Materials Research Express

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS You may also like

- Identifying hot-spots for microplastic
Manufacture of sustainable fired shale bricks using contamination in agricultural soils—a
spatial modelling approach for Germany
sewage sludge as raw material Elke Brandes, Martin Henseler and Peter
Kreins

- Investigation on Properties and

To cite this article: Jian Wu et al 2021 Mater. Res. Express 8 095510 Leachability of Sewage Sludge from
Wastewater Treatment Plant Incorporated
in Fired Clay Brick
N S Abdul Salim, A Abdul Kadir, M A
Kamarudin et al.
View the article online for updates and enhancements. - Review of enhanced processes for
anaerobic digestion treatment of sewage
sludge
Xinyuan Liu, Zeyu Han, Jie Yang et al.

This content was downloaded from IP address 27.57.252.110 on 17/01/2024 at 16:50

 Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ac28b5

PAPER

Manufacture of sustainable fired shale bricks using sewage sludge

OPEN ACCESS
as raw material
RECEIVED
13 July 2021
Jian Wu1,2,∗ , Shuai-shuai Yin1, Li-dan Zhang1 and Xin Song3,∗
REVISED 1
8 September 2021
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Safety and Durability of Concrete Structures, Xijing University, Xi’an, 710123, People’s Republic of China
2
The Youth Innovation Team of Shaanxi Universities, Xi’an, 710123, People’s Republic of China
ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION 3
Shaanxi Qinhan Hengsheng New Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd, Xi’an, 712000, People’s Republic of China
21 September 2021 ∗
Authors to whom any correspondence should be addressed.
PUBLISHED
30 September 2021 E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]

Keywords: shale, sewage sludge, sustainable brick, compressive strength, thermal conductivity
Original content from this
work may be used under
the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 Abstract
licence.
Any further distribution of This paper assessed the use of shale collected from western China and the incorporation of sewage
this work must maintain sludge for manufacturing fired shale bricks, which could reduce the environmental impact produced
attribution to the
author(s) and the title of in the mining process of traditional raw materials. Chemical constituents and mineral composition of
shale and sewage sludge were characterized by x-ray fluorescence spectrophotometer (XRF) and x-ray
the work, journal citation
and DOI.
diffractometer (XRD), the analysis indicated that only the shale was a fit bloating material, while the
sewage sludge could only be used as additive. Fired shale brick specimens containing 0%–30% (wt) of
sewage sludge were fired at temperatures ranging from 920 to 950 °C. The tests revealed that with the
increase of replacement ratio of sewage sludge, the water content and shrinkage rate increased,
whereas plasticity index, bulk density and compressive strength decreased. Comprehensively
considering the physical and mechanical properties of specimen, the optimum replacement ratio of
sewage sludge and sintering temperature were determined to be 15% (wt) and 940 °C, respectively.
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis indicated that specimens with sewage sludge contained
higher amounts of micropores, which could improve the thermal insulation properties of the
specimen. Through the analysis of the experimental results, it could be concluded that the addition of
sewage sludge resulted in the successful manufacture of qualified fired shale bricks.

1. Introduction

In order to reduce the impact on the environment, one of the problems that must be solved in modern society is
how to improve resource efficiency. Along with the advancement of urbanization, a lot of resources are used to
manufacture building materials, and the building material industry presents enormous potential for the
sedimentary and low-grade metamorphic rocks (e.g., clays and tuffs) [1–4] and industrial waste (e.g., water
treatment sludge, municipal sludge and tannery sludge) [5–7]. These studies indicated that the industrial waste
could be used as a partial substitute of sedimentary and low-grade metamorphic rocks in the manufacture of
bricks.
Due to the good insulation performance and durability, fired clay brick is widely used as building materials
in the world. However, the exploitation of clay has an adverse effects on the environment, while the use of
industrial waste in the manufacture of building materials could reduce the consumption of natural resources
and the cost of waste treatment. Accordingly, it is interesting to use industrial waste and other materials instead
of clay in the manufacture of construction materials.
In China, wall materials account for about 70% of the whole building materials, and fired clay bricks play a
leading role in wall materials. The annual production of fired clay bricks is about 600 billion pieces in China,
which is equivalent to about 0.47 billion square meters of farmland is destroyed every year [8], so it is necessary
to choose a material instead of clay to manufacture fired bricks. The shale, created by dehydration and
cementation of clay, is gradually being applied in building materials and constructions, such as the use of shale in

