1 s2.0 S1018363920303573 Main
1 s2.0 S1018363920303573 Main
1 s2.0 S1018363920303573 Main
Original article
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: This study examines an attempt to produce self-compacting concrete (SCC) containing fly ash (FA),
Received 9 March 2020 ground granulated blast furnace slag (S) and both (FA + S). The effects of these materials on the rheolog-
Accepted 9 December 2020 ical properties of the SCC mixes were studied experimentally. The study began with three groups of SCCs,
Available online 5 January 2021
each with 25% water binder (w/b) and 550 kg/m3 total binder content. Instead of superplasticizers (SP),
the chemical admixtures were lignosulphonates (LS), which replaced Portland cement (PC) at levels by
Keywords: weight of 10%, 20%, 30% 40%, 50%, and 60%. The fresh properties of the mixtures were examined exper-
Fly ash
imentally for slump flow diameter, T50 time, V-funnel time, and L-box height ratio. In the mixtures with
Ground granulated blast furnace slag
Rheological properties
FA alone, a continuous decrease was observed in compressive strength. Increases in strength ended at
Lignosulphonates 40% in the case of FA alone, and 30% for both the S and FA + S mixes. Statistical analysis was carried
Self-compacting concrete out to assess the effect of experimentally substituted materials FA and S, with results showing that S
had a greater influence than FA on T50 time, V-funnel, L-box height ratio, and compressive strength,
while FA had more effect than S on the slump flow diameter test.
Ó 2020 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an
open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2020.12.005
1018-3639/Ó 2020 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Aseel Madallah Mohammed, Diler Sabah Asaad and A.I. Al-Hadithi Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences 34 (2022) 388–397
tance of self-compacting mortar is more critical to small differ- 0.6% by weight of LS improved the cement paste’s viscosity com-
ences in properties such as gradation and moisture content of pared to the control mixture.
aggregates, type and potion of superplasticizer (Mahdikhani &
Ramezanianpour, 2015). Lignosulphonates (LS) are gaining popu- 2. Research significance
larity in concrete construction as they are regarded as more envi-
ronmentally friendly and a more robust admixture than other The main contribution of this study is to examine the effect of
water reducers, and therefore have the effect of reducing accumu- mineral admixtures on SCC mixtures containing LS to control the
lations of LS, with some 50 million tons of alkali lignin and Ligno- effects of such mineral admixtures as S and FA on high-
sulphonates being manufactured worldwide by paper makers performance self-compaction concrete (HPSSC)’s fresh properties.
every year (Reknes, 2013; Uchikawa et al., 1992; Xiao et al., Recommendations and results of previous studies were taken into
2001). Since mineral admixtures can result in some retardation account when choosing the percentages of LS, FA and S. In this
(Brooks et al., 2000), and the belief of the author is that LS incorpo- study, an experimental programme entailed comparing admix-
ration further increases the retardation, thus, using mineral admix- tures that would achieve HPSCC by combining a satisfactory level
tures with LS will result in increased construction time. of strength with the best fresh properties.
Several researchers have described the effect of S and FA on
SCC’s fresh properties, which include better rheology, longer set- 3. Experiments
ting times and reduced lateral pressure from formwork (Güneyisi
et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2010). In tests of 32 mixtures, Oner and 3.1. Materials
Akyuz (2007) found that the mixtures delivered the same consis-
tency with lower water to binder ratio than the reference mixture Cementitious materials used to produce SCC were Portland
(0% S). Topçu and Atesßin (2016) are among many researchers who cement type I 42.5 R complying with ASTM C150 (ASTMC150,
investigated the effect of high dosages of LS on concrete (up to 5%) C150M-18., 2018) (West Conshohocken, PA)), class F fly ash (FA)
and reported improvements of fresh properties, compared to the complying with ASTM C 618 (ASTMC618-17a., 2017 (West Con-
control mixture. Nagrockiene et al. (2013) demonstrated that shohocken, PA)), and ground granulated blast furnace slag (S) com-
plying with ASTM C989 (1999 (West Conshohocken, PA)). Table 1
provides a summary of the chemical composition and physical
Table 1 properties of the cement and mineral admixtures, and Fig. 1 shows
Chemical composition and physical properties of cement and mineral admixtures. the particle size distribution of FA, S, and cement. Ligno-
sulphonates (LS) were used as chemical admixtures.
