Global Politics Notes
Global Politics Notes
Global Politics Notes
KEY GLOPO CONCEPTS: (memorize definitions) Power, Sovereignty, Legitimacy, Conflict, Violence,
Globalization, Interdependence
Power- The ability of one global actor to influence the actions of another global actor. Power can be exercised in a
range of types and forms.
Sovereignty- Legitimate or widely recognised ability to exercise effective control of a territory within recognised
borders. Primary organizing principle of global politics which provides states with the authority to represent their
territorial entity within the international community. State sovereignty can be challenged internally (for example,
secessionist groups) or externally (for example, one state invades another).
Legitimacy- Political legitimacy is the popular acceptance of authority. It is considered to be the basic condition for
government, without which it will collapse. Sometimes it only takes a small-influential elite to render a nation
legitimate despite the regime being unpopular (syria).
Globalization- Acceleration and intensification of exchanges of goods, services, labor and capital which promote
global interdependence. These have been facilitated by rapid changes in communication and technology. Has
widespread impacts on social, political, economic and cultural life.
Conflict- The dynamic process of actual or perceived opposition between individuals, groups or countries. This
could be opposition over positions, interests or values. Most theorists would distinguish between nonviolent and
violent conflict. In this distinction, non-violent conflict can be a useful mechanism for social change and
transformation, while violent conflict is harmful and asks for conflict resolution.
Violence- Often defined as physical or psychological force inflicted upon another being. In the context of global
politics it could be seen as anything man made that prevents someone from reaching their full potential (e.g.
structural violence). This broader definition would encompass unequal distribution of power and discriminatory
practices that exclude entire groups of people from accessing certain resources.
Interdependence- For global politics, the concept of interdependence most often refers to the mutual reliance
between and among groups, organizations, areas and states for access to goods and services that sustain living
arrangements. Often, this mutual reliance is economic (such as trade), but can also have a security dimension
(such as defense arrangements) and, increasingly, a sustainability dimension (such as environmental treaties).
Globalization has increased interdependence , while often changing the relationships of power among the various
actors engaged in global politics.
Liberalism Believe soft-power, cooperation and a rules Sees sovereignty as one of several principles
based international order are the most in world politics. It is important but not
effective and safest way of using power in exclusive and at the expense of other groups
global politics. Liberals perceive states as or ideas. Sovereignty is not absolute and can
more powerful when they work together (i.e be pooled and challenged (when other states
through cooperation in international fail to exercise their sovereignty responsibly).
organizations. They believe states should use
power by conforming to a world order
governed by international law and respecting
human rights.
Realism Believe that power politics have to do with Sees sovereignty as an essential feature of
states’ hard power capabilities. They see global politics. Prepared both to defend
states as locked in competition with each sovereignty as an inviolable principle and to
other, with each state wanting to protect its breach the sovereignty of other states if their
national security against threats from other own national security requires it. View states
states in an anarchic world order. States are the only legitimate bodies in global
either pursue offensive realism (i.e aiming to politics. The interests and right of states to
expand their global power) or defensive act independently and defend their core
realism (i.e aiming merely to defend interests is prioritized over most other
themselves against external threats principles and ideas.
Definitions and Joseph Nye (American political scientist and cofounder of neoliberalism theory)
theories of power Hard power
The use of force and threats of force to influence the decision-
making of those in charge
Soft power
Achieving aims through persuasion or influence (i.e the power to
get others to want what you want)
Lies more in the realm of negotiation, promises of aid, cooperation
and other non-military means of influencing change
Smart power
The combination of hard and soft power – the ability to use both
when called for, or one or the other when necessary
Eric Wolf (Anthropologist)
Structural power
Refers to social conditions and the use of labor to maintain social
realms
John. J Mearshemer
Offensive realism
The essence of the debates about the UN center on its ability to challenge the
sovereignty of the nation state, and if any of its treaties and covenants are
enforceable at all.