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd

Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 J Wu et al

concrete [9–14] and construction binder [15–17]. Shale is widely distributed in western China, such as Xinjiang
and Sichuan provinces, and is easy to exploit (shale is generally distributed on the ground surface), which helps
to reduce the cost of raw materials and protect the farmland. At the same time, the constituents of shale are
similar to those of clay, meaning that it is worthwhile to study how to manufacture fired bricks by using shale as
raw materials.
Sewage sludge, a liquid or semi-solid material, is the waste produced by sewage treatment plant. It could be
expected that the amount of sewage sludge increases with the expansion of city size. Currently, Sewage sludge in
China is generally either deposited or burned, no matter which treatment method is used, the negative impact on
the environment is predictable. The sewage sludge mainly consists of organic matter and inorganic composition.
The inorganic composition could be converted into an environmentally benign material by incorporating it into
a ceramic body. Jordán et al [18] investigated the effect of sewage sludge in the manufacturing of traditional
ceramics. The study showed that the bending strength decreased when the addition of sewage sludge increased.
Kizinievič et al [19] examined the effect of water treatment sludge (WTS) on the physical and mechanical
properties of ceramic products. When burned at 1000 °C and 1050 °C temperature, the parameters of 40% of
WTS additive into clay mixture was created: virtual (gross) dry density 1340–1565 kg m−3, compressive strength
14–25.9 N mm−2, effective porosity 31%–39%. Erkliğ et al [20] studied the effects of sewage sludge ash (SSA)
and fly ash (FA) and SiC ceramic particles with different particle content on tensile strength and flexural strength
of the polyester composites. The results revealed that the highest improvement of mechanical properties was
obtained with the addition of 5 wt% SSA, the tensile and flexural strength increased by 4.4% and 5.8%
respectively. Alsaadi et al [21] reported the effect of SSA waste particle on the resistance of glass fabric-reinforced
epoxy composites (GFRPs) against moisture and temperature of ultraviolet (UV) aging. Comparing to the aged
unfilled composite, the deterioration of interlaminar fracture toughness values of composites with SSA inclusion
of 10 wt% increased by 14.3%. The organic matter could generate micro micropores during the firing process.
Zhang et al [22] concluded that the compressive strength of brick decreased from 33.1 MPa to 20.5 MPa due to
the weight loss during sintering. Esmeray et al [23] presented that the heat loss rates of bricks increased as the
sewage sludge content increased, which was related to the decrease of compressive strength.
Although the literature survey presents that shale and sewage could be used separately in the manufacture of
fired bricks. However, to the best knowledge of the authors, the influence of sewage sludge content on the
physical and mechanical properties of fired shale bricks was not adequately investigated by researchers. In this
paper, the chemical, mineralogical and thermal properties of shale and sewage sludge were characterized by XRF
and XRD to investigate whether these two materials were fit bloating materials or not. The water content,
plasticity index, shrinkage rate, bulk density and compressive strength of green bricks or fired bricks with
contents of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 25% (wt) were tested to determine the optimum mixture proportions of raw
materials and the sintering temperature. Microscopic investigation was carried out to analyze the effect
mechanism of sewage sludge in ceramic body.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials
In this study, shale and sewage sludge (figure 1) were used to manufacture fired bricks. Shale was chosen as the
main raw material, while sewage sludge was used as a partial replacement of shale for producing micropores to
improve the self-weight and thermal insulation performance of fired shale bricks. The shale was obtained from
West Mountain area of Urumqi (Xinjiang, China), and was sieved until it reached a particle size „1 mm. Sewage
sludge was collected from Hongqiao Sewage Treatment Plant in Shuimogou District, Urumqi City (Xinjiang,
China). Considering that the sewage sludge was difficult to be completely dried and needed to be broken after
drying process, the sewage sludge was directly used to mix with shale after being compressed dehydration, which
would reduce the production cycle and production cost.