Chemical analyses (%) Cement Fly ash Slag
Table 2 shows the chemical characteristics of the LS. The fine
CaO 62.58 4.24 34.12
aggregate comprised a crushed limestone and natural river sand
SiO2 20.25 56.2 36.41
Al2O3 5.31 20.17 10.39 mix, with a maximum size of 5 mm. The coarse aggregate was river
Fe2O3 4.04 6.69 0.69 gravel, with a maximum size of 16 mm. Table 3 shows the sieve
MgO 2.82 1.92 10.26 analysis and physical properties of the fine and coarse aggregates.
SO3 2.73 0.49 –
K2O 0.92 1.89 0.97
Na2O 0.22 0.58 0.35 3.2. Details of concrete mixture proportioning
Loss of ignition 3.02 1.78 1.64
Specific gravity 3.15 2.25 2.79 Nineteen SCC mixtures were prepared with water equal to 25%
Blaine fineness (cm2/g) 3260 2870 4180 of binder and total binder content of 550 kg/m3. As a control,
389
Aseel Madallah Mohammed, Diler Sabah Asaad and A.I. Al-Hadithi Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences 34 (2022) 388–397
Table 2 water. The aggregates were then left to absorb the water before
Properties of lignosulphonate admixtures. mixing continued for another minute after adding the powder
Properties LS materials of mineral admixtures and cement. The remaining water
Ingredient Sodium lignosulphonate with liquified LS was then added and the concrete mixed for
Color Dark brown another three minutes before being left to rest for one minute.
pH 8.21 Finally, the fresh state SCC was mixed for a further two minutes.
Solid (%) 39.3 All SCC mixtures were designed to give the desired slump flow
Density (g/cm3) 1.217
Insoluble matter (%) 0.043
by varying the LS dosages to produce trial batches for each
Average molecular mass (g/mole) 55 mixture.
Inverted sugars (%) 3
3.4. Test procedure
Duration and mixing sequences are significant in producing SCC 4. Results and discussion
(Khayat et al., 2000). To emphasise the uniformity and homogene-
ity of the mixtures, the procedures for mixing and batching were 4.1. The fresh density of SCCs
those recommended by Sonebi (2004). Coarse and fine aggregates
were homogenised for 30 s in a power-driven revolving pan mixer Fig. 2 shows the effects of mineral admixtures on SCCs’ fresh
and then for another minute after adding about half of the mixing density when FA and S admixtures are incorporated.
Table 4
Mixture proportions for SCC (Kg/m3).
Mix description w/b W (kg/m3) PC (kg/m3) FA (kg/m3) S (kg/m3) LS (kg/m3) Natural Sand (kg/m3) Crushed Sand (kg/m3) Coarse Agg. (kg/m3)
CM 0.25 137.5 550 0 0 23.4 606.3 259.8 866.1
10FA 0.25 137.5 495 55 0 23.4 599.8 257.1 856.9
20FA 0.25 137.5 440 110 0 22.3 594.2 254.6 848.8
30FA 0.25 137.5 385 165 0 21.7 588.1 252.1 840.2
40FA 0.25 137.5 330 220 0 20.9 582.3 249.5 831.8
50FA 0.25 137.5 275 275 0 19.5 576.8 247.2 824.1
60FA 0.25 137.5 220 330 0 18.7 571.0 244.7 815.7
10S 0.25 137.5 495 0 55 23.1 588.2 252.1 840.3
20S 0.25 137.5 440 0 110 22.0 570.8 244.6 815.4
30S 0.25 137.5 385 0 165 21.2 553.1 237.1 790.2
40S 0.25 137.5 330 0 220 20.1 535.7 229.6 765.3
50S 0.25 137.5 275 0 275 19.0 518.2 222.1 740.3
60S 0.25 137.5 220 0 330 18.2 500.6 214.5 715.1
5FA5S 0.25 137.5 495 27.5 27.5 22.8 594.3 254.7 849.1
10FA10S 0.25 137.5 440 55 55 21.5 583.0 249.9 832.9
15FA15S 0.25 137.5 385 82.5 82.5 20.6 571.3 244.8 816.1
20FA20S 0.25 137.5 330 110 110 19.5 559.7 239.9 799.6
25FA25S 0.25 137.5 275 137.5 137.5 18.4 548.2 234.9 783.1
30FA30S 0.25 137.5 220 165 165 17.9 536.2 229.8 766.0
390
Aseel Madallah Mohammed, Diler Sabah Asaad and A.I. Al-Hadithi Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences 34 (2022) 388–397
Fig. 3. A typical slump flow of SCCs. (a) 60S Mixture (60% slag replacement), (b) CM (100% Cement).