NGOs and extremist groups often gain legitimacy through the recognition of states
or IGOs, whereas an IGO is usually legitimized by a treaty or formal international
agreement
Cooperation: Cooperation
treaties, collective Treaties
security, strategic States do not simply cooperate with each other through IGOs. A
alliances, more flexible way of cooperating with other states is through
economic bilateral and multilateral treaties
cooperation, These are agreed between as many or as few states as
informal desired
cooperation These may be agreed by states that group together on a
particular issue, rather than by region
If in treaty form, they represent formal international law
Some treaties are used to establish, or change the rules of,
IGOs
To be fully covered by, and obliged to comply with treaties, states must:
Sign the treaty
Ratify the treaty through their national legislatures or parliaments
Examples of treaties
Strategic alliances
States frequently cooperate more informally, without the need for treaties or
IGOs. Choosing reliable and profitable allies and working together on
matters of security, trade or development is important if states want to
achieve their goals and protect their interests.
For example, the so-called “Special Relationship” between the US
and UK. This peaked after the attacks of 9/11, and subsequent
military campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq, where both states were
involved in military action in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Powerful states may decide to form new alliances with less powerful states
for mutual benefit.
China has increased ties with many African states in recent years.
China has invested heavily in infrastructure in return for favorable
access to natural resources which they lack.
Economic cooperation
Bilateral and multilateral trade agreements (Trans-Pacific Partnership, trade
blocs)
Regional economic integration (EU Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade
Areas, DCFTA)
These facilitate and regulate international production of goods and
services
Economic globalization
UNIT: Development
THEORIES:
Neo-Marxism/ An idea that stems from classical marxism, but operates on an international
Neo-Colonialism level:
The class struggle that is seen at a national level between the proletariat and
the bourgeois, the same inequalities of wealth and development are observed
between states. Developed states (Western world) exploit the developing
world by extracting their resources and making them dependent on them for
trading exports.
Free trade, privatization, and deregulation has created a new form of neo-
colonialism that keeps developing countries reliant on wealthier states for
development
o Global North vs Global South
Feminist Critical 'The personal is political' - Feminist theory claims that much of IR has
Theory operated on the premise that the state is the main actor, disregarding the
private sphere of influence concerning the individual.
The idea that women should be placed at the forefront of legislation, and that
empowering women through equal opportunities in education, employment
and political representation will promote development
Different Development
definitions A sustained increase in the standard of living in a society
of Contested essence of development
developmen The term has diverse meanings and forms for different stakeholders, ranging from
t IGOs, governments and NGOs to families and individuals.
While development for all sections of society necessarily includes the
basics of food, clothing and shelter, the significance of what else has to be
considered varies.
People often refer to Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs in the context of
development, as it shows a progression from basic human needs (i.e water) at the
bottom of the hierarchy, to higher needs (relationships, self-esteem) further up the
hierarchy.
The goal is self actualization (i.e achieving one’s potential), but this can
not be achieved if the bottom levels are not secure.
Human development
The process of enlarging people’s freedoms and opportunities, as well as
improving their well-being; in a way that enables them to:
Lead longer, healthier lives
Gain knowledge
Have a comfortable standard of living
There is an emphasis on capabilities which refers to the prerequisites people
require to pursue a life of value. Thus, it is imperative that this process of
development focuses on:
Widening people’s choices through formation of human capabilities –
through improved knowledge, skills and health
The level of their achieved well-being and the use people make of these
capabilities – for leisure, productive purposes or being active in
political/social/cultural affairs
Therefore, an increase in a country’s GDP does not translate to an improvement in its
inhabitants’ standard of living. This may occur because:
The poor may not be able to enjoy the benefits of this increase in income due to
income disparities
Weak governance, absence of a government inclined to assist the poor
High levels of corruption
Process of human development
Gender
Gender roles are integral to culture. Some societies adhere to strict gender roles
while others are more egalitarian.
How can gender roles promote development?
A society in which women have rights and access to opportunities
provides an environment for the expansion of capabilities (i.e
ability to read/write, have a long and healthy life, earn a
respectable living and take part in decision-making)
Empowering women will generate additional income and
productivity, and create employment
The most productive, and also most developed, states are the ones
that mobilize the productive capacity of its entire population,
regardless of gender.
The contribution of the many roles that women can play in
development cannot be disputed
How can gender roles inhibit development?
In some cultures, women are relegated to domestic tasks and child
care. This effectively removes women from the work force and
limits the overall productivity of society.