2.1.1. Chemical characteristics

Shale and sewage sludge were analyzed chemically using x-ray fluorescence spectrometer (Bruker Company,
Karlsruhe, Germany). The analysis results are shown in table 1. The results revealed that the shale was mainly
comprised of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 and CaO, and the percentage of fluxing agent (Fe2O3, CaO, MgO, K2O and
Na2O) reached 11.39%, ensuring the sufficient viscosity of glassy phase during the high temperature sintering
process. The chemical composition of sewage sludge showed considerable amount of SiO2 (18.46%), and was
associated with minor Al2O3 (6.14%) and, in a small quantity, Fe2O3 (2.39%), CaO (2.40%), MgO (2.38%) and
SO3 (2.46%). These results indicated that only the shale was feasible for manufacturing fired bricks, while the
sewage sludge could only be used as additive.

2
Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 J Wu et al

Figure 1. Photos of (a) shale, (b) sewage sludge.

Table 1. Chemical composition of shale and sewage sludge.

Chemical composition (%)

Material SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO K2O+Na2O SO3 LOI

Shale 61.22 17.41 4.33 3.34 2.15 1.57 0.82 6.18

Sewage sludge 18.46 6.14 2.39 2.40 2.38 1.55 2.46 64.22

The fluxing agent could help lower the material’s softening temperature [24]. Due to the fact that the
chemical composition of sewage sludge contained relatively greater amounts of CaO, MgO, K2O and Na2O,
which could be used as fluxing agent in the firing process, the addition of sewage sludge might be an effective
method to lower the softening temperature during the manufacture of fired shale bricks.

2.1.2. Mineralogical characteristics

The XRD pattern of shale (figure 2(a)) and sewage sludge (figure 2(b)) were obtained through x-ray diffraction
(Rigaku Company, Akishima, Japan). The mineralogical composition of shale was composed of quartz (SiO2),
calcite (CaCO3), albite (NaAlSi3O8), kaolinite (Al4Si4O10(OH)8) and illite (KAl2(SiAl)4O10(OH)2·nH2O).
The diffraction pattern of sewage sludge presented as main quartz (SiO2), illite
(KAl2(SiAl)4O10(OH)2·nH2O), albite (NaAlSi3O8) and chlorite (Mg3Si4O10(OH)2Mg3(OH)6).

2.1.3. Thermal characteristics

The thermal behavior of the shale and sewage sludge is given in figure 3. For shale, an endothermic valley,
attributed to the loss of moisture, was observed at approximately temperature 100 °C. As the temperature
increased, the DSC curve was smoother, showing a trend of endothermic (400 °C–1000 °C). During this period,
the crystal transformation of quartz occurred, the hydroxyl of illite and kaolinite escaped, the lattice was
destroyed and the amorphous state was formed. The dehydration and decomposition of illite also occurred at
this stage, and the iron in the illite lattice escaped in the form of hematite. The carbonate and various impurities
decomposed and the crystal structure was destroyed. There was a large endothermic valley at temperatures
between 1100 °C–1200 °C, indicating that the shale began to melt, the liquid phase was produced in large
quantities, and the eutectic components in the billet absorbed a lot of heat during melting.
For sewage sludge, an endothermic valley appeared at the temperature 100 °C, which was caused by the
evaporation of a large amount of free water. At temperatures between 300 °C–550 °C, the exothermic effect of
sewage sludge was observed. At 500 °C temperature small exothermic spike was observed, related to the burning
of organic matter. There was an endothermic valley at temperatures between 650 °C–750 °C, which was caused
by the decomposition of minerals. Further exothermic effect was observed at temperatures between 950 °C–
1050 °C, which was related to exothermic crystallization of non-static substances.

2.2. Preparation of samples

2.2.1. Mix proportions
In this study, sewage sludge was used to manufacture fired shale brick as additive. In order to investigate the
optimum proportion of the additive, different replacement ratios of sewage sludge are given in table 2.

3
Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 J Wu et al

Figure 2. XRD pattern of (a) shale and (b) sewage sludge.

Figure 3. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) of shale and sewage sludge.