391
Aseel Madallah Mohammed, Diler Sabah Asaad and A.I. Al-Hadithi Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences 34 (2022) 388–397
Fig. 5. Variation of T50 slump flow time of SCC respect to different mineral admixture contents.
flow target was achieved with reductions in LS by 25% for 60FA, Fig. 7 shows the T50 slump through V-funnel flow time for each
29% for the 60S, and 31% for 30FA30S. Moreover, a further decrease mixture according to EFNARC regarding viscosity classes.
in LS was needed in the binary FA + S group mixtures to maintain As Fig. 5 shows, the highest T50 slump flow times were
the same slump flow diameter, because the cementation materials observed in the control mixture (0% mineral admixtures), and low-
(cement, S and FA) are more regularly distributed and give better est in the mixture incorporating 60% FA. Replacing 10%, 20%, 30%,
flow. Previous studies of fresh SCC have produced the same result 40%, 50% and 60% of mineral admixtures led to slump flow times
(Gesoglu et al., 2015; Güneyisi et al., 2016). of 4.2 s, 3.2 s, 2.8 s, 2.3 s, 1.5 s, and 0.9 s for fly ash, 4.4 s, 3.5 s,
3.1 s, 2.6 s, 1.9 s, and 1.2 s for S and 4.7 s, 3.6 s, 3.3 s, 2.9 s, 2.2 s,
4.3. T50 Slump flow and V-funnel flow times and 1.7 s for a binary of fly ash + slag, respectively. V-funnel flow
time showed the same trend as T50 slump flow time, with flow
Figs. 5 and 6 show the SCC mixtures’ T50 and V-funnel slump times decreasing as more mineral admixtures were incorporated.
flow time when mineral admixtures are incorporated at different The lowest and highest flow times were shown by 60FA and CM,
replacement levels. with 7.1 s and 12.8 s, respectively. The reason SCC flow time
392
Aseel Madallah Mohammed, Diler Sabah Asaad and A.I. Al-Hadithi Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences 34 (2022) 388–397
Fig. 6. Variation of V-funnel flow time and viscosity classes of SCC at different mineral admixture contents.
Fig. 7. T50 slump flow time versus V-funnel flow time for SCC.
decreases is perhaps because their spherical shape helps particles simulate congested reinforcement. For SCC certification, the L-box
slide over each other more easily. T50 slump flow and V-funnel height ratio (H2/H1) must be equal or greater than 0.8; results
flow times iterations (see Fig. 7) showed that most SCC mixes were approaching 1.0 indicate perfect fluid behaviour. Fig. 8 shows the
within the limitations of VS2/VF2 viscosity specified in Table 5, result of this study and indicates that all mixes satisfied EFNARC lim-
where mineral admixture incorporation was 10%, 20%, 30%, and itations concerning SCC passing ability. Fig. 8 shows that using min-
40%. On the other hand, high-volume replacement levels like eral admixtures increased SCC’s L-box height ratio. The increasing
50FA, 60FA, 50S, 60S, and 30FA30S were within the VS1/VF1 vis- tendency reached a maximum in mixes containing 60% of FA, S,
cosity class. It can, therefore be concluded that such mixtures help and FA + S. The rise in the height ratio for the mineral admixture
improve resistance to segregation and limit formwork pressure was 0.98 for 60%FA, 0.95 for 60%S, and 0.93 for 30%FA + 30%S, mean-
(Saak et al., 2001). ing that FA replacement improved SCC passing ability more than S,
meaning that it was improved more than FA + S. This may be because
4.4. L-box height ratio and T20 and T40 flow time the spherical shape of FA particles improves passing ability more
than the irregular shapes of S particles. It is also possible, though,
To identify the passing ability of the SCC mixes, an L-box height that the decrease in L-box height ratio from combined FA and S is
ratio was determined using H2/H1 which contained three bars to due to the two types of particle interlocking.
393
Aseel Madallah Mohammed, Diler Sabah Asaad and A.I. Al-Hadithi Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences 34 (2022) 388–397
Fig. 8. Variation of L-box height ratio and passing ability classes of SCC at different mineral admixture contents.
