A school policy that you agree with or disagree with.

ANSWER 1:
Introduction:
In Vietnam, the cost of public service transportation on a daily basis can
sometimes pose a financial burden for students who are often on a tight
budget. Fortunately, the government has implemented a policy that
exempts and reduces the cost of public service tickets for students. In my
opinion, this policy is a step in the right direction for ensuring that
students can access educational resources without worrying about the
cost of transportation.
Background Information:
The cost of transportation in Vietnam has been a longstanding issue. Many
students are forced to walk long distances to school due to the high cost of
public transportation. This not only impacts their health but also their
ability to focus on their studies. Recognizing this challenge, the
government has implemented a policy that exempts and reduces the cost
of public service tickets for students.
Thesis Statement:
I agree that the policy on exemption and reduction of public service tickets
for students is a necessary step in promoting educational access and
success in Vietnam.
Body Paragraphs:
Topic Sentence:
The exemption and reduction of public service tickets for students is a
crucial step in mitigating the financial burden on students and promoting
equitable access to education.
Example Reasons:
Firstly, the financial burden of transportation can pose a challenge for
many students. The cost of transportation can add up, and for many low-
income and working-class students, this can be the difference between
attending school and missing classes. The policy on exemption and
reduction of public service tickets for students ensures that economically
disadvantaged students are able to access educational resources, which is
essential for the development of the country.
Furthermore, the policy promotes equal access to education for all.
Education should not be a luxury afforded only to those who can afford it.
All students, regardless of their socioeconomic background, should have
the opportunity to access educational resources. The policy on exemption
and reduction of public service tickets for students ensures that all
students are able to attend school, regardless of their financial situation.
Counter-argument:
However, some may argue that the policy may encourage students to use
public transportation more frequently, which may increase traffic
congestion and environmental issues.
Refutation:
Despite this, the benefits of the policy outweigh its potential drawbacks.
The policy is a crucial step towards ensuring that all students have access
to education, which is essential for the development of the country.
Furthermore, with proper regulations and monitoring, the potential
drawbacks of increased traffic congestion and environmental impact can
be mitigated.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the policy on exemption and reduction of public service
tickets for students is a necessary and positive step in promoting
educational access and success in Vietnam. The policy ensures that all
students, regardless of their financial situation, have the opportunity to
access educational resources, which is crucial for the development of the
country. With proper regulation and monitoring, the potential drawbacks
of increased traffic and environmental issues can be minimized. Overall,
the policy is a crucial investment in the future of Vietnam.
ANSWER 2:
As society becomes more and more diverse and complex, governments
worldwide struggle to find ways of meeting the needs of their citizens. One
such issue in Vietnam is the policy on exemption and reduction of public
service tickets for students. While some argue that this policy will help
students, I strongly disagree and believe that it will only lead to more
problems.
Background Information:
The policy on exemption and reduction of public service tickets for
students is a policy that allows students to ride public transportation for
free or at a reduced cost. The idea behind this policy is to make
transportation more accessible for students, who often face difficulties in
accessing public services due to their low income.
Thesis Statement:
Although the policy on exemption and reduction of public service tickets
for students may seem like a good idea at first glance, it will ultimately
lead to more problems than solutions.
Body Paragraph:
Topic Sentence: One of the main problems with this policy is that it will
encourage more students to rely on public transportation instead of
walking or biking to school.
Example Reason: This will not only increase traffic congestion, but also
lead to long wait times at bus stops and over-cramped buses.
Counter-Argument: Some might argue that this policy will help reduce air
pollution by encouraging more students to use public transportation, but
this overlooks the fact that students who live within walking or biking
distance of their school will be more likely to use public transportation for
convenience rather than necessity.
Refutation: In fact, students who live near their school should be
encouraged to walk or bike to reduce traffic and air pollution, rather than
being given an incentive to use public transportation unnecessarily.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the policy on exemption and reduction of public service
tickets for students is a short-sighted policy that will only lead to more
problems than solutions. Instead, we should focus on encouraging
students to be more environmentally friendly by walking or biking to
school, rather than relying on public transportation. Ultimately, this will
lead to a healthier and more sustainable future for all of us.