As presented in the table, the specimens are identified as mS-nSS, where S and SS denote shale and sewage
sludge, respectively. In addition, m refers to the proportion of shale and n denotes the replacement ratio of
sewage sludge. For instance, 85S-15SS indicates that the replacement ratio of sewage sludge is 15%.

4
Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 J Wu et al

Table 2. Mix proportion of the brick

samples.

Mix proportion (%)

Sample Shale Sewage sludge

100S 100 0
95S-5SS 95 5
90S-10SS 90 10
85S-15SS 85 15
80S-20SS 80 20
75S-25SS 75 25
70S-30SS 70 30

Table 3. The temperature, heating rate and soaking time.

Samples Temperature range (°C) Heating rate (°C min−1) Soaking time (min)

Brick specimens 0–400 4 100

400–600 1 200
600–900 3 100
900-Sintering temperature 1 50
Sintering temperature 0 180

Table 4. The sintering temperature of bricks with different replacement ratios of sewage sludge.

Mix proportion 100S 95S-5SS 90S-10SS 85S-15SS 80S-20SS 75S-25SS 70S-30SS

Sintering temperature(°C) OST OST OST-10 OST-10 OST-20 OST-20 OST-30

2.2.2. Sintering
In order to determine the sintering temperate of the fired shale brick using sewage sludge as additive accurately,
the optimum sintering temperature (OST) of shale should be investigated. The sintering temperature, heating
rate and soaking time of brick samples for the sintering tests are given in table 3.
The calorific value of sewage sludge was higher, which helped to reduce the sintering temperature of brick.
Therefore, the sintering temperature of specimen should be adjusted based on the replacement ratio of sewage
sludge, as given in table 4. The sintering process of fired shale brick with sewage sludge additive was still in
accordance with the requirements of table 3.

2.3. Methods
2.3.1. Water content and plasticity index test
It was experimentally proved that the effect of water content on the mixture properties should be considered
[25]. According to Chinese code GB/T 50123–2019 [26], liquid limit (LL ) and plastic limit (PL ) experiments
were carried out in this paper to study the influence of water content on mixtures of shale and sewage sludge
physically.
Put the sample into a bowl. A 76 g cone was gently placed on the surface of the mixture and sunk into the
mixture under the action of its self-weight. When the cone sunk into the mixture to a depth of 10 mm after 15 s,
the water content was determined to be the liquid limit value.
For plastic limit experiment, ball-shaped mixture was rolled to the shape of cylindrical pasta. If cracks
appeared when the diameter of cylinder was about 3 mm, the water content of the mixture was established as the
plastic limit value.
The plastic performance of the mixture was expressed by plasticity index (PI ), which was the difference of
the LL and PL, as given in equation (1):

PI = LL - PL (1)

2.3.2. Shrinkage rate test

Based on ASTM standard C326–2009 [27], drying shrinkage rate and firing shrinkage rate were determined
using equation (2)–(3):

5
Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 J Wu et al

Drying shrinkage rate (%) = (L p - L d ) / L p (2)

Firing shrinkage rate (%) = (L p - L f ) / L p (3)
where L p is the plastic length of the green brick, Ld is the dry length of green brick, L f is the length of the fired
brick.

2.3.3. Bulk density test

The bulk density was determined according to ASTM C134–95 [28], and was calculated using equation (4):
B = (d / l ´ w ´ t ) (4)
in which B is the bulk density (kg m−3), d, l, w and t are dry weight (kg), length (m), width (m) and thickness
(m) of the specimen, respectively.

2.3.4. Water absorption test

The water absorption of the brick was measured as specified by ASTM C67–14 [29].The dry, cooled specimens
were submerged in clean water at 15.5 °C–30 °C for 24 h. In this test, the specimens were removed and wiped off
the surface water. The complete weighing of the specimens should be within 5 min after removing the specimens
from the bath. The calculation of the water absorption was given as follows:
Water absorption (%) = 100(Ws - Wd ) / Wd (5)
where Ws and Wd are the dry weight and saturated weight of the specimens, respectively.

