Iso 14064-2019 R1
Iso 14064-2019 R1
Iso 14064-2019 R1
ISO 14064:2019
1
Training Agenda
Introduction
2
16/03/2021
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 3
CFV91001ENIN
Issue 1.1 August 2013
3
16/03/2021
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 4
5
16/03/2021
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 6
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 7
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 8
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 9
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 10
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 12
GHG Protocol
• By WRI (World Research Institute & WBCSD (World Business
Council of Sustainable Development)
• 2004 ---- 2011 (Scope 3 guidance)
Module 1
ISO 14064 -1
15
16/03/2021
How to
measure?
How to
verify?
ISO
14064
How to Where to
report? measure?
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 16
Organizational Boundary
• Control approach:
• Financial control
• Operational control
• Equity Share approach
• As defined by other GHG programs /legal contracts
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 20
20
GHG Organizational Boundary
Key
x is the number of facilities within
the organizational boundary
Facility 1 Facility x
n is the number of GHG sources
or sinks at the facility
GHG GHG GHG GHG
source source source source
1,1 1,n x,1 x,n
NOTE 1: An organization's GHG emissions and removals are aggregated from facility-level quantification of GHG sources and sinks.
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 21
21
Setting Operational / Reporting Boundaries
Direct
emissions
22
Source: HKIE Carbon Audit Training
23
Exercise 2
Organisation shall:
Organisation may:
1. Identify & Document : All relevant sources and Sinks
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 25
25
Quantification of GHG emissions and Removal
Site specific
Mass,
Volume,
• For each source/sink Emission factors Min. Uncertainty/max Energy,
accuracy Monetory
value,
Identify quantification method CV,
Technical Feasibility density
Cost Oxidation
factor
Document & explain if Conversion
any change is there Activity Data factors
(Primary data)
26
Data Quality – Accuracy/Priority/Authenticity
When the collection of site-specific data is not practicable, primary data based on
global or regional averages, collected by regional or international organizations
and which have undergone third-party verification should be used.
Secondary data and primary data that are not site-specific data should
only be used for inputs where the collection of site-specific data is
not practicable, or for processes of minor importance.
, 27
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021
27
Sources of data
• Data collection and sink
• Data sources
Data Documents
Fuel Consumption Purchase order, Delivery notes, procurement contractor record,
material inventory, fuel measurement record
Specific Heat Content and Emission factor Purchase order, Delivery notes, procurement contractor record,
IPCC, IEA, Country / industry reports, test reports
Fuel price – convert to fuel consumption or Purchase order, Delivery notes, procurement contractor record,
energy content IPCC, IEA, Country / industry reports
All assumed fuel consumption, heat content
and emission factors All applicable / publicly available information sources
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 28
Definition of Accuracy of Quantification Methodology & GHG Emission Factor
• This approach could have 2%-3% tolerance if knowing the carbon content of fuel and fuel
consumption.
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 29
Emission Factor Selection
• Known evidences.
• Similar or comparable types of facilities or processes of evidences.
High • Under the circumstance of known input and load, manufacturer specification of individual or similar
accuracy facilities.
• Specific external provided emission factors for special technology, district, provincial and state.
• Specific external provided emission factors for special country or national district.
• Average emission factors for international use.
Low
accuracy Calculation method Quality of verification Demand of data Cost
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 30
16/03/2021
d. take account of quantification uncertainty and are calculated in a manner intended to yield
accurate and reproducible results, and
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 31
Emission of CH4 (t CO2e) = Σ Amount of Fuel Consumed x Emission Factor of CO2 x 28 (GWP of CH4)
Emission of N2O (t CO2e) = Σ Amount of Fuel Consumed x Emission Factor of CO2 x 265 (GWP of N2O)
GHG emission of Fuel combustion (tCO2e) = Emission of CO2 (tCO2) + Emission of CH4 (tCO2e) + Emission
of N2O (t CO2e)
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 32
GHG Emission Calculation (1)
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 33
GHG Emission Calculation (1)
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 34
GHG Emission factor Database
https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/EFDB/main.php
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 35
GHG Emission factor Database
https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/index.html
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 36
GHG Emission factor Database
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-03/documents/emission-factors_mar_2018_0.pdf
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 37
GHG Emission factor Database
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2019
http://www.cea.nic.in/reports/others/thermal/tpece/cdm_co2/user_guide_ver14.pdf
https://www.indiaghgp.org/road-transport-emission-factors
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 38
GHG Emission Calculation (1)
http://www.iocl.com/Products/DieselSpecifications.pdf
39
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 39
GHG Emission Calculation (2)
Purchased Electricity
GHG Emission from purchased electricity in India = Quantity of purchased electricity x Territory-wide
default Emission factor
(Published last in Dec 2018)
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 40
GHG Emission Calculation (3)
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 41
GHG Emission Calculation (4)
Process-Related Emissions
Emission of specific industrial process can be evaluated with some published tools
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 42
GHG Emission Calculation (5)
Fugitive Emissions
Can be calculated as in EPD/EMSD Guidelines
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 43
GHG Emission Calculation (6)
Removals
Basic equation :
CO2 removed by trees in one year = net number of additional trees planted since the concerned building
is constructed x Removal Factor (kg CO2/tree)
Figure for specific tree species are referred to other international published figures.
