The closing speech summarizes the trial and evidence heard for a case involving a defendant named Rowan Hynes. The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The speech describes a protest on July 8th, 2023 that initially had 100 people but grew larger, blocking roads and causing traffic issues. This delayed ambulances and escalated tensions between protesters and drivers.
The closing speech summarizes the trial and evidence heard for a case involving a defendant named Rowan Hynes. The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The speech describes a protest on July 8th, 2023 that initially had 100 people but grew larger, blocking roads and causing traffic issues. This delayed ambulances and escalated tensions between protesters and drivers.
The closing speech summarizes the trial and evidence heard for a case involving a defendant named Rowan Hynes. The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The speech describes a protest on July 8th, 2023 that initially had 100 people but grew larger, blocking roads and causing traffic issues. This delayed ambulances and escalated tensions between protesters and drivers.
The closing speech summarizes the trial and evidence heard for a case involving a defendant named Rowan Hynes. The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The speech describes a protest on July 8th, 2023 that initially had 100 people but grew larger, blocking roads and causing traffic issues. This delayed ambulances and escalated tensions between protesters and drivers.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
CLOSING SPEECH ON R V Hynes
May it please the court; members of the jury,
You have now seen the trial and you have heard the evidence from this case and arguments from both the defence and the prosecution. The incident that took place months ago is drawing to a close and it is time to provide a judgement. Your job, as members of the jury, is to reach a fair and just verdict. In the meantime, my learned friends and I will be reviewing the case by reminding you what the evidence suggests, whilst addressing the relevancy of the law in this case. Firstly, I would like to take this opportunity to remind you that the burden of proof lies with me to prove there is beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty. Essentially, you must be satisfied so that you are sure of Rowan Hynes’s guilt. What this means, is that if you have any reasonable doubts as to the defendant’s guilt, you should pronounce the defendant not guilty. However, if you agree with me and do not doubt that the evidence shows the defendant’s guilt, I have proven the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and your job would be to return a guilty verdict. Ladies and gentlemen of the Jury, let me take you back to that afternoon on 8 th July 2023. During a protest against oil that was scheduled at 13:13, the event took an unexpected turn as it gained momentum. The initially peaceful protesters of approximately 100 individuals at the location grew in size, causing a disruption to many vehicles. The protest led to the blockage of roads, resulting in a traffic jam. As a consequence, numerous drivers, including one driver, found themselves delayed and, regrettably, late for important appointments. The road blockade, unintended as it may have been, also posed a serious impediment to emergency services. Ambulances in route to a nearby hospital were unable to get to their location through the large blockade, potentially affecting critical medical situations. Tensions escalated as individuals at the front of the vehicular queue engaged in heated arguments with the protestors. Frustrations escalated to the point where a person from the queue attempted to physically remove a seated protestor obstructing the road. In response, a member of the protesting crowd intervened, increasing the chaos by directing anger towards a driver. You will be familiar with the facts of the case by now and from all the evidence you have heard, it simply points to one answer. Rowan was involved at the scene and has created a risk to the public by acting recklessly.
United States v. Romanus Nwaneri, A/K/A Frank Davis, A/K/A Romero, United States of America v. Bennet Chika Aboh, A/K/A JB, A/K/A Chika, 74 F.3d 1234, 4th Cir. (1996)