2.3.5. Compressive strength test

Operations were carried out to assess the mechanical performance of fired bricks. The specimens were tested as
denoted by Chinese code GB/T 2542–2012 [30]. Processes were carried out using compression testing machine
connected to the computer. The compressive strength value was calculated using the following equation
(equation (6)):
P = F /A (6)
where P is the compressive strength of the bricks (MPa), F is the maximum load of the testing machine (N), A is
the average of the areas of the upper and lower bearing surfaces of the brick (mm2).

2.3.6. Coefficient of thermal conductivity test

Bricks were usually used as raw materials of the exterior walls of buildings, thus the thermal insulation properties
should be determined to improve the building efficiency. The thermal conductivity coefficient of brick was
tested by infrared thermal imager (Infratest Electronics CO., Ltd, Shanghai, China) as denoted in Chinese code
GB/T 10295–2008 [31]. The coefficient of thermal conductivity was obtained from equation (7):
tw - t0
l= ·d (7)
( t i - t 0) R w
in which ti is the temperature of incubator (K), t 0 is ambient temperature (K), t w is external surface temperature
of brick (K), R w is heat transfer resistance of the external surface of brick (m2·K W−1), and d is the thickness of
the brick (m).

3. Results and discussions

The optimum sintering temperature of shale was determined firstly. Then in order to promote the industrialized
production of fired shale bricks using sewage sludge as additive, the water content, plasticity index and drying
shrinkage rate of green brick samples, the firing shrinkage rate, bulk density, compressive strength, and thermal
conductivity of fired brick samples were tested. Obvious defects, such as cracking and deformation, were
observed in the brick samples with 30% (wt) of sewage sludge. Therefore, the performance tests were mainly
carried out for brick samples whose replacement ratios of sewage sludge were lower than or equal to 25%.

3.1. The optimum sintering temperature of shale

In order to obtain the optimum sintering temperature of shale, the sintering temperatures were determined to
be 800 °C, 850 °C, 900 °C, 950 °C, 1000 °C, 1050 °C and 1100 °C through the analysis of thermal characteristics
of shale (figure 3). The cured specimens are given in figure 4. During the firing process, there were no fissures and
efflorescence defects could be observed in the specimens. The color of the brick samples was light orange, and
the surface of the samples was rough and dull at the temperature 800 °C. Following the increasing of sintering
temperature, the color of brick samples tended to be darker.

6
Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 J Wu et al

Figure 4. Cured brick samples.

Figure 5. Firing shrinkage and water absorption values of brick samples.

The water absorption (WA) and firing shrinkage (FS) of brick samples are given in figure 5. Based on Chinese
code GB 26538–2011 [24], the water absorption of fired bricks should not be larger than 20.0%, indicating that
the minimum sintering temperature was about 850 °C. The firing shrinkage of brick samples was −0.56 and the
water absorption increased significantly at the sintering temperature 1100 °C, showing that the brick samples
were overburned. Therefore, the highest sintering temperature was approximately 1050 °C.
Figure 6 gives the XRD pattern of shale at different sintering temperatures. The contents of quartz and albite
in the brick samples decreased as the sintering temperature increased. Liquid phase appeared at the contact part
of albite and quartz at the temperature 900 °C, and the feldspar and quartz content decreased. Following the
increase of sintering temperatures, quartz content decreased and part of the quartz crystals were melt in the glass
phase of the samples, and mulita would be formed because of the reaction between the quartz and alumina.
Finally, a large amount of glass phase was formed at 1050 °C, indicating that the sintering temperature should
not be higher than 1050 °C.
According to the study of He [32] and figures 4–6, the optimum sintering temperature of shale was
calculated from the equation:

T = Ts + (Te - Ts) / 2 (8)

Where Ts is initial sintering temperature and equals to 850 °C, Te is melting temperature and equals to 1050 °C.
It could be obtained that the optimum sintering temperature of shale used in this paper was about 950 °C.

7
Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 J Wu et al

Figure 6. XRD pattern of shale under different sintering temperatures.

Figure 7. Effects of sewage sludge content on water content and plasticity index of green bricks.