ANSWER 3:
Introduction: Education plays a vital role in human life, and the
government of Vietnam has implemented several policies to encourage
students to pursue higher education. One of these policies is the credit
policy, which allows students to take loans for educational purposes. While
this policy has benefits, it also has drawbacks. In this essay, I will discuss
the advantages and disadvantages of the education credit policy in
Vietnam.
Body Paragraph: The credit policy is advantageous in providing financial
access to education for all students. Many individuals who cannot afford
educational fees can benefit from this policy, enabling them to pursue
higher education. Additionally, the credit policy can enhance the economic
growth of the country by producing skilled personnel who can contribute
to the growth of industries. However, some people believe that the credit
policy has disadvantages, as it can result in increased student debt.
Students may face difficulty in repaying these debts soon after their
graduation due to the high interest rates. The accumulation of education
loans can also affect their credit score and hinder their future prospects.
To address the counter-argument, it is essential to understand that the
Vietnamese government has recently revised its credit policy, reducing the
interest rate and extending the repayment period to ease the burden of
students. Furthermore, instead of relying solely on the credit policy,
students should also explore scholarships, grants, and work-study
programs to minimize their student debt.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the education credit policy in Vietnam has both
advantages and disadvantages, and it is crucial to recognize both sides of
this policy. While the policy provides financial access for students to
pursue higher education, it can also lead to increased student debt.
However, with proper implementation and regulation, and students’
optimal debt management, the education credit policy can be beneficial in
promoting the economic growth of Vietnam.
ANSWER 4:
Introduction:
Education is an essential aspect of any country's development, and
policies concerning it shape the future of a nation. In this regard, Vietnam
has made many efforts to improve its education system by implementing
credit policies to enable students to pursue higher education. This essay
will discuss the effectiveness of Vietnam's education credit policy, taking
into account both its advantages and disadvantages.
Background Information: Access to higher education has always been a
challenge for many students in Vietnam due to financial constraints.
Recognizing this challenge, the Vietnamese government initiated the
education credit policy in 2007, which grants students loans for tuition,
living expenses, and other fees. This credit policy made higher education
accessible to more students nationwide.
Thesis Statement: This essay argues that Vietnam's education credit
policy is effective in promoting higher education access and creating a
better future for young people.
Body Paragraph:
One of the advantages of the education credit policy is that it makes
higher education accessible to more students regardless of their social and
economic background. Students who previously could not afford to pay for
higher education can now access it by receiving government-funded loans.
According to a report by the Ministry of Education and Training in 2019,
the education credit policy helped over 1.5 million students achieve higher
education degrees, creating a better future for them.
However, concerns have been raised that the policy might lead to more
student debt, especially considering the high-interest rates attached to the
student loans. It is important to note, however, that the student loans have
an interest rate of only 0.55% while the government covers the rest of the
interest rate from its budget. This makes it considerably affordable
compared to other forms of loans available in the country.
Counter-Argument:
Some people argue that the education credit policy is ineffective
because the loan repayment rate is low, and there are cases of loan
defaulters. These arguments cannot be wholly dismissed, as the
repayment rate is indeed low, standing at 60%, but this rate has improved
over the years.
Refutation:
Furthermore, the government has taken steps to address this issue by
launching awareness programs that increase loan repayment, revising the
terms of the loans, and introducing vocational training programs that help
students get jobs and pay off their loans. Additionally, the government also
wrote off about 43% of the outstanding student loans in 2018, which
greatly alleviated the burden on those struggling to repay.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, Vietnam's education credit policy has, in many ways,
been effective in enabling students to access higher education and get
better job opportunities. Despite some challenges within the policy, the
Vietnamese government has shown a commitment to improving the policy,
making it workable for students. Therefore, it is evident that Vietnam's
education credit policy is a positive step towards the country's
development and creating opportunities for its youth.
ANSWER 5:
Introduction:
As our society continuously progresses, the importance of education
becomes more apparent. Education is the key to unlocking doors of
opportunity, both personal and professional. However, educational
opportunities can come at great cost. Vietnam has recently implemented a
credit policy for higher education that I disagree with. This policy has the
potential to do more harm than good, and it is imperative that we revisit
and reconsider this policy.
