Propositions and Sequence in "The Heer Ranjha":: An Application of Todorov's Theory of Narratology
Propositions and Sequence in "The Heer Ranjha":: An Application of Todorov's Theory of Narratology
Propositions and Sequence in "The Heer Ranjha":: An Application of Todorov's Theory of Narratology
2021 1
* Afshan Abbas
** Dr. Fouzia Janjua
Abstract:
The present study aims at analyzing the
propositions and sequences in the folk tale Heer
Ranjha. For this Purpose, Todorov’s theory of
narratology is employed with a focus on verbal and
syntactic choices. The verbal and syntactic choices
depict the themes of the folk tale. Todorov’s five
stages of narrative theory: Equilibrium, Disruption of
Equilibrium, Recognition of Disruption, an attempt to
repair the damage, and New Equilibrium will be
applied to the present text to analyze how by following
five stages, the folk tale of ‘Heer Ranjha’ progresses
and what fantastic elements could be found that make
readers understand or take it as the folk literature. The
linguistic choices are significant in terms of sequence
and propositions. The study is also aims at providing
the comprehensive view and application of the
Todorov’s theory of narratology. The data comprises
on the translation of ‘Heer Ranjha’ by Usborne (1973).
The study focuses on the language of the folk tale,
which helps the readers to understand the social and
cultural norms of Punjab.
Key Words: Propositions, sequences, Heer Ranjha,
Todorov’s theory of narratology, verbal & Syntactic
choices.
Introduction:
Folktales offer a wonderful resource for highlighting
traditional socio-cultural values. While, folktales have the capacity
to enrich the past but their linkage with the present becomes more
“Khoj” Vol. 87, July-December. 2021 2
Literature Review:
A number of writers and researchers have explored the
theme of love and affection in the folk tales based on the particular
patterns of the folk tales.
Butler (2007) employed the feminist study of folk tales
which aimed at analyzing socio-cultural and political norms of the
society for women while rejecting the traditional notions of
feminism and gender. She opposes binary classifications such as
men and women, defining gender as a variable attribute that shifts
and changes depending on the roles one takes on. Gender
difference, according to Tannen (1994), is an expository
experience that enhances emotional connection. According to her
findings, men are more indirect due to weakness or a lack of
confidence, whereas women are more direct. Lazar (2007)
conducted a critical discourse analysis, looking at gender, power,
and ideology in discourse through the lens of inequality and how it
exists in society.
Institutional, cultural, and geographic circumstances are all
diverse. Aside from that, she regarded gender as a factor. Men and
women are divided into two classes by an ideological structure that
is centered on gender on the subject of dominance and
subordination.
Bachtarzi (2010) examines human relationships in
Lawrence's "Sons and Lovers" to document her findings by
contextualizing each character in regard to the causes of failure in
human relationships through the eyes of the Oedipus complex,
with respect to the other characters. Foghel (2013) investigates the
concept of love in Shakespeare's Hamlet, questioning how
Shakespeare not only exemplified but also brilliantly replicated
repeating patterns of love.
Language is an ideal medium and tool for the
representation of love. Words cannot be considered
decontextualized lexical elements, but they do give context for
other lexical items. Assessing the worth of any text and attempting
to grasp the truth established by language narratological analysis is
“Khoj” Vol. 87, July-December. 2021 4
References
* PhD Scholar, Internation Islamic University Islamabad
** Associate Professor, Internation Islamic University Islamabad
1. Bachtarzi, A. (2010). Men’s Relationships in D.H.
Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers. [Master’s thesis] Mentouri
University Constantine
2. Butler, J. (2007). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the
Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
3. Hogan, P.C. (2011). Affective narratology: The structure of
stories. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
4. Prince, G. (2003). A dictionary of narratology (Rev ed.).
Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
5. Todorov, T. (1971). The Two Principles of Narratives.
Diacritics 1(1), pp. 37-44
6. Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist Critical Discourse
Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse PraxIS1.
Critical Discourse Studies 4 (2):141-164.
7. Usborne, C.F. (1973). The Adventures of Heer Ranjha. A
British Commonwealth, London: Owen. 203S. UNESCO.