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 44
GHG Emission Calculation (7)
Paper Recycling
EO = (PBsB + PBiB – PBrB– PBeB) x Emission Factor (estimated at 4.8 kg CO2e / kg) where
EO = Emissions from paper waste disposed at landfills
PBsB = Paper inventory at the beginning of the reporting period (in storage) (kg)
PBiB = Paper added to the inventory during the reporting period (kg)
PBrB = Paper collected for recycling purpose (kg)
PBeB = Paper inventory at the end of the reporting period (in storage) (kg)
Water Processing
Emission = volume of water consumed x emission factor
Base Year
Organization shall:
Organization may change base year, but shall explain the change
Base year shall be recalculated when Base year shall not be recalculated when
• Change in operational/organisational boundary • Change in production level
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 47
Mitigation activities
The organization may plan and implement directed actions to reduce or prevent GHG emissions or
increase GHG removals.
Establish and
maintain
procedures
GHG information
management List of
considerations for
the procedures to
document
Have procedures
Inventory for document
Quality retention
management
Document/record Enable
retention verification
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 49
GHG Report
GHG reporting
20 topics 11 topics
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 50
Verification
• Internal Verification
• External Verification
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. CFV 999 910 ENIN v1.3 Mar 2021 51
Module 2
ISO 14064 -1
52
16/03/2021
Principles
Relevance -Select the GHG sources, GHG sinks, GHG reservoirs, data and methodologies
appropriate to the needs of the intended user.
Standard structure -1
Standard structure -2
Standard structure -3
d) Direct fugitive emissions from the release of GHGs in anthropogenic systems. (see Notes)
e) Direct emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF)
b) Indirect emissions from imported energy, including GHG emissions related to the production of
energy consumed by the organization through a physical network (steam, heating, cooling and
compressed air), excluding electricity.
This category includes only GHG emissions due to the fuel combustion associated with the production
of final energy and utilities, such as electricity, heat, steam, cooling and compressed air. It excludes
all upstream emissions (from cradle to power plant gate) associated with fuel, emissions due to the
construction of the power plant, and emissions allocated to transport and distribution losses
b) Indirect emissions from imported energy, including GHG emissions related to the production of
energy consumed by the organization through a physical network (steam, heating, cooling and
compressed air), excluding electricity.
a) Emissions from upstream transport and distribution for goods, which are emissions from freight
services that are paid for by the organization.
b) Emissions from downstream transport and distribution for goods are emissions from freight
services that are due to the first purchasers or other purchasers throughout the supply chain but
not paid for by the organization.
d) Emissions from client and visitor transport, including emissions associated with the travel of
clients and visitors to the reporting company’s facility.
e) Emissions from business travel mainly due to fuel burnt in mobile sources of combustion. Hotel
nights might be included when linked to the business travel.
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. 65
Capital goods
a) Emissions from purchased goods, which are emissions associated with the fabrication of the
product.
b) Emissions from capital goods are emissions from goods that are purchased and amortized by the
organization.
Training /auditing
Cleaning
Outsource services
Banking
Consultancy
Waste Maintenance
handling
Leased services
b) Emissions from the use of assets are generated through equipment leased by the reporting
organization in the reporting year. This subcategory is only applicable to an organization that
operates leased assets
c) Emissions from the use of services that are not described in the above subcategories include
consulting, cleaning, maintenance, mail delivery, bank, etc.
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. 71
Leased asset
GHG emissions or removals associated with the use of products from the organization result from products sold
by the organization during life stages occurring after the organization’s production process. Those emissions or
removals might cover a very wide range of services and associated processes.