Women are unable to realize their potential
(impedes human development)
Discriminated against in terms of education, property,
employment opportunities, economic freedom and empowerment
Contradicts feminist critical theory
Miration
Environmen Safeguarding the environment and sustainable development are critical aspects of
tal factors the discourse and practice of development goals in today’s world.
Impact of climate change
Climate change directly opposes sustainable development. Communities and
countries are harming and overexploiting the very resources on which they depend
for survival.
How can climate change inhibit development
Climate change and global warming are having a direct impact on
weather and rainfall patterns. This results in floods, droughts,
rising seawater levels, higher temperatures and other natural
disasters that affect agricultural production.
Disease, hunger and malnutrition are additional problems that the
poor are likely to face as a result of this, bringing about added
costs of healthcare and a fall in productivity of human resources.
Developing countries (and the poorest), will bear the
brunt of climate change. Vulnerable areas include: sub-
Saharan Africa (drying), Asian mega deltas (flooding),
small islands and the Arctic region.
Such states do not have the resources/expertise to face this challenge as
they try to move ahead on the path to growth,
ANY development now has to be in tandem with the sustainability
factor
Globalizatio Globalization
n; winners The increasing interdependence among countries, regions and people due to the
and losses integration of trade, culture, finance, people and ideas in one global marketplace.
Advantages of globalization
Increased economic growth; economies that have access to more markets,
workers and resources are more likely to grow. This can mean more wealth for
more people.
Improved standards of living; workers who work within growing economies
have more purchasing power and can access a wider variety of ideas, products and
services.
Globalized countries can become more democratic; economies that become more
financially open usually have to become more politically open. Greater freedoms
are enjoyed by people living in politically open states
Cultural development; globalized cultures tend to embrace modern ideas, for
example, with regards to women’s rights, children’s rights, worker rights and the
rights of other minority groups (i.e LGBTQ and racial minorities)
Transnational problems (i.e environmental pollution, climate change, threat of
terrorism), all of which impede the goal of sustainable human development, can be
managed and handled more effectively.
Disadvantages of globalization
Loss of jobs for people in countries with high cost of living as factories and
manufacturing units are shifted to underdeveloped countries that provide cheaper
labor and materials.
While this may mean greater employment opportunities in
underdeveloped countries, there is a greater likelihood of the exploitation
of local labor, including working conditions that present a threat to life.
Growing wealth gap: in a globalized marketplace, wealth can become
concentrated within an elite.
Wage competition: workers have to compete with workers in other countries and
this places pressure on wages. This result is potentially lower wages, as
multinational corporations can threaten to relocate their factories to places with
lower worker wages. While this may be good for corporate profits, it is bad for
workers
Price competition: there is global price competition, meaning prices are
sometimes lowered. However, the option to buy abroad is usually only of benefit
to large corporations and not individuals.
Regulation avoidance: corporations locate factories in countries where
regulations are less strict. Regulations might cover workers’ rights, health and
safety, ot child labor.
Lack of cultural diversity: globalization does not always lead to an equal exchange
of ideas, products and services.
English is becoming a dominant language. At the same time, Western
corporations are dominant within marketplaces, while non-Western
corporations go bankrupt, finding it difficult to compete.
Inequality: Beyond a certain threshold, inequality harms growth, poverty reduction, the quality of
how relations in the public and political spheres of life and an individual’s sense of fulfillment
important a and self-worth.
factor in There are several viewpoints on how inequality affects development
developmen Benefit:
t The process of globalization will ultimately benefit the
underdeveloped/developing countries. Changes such as free trade and
open markets, along with the culture of liberal democracy will only add to
the prosperity, progress, growth and well-being of less fortunate people.