Background Information: In 2018, the Vietnamese government
introduced a credit policy for higher education, which aimed to make
higher education more affordable and accessible for Vietnamese students.
Under this policy, students can borrow up to 70% of their tuition fees and
pay it back over an extended period. This policy was met with great
enthusiasm, but it has some serious unintended consequences.
Thesis Statement: Although the credit policy for education in Vietnam
seems like a good idea, I disagree with it because it creates an
environment where students are burdened with debt, encourages
carelessness and reduces the value of education.
Body Paragraph:
Topic Sentence: The credit policy for education in Vietnam creates an
environment where students are burdened with debt.
Example: As students take on debt to pay for their higher education, they
become more debt-ridden in the long run. They have to repay the loan and
the interest that accrues with it. This creates undue burden and pessimism
among students. Furthermore, a large portion of a student’s income is used
to repay the debt, leaving little to no space for personal expenditures.
Counter-argument: Higher education is expensive in Vietnam and many
students cannot afford it, which justifies the need for the credit policy.
Refutation: While the cost of education can be an obstacle for many
students, the credit policy exacerbates the problem by pushing them
deeper into debt. It's better for the government to look into ways to make
education more affordable than to burden students with loans.
Topic Sentence: The credit policy encourages carelessness among
students.
Example: The credit policy doesn't hold students accountable for how
they use the borrowed money. Some students may use it for recreational
purposes rather than for education. This undermines the entire purpose of
the policy and creates an environment where students do not take
responsibility for their actions.
Counter-argument: The credit policy allows students to take control of
their education and gives them the power to choose how to finance it.
Refutation: While the credit policy does give students more control over
their education, it also encourages carelessness and irresponsibility. It's
better for the government to provide scholarships or grants to students
rather than loans so that they don't misuse the funds.
Topic Sentence: The credit policy reduces the value of education.
Example: By placing a greater emphasis on accessibility rather than
quality education, the credit policy undermines the value of education.
This could have devastating long-term consequences for students,
reducing their ability to secure good jobs or even complete their
education.
Counter-argument: The credit policy makes education accessible to the
masses and helps to promote social mobility.
Refutation: While the credit policy does help promote social mobility, it
could also reduce the quality of education by incentivizing subpar
academic institutions to stay in business. It may also limit students to only
attending schools with affordable tuition, instead of choosing a school that
better fits their needs.
Conclusion: In summary, the credit policy for education in Vietnam is
misguided as it places undue burden on students, encourages carelessness,
and reduces the value of education. Instead of this policy, the government
should look for other ways to make education more accessible and
affordable to students. Education is the future of Vietnam, and it's vital
that the government makes it a priority by providing high-quality and
affordable education for all.
ANSWER 6:
Introduction:
In today's world, education has become a basic necessity for everyone.
However, education can be an expensive affair, especially for those who
come from humble backgrounds. In order to encourage and support
learners to pursue their educational dreams, the state has implemented a
preferential credit policy. This policy offers special interest rates,
conditions and loan terms for learners who wish to study. In this essay, I
will discuss why it is important to encourage socialization of educational
credit activities and why I agree with this policy.
Background information:
The preferential credit policy is a state-initiated policy that provides
support to learners who are facing financial difficulties in pursuing their
educational goals. The policy offers special interest rates, conditions, and
loan terms for learners to study. The aim of this policy is to provide
financial support to learners, irrespective of their financial backgrounds, to
pursue their educational dreams.
Thesis statement:
I strongly believe that socialization of educational credit activities should
be encouraged to ensure that students from all financial backgrounds have
access to education. This is crucial in building an educated workforce that
will drive economic growth and development.
Body Paragraph:
Topic sentence:
One of the primary reasons why socialization of educational credit
activities is important is that it helps to bridge the gap between the haves
and have-nots. This is because education is a fundamental right of every
citizen, irrespective of their social and financial background.
Example:
For instance, students who are from economically weaker backgrounds
may face financial barriers to pursuing tertiary education. However, with
preferential credit policies in place, these students can now access
education, which would have otherwise been impossible.