In most cases, the organization does not know the product’s exact destiny through its life stages and, thus,
should define plausible scenarios for each life stage. The scenarios should be clearly explained in the report.
a) Emissions or removals from the use stage of the product include the total expected lifetime
emissions from all relevant products sold.
b) Emissions from downstream leased assets include those from the operation of assets that are
owned by the reporting organization and leased to other entities during the reporting year
c) Emissions from end of life stage of the product include the emissions associated with the end of
life of all products sold by the reporting organization in the reporting year
d) Emissions from investments are mainly targeting private or public financial institutions. Emissions
could result from four types of operations: equity debt, investment debt, project finance and
others.
The purpose of this category is to capture any organization specific emission (or removal) that cannot
be reported in any other category. In consequence, it is the organization’s responsibility to define the
content of this particular category
Cycle of influence
Cycle of no control
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. 76
Quantification of emissions
Identify and explain why emissions are excluded (if any) for any GHG
source included in report
Quantification Approach
Methodology
Data collection
3. Identify and document data for each source (activity data) (Annex C)
Quantification Approach -2
Data collection
• The organization should establish, document, implement and maintain written procedures
for data flow activities for the monitoring and reporting of GHG emissions
• Written procedures for data flow activities should at least cover the following elements:
a) identification of the primary data sources;
b) each step in the data flow from primary data to annual emissions reflecting the sequence and
interaction between the data flow activities;
c) the processing steps related to each specific data flow activity, including the formulae and data
used to determine the emissions;
d) pertinent electronic data processing and storage systems used, as well as the interaction
between such systems and other inputs, including manual input;
e) description of the way outputs of data flow activities are recorded.
Quantification Approach -3
Site specific data
• activity data (inputs and outputs of processes that result in GHG emissions)
Quantification Approach -4
Laboratories
ensure that laboratories used to carry out analyses for the determination of site-specific data are
accredited in accordance with associated norms for the pertinent analytical methods
Calibration
ensure that measuring instruments are calibrated at least within the minimum frequency specified by
the manufacturer, in order to operate free of error and within the required uncertainty range.
Data Gaps
If pertinent data is missing – appropriate estimation method for determining conservative surrogate
data for the respective time period and missing parameter to be used. Use best practice to establish
the estimation method in written procedure.
Quantification Approach -5
Records to be maintained (best practice)
a) the activity data;
c) the full set of sampling and analysis results for the determination of site-specific data;
g) any uncertainty assessments, where applicable, as well as data used for the uncertainty analysis of the
quantification approach;
i) raw and aggregated data from the continuous measurement system, including documentation of
changes over time, the log-book on tests, down-times, calibrations, servicing and maintenance, and
Quantification Approach -5
Non Site specific data
• Should be only used for inputs where collection of site specific data is
• is not practicable
• may include literature data (e.g. default emission factors), • non site specific values ,
• When collection of site specific data is not practicable: • Reason for selection
should be used.
Quantification Approach -6
- Direct GHG emissions from electricity generated and exported or distributed by the organization
may be reported separately, but shall not be deducted from the organization’s total direct GHG
emissions.
7 Mitigation activities
7.1 GHG emission reduction and removal enhancement initiatives
7.2 GHG emission reduction or removal enhancement projects
7.3 GHG emission reduction or removal enhancement targets
f) direct GHG emissions, quantified separately for CO2, CH4, N2O, NF3, SF6 and other appropriate
g) a description of how biogenic CO2 emissions and removals are treated in the GHG inventory
and the relevant biogenic CO2 emissions and removals quantified separately in tonnes of CO2e
Copyright © 2012 BSI. All rights reserved. 87
i) explanation of the exclusion of any significant GHG sources or sinks from the quantification
k) the historical base year selected and the base-year GHG inventory (6.4.1);
l) explanation of any change to the base year or other historical GHG data or categorization and any
recalculation of the base year or other historical GHG inventory (6.4.1), and documentation of any
m) reference to, or description of, quantification approaches, including reasons for their selection
p) description of the impact of uncertainties on the accuracy of the GHG emissions and removals data per
category (8.3);
r) a statement that the GHG report has been prepared in accordance with this document;
s) a disclosure describing whether the GHG inventory, report or statement has been verified, including the
t) the GWP values used in the calculation, as well as their source. If the GWP values are not taken from
the latest IPCC report, include the emissions factors or the database reference used in the calculation, as
b) if appropriate, description of GHG reduction initiatives and how they contribute to GHG
from GHG emission reduction and removal enhancement projects, quantified in tonnes of CO2e ;
k) if appropriate, explanation of GHG emissions differences between the present inventory and the
previous one.
Module 3
Verification
94
ISO 14064-3
Intended user
Assurance
Accountability
GHG statement
Responsible party
Validator/
Verifier
Independence
95
Clause 4.3.1:Level of assurance
• Assistance with compilation of the responsible party’s GHG assertion on GHG information is considered
to be a breach of independence and the validator or verifier should not issue assurance of any kind.