Harm:
Development does not necessarily translate into inequalities in societies or
between states. The rich continue to get richer at the expense of the poor,
and large organizations (i.e MNCs) are the real winners as whole
populations have become losers in a global scheme
Sustainable In order to achieve sustainable development, states must address economic, social and
developmen
t: which
way
forward?
environmental factors which threaten well-being
Economic sustainability
Reduce factors that threaten economic well-being
Establishing sustainable transportation and infrastructure
Investing in education, research, technology, entrepreneurial and
workforce skills
Increasing jobs and incomes through business development
Reducing corruption
(i.e addressing the global north vs. global south divide)
Social sustainability
Reduce factors that threaten human social well-being
KEY GLOPO CONCEPTS: (memorize definitions) Peace, Conflict, Violence, Non-violence, Power,
Sovereignty,
Peace - The absence of violence or conflict, sometimes underpinned by a level of deeper harmony and equity. Can
be divided into negative and positive peace. The former refers to merely the absence of active, organized violence
by both state and non-state groups. Positive peace looks more deeply at what helps sustain peace beyond simply
reducing or stopping violence. It is possible to identify a deeper level of harmony in society, where the causes of
conflict themselves are neutralized.
Conflict - The dynamic process of actual or perceived opposition between individuals, groups or countries. This
could be opposition over interests and values, a distinction between violence and non-violent and violent conflict
must be made (i.e non-violent conflict can be a useful mechanism for social change).
Violence - Violence is often defined as physical or psychological force afflicted upon another being. In the context of
global politics it could be seen as anything man made that prevents someone from reaching their full potential. Can
be divided into structural, cultural, and direct.
Non-violence - The practice of advocating one’s rights without physically harming the opponent. It often involves
actively opposing the system that is deemed to be unjust, through boycotts, demonstrations and civil disobedience.
Can draw attention to issues and provide a fertile base for post-conflict transformation.
Sovereignty - Legitimate or widely recognised ability to exercise effective control of a territory within recognised
borders. Primary organizing principle of global politics which provides states with the authority to represent their
territorial entity within the international community. State sovereignty can be challenged internally (for example,
secessionist groups) or externally (for example, one state invades another).
Power - The ability of one global actor to influence the actions of another global actor. Power can be exercised in a
range of types and forms.
Legitimacy- Political legitimacy is the popular acceptance of authority. It is considered to be the basic condition for
government, without which it will collapse. Sometimes it only takes a small-influential elite to render a nation
legitimate despite the regime being unpopular.
Realism The more natural state in an anarchical world An unrealistic aim. It is natural for states to
order. States exist to protect and advance their compete with each other. Equal status among
own national interests. Their priority is national nation states is both impossible and undesirable.
security over peace for its own sake.
Liberalism A desirable and realistic first objective, perhaps The desired final state in all conflict situations,
to be achieved through diplomacy, negotiation seen as realistic and achievable. Both sides will
and with the assistance of IGOs. A means to an be willing to make concessions on core interests
end, rather than an end in itself. and seek to reconcile and forgive.
CASE STUDIES:
UN Mission in Sierra Leone
South Sudan
South Africa and Sierra Leone TRC
Iraq war
Libya 2011
Different Peace
definitions of
peace, conflict The absence of violence or conflict, sometimes underpinned by a level of deeper
and violence (i.e equity and harmony
positive peace and
structural violence) Negative Peace
Involved merely the absence of active, organized violence by both state and non-
state groups
Most useful at the first stage in conflict resolution, where the aim is to stop
immediate violence
Does not consider factors contributing to non-violence
Power and Peace
Power plays an important role in developing peace, notably in the distribution and
balance of power between great powers who might be drawn into conflict with
each other.
Unipolarity
One great power (hegemon) exists which cannot be challenged militarily
by any other
Hegemonic stability theory (the theory that peace is more likely
with the presence of a single dominant power on the global
stage)
Bipolarity
In the Cold War, the United States and Soviet Union were in direct
bipolar competition with each other, but never fought directly. The
appalling consequences of nuclear war introduced a measure of stability
(i.e mutually assured destruction)
Multipolarity
Many powers are competing with each other and non-state groups are
challenging nation states in armed conflict
Realists believe there is more instability in a multipolar order
Liberals are more optimistic; they believe if many states have
power, it increases the possibility of nation states working in
common interest.
(i.e working through the UN to achieve international
peace)
Democratic Peace Theory
Some theorists argue that democracy itself promotes peace. This is
because in democratic states there is a fairer balance of power and
distribution of wealth/resources, where, if there is conflict, democracy
promotes dispute resolution through democratic rather than violent
means.
