern company. State clearly any assumptions that you make.
Question 4
Droxfol Co is a listed company that plans to spend $10m on expanding its existing business.
It has been suggested that the money could be raised by issuing 9% loan notes redeemable in
ten years’ time. Current financial information on Droxfol Co is as follows.
The current ex div ordinary share price is $4.50 per share. An ordinary dividend of 35 cents
per share has just been paid and dividends are expected to increase by 4% per year for the
foreseeable future. The current ex div preference share price is 76.2 cents. The loan notes are
secured on the existing non-current assets of Droxfol Co and are redeemable at par in eight
years’ time. They have a current ex interest market price of $105 per $100 loan note. Droxfol
Co pays tax on profits at an annual rate of 30%.
The expansion of business is expected to increase profit before interest and tax by 12% in the
first year. Droxfol Co has no overdraft.
Required:
(a) Calculate the current weighted average cost of capital of Droxfol Co. (9 marks)
(b) Discuss whether financial management theory suggests that Droxfol Co can reduce its
weighted average cost of capital to a minimum level. (8 marks)
(c) Evaluate and comment on the effects, after one year, of the loan note issue and the
expansion of business on the following ratios:
(i) interest coverage ratio;
(ii) financial gearing;
(iii) earnings per share.
Assume that the dividend growth rate of 4% is unchanged. (8 marks)
(Total 25 marks)
(ACCA F9 Financial Management Pilot Paper 2008 Q1)
Question 5
DD Co has a dividend payout ratio of 40% and has maintained this payout ratio for several
years. The current dividend per share of the company is 50c per share and it expects that its
next dividend per share, payable in one year’s time, will be 52c per share.
Bond A will be redeemed at par in ten years’ time and pays annual interest of 9%. The current
ex interest market price of the bond is $95.08.
Bond B will be redeemed at par in four years’ time and pays annual interest of 8%. The cost
of debt of this bond is 7·82% per year. The current ex interest market price of the bond is
$102·01.
DD Co has an equity beta of 1.2. The risk-free rate of return is 4% per year and the average
return on the market of 11% per year. Ignore taxation.
Required:
Fence Co plans to invest in a project which is different to its existing business operations and
has identified a company in the same business area as the project, Hex Co. The equity beta of
Hex Co is 1·2 and the company has an equity market value of $54 million. The market value
of the debt of Hex Co is $12 million.
The risk-free rate of return is 4% per year and the average return on the stock market is 11%
per year. Both companies pay corporation tax at a rate of 20% per year.
Required:
(a) Calculate the current weighted average cost of capital of Fence Co. (7 marks)
(b) Calculate a cost of equity which could be used in appraising the new project.
(4 marks)
(c) Explain the difference between systematic and unsystematic risk in relation to portfolio
theory and the capital asset pricing model. (6 marks)
(ACCA F9 Financial Management June 2014 Q3(a), (b) & (c))
The ordinary shares of AMH Co have an ex div market value of $4·70 per share and an
ordinary dividend of 36·3 cents per share has just been paid. Historic dividend payments have
been as follows:
Year 2008 2009 2010 2011
Dividend per share (cents) 30.9 32.2 33.6 35.0
The preference shares of AMH Co are not redeemable and have an ex div market value of 40
cents per share. The 7% bonds are redeemable at a 5% premium to their nominal value of
$100 per bond and have an ex interest market value of $104·50 per bond. The bank loan has a
variable interest rate that has averaged 4% per year in recent years.
Required:
(a) Calculate the market value weighted average cost of capital of AMH Co. (12 marks)
(b) Discuss how the capital asset pricing model can be used to calculate a project-specific
cost of capital for AMH Co, referring in your discussion to the key concepts of
systematic risk, business risk and financial risk. (8 marks)
(c) Discuss why the cost of equity is greater than the cost of debt. (5 marks)
(25 marks)
(ACCA F9 Financial Management June 2013 Q2)
Question 9
Grenarp Co is planning to raise $11,200,000 through a rights issue. The new shares will be
offered at a 20% discount to the current share price of Grenarp Co, which is $3·50 per share.
The rights issue will be on a 1 for 5 basis and issue costs of $280,000 will be paid out of the
cash raised. The capital structure of Grenarp Co is as follows:
$m $m
Equity
Ordinary shares ($0.50 nominal) 10
Reserves 75
85
Non-current liabilities
8% Loan notes 30
115
The net cash raised by the rights issue will be used to redeem part of the loan note issue. Each
loan note has a nominal value of $100 and an ex interest market value of $104. A clause in the
bond issue contract allows Grenarp Co to redeem the loan notes at a 5% premium to market
price at any time prior to their redemption date. The price/earnings ratio of Grenarp Co is not
expected to be affected by the redemption of the loan notes.
The earnings per share of Grenarp Co is currently $0·42 per share and total earnings are
$8,400,000 per year. The company pays corporation tax of 30% per year.
Required :
(a) Evaluate the effect on the wealth of the shareholders of Grenarp Co of using the net
rights issue funds to redeem the loan notes. (8 marks)
(b) Discuss whether Grenarp Co might achieve its optimal capital structure following the
rights issue. (7 marks)
(15 marks)
(ACCA F9 Financial Management June 2015 Q4)
Question 10
The managing director of Wemere, a medium-sized private company, wishes to improve the
company’s investment decision-making process by using the discounted cash flow
techniques. He is disappointed to learn that estimates of a company’s cost of capital usually
require information on share prices which, for a private company, are not available. His
deputy suggests that the cost of equity can be estimated by using data for Folten Inc, a similar
sized, quoted company in the same industry, and he has produced two suggested discount
rates for use in Wemere’s future investment appraisal. Both of these estimates are in excess of
15% per year which the managing director believes to be very high, especially as the
company has just agreed a fixed rate bank loan at 10% per year to finance a small expansion
of existing operations. He has checked the calculations, which are numerically correct, but
wonders if there are any errors of principle.
This rate must be adjusted to include inflation at the current level of 4%. The recommended
discount rate is 29.2%
Notes:
(1) The current ex-div share price of Folten Inc is 138 cents.
(2) Wemere’s board of directors has recently rejected a take-over bid of $10.6 million.
(3) Corporate tax is at the rate of 35%.
Required:
(a) Explain any errors of principle that have been made in the two estimates of the cost of
capital and produce revised estimates using both of the methods. State clearly any
assumptions that you make. (14 marks)
(b) Discuss which of your revised estimates Wemere should use as the discount rate for
capital investment appraisal. (4 marks)
(c) Discuss whether discounted cash flow techniques including discounted payback are
useful to small unlisted companies. (7 marks)
(Total 25 marks)