IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL MISCELLEANOUS JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE
Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh

CRM (SB) 164 OF 2023

Shri Souvik Bhattacharya

versus
Enforcement Directorate

For the Petitioner : Mr. Jishnu Saha, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kumarpal R. Chopra, Adv.,
Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta, Adv.,
Ms. Sofia Nesar, Adv.,
Mr. Santanu Seth, Adv.,

For the Enforcement Directorate :

Mr. Phiroze Edulji, Adv.,
Ms. Anamika Pandey, Adv.,

Heard On : 16.08.2023, 30.8.2023, 06.09.2023, 12.09.2023,

15.09.2023, 18.09.2023, 21.09.2023, 09.10.2023,
11.10.2023, 12,10,2023, 17.10.2023

Judgement On : 18.10.2023

Tirthankar Ghosh, J. :

The present application for bail has been preferred by the petitioner in

connection with M.L. case no. 13 of 2022 arising out of ECIR No. KLZO-

II/19/2022 dated June 24, 2022 for alleged commission of offence under

Sections 3 read with Section 70 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act,

2002 and punishable under Section 4 of the Prevention of Money

Laundering Act, 2002.

Without going into the details of the case, records reflect that the

initial complaint was filed on September 19, 2022 by the Directorate of

 2

Enforcement (E.D.) and subsequently number of supplementary complaints

were filed.

The present petitioner has been implicated pursuant to the

prosecution complaint being filed on 7th of December, 2022.

The accusations made against the present petitioner along with M/s

Acuere Consultancy Services and M/s. Educlasses Online are as follows:

“2. Shri Souvik Bhattacharya (A-10), D.O.B- 23.02.1989, S/o- Shri

Manik Bhattacharya, R/o-26S, Jadavpur East Road, 1st Floor,
Kolkata-700032:

Shri Souvik Bhattacharya was actively involved in assisting his

father Shri Manik Bhattacharya in acquisition, possession,
concealment and laundering the proceeds of crime acquired by Shri
Manik Bhattacharya out of his corrupt and criminal activities
relating to schedule offences under PMLA.

Shri Manik Bhattacharya being the president of West Bengal Board

of Primary Education has abused and misused his high official
position and in pursuance thereof he compelled 530 self-financed
D.El.Ed Colleges to give him an amount of Rs. 50,000/- per
institute. In order to launder the said extorted money, Shri Souvik
Bhattacharya in connivance with Shri Manik Bhattacharya, formed
a proprietary concern namely M/s Acuere Consultancy Services In
his name and arranged an agreement vide dated 02.10.2018
between the said firm and Bengal Teachers Training Colleges
Association being the association of self-financed D.El.Ed colleges of
West Bengal, showing purpose of consultancy services to be
provided to the said 530 self-financed D.El.Ed colleges by M/s
Acuere Consultancy Services. Investigation conducted under PMLA,
2002 revealed that an amount of Rs.2,64,53,988/- was extorted
 3

from 530 self-financed D.El.Ed Colleges at the rate of Ps. 50,000/-

per college which was received in the bank accounts of M/s Acuere
Consultancy Services in guise of services rendered to them.
Investigation conducted under PMLA, 2002 revealed that no such
services have been provided to these colleges/institutions by M/s
Acuere Consultancy Services against the amounts so received from
them. Further the amount so received from the said institutions has
not been returned so far.

Investigation also revealed that Shri Manik Bhattacharya being the

president of West Bengal Board of Primary Education has abused
and misused his high official position and in pursuance thereof he
compelled D.EI.Ed Colleges to give him an amount of Rs. 500/- per
D.El.Ed student during the covid-19 pandemic. Investigation
revealed that an amount of total Rs. 2.47 Crores at the rate of Rs.
500/- per student from the colleges have been extorted by Shri
Manik Bhattacharya. In order to launder the said extorted money,
Shri Souvik Bhattacharya in connivance with Shri Manik
Bhattacharya formed a proprietary concern namely M/s Educlasses
Online and brought the said extorted money of Rs. 2.47 Crores in
the bank accounts of this firm in order to show them as business
transaction towards providing online classes. However,
investigation conducted under PMLA revealed that no such classes,
except some classes arranged as an eyewash, have been arranged
for the students of D.El.Ed colleges by the said firm.

