Name: Fatima N.

Valeriano Course: MAED

MIDTERM
1. The purpose of curriculum evaluation is two-fold: What are they? Explain.
the two components of curriculum evaluation are formative and summative evaluation. It is true that
the formative and summative aspects of curriculum evaluation serve two different purposes. In order to
continuously evaluate and enhance educational curricula, these two methods of evaluation serve different but
complimentary functions.

1. Formative Evaluation:
When creating and implementing a curriculum, formative evaluation is a continuous and ongoing process. Its
main objective is to offer suggestions and analysis to help the curriculum while it is still being developed. Based
on my own understanding the following are the main goals of formative evaluation:
a. Feedback for Improvement: Formative evaluation allows curriculum developers, educators, and
stakeholders to receive feedback on various aspects of the curriculum. This feedback helps identify strengths,
weaknesses, and areas that require further development or enhancement.
b. Identifying Problems Early: By conducting formative evaluation, any issues, inconsistencies, or gaps in the
curriculum can be identified and addressed early on. This proactive approach minimizes potential negative
impacts on the learning process.
c. Continuous Refinement: Through formative evaluation, curriculum developers can continuously refine and
modify the curriculum based on feedback and evidence gathered during its implementation.
d. Ensuring Alignment: Formative evaluation helps ensure that the curriculum remains aligned with its
intended goals, learning outcomes, and educational standards.
e. Supporting Professional Development: Formative evaluation provides opportunities for educators to reflect
on their instructional practices and make adjustments to better meet students' needs.

2. Summative Evaluation:
On the other hand, summative evaluation takes place after the curriculum has been completely integrated and
provided to the students. It makes to evaluate the curriculum's overall impact and effectiveness in relation to
established standards and objectives. Based on my own understanding also the following are the main goals of
summative evaluation:
a. Determining Effectiveness: Summative evaluation seeks to determine whether the curriculum has achieved
its intended learning outcomes and objectives.
b. Accountability and Accreditation: It helps provide evidence of the curriculum's success or shortcomings for
accountability purposes, such as reporting to educational authorities or seeking accreditation.
c. Decision Making: The results of summative evaluation can inform decisions regarding the future use of the
curriculum, its possible revisions, or potential replacements.
d. Policy and Funding Considerations: The outcomes of summative evaluation may influence education
policies, funding decisions, and resource allocation based on the curriculum's demonstrated impact.
e. Assessing Long-Term Impact: Summative evaluation also looks at the lasting effects of the curriculum on
learners' knowledge, skills, and attitudes over time.

In conclusion, it is true that the formative and summative aspects of curriculum evaluation serve two different
purposes. In order to continuously evaluate and enhance educational curricula, these two methods of
evaluation serve different but complimentary functions. Summative assessment measures the curriculum's
overall effectiveness and impact after it has been delivered, whereas formative evaluation focuses on
curriculum improvement during development and implementation. These two kinds of evaluation work
together to improve educational curricula continuously and ensure their quality.

2. What are the Purposes and Functions of Curriculum Evaluation? Briefly explain each one.
Evaluation of curricula serves a variety of important purposes and objectives in determining the effect and
effectiveness of educational activities. The main goals and brief justifications for each are listed below:

 Enhancement: Curriculum evaluation reveals the existing curriculum's areas of strength and weakness.
Making informed choices on how to develop the curriculum that better meets the needs of students
and is suitable with educational goals enables educators and administrators. It guarantees continued
growth and development of the educational system by identifying opportunities for improvement.
 Accountability: Curriculum evaluation helps in making educational institutions, decision-makers, and
other stakeholders responsible for the level of education they deliver. In addition to determining if the
curriculum is producing the desired results, it also makes sure that educational resources are being
used effectively and efficiently.
 Quality Assurance: Through evaluation, the curriculum's quality is continuously monitored and
evaluated. By doing this, it is made sure that the curriculum maintains a high level for its content,
teaching strategies, and learning opportunities. Creating a reliable and efficient learning environment
depends on quality assurance.
 Alignment with Objectives: A curriculum evaluation can assist in establishing whether the curriculum is
in line with the institution's or system's educational objectives and aims. It ensures that the curriculum
is created to meet learning objectives and adequately prepares students for further study or future
employment.
 Feedback for Teachers and Students: Evaluation gives teachers and students insightful feedback about
the efficacy of the curriculum. This feedback empowers teachers to modify their teaching strategies
and methods to improve student learning.
 Evidence-Based Decision Making: Curriculum evaluation allows educational institutions to make
evidence-based decisions. By analyzing data and outcomes, administrators can make informed choices
about curriculum revisions, resource allocation, and professional development for teachers.
  Continuous Improvement: Evaluation promotes a culture of continuous improvement within the
educational system. It encourages ongoing reflection and adaptation to changing needs and challenges,
fostering a dynamic and responsive learning environment.

Curriculum evaluation is a crucial process that ensures educational programs are effective, relevant, and
continuously evolving to meet the needs of learners and society. It provides valuable insights for improvement,
accountability, quality assurance, alignment with objectives, feedback, evidence-based decision-making, and
continuous growth in the educational realm.

3. In your experience, what are the Issues with K–12 Curriculum Implementation?
Based on my experience in teaching within in a public school, Implementing K–12 curriculum is a complex and
multifaceted process that often faces various challenges. Here are some common issues that I encounter with
K–12 curriculum implementation:
1. Lack of Alignment with Goals: Sometimes, the curriculum may not align well with the educational
goals and objectives of the school or district. This misalignment can lead to confusion and inefficiencies
in teaching and learning.
2. Constantly Changing Standards: Educational standards and requirements may change frequently at the
state or national level. This can make it challenging for schools and teachers to keep up and adapt their
curriculum accordingly.
3. Limited Teacher Training and Professional Development: Insufficient training and professional
development opportunities for teachers can hinder effective implementation. Teachers need support to
understand and effectively deliver the curriculum content and pedagogy.
4. Resource Constraints: Limited resources, including textbooks, technology, and teaching materials, can
make it difficult for schools to fully implement the curriculum as intended.
5. Time Constraints: The curriculum might be too ambitious or packed, leaving little room for in-depth
exploration of topics or for addressing the diverse learning needs of students.
6. Assessment and Accountability Pressure: Heavy emphasis on standardized testing and accountability
measures can lead to "teaching to the test" rather than focusing on a broader and more holistic
approach to education.
7. Resistance to Change: Some teachers and administrators may resist changes to the curriculum due to
various reasons, such as comfort with the existing approach or concerns about its effectiveness.
8. Overemphasis on Rote Learning: Curriculum implementation may lean towards rote memorization
rather than promoting critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills.
REFERENCES:
https://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/COPs/Pages_documents/Resource_Packs/TTCD/
sitemap/Module_8/Module_8.html#:~:text=Curriculum%20evaluation%20aims%20to%20examine,learning
%20processes%20in%20the%20classroom.

https://www.slideshare.net/DrGavisiddappaAngadi/curriculum-formative-amp-summative-evaluation

https://study.com/academy/lesson/curriculum-evaluation-process-models.html

http://studylecturenotes.com/curriculum-evaluation-meaning-importance-objective/