Counter-argument:
Some people might argue that providing preferential credit policies to
learners for education is not fair to those who have not pursued tertiary
education.
Refutation:
However, this argument is flawed since tertiary education is not a luxury
anymore, but a necessity. It is crucial for students to have access to
education regardless of their financial backgrounds, to obtain skills that
are marketable in today's economy.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, providing preferential credit policies to learners helps to
promote social inclusion and equality in an education system that is
accessible to all. This policy encourages learners to pursue their
educational dreams without facing financial barriers, which would have
otherwise been impossible. The state should, therefore, continue to
encourage socialization of educational credit activities and promote
policies that will make education accessible to all students. This will go a
long way in ensuring that students from all financial backgrounds have
access to education, which is essential for building a healthy, educated
workforce that will drive economic growth and development.
Answer 7:
Introduction:
In Vietnam, there is currently a policy in place that exempts students from
paying for public service tickets or provides them with a reduced fee.
Some argue that this policy is unfair to the general public, but I firmly
believe that it is a necessary allowance for students who are pursuing their
education. In this essay, I will explain why I support this policy through
various examples, the counter-argument, and refutation.
Body Paragraph:
The policy of exemption and reduction of public service tickets for
students is a beneficial one for various reasons. Firstly, students are often
struggling financially as they balance their education with work or family
obligations. Paying for public transportation can become a significant
financial burden that can hinder their academic progress. This policy
allows them to focus on their studies and achieve academic success
without worrying about the expenses of traveling. Moreover, students are
the future of the country and deserve to be given specific privileges such as
free transportation.
Counter-Argument:
On the other hand, some may argue that this policy is unfair to the
general public. They may suggest that all citizens should be granted the
same benefits regardless of their station in life. However, this argument
overlooks the challenges students face in maintaining a balance between
their education and financial responsibilities. It also fails to acknowledge
that the future growth of the country relies heavily on the success of the
student population.
Refutation:
The critics of this policy are mistaken because it reflects the state's
commitment to invest in the education of its citizens. By allowing students
to have exemptions or reductions in fees, the government is investing in
the education of its citizens, which is an investment in the country's future.
Students who receive these benefits are more likely to achieve academic
success and contribute positively to society in the future.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the policy of exemption and reduction of public service
tickets for students is a crucial policy that should be maintained in
Vietnam. We must all recognize that it is in our best interest as a country
to invest in the education of our future generations. By granting students
exemptions or reduction in fees, we can help alleviate some of the financial
burdens they face while pursuing their education. We must stand by this
policy and continue to support our students as they pave the way towards
a brighter future.
ANSWER 8:
Introduction:
Obtaining a college degree is no mean feat. For many students who
struggle to make ends meet, the cost of commuting to college becomes a
significant burden. To reduce the financial burden on these students, the
government of Vietnam recently implemented a policy that grants
students exemption or reduced rates for public service tickets. While some
argue that this policy is misplaced, I strongly believe that it is a necessary
piece of legislation that the government should uphold.
Background Information: The cost of transportation in Vietnam
continues to soar, making it harder for ordinary citizens to afford it, let
alone students who barely scrape by. To mitigate the financial burden, the
government recently introduced policies aimed at reducing these costs.
The policy on exemption and reduction of public service tickets for
students is one such initiative.
Thesis Statement: Despite the widespread opposition to this policy, I fully
support it, as it aims to lessen the economic burden placed on students,
who already carry enough financial responsibility.
Body Paragraph:
The policy on exemption and reduction of public service tickets for
students is essential because it helps struggling students to access public
transport, enabling them to attend classes regularly. For instance, students
living in rural areas without easy access to public transport are likely to
benefit greatly from this policy which would make public transport more
affordable. Moreover, this policy is an excellent way of encouraging more
students to enroll in school, enhancing access to education, and improving
academic performance.
While some argue that this policy is misguided since it may lead to
students missing classes or exploiting the exemptions, the benefits far
outweigh the potential downsides. As such, this policy should be upheld,
and the government should consider creating measures to mitigate any
negatives.