Peace as balance of power
Goes beyond the negative peace interpretation by also identifying how war could
be prevented
At an international level, this refers to a balance of power between global
power blocs or the lack of a power vacuum
Hegemonic stability theory argues the opposite — that the existence of one
global superpower furthers stability/peace
This still relates to the balance of forces view as it also interprets
peace as the absence of war and the prevention of it through
stability
At a national level, balance of forces refers to a certain balance between
various groups within a country that could prevent the outbreak of civil
war
(i.e when Yanukovych not signing the association treaty with the
EU led to an outbreak of violence stemming from the lack of
balance between pro-Russia and pro-EU governments)
Positive Peace
Looks more deeply at what helps sustain peace beyond simply reducing or
stopping violence
There is no visible violence and no deeper social causes of conflict
Positive peace is the absence of both direct and structural violence, and is
the presence of social justice (just & equal society).
This would indicate that without development, there would not be
peace (not just economic development, but the removal of any
form of inequality).
Feminist peace
Further extended the interpretation of peace to include the removall of any
form of discrimination
Does not emphasize discrimination towards women over other forms, it
refers to the feminist peace researchers who put this interpretation forward.
“Holistic gaia-peace” and “holistic inner-outer peace”
Relate to living in harmony with the environment and being at ease with yourself
Holistic gaia-peace
A holistic peace theory, where human beings are seen as one of many species
inhabiting the earth, and the fate of the planet is seen as the most important goal.
Spiritual, often religious, dimension and “holistic inner-outer peace”
The often-heard phrase “if you don’t love yourself you can’t love someone else” is
here applied to peace.
If you’re not at peace with yourself, your own shortcomings, temptations
and abilities, how can you further peace towards others?
This can, for example, be related to the concept of the Greater Jihad in
Islam. The Greater Jihad entail the internal human struggle of dealing with
disappointment, strong emotions and temptations
Conflict
When parties disagree or compete with each other over ideas, resources or
territory. Conflict may be violent or non-violent
Actors in pursuit of incompatible goals. The aims of two or more parties seem to
be contradictory and as they seek to achieve these aims, they clash or strike
together.
Non-violent Conflict
Groups often disagree with each other in an entirely peaceful way, without
violence (i.e peaceful demonstrations, strikes, civil disobedience, campaigns,
diplomacy)
These conflicts are non-violent because
A legitimate structure or process for dialogue is in place
Democratic structures allow the population to be consulted
(these consultations are considered legitimate)
Violent solutions are against the core interests of all parties
Violent Conflict
Much conflict results in violence — the most obvious form being direct, which
commonly takes place during a war (i.e terrorist attacks, civil war, interestate war,
guerrilla war, genocide)
These conflicts can be violent
Lack of trust between both sides of the conflict
No structure exists for the dispute to be resolved peacefully,
through democratic or legitimate means
Grievance and trauma are sustaining, and deepening, the conflict
Violent approaches are seen as the only way to secure core
interests
Violence
Direct violence
When an individual or group is physically or mentally harmed, through
direct action. Refers to physical violence
Direct violence is generally:
Straightforward to identify
Possible to investigate and establish who is responsible in
such a way that people can be held accountable
Possible to quantify/measure
Structural violence
When a government/other forms of power functions in a way that results in
direct violence to groups.
Discrimination and unequal global distribution of power, resources
and food should be considered structural violence.
A government that hoards wealth within an elite, and fails to spend
resources to protect its citizens from preventable illnesses/violence
is considered structural violence
Structural violence generally
Leads to preventable suffering not being prevented
Is widespread, but often unchallenged and unacknowledged
Is hard to quantify and deem who is responsible
Causes harm through lack of basic necessities
Perpetuates direct violence
Cultural violence
The way in which society legitimizes direct or structural violence is called
cultural violence. Refers to the values embedded in society which
perpetuate violence.
Can be identified in the mindset, beliefs and values of a society
In general, cultural violence:
May be government-driven (culture influencing government
structure) or society-driven (grassroots culture influencing
behavior)
Is any aspect of culture used to legitimize violence in
direct/structural forms
Harder to eliminate as it is embedded in the mindset of a society
and linked to cultural/religious values seen as legitimate
Types of conflict Armed Conflict
The contested incompatibility which concerns government and/or territory where
the use of armed force between two parties, of which at least one is the government
of a state, results in at least 25 battle-related deaths
Inter-state Conflict
The warring parties, who first stated the incompatibility, must be government
parties.
