Quail Article
Quail Article
Quail Article
Abstract
The present study was carried out for six weeks on 135 day old quail chicks to study the effect of
supplementation of probiotic and enzymes on growth performance. The dietary treatments
comprised of T1 – control i.e. corn – soya based diet as control, whereas T2 and T3 supplemented
with probiotic and multienzyme respectively. The body weight gain and feed conversion efficiency
was significantly (P<0.01) better in probiotic and enzyme fed groups. Similarly dressing percentage
was also significantly (P<0.01) better in these groups as compared to control. It is concluded that
probiotic and enzyme can be successfully incorporated in diet of Japanese quail as a growth
promoter.
Keywords: Supplementation, Probiotic, Enzyme, Performance, Japanese Quail, Diet.
et al (2001) and Elongvan et al (2004) who also 3. Edwin, S. C., K. Vishwanathan, B. Mohan and M. R.
reported better FCR on feeding of probiotic and Purushottaman (2004): Indian J. Poult. Sci., 39 (3) :
enzymes in quails. The dressing percentage was also 241-245.
4. Elangovan, A. V., A. S. Mandal, P. K. Tyagi, P.K. Tyagi,
better in probiotic and enzyme supplemented diet and S.
collaborates with Rathi (2003) and Kumar et al (2005) Tappo and T. S. Johari (2004): J. Sci. Food and Agri.,
who observed increased dressing percentage by 84 (15) : 2028-2034.
inclusion of probiotic and multienzymes. Similarly 5. Fuller, R. (1989): J. Appl. Bacterial., 66:305-378.
nitrogen retention was also maximum in probiotic and 6. Kumar, R., P. K. Tyagi, A. V. Elangovan, A. K. Shrivastav,
enzymes group comprising to control and accordance P. K. Tyagi, V. R. B. Shastry (2005): XXIII IPSACON,
with Rathi (2003) also revealed higher N2 retention on Hyderabad, Vol. II
7. Kumarraj, R., D. Narhari, G. Shrinivasan & R. A. Rajani
probiotic and enzymes fed groups. (1997): Indian J. Poult. Sci., 32: (1) : 106-107.
It is concluded that probiotic and enzymes can 8. Mujeeb Ather, M. A. (2001): Poult. Line. 5 : 16-20.
be successfully incorporated in diet of Japanese quails 9. Pakhira, M. C. and G. Samantha (2006): Indian J. Poult.
a growth promoters. Sci., 41 (1) :68-73.
10. Panda, B., V. R. Reddy, V. R. Sadagopan & A. K.
References
Shrivastav (2002): ICAR Pub., New Delhi.
th
1. A. O. A. C. (1990): Official Method of Analysis, 15 ed, 11. Rathi, A. (2003): M. V. Sc., Thesis, MAFSU, Nagpur
Washington D. C. : 945. 12. Staznicka, H. (1992): Zivocisna Vyroba, 37: 61-68.
2. Asmita Kumari, S. S. Singh, M. D. Neeruddin and K. C. 13. Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran (1994): 8th edn. Oxford
P. Singh (2001): Indian J. Poult. Sci., 36 (2) : 233-234. and IBH. Pub. Co. Calcutta.
14. Wantia, D. (1993): Zivocisna Vyroba, 39 (2) : 983-992.
Table-1. Percent composition of experimental diets
Groups Initial body Final body Weekly body Total feed Feed Conversion Dressing N2 Retention
weights weights weights gain** Consumption Ratio** Percentage* (%)
(gms) (gms) (gms) ** (gms)
T1Control 8.84± 0.20 221.68a±2.72 35.45a± 3.07 121.95b ±20.53 3.32a ±0.14 69.06a ±0.66 59.00
b b a b
T2Probiotic 9.04± 0.23 243.46 ± 2.97 39.26 ±4.34 117.44 ± 19.73 2.83 ± 0.10 75.16b±1.42 67.24
T3Enzyme 9.26± 0.22 234.37b±4.66 38.63b±4.07 120.47ab±19.82 2.97b± 0.10 74.15b± 0.81 64.91
********