Fig. 9. Variation of (a) T20 and (b) T40 L-box flow time of SCC with respect to different mineral admixture contents.
Fig. 9 shows the time taken by fresh SCC to travel 200 and decrease, but the increase in strength ended at 40% S incorporation
400 mm (T20 and T40) from the L-box’s slide door. Increasing and 30% FA + S incorporation. It would, therefore, seem that the
the amount of mineral admixtures was seen to lower the T20 binary effect of FA + S is to be preferred over S for replacements
and T40 flow times. Replacing PC with FA improved L-box flowing up to 30%, while S is the preferred replacement starting at the
times more than replacing it with S, which was still better than a higher level of 40%. The highest compressive strength of
FA + S replacement. 85.9 MPa was seen in SCCs with 30% FA + S, reducing to
84.2 MPa for 40% S replacement. Any level of FA reduced the com-
4.5. Compressive strength pressive strength, but SCC continued to be within high-strength
concrete limits up to 50% incorporation according to ACI
Fig. 10 shows how different mineral admixtures by which Committee. (363 2010). A preference for binary over individual
cement in SCCs is replaced by FA, S, and FA + S affect the compres- mineral admixtures is likely due to the regular combination of dif-
sive strength at 28 days. FA substitution caused a continual ferent cementation particle sizes (cement, FA, and S). In addition,
394
Aseel Madallah Mohammed, Diler Sabah Asaad and A.I. Al-Hadithi Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences 34 (2022) 388–397
FA and S formed more C-S-H gel to fill pores during hydration All tests of SCC fresh property and compressive strength were cho-
which led to higher strength. sen as dependent variables; the independent variables were FA, S,
Gesoğlu et al. (2009) also reported the compressive strength of and FA + S. Table 6 shows the results of the statistical analysis. A P-
binary FA + S to be higher than S, which was itself higher than FA. value of less than 0.05 signifies that the parameter is an acceptable
significant test parameter of the fresh properties. Statistical analy-
5. Statistical evaluation of fresh properties sis showed, under the P-values generated by the two-way ANOVA,
that FA and S contents affected compressive strength as well as all
GLM-ANOVA (the general linear model analysis of variance) is fresh properties. Each independent variable was assessed by the
an important tool for statistical diagnosis and analysis of the effec- percentage contribution, so that highest percentage contribution
tiveness of the investigation test parameters. Minitab software was was directly proportional to higher parameter’s effectiveness. In
used to evaluate whether the test results were below the level of this way, the statistical analysis showed that S had a greater
0.05 to ensure that the parameters were statistically acceptable. impact than FA on compressive strength, while the latter had a
Fig. 10. 28-day compressive strength of SCC mixtures with respect to mineral admixture content.
395
Aseel Madallah Mohammed, Diler Sabah Asaad and A.I. Al-Hadithi Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences 34 (2022) 388–397
Table 6
Statistical assessment of fresh property tests for SCCs.
Dependent variable Independent variable Sequential sum of squares Computed F P value Significance Contribution (%)
Slump flow diameter Fly ash content 5721.7 336.57 0 Yes 84.54
Slag content 999.97 58.82 0 Yes 14.77
Error 46.4 – – – 0.69
Total 6768.08 – – – –
T50 Slump Flow time Fly ash content 8.45671 143.76 0 Yes 52.09
Slag content 7.62321 129.59 0 Yes 46.96
Error 0.15354 – – – 0.95
Total 16.2335 – – – –
V-funnel flow time Fly ash content 20.55025 61.65 0 Yes 63.53
Slag content 10.91125 32.73 0 Yes 33.73
Error 0.88425 – – – 2.73
Total 32.34575 – – – –
L-box height ratio Fly ash content 0.008757 30.65 0 Yes 60.69
Slag content 0.004902 17.16 0.001 Yes 33.97
Error 0.000771 – – – 5.34
Total 0.014429 – – – –
Comp. strength Fly ash content 484.44 30.28 0 Yes 19.2
Slag content 1998.41 124.9 0 Yes 79.1
Error 43.79 – – – 1.7
Total 2526.63 – – – –
greater impact than the former on slump flow diameter, T50 slump Ahari, Reza Saleh, Erdem, Tahir Kemal, Ramyar, Kambiz, 2015. Effect of various
supplementary cementitious materials on rheological properties of self-
flow time, V-funnel flow time and L-box height ratio. Fresh prop-
consolidating concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 75, 89–98.
erty tests were mostly related to speed of particles. Arel, Hasan S ß ahan, 2017. The effect of lignosulfonates on concretes produced with
As shown in Fig. 9, spherical particles of Fly ash played an cements of variable fineness and calcium aluminate content. Constr. Build.
important role in increasing speed and decreasing flow times. Mater. 131, 347–360.