This type of conflict has been decreasing in prevalence since the end of the
Cold War, some years (2004-2008), have seen no inter-state war anywhere
in the world.
Yet, inter-state conflict remains of the main concerns of leaders and
decision-makers
Extra-state Conflict
Extra-state conflict occurs between a state and a non-state group outside its own
territory. It can be further subdivided into colonial war and imperial war.
This type of conflict has not occurred since 1975, when Indonesia
conquered East-Timor
Such conflicts were common in the period of colonization
Internationalized and Internal Conflict
Internationalized internal conflict occurs between the government of a state and
internal opposition groups with intervention from other states
This type of conflict has become more prominent since the end of the Cold
War.
The Ukrainian government is largely supported by Western powers,
whereas the pro-Russian opposition has received support from Russia.
Intra-state Armed Conflict
Intra-state conflict occurs between the government of a state and internal
opposition groups without intervention from other states,
By far the most widespread form of armed-conflict — it has increased
steadily since 1946
Non-state Conflicts
Non-state armed conflicts involve the use of armed force between two organized
armed groups, neither of which is the government of a state
i.e The Taliban in Afghanistan, Christian and Muslim groups in the Philippines,
various Kenyan tribes, and paramilitary and revolutionary groups in Columbia
This type of conflict has been under-researched and often ignored in
traditional conflict analysis
Moore claims that issues within conflicts are often at an impasse around the following:
relationship, interest, value, structure, and data
Relationship Conflicts
Relationship conflicts can arise from a number of causes, 1) when parties involved
are upset with one another 2) when one party has a negative perception or
stereotype of the other 3) when poor communication leads to a damaged
relationship
Examples are found in:
Conflicts where initially positive relations turned sour (i.e certain
marriage conflicts)
Conflict parties who have a long history of problematic relations –
or a particularly painful memory of the past – like ethnic violence
(i.e violence in the Sierra Leone Civil War, Armenian genocide)
Data Conflicts
Data conflicts can be caused by inadequate, inaccurate, untrustworthy information,
or different interpretations of relevant data.
In conflicts there are often disagreements about what actually happened
during an argument; be it non-violent conflicts or a battle/massacre.
Information can be distorted by the emotional state of the conflict
parties,
Parties may have an interest in hiding information or downplaying
its importance
Parties often highlight the events that were particularly painful for
them, without acknowledging the other party’s views
After a long period of violence and discrimination, it is difficult to obtain
the complete picture and all the relevant facts
Interest Conflicts
Interest conflicts occur when there are perceived or actual competitive interests
Many conflicts revolve around the perception of competitive interests (i.e
the Arab-Israeli conflict is often seen as such because spokespeople of
both parties lay claim to exclusive right of ownership of the land)
Structural and Value Conflicts
Structural conflicts are caused by destructive patterns of behavior or interaction,
unequal control, ownership or distribution of resources, and unequal
power/authority.
Although inequality can be seen as a form of structural violence, it often
leads to tensions between those who aspire to create more equality, versus
those who want to preserve the status quo.
Value conflicts revolve around ‘different criteria for evaluation ideas or
behavior… different ways of life, ideology and religion.’
It is important to identify the main area of conflict, as in the end that is the area where real
progress is to be made, in order to solve all other related problems.
It must be noted however that as conflict progresses, other issues arise and it is up
to mediators to address such newly risen issues
Justifications of Justifications of Violence
violence,
including just At all levels, we often aim to justify our violent behavior with references to
war theory culture, religion and human nature.
