He December 2020
He December 2020
He December 2020
H
istorically, horizontally split compressors have
been the most widely used technology for
compression in chemical and steel plants where
high-volume flows are required. This has
particularly been the case for large air separation units
(ASUs) i.e., blast furnace blowers, and regeneration air
applications in propane dehydrogenation (PDH) facilities.
However, end users often cite many pain points with
axial compressors, including a large footprint, long lead
time, high costs, and frequent service – the latter of
which increases plant downtime.
Although integrally geared compressors (IGCs) can
solve many of these issues, they have traditionally not
been viewed as a viable option for high-flow
applications. However, in recent years this has changed,
as advancements in the design of these machines have
enabled them to reliably achieve rates of up to
1 million m3/hr in a single stage. IGCs are also smaller
and require less maintenance than axial compressors, and
HYDROCARBON 43 2020
Reprinted from December
ENGINEERING
lead times are shorter. When evaluating the entire predictable performance. However, the units come with
compression train, significant cost savings can be several trade-offs.
achieved. For example, axial compressors utilise complex
This article looks at some of the specific design designs – often with four to six stages for PDH
enhancements that have made IGCs a suitable alternative applications and up to 17 stages for blast furnace
to axial machines, and makes a case for why they should application. A single unit can contain up to 400 blades,
be considered in high-flow applications. each of which is critical to compressor operation. The
higher number of intricate parts increases the likelihood
Axial compressor pain points of component failure and results in the requirement for
Across the oil and gas industry, the adoption of new more frequent service. Owing to their design complexity,
technology is often viewed as a risk to production. This is they are also often associated with long lead times.
particularly the case in the downstream sector, where Additionally, the up-front cost of an axial compressor
downtime can result in millions of dollars in losses per is comparatively higher than other types of technologies.
day. Operators of these facilities have traditionally been Other drawbacks include high oil consumption, a large
reluctant to implement new rotating equipment footprint, and expensive maintenance. The last of these is
configuration, instead electing to replicate ‘tried-and-true’ attributable to several factors, including the need to
designs that they are familiar with. remove inlet cones for bearing and/or seal exchange, and
In PDH, blast furnace blower, and fluid catalytic the requirement for heavy lifting equipment when
cracking (FCC) applications, axial compressors have been servicing the rotor.
the solution of choice when it comes to process air These pain points have generally been accepted by
compression. Up until recently, these machines were end users as unavoidable because there were no other
widely recognised as the best available technology (BAT) suitable compressor technologies available for high-flow
for such purposes. They offer high efficiency and, with applications.
thousands of project references, provide relatively However, this is no longer the case. Advancements in
the design of IGCs have allowed them to achieve
comparable flow rates to axial compressors.
They are now a viable and cost-effective
option in PDH plants, FCC units, blast furnace
blowers, and large ASUs.