3.2. Performance of fired shale bricks with sewage sludge

3.2.1. Effects of sewage sludge content on water content and plasticity index of green bricks
The water content and the plasticity index of green brick were considered as important factors for the shaping of
bricks. Figure 7 shows the measured results. The water content of green brick tended to increase with the
increase of sewage sludge content, while the increase of sewage sludge content led to the decrease in plasticity
index. Results showed that when the sewage sludge content increased from 0% to 25%, the water content
increased from 19.00% to 24.21%, the plasticity index decreased from 12.22% to 7.02%. Following the increase
of sewage sludge content, the forming of green bricks became very difficult, thus the maximum sewage sludge
content was determined to be 25%. This is because:

• The organic fibers in sewage sludge absorbed a large amount of water, which reduced the free water in the
shale-water two-phase system and weakened the attraction between adjacent particles of the shale, thus
reducing the forming ability of the mixture.
• The excessive moisture of the sewage sludge affected the mixing uniformity of the sewage sludge and shale
significantly. Therefore, following the increase of sewage sludge content, the plasticity index of the green brick
decreased.

8
Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 J Wu et al

Figure 8. Effects of sewage sludge content on drying shrinkage rate and firing shrinkage rate.

Figure 9. Effects of sewage sludge content on bulk density and compressive strength.

3.2.2. Effects of sewage sludge content on the drying shrinkage rate and firing shrinkage rate
The drying shrinkage rate and firing shrinkage rate affected the manufacture of the production mold and the
outer dimensions of the specimen. Figure 8 presents the test results for shrinkage rate. The highest shrinkage rate
was observed in specimens with 15% content of sewage sludge additive. In this case, the drying shrinkage rate
and firing shrinkage rate increased 16.6% and 58.8%, respectively. This was due to the fact that the water content
required for brick forming increased with the increase of replacement ratio of sewage sludge, and the
evaporation of water led to the shrinkage of brick during the drying and sintering process.

3.2.3. Effects of sewage sludge content on bulk density and compressive strength of brick
Smaller bulk density of brick helped to reduce the building self-weight and construction cost, and adequate
compressive strength of brick was a necessary condition for its application in engineering. The test results of bulk
density and compressive strength of bricks are given in figure 9. The bulk density produced with 0% sewage
sludge exhibited a value of 1770 kg m−3, this value reduced to 1230 kg m−3 at the 25% replacement ratio. This
revealed that the high loss on ignition of sewage sludge resulted in a large number of pores after firing, which
effectively reduced the bulk density of bricks.
The compressive strength of the brick decreased rapidly with the increase of sewage sludge content. The
compressive strength was 13.95 MPa for the 0% replacement ratio, and when the sewage sludge content was
25%, the compressive strength decreased to 3.00 MPa. This situation was due to the reason that the number of
pores increased with the increase of sewage sludge content, which reduced the cross-sectional stress area of the
brick.
According to Chinese code GB 50003–2011 [33], the compressive strength of fired bricks should not be less
than 5.0 MPa, while the compressive strength was 4.42 MPa for the 20% replacement ratio. Therefore the

9
Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 J Wu et al

Figure 10. Microstructure images of (a) brick without sewage sludge, (b) brick with 15% replacement ratio of sewage sludge.

Figure 11. Testing equipment.

replacement ratio of sewage sludge should not be more than 15%. Considering that the other parameters
satisfied the requirements of manufacturing and application of fired brick, the optimum replacement ratio of
sewage sludge was determined to be 15%.

3.3. Microstructure of fired shale bricks

The microstructure of the fired shale bricks (figure 10) was studied by SEM (TESCAN Company, Brno, Czech).
Compared to the specimen without sewage sludge, the microstructure’s view of the ceramic body with 15% of
sewage sludge additive showed that the density of the microstructure was smaller and the amount of micropores
was larger. High porosity was also confirmed by the chemical characteristic obtained earlier in table 1. The
earlier investigations of physical and mechanical performance of specimens also confirmed the same results: for
the 0% and 15% replacement ratio of sewage sludge, density strength decreased from 1770 to 1380 kg m−3,
compressive strength decreased from 13.95 to 8.23 MPa (figure 9).