Arel, Hasan S ß ahan, Aydin, Ertug, 2017. Effects of Ca-, Mg-, K-, and Na-
lignosulfonates on the behavior of fresh concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 157,
6. Conclusions 1084–1091.
ASTMC39, C39M-18. (West Conshohocken, PA). Standard Test Method for
Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens 2018 ASTM
The conclusions drawn from the study can be summarised as International
follows: ASTMC150, C150M-18., 2018. (West Conshohocken, PA). ’Standard Specification for
Portland Cement’. ASTM International.
1. The fresh density of concrete showed a continuous decrease
ASTMC618-17a. 2017 (West Conshohocken, PA). Standard Specification for Coal Fly
in line with increasing substitution of FA for cement, while the Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete, ASTM
reverse was true for substitution of S. International.
ASTMC989-99. 1999 (West Conshohocken, PA). Standard Specification for Ground
2. In this study, the workability of the SCC mixtures was fixed
Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag for Use in Concrete and Mortars, ASTM International.
by adjustments to the amount of LS and not by adding superplas- Brooks, J.J., Megat Johari, M.A., Mazloom, M., 2000. Effect of admixtures on the
ticizers. A good correlation was noted between the mineral admix- setting times of high-strength concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 22, 293–301.
tures’ replacement level and the amount of LS needed. Moreover, a EFNARC, Specification. 2002. ’Guidelines for Self-Compacting Concrete, European
Federation for Specialist Construction Chemicals and Concrete Systems,
further decrease was seen in the FA + S binary group because of the Norfolk, UK’, English ed., February.
regular distribution of cementitious materials. Ganeshan, Mahima, Venkataraman, Sreevidya, 2020. Interface shear strength
3. The control mixture showed the highest T50 slump flow evaluation of self compacting geopolymer concrete using push-off test. J. King
Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. ‘‘https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2020.08.005.
times and the 60% FA mixture the lowest. This trend was also seen Gesoğlu, Mehmet, Güneyisi, Erhan, Özbay, Erdoğan, 2009. Properties of self-
for V-funnel flow time, which decreased as more mineral admix- compacting concretes made with binary, ternary, and quaternary cementitious
ture was added. blends of fly ash, blast furnace slag, and silica fume. Constr. Build. Mater. 23 (5),
1847–1854.
4. All mixes met EFNARC limitations related to the SCC’s passing Gesoglu, Mehmet, Güneyisi, Erhan, Ozturan, Turan, Oz, Hatice Oznur, Asaad, Diler
ability. FA replacement, therefore, improved the SCC mixtures’ Sabah, 2015. Shear thickening intensity of self-compacting concretes containing
passing ability more than the other mixes. Replacing PC with FA rounded lightweight aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 79, 40–47.
Güneyisi, Erhan, Gesoglu, Mehmet, Azez, Oday Ali, Öz, Hatice Öznur, 2016. Effect of
improved L-box flow times more than S, which itself was more
nano silica on the workability of self-compacting concretes having untreated
than binary FA + S. and surface treated lightweight aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 115, 371–380.
5 There was a continuous decrease in compressive strength for Güneyisi, Erhan, Gesoglu, Mehmet, Özbay, Erdoğan, 2009. Evaluating and
forecasting the initial and final setting times of self-compacting concretes
FA replacement. Increases in strength for S and FA + S replacements
containing mineral admixtures by neural network. Mater. Struct. 42, 469–484.
were capped at, respectively, 40% and 30%. Karthik, S., Ram Mohan Rao, P., Awoyera, P.O., 2017. Strength properties of bamboo
6. Statistical analysis showed compressive strength and that all and steel reinforced concrete containing manufactured sand and mineral
fresh SCC properties were affected by FA and S content, and most admixtures. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 29, 400–406.