Historically, it is generally accepted that the state is the on actor allowed to
use violence
Many non-state actors (i.e Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia,
Islamic State) are likely to use similar forms of violence, yet with the
state’s generally accepted monopoly on violence this is normally
considered unjustified
If these actors were to establish themselves as rulers of a particular
state, they could adjust the legal systems to retrospectively
legitimize their violent actions
Other states may further legitimize this by accepting the
new government
Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
Doctrine provides justifications for intervening militarily in conflict
situations
Jus ad bellum (basic criteria for a war to be fought for the right reasons)
Right authority — those starting violent conflict should have legitimate authority
to do so — nation states have to follow international law (some question legality of
Iraq War in 2003, while Libya 2011 was authorized by UNSC)
Just cause (heavily debated) — One of the main just causes is “self defense.” Yet,
it is unclear how far this self defense goes (i.e Bush Administration stretched just
cause in Iraqi invasion, causing its legality to be questioned)
Right intention — A state must pursue its just cause, and cannot change its
objectives during the war to include other (perhaps unjust) causes.
The war must have the objective of restoring peace rather than material
gain.
Probability of success — it must be achievable (violence in pursuit of
unachievable or unrealistic aims is not just).
Proportionality — The ends must justify the means, the probable good expected
to result from success is weighted against the probable evil that the war will cause.
Any action taken must be proportional to the initial act of aggression.
Last resort — efforts to resolve the conflict peacefully (i.e diplomacy,
negotiation) have been exhausted.
Factors which make some places more predisposed to violence than others
i.e if a state’s government has a lack of control over its territory it can be classified
as a weak state. Such lack of control can then lead to groups providing for their
own security which makes violent conflict much more likely
Similarly, if a state’s political system values groups equally, and provides the same
opportunities for groups to represent themselves through the political system, it is
less likely that conflict will lead to violence.
Manifestations of Conflict
Our behavior based on prejudgements can begin relatively harmless, but escalate
and manifest itself in several ways
This shows how the sooner prejudiced behavior is addressed, the greater the
chance to prevent further suffering in the future
Terrorism, Interstate war, guerrilla warfare
The violent manifestations of conflict we are often confronted with on the news
are wars and acts of terrorism.
Conventional warfare/terrorism are rather different – from the use of
weaponry to legality of actions
Violent Protests
Violent protest groups generally claim they have the right to use violence as they
are often fighting a stronger opponent with more resources, weaponry and financial
support
Violent protestors may refer to religious/ideological texts that justify the use of
violence
These organizations often fight against the state and contest their
monopoly on violence.
Nonviolent Protest (i.e demonstrations)
Deemed twice as successful as violent campaigns.
It can draw attention to the cause of the protestor, especially when the
opponent uses violence against non-violent protests, as supporters of the
opponent are likely to side with the protestors, or withdraw their support
→ playing a large role in the success of the protest
In all its simplicity the conflict triangle visualizes the dynamic nature of conflict
and its core components.
Positions-Interests-Needs Model
In conflicts, we mainly see the position of a party, or what they claim to be
pursuing. However, the reasoning behind this claim, or the interest, is often hidden
Russia may claim it is defending the rights of ethnic Russians in its
relations with Ukraine, but is merely creating pretext to justify its actions.
The deeper need for the Russian government is security.
The model is also often used to find “shared interests and needs” or overcome what
seems to be an unresolvable conflict
Russia and Ukraine’s claim to Crimea seems incompatible in that they
both agree they should have full ownership. However, if the deeper needs
of both were addressed (i.e Russia’s global security concerns, and
Ukraine’s concerns about safety from Russian domination).
Humanitarian Intervention
These are only a limited number of justification for military intervention. The
UNSC may sanction it under article 42 of the UN Charter, but only if
international peace and security are under threat.
The gradual emergence of humanitarian intervention has undermined the realist
principle of state sovereignty
The R2P argues that states forego the right to full sovereignty if they fail
to protect their populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic
cleansing and crimes against humanity
With so many examples of states doing so (i.e Sudan, Syria), it
seems like an obvious choice for the international community to
support this development.
Humanitarian Intervention
For Against
Legal Case
- The United Nations Charter “highlights the
importance of human rights.” This would
provide justification for the UNSC-sanctioned
intervention
- There are historical cases of what could
be considered humanitarian intervention,
which would provide a legal basis for future
interventions
It can diminish individual Tribunals can be seen as justice imposed by the victors on
vengeance and avoid a the defeated, that they can be slow, partial, and criticized
continuing cycle of because individuals were prosecuted for acts more
violence attributable to governments
It can enhance respect for Courts are a costly affair and involve many perpetrators
the rule of law denying their involvement in acts of violence.