Investigation conducted under PMLA also revealed that Shri Souvik

Bhattacharya and Shri Manik Bhattacharya in conspiracy with
themselves and others induced their other family members and
distant relatives and pursuant to that conspiracy opened a number
of joint bank accounts with those induced persons without
informing them the purpose of opening such Joint accounts with
them. Further, he kept such joint bank accounts in his control,
occupation and operation. Further he also infused huge sums of
 4

cash in that bank accounts and from there the same were used for
making FD jointly in the name of himself and his one of the relative
Shri Debabrata Mukherjee. . Further, Shri Souvik Bhattacharya
operated those accounts by showing himself as secondary holder
but the said bank accounts was completely under his control and
use.

As such Shri Souvik Bhattacharya was involved in the acquisition,

use, possession, and concealment of proceeds of crime with the
assistance of other accused persons and entities. Thus, the accused
person has committed the offence of Money Laundering as defined
under section 3 of PMLA and is, therefore, liable to be punished
under section 4 of PMLA, 2002.

Aforesaid acts committed by him are covered by the definition of

offence of money-laundering. In addition to that, Explanation to
Section 3 of PMLA also provides that "the process or activity
connected with proceeds of crime is a continuing activity and
continues till such time a person is directly or indirectly enjoying the
proceeds of crime by its concealment or possession or acquisition or
use or projecting it as untainted property or claiming it as untainted
property in any manner whatsoever". As revealed from the facts of
the case, he continued to be involved in processes and activities
connected with said proceeds of crime and continued to be in
possession and use of the said proceeds of crime. In view of the
facts and aforesaid legal explanation, it is noticed that he continued
to commit offence of money laundering as per Section 3 of PMLA
and therefore liable to be punished under Section 4 of PMLA for
such continuing activity.

……………

4. M/s Acuere Consultancy Services (A-12) (Represented through its

proprietor Shri Souvik Bhattacharya), at:- 26 S, Jadavpur East
Road, 1st Floor, Kolkata-700032:
 5

M/s Acuere Consultancy Service is the proprietary concern of Shri

Souvik Bhattacharya (A-10) which was formed solely for the
purpose to launder the proceeds of crime generated/derived out of
the criminal activity relating to the scheduled offences under FMLA.

Shri Manik Bhattacharya (A-9) being the president of West Bengal

Board of Primary Education has abused and mused his high official
position and in pursuance thereof he compelled the self-financed
D.El.Ed Colleges to give him an amount of Rs. 50,000/- per institute
during the period from Oct 2018 to April 2019 in the name of
services rendered to them investigation conducted under PMLA,
2002 revealed that an amount of Rs. 2,64,53,988/- was extorted
from 530 self-financed D.El.Ed Colleges in the name of services
rendered to them.

In order to launder the said extorted money, Shri Manik

Bhattacharya (A-9) in connivance with his son Shri Souvlk
Bhattacharya (A-10) formed this proprietary concern: (A-12) and
arranged to be made an agreement dated 02.10.2018 between M/s
Acuere Consultancy Services and Bengal Teachers Training
Colleges Association being the association of self-financed D.El.Ed
colleges of West Bengal, in the name of consultancy to be provided
to the said 530 self-financed D.El.Ed colleges. Investigation
conducted under PMLA, 2002 revealed that no such services have
been provided to these colleges, institutions by M/s Acuere
Consultancy Services against the amounts so received from them.
Further, the amount so received from the said institution has not
been returned so far. This is nothing but solely an act of influencing
and abusing the power of the post of president of West Bengal
Board of Primary Education by Shri Manik Bhattacharya. Therefore,
it is clear that this amount was nothing but the proceeds of crime
generated through the criminal activities relating to the scheduled
offence under PMLA, 2002
 6

This business entity was solely used in the acquisition, use,

possession, and concealment of proceeds of crime with the
assistance of other accused persons and entities. Thus, it has
committed the offence of Money Laundering as defined under
section 3 read with section 70 of PMLA, 2002 and is, therefore,
liable to be punished under section 4 of PMLA, 2002.

5. M/s Educlasses Online (A-13) (Represented through its proprietor

Shri Souvik Bhattacharya), At:- 26 S Jadavpur East Road, 1st Floor,
Kolkata-700032:

M/s Educlasses Online is the proprietary concern of Shri Souvik

Bhattacharya (14-10) which was formed solely for the purpose to
launder the proceeds of crime generated/derived out of the criminal
activity relating to the scheduled offences under PMLA.