Counterargument: One of the main objections to the policy on exemption
and reduction of public service tickets for students is that it is more about
politics than actual benefits. Critics argue that this policy gives politicians
leverage to induce young voters to support them. They also argue that
such policies may be unsustainable in the long term since it creates a hefty
economic burden on the government.
Refutation: While it is true that some policies are often used as political
tools, the policy on exemption and reduction of public service tickets for
students serves important social and economic purposes. The government
of Vietnam has a responsibility to ensure that its citizens access quality
education irrespective of their socioeconomic status. Therefore, such
policies should be viewed as investments in building a well-educated,
skilled, and prosperous nation.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the policy on exemption and reduction of
public service tickets for students is a necessary measure that should be
supported by all. The far-reaching benefits of this policy in addressing
educational equity, academic performance, and financial hardships that
students face make it a critical investment that the government should
uphold. The Vietnamese government should consider creating oversight
committees to monitor the implementation of this policy to ensure that it
meets its intended goals.
ANSWER 9
Introduction:
In recent years, there has been a growing debate over the policy of
exemption and reduction of public service tickets for students in Vietnam.
This policy aims to provide students with more affordable transportation
options to encourage them to attend school regularly. However, I
completely disagree with this policy for several reasons. In this essay, I will
explain my viewpoint in detail.
Background Information:
The policy of exemption and reduction of public service tickets for
students was introduced in Vietnam in 2005 to improve the attendance of
students in schools. The policy enables students to receive a 50% discount
on public transport services such as buses, trains, and ferries. This
discount is intended to alleviate the financial burden that students face
and make it easier for them to attend school regularly.
Thesis Statement:
Despite the best intentions of this policy, I disagree with it because it
unfairly burdens taxpayers and reduces incentives for students to take
responsibility for their education.
Body Paragraph:
Topic Sentence:
The policy of exemption and reduction of public service tickets for
students unfairly burdens taxpayers who are already struggling to make
ends meet.
Example Reasons:
First of all, this policy forces taxpayers to bear the cost of the discounts
offered to students. It is important to note that these discounts are not
free, and someone has to pay for them. With the state of Vietnam already
struggling to finance many of its essential programs, this policy is simply
unfair to taxpayers who have to shoulder the extra burden. Additionally, it
is discouraging as it makes many hardworking Vietnamese citizens feel
that their efforts are not rewarded.
Counter-Argument:
Some may argue that the policy is necessary to encourage more students
to attend school regularly, and therefore it is a worthwhile investment.
Refutation:
While the intention of the policy is laudable, it does not necessarily mean
that it is the best way to achieve the objective. Furthermore, some students
may still choose to skip school even with the discount, which would make
the policy ineffective.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the policy of exemption and reduction of public service
tickets for students should be abolished. It unfairly burdens taxpayers,
reduces incentives for students to take responsibility for their education,
and even fails to achieve its primary objective. Rather than relying on this
well-meaning but problematic policy, we should focus on finding more
effective solutions that can better support students in pursuit of their
educational goals.
ANSWER 10:
Introduction:
In recent years, there has been a lot of debate about the policy of
exemption and reduction of public service tickets for students in Vietnam.
While some argue that this policy is essential for the financial well-being of
students, I must disagree. In my view, this policy is flawed and should be
revisited. This essay will explore the reasons why I disagree with this
policy.
Background Information:
The exemption and reduction of public service tickets for students in
Vietnam is a policy that was put in place to reduce the burden on students.
The policy provides discounts on public transport tickets, including buses,
trains, and ferries, to students who meet certain criteria. The policy is
supposed to help students save money, which they can then invest in their
education.
Disadvantages of the Policy:
However, the policy of exemption and reduction of public service
tickets for students in Vietnam is flawed for several reasons.
Firstly, it creates inefficiencies in the public transport system. When
students are given discounts on public transport tickets, the government
loses revenue, which may be used to maintain and upgrade the transport
system. This may lead to poor services, which will impact not only
students but also the general public.
Secondly, the policy creates a divide between students and non-
students. When non-students travel on public transport, they still have to
pay the full price of the tickets. This may lead to resentment and ill-feeling
towards students who are perceived to be getting preferential treatment.
It may also create a...
culture of entitlement among students, who may come to expect special
treatment in other areas of life as well.