3.4. Thermal conductivity of fired shale bricks

The testing equipment and the test results are given in figures 11 and 12. The thermal conductivity coefficient of
fired shale brick was 0.45 W (m K)−1 for the 0% replacement ratio, 0.19 W (m K)−1 for 15% replacement ratio of
sewage sludge. The addition of sewage sludge generated more pores inside the brick, which could block the
transfer of heat and improve the thermal performance of the brick. Compared with fired clay brick (l = 0.81
[34]), the thermal conductivity coefficient of the fired shale brick decreases obviously with or without the
addition of sewage sludge.

10
Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 J Wu et al

Figure 12. Thermal conductivity coefficient of bricks.

4. Conclusions

The effect of different content of sewage sludge on the properties of green or fired shale bricks were examined
experimentally. It was found that the physical, mechanical and thermal performances as well as microstructure
of the bricks were affected apparently by the additive of sewage sludge. The main observations are summarized as
follows:

1. According to the analysis of XRF, shale (large amount of SiO2 and Al2O3) was a fit bloating material for
manufacturing fired bricks independently, while the sewage sludge could only be used as additive to
improve the properties of the bricks.
2. After the introduction of fired shale bricks without the sewage sludge additive at 800 °C–1100 °C
temperature, the ceramic body with the following parameters was created: the firing shrinkage 0.51–
(−1.16)% and water absorption 22.05%–13.86%. Taking into account of the XRD and thermal
characteristics, the optimum sintering temperature of shale was determined to be 950 °C.
3. After the introduction of 0%–30% of sewage sludge additive into shale mixture and the burning of the
bricks at 920 °C–950 °C temperature, the following parameters of green or fired bricks was created: the
water content 19.00%–24.21%, plasticity index 12.22%–7.02%, drying shrinkage 4.22%–5.15%, firing
shrinkage 0.97%–1.36%, bulk density 1770–1260 kg m−3 and compressive strength 13.95–3.00 MPa.
Considering the requirements of manufacture and engineering application of bricks, the optimum
replacement of sewage was determined to be 15%.
4. As could been seen from the SEM images of the bricks, the microstructure of the brick was disrupted by the
sewage sludge. The microstructure of reference specimen was denser than the microstructure of specimen
containing 15% of sewage sludge, the results could also be seen from the results of the physical and
mechanical tests.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2021JQ-876) and
Scientific Research Foundation for High-level Talents (XJ17T08). The authors would like to thank Shaanxi Key
Laboratory of Safety and Durability of Concrete Structures for the project testing.

Data availability statement

The data generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available for legal/ethical reasons
but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

11
Mater. Res. Express 8 (2021) 095510 J Wu et al

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in
connection with the work submitted.