Shri Manik Bhatracharya (A-9) being the president of West Bengal

Board of Primary Education has abused and misused his high
official position and in pursuance thereof he compelled the students
of the D.El.Ed Colleges and/or the D.El.Ed colleges to give him an
amount of Rs. 500/- per student of all the D.El.Ed Colleges in guise
of arranging online classes to the students of D.El.Ed. colleges
during the Covid-19 pandemic. Investigation conducted under
PMLA, 2002 revealed that an amount of Rs. 2,47,44,500/-was
extorted from the students of all the D.El.Ed Colleges and/or the
D.El.Ed Colleges in guise of arranging online classes to the students
of D.El.Ed. colleges. Investigation revealed that no such online
classes were provided to the D.El.Ed students.

In order to launder the said extorted money, Shri Manik

Bhattacharya (A-9) in connivance with his son Shri Souvik
Bhattacharya (A-10) formed this proprietary concern (A-13) and
arranged to bring the said extorted money in the bank accounts of
this firm by routing into the bank accounts of All Bengal Teacher's
Training Achievers Association, which is the association of Teacher
 7

Training Collages of West Bengal, in view of the namesake

agreement made between this accused firm and All Bengal
Teachers Training Achievers Association.

This business entity was solely used in the acquisition, use,

possession, and concealment of proceeds of crime with the
assistance of other accused persons and entries. Thus, it has
committed the offence of Money Laundering as defined under
section 3 read with section 70 of PMLA, 2002 and is, therefore,
liable to be punished under section 4 of PMLA, 2002.”

On 7.1.2023 the petitioner appeared in respect of the summons

issued by the ld. Special Court and prayed for bail. The E.D. prayed time to

file their objection. The same was filed in due course when the learned

Court was pleased to keep the objection on record and fixed next date on 7th

of February, 2023. On 7th of February, 2023, an adjournment was sought

for on behalf of the petitioner. The learned Court was pleased to fix the next

date on 22nd February, 2023 for hearing of the bail application.

After hearing both the sides by an order dated 22.2.2023, the learned

Special Court was pleased to reject the prayer for bail of the present

petitioner.

Challenging the order refusing bail, a revisional application was filed

under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 397 of

the Cr.P.C. being CRR 816 of 2023 before the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.

However, the said revisional application subsequently was not pressed by

the petitioner.
 8

In the meantime, an application under Section 88 of the Cr.P.C. was

preferred before the learned Special Court. The learned Special Court by its

order dated 22.3.2023 rejected the prayer of the petitioner assigning its

grounds.

Mr. Saha, learned Senior Advocate, appearing for the petitioner

emphasized the issues relating to the period of detention, the innocence of

the accused, bank accounts of the petitioner being already mapped by the

investigating agency and the funds already being seized by the investigating

agency in course of investigation.

It has also been submitted that the petitioner is cooperating with the

investigating agency and made himself available as and when called for in

course of the investigation.

It has further been stressed that the petitioner was never arrested nor

the power under Section 19 of the PMLA Act was exercised by the

investigating agency in course of the investigation.

Learned Senior Advocate in order to substantiate the arguments

relied upon the observations made in Satarupa Bhattacharya –vs-

Enforcement Directorate reported in 2023 SCC OnLine Cal 2273 as also the

judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Pankaj Banshal –vs- Union of

India & Ors. reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1244.

Mr. Edulji, learned Advocate for the E.D., opposed the contention of

the petitioner and stressed on the complicity and the money trial,

particularly with the proprietorship firms held by the petitioner namely M/s
 9

Acuere Consultancy Services and M/s. Edu Classes Online, the seizure

effected and the manner in which Manik Bhattacharya, the then President

of the Board of Primary Education, used his influence to transmit funds of

different colleges in the accounts of the two proprietorship concern of

Souvik Bhattacharya, named above.

Learned Advocate for the E.D. has relied upon the statements of

Pannalal Bhattacharya, Hiralal Bhattacharya, Asfak Alam, Sudip Ganguly,

Rajib Kundu and Ruhul Amin to emphasise on the issues relating to the

complicity of the present petitioner, relating to transfer of funds, the

manner in which, according to the prosecution, the amounts were

transmitted, the movement of the funds through the accounts of relations

reached the petitioner as the final beneficiary, differentiates him from the

other accused who was granted bail.