Thirdly, the policy may not necessarily benefit all students equally.
Students from low-income families may still struggle to afford public
transport, even with the discounts, while students from wealthier families
may not need the discounts at all. This may lead to further inequality and
create a gap between students from different socioeconomic backgrounds.
Fourthly, the policy may not be sustainable in the long run. The cost of
providing the discounts and exemptions may increase over time, and the
government may not be able to afford it. This may lead to the policy being
scaled back or discontinued, which may create disruptions in the public
transport system and cause inconvenience to students.
Fifthly, the policy may also have unintended consequences on public
transport systems. If a large percentage of students start using public
transport, it may increase the demand for transport services, leading to
overcrowding and longer wait times. This may make public transport less
attractive to other commuters, creating a negative impact on the wider
public.
 Lastly, the policy may also lead to a reduction in revenues for public
transport operators. If the discounts and exemptions are not fully
compensated by the government, it may put a strain on the finances of
public transport providers, leading to a reduction in the quality of services
provided to all commuters, including students.
In conclusion, while providing discounts and exemptions for students
using public transport may seem like a positive policy, it can have several
unintended consequences that need to be considered. Before
implementing such a policy, authorities should assess its impact on public
transport systems, including the level of subsidies required to ensure that
the scheme does not lead to financial losses for public transport operators.
Additionally, measures should be put in place to prevent overcrowding,
longer wait times, and reduced quality of services for other commuters.
Overall, it is important to strike a balance between making public
transport affordable for students and ensuring that it does not adversely
affect the wider public or the transport system's viability.
ANSWER 11:
Introduction:
- Hook: As the cost of living continues to rise, many students are
struggling to make ends meet, especially in Vietnam.
- Background information: In response, authorities have proposed a
policy that would exempt or reduce public service tickets for students.
- Thesis statement: While this policy may seem like a positive step in
supporting students, I disagree with it due to its potential negative
consequences.
Body paragraph:
- Topic sentence: Exempting or reducing public service tickets for
students can lead to financial losses for public transport operators and
reduced quality of services for other commuters.
- Example reasons:
- Public transport systems rely heavily on government subsidies to
operate, and reducing revenue from ticket sales could put these services at
risk
- If more students are

ANSWER 12:
Introduction:
Public transportation is a crucial aspect of modern-day living,
especially in large cities. In Vietnam, students receive special treatment
with regards to the payment of public service tickets. However, I strongly
disagree with the policy on exemptions and reductions of public service
tickets for students in Vietnam.
Background Information:
Vietnam has a relatively affordable public transportation system, with
various modes of transportation such as buses, trains, and taxis. Students
in Vietnam are granted exemptions and reductions on public service
tickets as they are considered to be financially challenged. This policy has
been in place for a significant period and has been well-received by
students and their parents.
Thesis Statement:
However, despite the benefits of the policy, I disagree with it due to
several reasons that demonstrate why exemptions and reductions of
public service tickets for students in Vietnam are not ideal.
Body Paragraphs:
Firstly, the policy creates inequality among citizens who are not
students. Public transportation fees are relatively low in Vietnam, and
everyone who uses public services should pay for them. Granting
exemptions and reductions solely to students is unfair to other citizens
who pay the same transportation fee regardless of whether they are
students or not.
Secondly, the policy is imposing a considerable cost on the
government, which could be used to support other more pressing issues.
The government collects revenue from public transportation fees to cover
public services costs. However, granting exemptions and reductions to
millions of students require significant subsidies from the government.
The money used for these subsidies could be used to support other
important sectors like healthcare, education, and infrastructure
development.
Thirdly, the policy can lead to a decrease in the quality of public
transportation services. When there are a significant amount of
exemptions and reductions in place, the revenue for public transportation
services can decrease. This can result in a reduction in the maintenance
and improvement of public transportation systems, leading to a decrease
in their quality. Ultimately, public transportation services may not be
attractive to the general population, leading to a decline in ridership and
possible economic losses.