Khayat, Kamal H, Bickley, John, Lessard, Michel, 2000. Performance of self-
implemented tests showed a superior effect of S replacement than FA. consolidating concrete for casting basement and foundation walls. Mater. J.
97, 374–380.
Declaration of Competing Interest Kim, Jae Hong, Beacraft, Mark, Shah, Surendra P, 2010. Effect of mineral admixtures
on formwork pressure of self-consolidating concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 32,
665–671.
The authors declare that they have no known competing finan- Kovler, Konstantin, Roussel, Nicolas, 2011. Properties of fresh and hardened
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 41, 775–792.
to influence the work reported in this paper. Leemann, Andreas, Lura, Pietro, Loser, Roman, 2011. Shrinkage and creep of SCC–the
influence of paste volume and binder composition. Constr. Build. Mater. 25,
2283–2289.
References Li, Yinwen, Zhu, Huayu, Yang, Chaolong, Zhang, Yunfei, Jing, Xu., Mangeng, Lu.,
2014. Synthesis and super retarding performance in cement production of
diethanolamine modified lignin surfactant. Constr. Build. Mater. 52, 116–121.
ACI Committee. 2010. Report on High-Strength Concrete (ACI 363R-10) (ACI).
396
Aseel Madallah Mohammed, Diler Sabah Asaad and A.I. Al-Hadithi Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences 34 (2022) 388–397
Mahdikhani, Mahdi, Ramezanianpour, Ali Akbar, 2015. New methods development Sekhar, Darshan C, Nayak, Sitaram, 2018. Utilization of granulated blast furnace slag
for evaluation rheological properties of self-consolidating mortars. Constr. and cement in the manufacture of compressed stabilized earth blocks. Constr.
Build. Mater. 75, 136–143. Build. Mater. 166, 531–536.
Nagrockiene, Dzigita, Pundienė, Ina, Kicaite, Asta, 2013. The effect of cement type Sonebi, Mohammed, 2004. Medium strength self-compacting concrete containing
and plasticizer addition on concrete properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 45, 324– fly ash: Modelling using factorial experimental plans. Cem. Concr. Res. 34,
331. 1199–1208.
Ng, S., Justnes, H., 2016. Influence of plasticizers on the rheology and early heat of _
Topçu, Ilker Bekir, Atesßin, Özgün, 2016. Effect of high dosage lignosulphonate and
hydration of blended cements with high content of fly ash. Cem. Concr. Compos. naphthalene sulphonate based plasticizer usage on micro concrete properties.
65, 41–54. Constr. Build. Mater. 120, 189–197.
Okamura, H., Ouchi, M., 2003. Self-compacting concrete. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 1 Uchikawa, Hiroshi, Hanehara, Shunsuke, Shirasaka, Tokuhiko, Sawaki, Daisuke,
(1), 5–15. 1992. Effect of admixture on hydration of cement, adsorptive behavior of
Oner, A., Akyuz, S., 2007. An experimental study on optimum usage of GGBS admixture and fluidity and setting of fresh cement paste. Cem. Concr. Res. 22,
for the compressive strength of concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 29, 505– 1115–1129.
514. Vejmelková, Eva, Keppert, Martin, Grzeszczyk, Stefania, Skaliński, Bartłomiej, Černý,
Persson, Bertil, 2001. A comparison between mechanical properties of self- Robert, 2011. Properties of self-compacting concrete mixtures containing
compacting concrete and the corresponding properties of normal concrete. metakaolin and blast furnace slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 1325–1331.
Cem. Concr. Res. 31, 193–198. Xiao, B., Sun, X.F., Sun, RunCang, 2001. The chemical modification of lignins with
Reknes, I.K., 2013. Quality lignosulfonate for concrete. Masterbuilder 15, 84–90. succinic anhydride in aqueous systems. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 71, 223–231.
Saak, Aaron W, Jennings, Hamlin M, Shah, Surendra P, 2001. The influence of wall Zhao, Hui, Sun, Wei, Xiaoming, Wu., Gao, Bo, 2015. The properties of the self-
slip on yield stress and viscoelastic measurements of cement paste. Cem. Concr. compacting concrete with fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag
Res. 31, 205–212. mineral admixtures. J. Clean. Prod. 95, 66–74.
Saidi, Taufiq, Hasan, Muttaqin, 2020. The effect of partial replacement of cement
with diatomaceous earth (DE) on the compressive strength, absorption of
mortar. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci.
397