Learned Advocate has also relied upon the statement of the present

petitioner under 50 of the PMLA Act to substantiate his argument. Ld.

Advocate has also relied upon the following judgments:

Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy vs. CBI, (2013) 7 SCC 439; Rohit Tandon vs.

Directorate of Enforcement, (2018) 11 SCC 46; Anil Kumar Yadav vs. State

(NCT of Delhi), (2018) 12 SC 129; Gautam Kundu vs. Directorate of

Enforcement (Prevention of Money- Laundering Act), (2015)16 SCC 1;

Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma vs. State of Maharashtra, (2005) 5 SCC

294; Subires Bhattacharyya, in re, 2022 SCC online Cal 4307; Anubrata

Mondal vs. CBI, 2023 SCC OnLine Cal 23 and Vijay Madanlal Choudhry
 10

vs. Union of India, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929; Pankaj Jain vs. Union of

India, AIR 2018 SC 1155; Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI, (2022) 10 SCC 51

and Directorate of Enforcement vs. Debabrata Halder, 2022 SCC OnLine

Cal 4095.

The main thrust of argument relied upon by the E.D. were that in

economic offences the same principles as under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.

do not apply and as and when material so surfaces, the investigating agency

has to act upon the same.

Learned Advocate for the E.D. has also drawn the attention of the

Court to the accounts to show that majority of the funds which

accumulated, which is the subject-matter of the prosecution’s case, is in the

name of the present petitioner. Further the petitioner himself being the son

was involvement for concealing and acquiring the funds which were

obtained by the said Manik Bhattacharya while he was discharging his

duties as the President of the West Bengal Board of Primary Education and

the proceeds collected, which is being investigated in the alleged Teachers

Recruitment Scam.

The thrust is on the factum of the complicity of the present petitioner

so far as the proceeds of crime is concerned.

At the initial stage when the argument commenced and the

Enforcement Directorate prayed for filing their affidavit, this Court directed

to clarify whether any policy has been adopted by the Investigating Agency

so far as the exercise of the powers under Section 19 of the PMLA is

 11

concerned. In paragraph 54 of the affidavit-in-opposition the Enforcement

Directorate categorically stated that they have not adopted any parameters

for invoking the powers under Section 19 of the PMLA and the same would

depend on the facts and circumstances of the case. There were no cogent

reasons assigned by the Investigating Agency which in the background of

the present case satisfies the conscience of the Court regarding the exercise

of such powers. Towards the end of the hearing, it was pointed out by the

Enforcement Directorate that the Teachers’ Recruitment Scam involves wide

magnitude and there are materials which have recently surfaced leading to

money trail where the involvement of the petitioner is glaring.

Records which have been produced before this Court reflect that

such documents were collected by the Investigating Agency on 16th October,

2023. The statement of some of the witnesses with regard to the money trail

has been recorded and the Enforcement Directorate intends to examine

some more witnesses which could not be done by them due to paucity of

time. Another factor which has been brought to the notice of the Court is

that the Division Bench in MAT 196 of 2023 in its order dated 5th October,

2023 at paragraph 24 was pleased to observe as follows:

“We would except the entire investigation to be concluded by 31st

December, 2023. The appellant shall cooperate with the E.D. in all
respect. However, the E.D. shall not call the applicant between 19th
October, 2023 and 26th October, 2023. ..........”

Having considered the tentative time limit set by the Hon’ble Division

Bench to the Investigating Agency to conclude the investigation and further

 12

materials having surfaced for which the Investigating Agency at this stage

sought for time to examine two more witnesses apart from the witnesses

who have already been examined particularly with regard to the amount

which has transpired relating to the donations in the account of the school,

I am of the view that having regard to the ramifications involved in the

Teachers’ Recruitment Scam, the Investigating Agency at this stage must be

granted an opportunity to exhaust their powers relating to investigation.

Accordingly, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner

on bail.

Thus, the prayer for bail of the petitioner being CRM (SB) 164 of

2023 is dismissed.

The documents, which were handed over by the Enforcement

Directorate in course of hearing particularly, in respect of which

investigation is in progress, are returned to the learned advocate appearing

for the Enforcement Directorate.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this judgment duly

downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be

supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)