96
Clause 4.3.1:Level of assurance
-is materially correct and is a fair presentation of the GHG data and information, and
-is prepared in accordance with the related International Standard on GHG quantification,
monitoring and reporting, or to relevant national standards or practices.
97
Clause 4.3.1:Level of assurance
• EXAMPLE 2: A validation or verification statement expressing a limited level of assurance could be worded
as follows.
Based on the process and procedures conducted, there is no evidence that the GHG assertion
-is not materially correct and is not a fair representation of GHG data and information, and
-has not been prepared in accordance with the related International Standard on GHG quantification,
monitoring and reporting, or to relevant national standards or practices.
98
Clause 4.3.4:Scope
• The validator or verifier and client shall agree on the validation or verification scope at the
beginning of the validation or verification process. The validation and verification scope, as a
minimum, shall include the following:
2. Physical infrastructure, activities, technologies and processes of the organization or GHG project;
4. types of GHGs;
5. time period(s).
99
Clause 4.4.2:Validation or verification plan
• The validator or verifier shall develop a documented validation or verification plan that addresses, as a
minimum, the following:
1. level of assurance;
5. materiality;
• The validation or verification plan shall be revised as necessary during the course of the validation or
verification process. The validator or verifier shall communicate the validation or verification plan to the
client and the responsible party.
100
Clause 4.3.5 Materiality
• In order to ensure consistency and avoid unanticipated discrimination, some GHG programmes or internal
programmes assist this decision-making process by including materiality thresholds. This can be defined
at the overall level,
• Such as 5% of an organization’s or GHG project’s GHG emissions. It can also include varying thresholds
depending on the level of disaggregation, such as 5% at the gross organizational level, 7% at the
facility level, and 10% at the GHG source level.
• Furthermore, a series of discrete errors or omissions identified within a particular disaggregation level
(individually less than the materiality threshold) can, when taken together, exceed the threshold and can
thus be considered material. Identified omissions or errors that represent amounts greater than the
stipulated threshold are predetermined as being a “material discrepancy”, that is, a nonconformity.
101
Clause 4.4.3 Sampling plan
The validator or verifier shall develop a sampling plan to take account of the following:
102
Clause 4.6:Assessment of GHG data and information
Validation and verification activities typically focus on gathering three types of evidence (physical,
documentary and testimonial) by following steps outlined in the validation or verification plan.
1. Physical evidence refers to something that can be seen or touched, such as fuel or utility meters,
emission monitors or calibration equipment. Physical evidence is gathered by direct observation of
equipment or processes, and is persuasive because it demonstrates that the organization being verified is
in the practice of collecting relevant data.
2. Documentary evidence is written on paper or recorded electronically, and includes operating and control
procedures, log books, inspection sheets, invoices and analytical results.
3. Testimonial evidence is gathered from interviews with technical, operating, administrative or managerial
personnel. It provides a context for understanding physical and documentary information, but its
reliability depends on the knowledge and objectivity of the interviewees.
103
Clause 4.6 Assessment of GHG data and information
• Verification testing includes a wide variety of activities, such as retracing data to find omissions or
transcription errors, re-computing emission estimates to confirm engineering calculations, or reviewing
documents attesting to an activity.
(a) Vouching:
This test uncovers errors in reported GHG information and involves following the paper trail back to the
raw data. For example, reported quantities of purchased fuel oil used to calculate CO2 emissions would be
traced back to the accounts payable department to check invoices from the fuel supplier. This process
verifies that all reported information is supported.
(b) Re-computation:
104
Clause 4.6 Assessment of GHG data and information
Contd.
This test uncovers omissions in reported information and involves reviewing the original data records to
ensure that all results are appropriately reported. For example, continuously monitored GHG emissions
from multiple sources might be reviewed. The verifier would then verify that all the emissions sources
were included in the inventory.
(d) Confirmation:
This test seeks written confirmation from objective third parties. This test could be used when a
validator or verifier cannot physically observe a condition, such as the calibration of a flow meter.
105
Clause 4.9:Validation and verification statement
The validator or verifier shall issue a validation or verification statement to the responsible party upon
completion of the validation or verification. The validation or verification statement:
• shall describe the objectives, scope and criteria of the validation or verification,
• shall describe whether the data and information supporting the GHG assertion were hypothetical,
projected and/or historical in nature,
• shall include the validator’s or verifier’s conclusion on the GHG assertion, including any qualifications or
limitations.
106
16/03/2021