Lastly, the policy can also create a negative perception of students
among the public. Non-student citizens may view this policy as a form of
entitlement and privileges that students enjoy over them, which can lead
to resentment and ill-feeling towards students This negative perception
can affect the overall relationship between students and the community,
which can have long-lasting effects. It is important to ensure that policies
like these are implemented in a fair and equitable manner, taking into
account the needs and concerns of all stakeholders.
In conclusion, while the policy of providing transportation concessions
to students can have many benefits, it is important to also consider the
potential drawbacks as well. Policymakers and stakeholders must
carefully balance the economic and social benefits against the potential
negative consequences, in order to ensure that the policy serves the needs
of both students and the broader community. With careful planning and
implementation, it is possible to create policies that promote fair and
sustainable growth for all.
ANSWER 13:

INTRODUCTION
Hook: Giving students concessions on public transportation tickets sounds
like a great idea, but is it really a wise policy decision?
Background information: Many countries have implemented policies
that provide exemptions or reductions on public transportation tickets to
students. Vietnam is one such country.
Thesis statement: While the policy of providing reduced or exempt public
transportation tickets to students in Vietnam may seem like a good idea on
the surface, there are several reasons why I disagree with this policy.

BODY PARAGRAPH
Topic sentence: The policy of exempting or reducing public
transportation tickets for students can have negative effects on the
economy.
Example reason: When students are given exemptions or reductions on
public transportation tickets, this means that other members of society
will have to pay more to make up for the revenue lost by the
transportation companies. This can lead to a decrease in consumer
spending and an overall reduction in the economy's growth.
Evidence: According to a study conducted by the Massachusetts Bay
Transportation Authority, providing free public transportation to students
in the area would result in an estimated $7 million loss in revenue. This
loss of revenue could result in a decrease in the quality of public
transportation services provided, leading to further economic impacts.
Explanation: It is important to note that public transportation services
are crucial for economic activity as they allow people to travel more easily
to work, school or other places. Any negative impact on public
transportation services could therefore harm economic activity and harm
the overall growth of the country.
Counterargument: Some may argue that providing exemptions to certain
groups, such as students, can increase ridership and therefore result in
revenue gains for transportation companies. However, this argument only
holds if the increase in ridership exceeds the revenue lost from providing
the exemption. Additionally, if the transportation company is already
operating at full capacity, an increase in ridership may not lead to revenue
gains as there may be no additional capacity to generate revenue from.
Conclusion: While providing exemptions for certain groups, such as
students, may seem like a good idea in order to promote equity and
accessibility, it is important to consider the potential economic impacts.
These impacts could negatively affect public transportation services as
well as the overall economy. It is therefore crucial to carefully weigh the
potential benefits of such exemptions against their potential economic
costs....
Additionally, it is important to consider whether the burden of
providing these exemptions falls disproportionately on certain groups,
such as low-income individuals or small transportation companies. If so,
the benefits of the exemption may be outweighed by the negative impact
on these groups.
Another factor to consider is the potential impact on the environment.
Encouraging the use of public transportation can reduce carbon emissions
and other harmful pollutants, which has positive environmental impacts.
However, if providing exemptions for certain groups leads to decreased
revenue and therefore reduced investments in environmentally friendly
transportation options, the net impact on the environment may be
negative.
Overall, providing exemptions for certain groups can have both
positive and negative economic and environmental impacts. As with any
policy, it is important to carefully consider and evaluate potential costs...
and benefits before implementing it. This includes analyzing the impact on
revenue, the potential burden on certain groups, and the resulting effect
on the environment.
If exemptions are going to be implemented, it is important to ensure
that they are targeted at groups that truly need them and that they do not
create significant negative consequences. For example, exemptions for
low-income individuals may be appropriate if they help make public
transportation more affordable and accessible, but exemptions for large
corporations may not be justified if they are more likely to lead to reduced
revenue and investments in public transportation.
It is also important to consider alternatives to exemptions, such as
targeted subsidies or financial assistance programs, that may be more
effective at achieving the same goals without creating unintended negative
consequences. Ultimately, any policy related to public transportation fare
exemptions needs to be carefully designed, based on thorough analysis
and evaluation of all options, and continuously monitored and adjusted as
necessary to ensure that it is achieving its intended objectives without
causing unintended harm.