ORCID iDs

Jian Wu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5698-3657

References
[1] Dalkılıç N and Nabikoğlu A 2017 Traditional manufacturing of clay brick used in the historical buildings of Diyarbakir (Turkey)
Frontiers of Architectural Research 6 346–59
[2] Monatshebe T, Mulaba-Bafubiandi A F and Nyembwe D K 2019 Mechanical properties and mineralogy of artisanal clay bricks
manufactured in Dididi, Limpopo, South Africa Constr. Build. Mater. 225 972–82
[3] Zoppo M D et al 2019 In-plane shear capacity of tuff masonry walls with traditional and innovative composite reinforced mortars
(CRM) Constr. Build. Mater. 210 289–300
[4] Alecci V et al 2019 Estimating elastic modulus of tuff and brick masonry: a comparison between on-site and laboratory tests Constr.
Build. Mater. 204 828–38
[5] Cusidó J A and Cremades L V 2012 Environmental effects of using clay bricks produced with sewage sludge: leachability and toxicity
studies Waste Manage. 32 1202–8
[6] Goel G and Kalamdhad A S 2017 Degraded municipal solid waste as partial substitute for manufacturing fired bricks Constr. Build.
Mater. 155 259–66
[7] Juel M A I, Mizan A and Ahmed T 2017 Sustainable use of tannery sludge in brick manufacturing in Bangladesh Waste Manage 60
259–69
[8] Xu N N 2010 On destruction of solid clay brick to land resources and countermeasures Journal of Henan University of Urban
Construction 19 16–7 [in Chinese]
[9] Feng N Q et al 1997 Shale ash concrete Cem. Concr. Res. 27 279–91
[10] Meddah M S 2015 Durability performance and engineering properties of shale and volcanic ashes concretes Constr. Build. Mater. 79
73–82
[11] Wang X F et al 2017 Experimental study on early cracking sensitivity of lightweight aggregate concrete Constr. Build. Mater. 136 173–83
[12] Zhao M L et al 2018 An experimental study on strength and toughness of steel fiber reinforced expanded-shale lightweight concrete
Constr. Build. Mater. 183 493–501
[13] Li X K et al 2019 Testing and prediction of shear performance for steel fiber reinforced expanded-shale lightweight concrete beams
without web reinforcements Materials 12 1594
[14] Irassar E F et al 2019 Calcined illite-chlorite shale as supplementary cementing material: thermal treatment, grinding, color and
pozzolanic activity Appl. Clay Sci. 179 105143
[15] Vejmelková E et al 2012 Application of burnt clay shale as pozzolan addition to lime mortar Cem. Concr. Compos. 34 486–92
[16] Rieger D et al 2015 Effect of thermal treatment on reactivity and mechanical properties of alkali activated shale–slag binder Constr.
Build. Mater. 83 26–33
[17] Bundur Z B, Kirisits M J and Ferron R D 2017 Use of pre-wetted lightweight fine expanded shale aggregates as internal nutrient
reservoirs for microorganisms in bio-mineralized mortar Cem. Concr. Compos. 84 167–74
[18] Jordán M M et al 2005 Application of sewage sludge in the manufacturing of ceramic tile bodies Appl. Clay Sci. 30 219–24
[19] Kizinievič O et al 2013 Utilisation of sludge waste from water treatment for ceramic products Constr. Build. Mater. 41 464–73
[20] Erkliğ A, Alsaadi M and Bulut M 2016 A comparative study on industrial waste fillers affecting mechanical properties of polymer-
matrix composites Mater. Res. Express 3 105302
[21] Alsaadi M and Erkliğ A 2021 UV accelerated aging and sewage sludge ash particle effects on mode I interlaminar fracture properties of
glass fiber/epoxy composites Iran. Polym. J. 30 811–20
[22] Zhang Y M et al 2016 Fabrication, microstructure and properties of bricks fired from lake sediment, cinder and sewage sludge Constr.
Build. Mater. 121 154–60
[23] Esmeray E and Atıs M 2019 Utilization of sewage sludge, oven slag and fly ash in clay brick production Constr. Build. Mater. 194 110–21
[24] Huang C-H and Wang S-Y 2013 Application of water treatment sludge in the manufacturing of lightweight aggregrate Constr. Build.
Mater. 43 174–83
[25] Kalinski M E 2011 Soil Mechanics Lab Manual (United States of American: Hamilton Printing Company) 978-0-470-55683-2
[26] GB/T 50123-2019(Code of China) Standard for Geotechnical Testing Method (Beijing, China: China Architecture and Building Press)
[27] ASTM C326-2009 Test Method for Drying and Firing Shrinkage of Ceramic Whiteware Clays (PA, USA: West Conshohocken)
[28] ASTM C134-95 2016 Standard Test Method for Size, Dimensional Measurements, and Bulk Density of Refractory Brick and Insulating
Firebrick (PA, USA: West Conshohocken)
[29] ASTM C67-14 Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing brick and Structural Clay Tile (PA, USA: West Conshohocken)
[30] GB/T 2542-2012(Code of China) Test Methods for Wall Bricks (Beijing, China: China Standard Press)
[31] GB/T 10295-2008(Code of China) Thermal Insulation-Determination of Steady-State Thermal Resistance and Related Properties-Heat
flow Meter Apparatus ( Beijing, China: China Architecture and Building Press)
[32] He K Y 1995 Physical Chemistry for Silicate (Wuhan, China: Wuhan University of Technology Press) pp 336–50
[33] GB 50003-2011(Code of China) Code For Design Of Masonry Structures (Beijing, China: China Architecture and Building Press)
[34] Cao S P 2012 Fired brick is an energy saving wall material Brick and Tile. 10 50–2

12