2023B HKTF - L7 - Profits
2023B HKTF - L7 - Profits
2023B HKTF - L7 - Profits
Coverage
1 Basic charge of profits tax
2 Definition of business
3 Definition of profession
4 Definition of trade
5 Badges of trade
6 Carrying on trade, profession or business in Hong Kong
7 Deemed trading receipts
8 Income excluded from scope of charge
9 Source of profits
10 DIPN No. 21: Locality of profits
11 Classical cases on source rules
Learning Outcomes
After completing this unit, you should be able to:
• describe the scope of charge to profits tax
• identify chargeable person for the purposes of profits tax
• define trade, business and profession
• determine whether the activities involved are considered to be a trade carrying on in
Hong Kong
• determine what receipts are deemed to be taxable trading receipts
• identify income specifically excluded from the charge to profits tax
• apply source principles to profits in different business environments
• determine whether profits are attributable to a Hong Kong source
1.2 Exclusion
• Profits arising from sale of capital assets
• Capital vs Revenue?
https://www.ird.gov.hk/eng/tax/bus_qdi.htm
3 DEFINITION OF PROFESSION
• Section 2: includes “every trade and manufacture, and every adventure and
concern in the nature of trade”
• Isolated transaction, e.g. sale of property – “adventure in the nature of trade”
5 BADGES OF TRADE
• Six badges (i.e. 6 factors) to consider whether a “trade” exists as per the
Royal Commission on the Taxation of Profits and Income (1955):
(1) subject matter – nature of asset/quantity of asset
(2) length of ownership – the shorter, the more likely it is a trade
(3) frequency/number of similar transactions – even one transaction can
be trade
(4) supplementary work done – to make the asset more saleable?
(5) circumstances responsible for disposal – reasons other than profit-
making?
(6) motive – profit-seeking motive?
• Other additional factors:
- method and reason of acquisition
- trading interests in the same field
- method of financing
- utilisation of sale proceeds
• No one factor is conclusive; one must look at all circumstances as a whole
• Three perspectives
- central management and control (re: De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd
case)
- gainful use of assets (re: Bartica Investment Ltd case)
- maintenance of a permanent establishment
• The place of incorporation is not relevant
• Permanent Establishment
- Distinguish: carrying on trade/business in Hong Kong vs with Hong
Kong
- If trade/business is carried on through a “permanent establishment” →
in Hong Kong
- If trade/business is carried on without a “permanent establishment” →
with Hong Kong (except where the activities in Hong Kong are very
extensive)
- e.g. goods merely purchased from or sold to Hong Kong does not
constitute a PE in Hong Kong
- “Permanent establishment” was previously defined in IRR 5; pursuant to
the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (No. 6) Ordinance 2018, effective
from the year of assessment 2018/19, the definition is now governed by
section 50AAC(5) and defined in Schedule 17G
- For a DTA territory resident person, permanent establishment is to be
determined in accordance with the relevant provisions under the DTA
concerned
- For a non-DTA territory resident person, an enterprise has a permanent
establishment in Hong Kong if it has a fixed place of business in Hong
Kong through which the business of the (foreign) enterprise is wholly or
partly carried on
- A fixed place of business includes, but is not limited to, a place of
management, a branch, an office, a factory, a workshop, and a mine, an
oil or gas well, a quarry or any other place of extraction of natural
resources
- It also constitutes a permanent establishment if:
- a person (agent) is acting in Hong Kong on behalf of the enterprise
and in doing so habitually concludes contracts, or plays the principal
role leading to the conclusion of contracts that are routinely
concluded without material modification by the enterprise; and
- the contracts are in the name of the enterprise for the transfer of the
ownership of property owned by the enterprise, or for the granting of
the right to use that the enterprise has, or for the provision of
services by the enterprise
- A permanent establishment also includes a building site or construction
or installation project if certain conditions are met, but excludes
activities carried out which are of preparatory or auxiliary character and
an independent agent (details of these will not be covered)
Deposit used to
secure borrowing?
Yes No
Interest expense No
deductible?
Yes
Ace Ltd carries on business in Hong Kong. It receives interest income from a
deposit placed with HSBC bank in Hong Kong. Interest income is sourced in
Hong Kong under the provision of credit test, and is taxable under section
15(1)(f).
The interest income from the deposit is exempt from the payment of profits tax.
The bank deposit is used as a security for a loan borrowed to finance its
business operations in Taiwan, and the interset expense on the loan is not
deductible under Hong Kong profits tax (deduction rules will be covered in Unit
8).
The interest income from the deposit is exempt from the payment of profits tax
because the interest expense is not deductible.
The interest income from the deposit cannot be exempt from the payment of tax.
Operations test
• “where do the operations take place from which the profits in substance
arise?” – Smidth & Co v Greenwood (1921)
• 3 steps:
(i) there must be some operations – what are they?
(ii) these operations must have been done in somewhere – where are the
places?
(iii) some operations must have different weightings against each other –
how important are they?
Situs test
• “where the property (or asset) is situated?”
• Applicable to profits earned by possession of assets or properties, e.g. rental
income from immovable properties
Activities test
• “where the profit making activities are carried out?”
• Applicable to manufacturing profits
Profits from purchase and sale of Place where the contracts of purchase
unlisted shares/securities and sale are effected
• No hard and fast rule, each case has to be decided on its own
11.1 CIR v Hong Kong & Whampoa Dock Co. Ltd. (1960)
• Profits earned by the taxpayer arose from the salvage operation on the high
seas were held as sourced outside Hong Kong notwithstanding that
taxpayer’s infrastructure was in Hong Kong
• Court of Appeal decision relies on the “operations test”, i.e. the operations
involved in “performing” the contract under which the profit was realised
Reading
Wong & Wong: ¶6-0030 – 6-1250, 6-1550 – 6-2100, 6-2180 – 6-2380, 6-2600,
6-3310 – 6-3355, 6-3400 – 6-3450, 6-3950
Ho & Mak: Chapters 14-16
DIPN No. 13, 21, 22 and 34