UNIT 1 - Bawarshi, A & Reiff - CH 3 and 4
UNIT 1 - Bawarshi, A & Reiff - CH 3 and 4
UNIT 1 - Bawarshi, A & Reiff - CH 3 and 4
4) What does Halliday understand by register? What are field, tenor and mode? How
are these concepts realised?
Halliday: Register
Register: “a clustering of semantic features according to situation types”.
Register links a situation type to a particular semantic and lexico-grammatical
patterns. It describes:
● What actually takes place: the social action (Field)
● How participants relate to one another: the role structure or relationship
(Tenor)
● What role language is playing: the abstract symbolic representation (Mode).
All three are contextual factors or variables that are carried into or realised in text.
FIELD: (the social action): The field of discourse: the system of activity within a
particular setting including the participants, practices, and circumstances involved.
- What is happening, the nature of the social action that is taking place, what it
is the participants are engaged in, the language figures as some essential components.
TENOR: (the role of structure). The Tenor of discourse: the social relations between the
participants, their interactions, who is taking part, the nature of the participants, their
statuses and roles (i.e. permanent and temporary relationships); the types of speech
role that they are taking on in the dialogue (situated roles), the whole clusters of
socially significant relationships they are involved in.
MODE: (the symbolic organisation). The mode of discourse: the channel or wavelength
of communication (face-to-face, via e-mail, telephone, or other linguistic systems)
used by participants to perform their actions or relations, what part language is
playing, what the participants expect the language will do for them in the
situation; the symbolic organisation of the text, its status, and its
function in the context, including the channel (spoken, written, on-line,
off-line), the rhetorical mode (i.e. what is being achieved by the text →
persuasive, expository, didactic, rhetorical functions.)
Example: job interview
Field:( what - ideational meaning ) educational (technical) questions pre-planned
Tenor : (who/ interpersonal meaning) unequal, interviewers have more power
Mode: (how/ textual meaning) spoken / formal
5) How can the three register variables proposed by Halliday be related to what he
calls ‘the three language metafunctions’?
Metafunction: a theoretical construct that transfers or transmits the domain of context
to the language system itself. It carries social functions beyond the contextual level
onto the textual level.
What happens at the level of context of situation in terms of field, tenor and mode
corresponds to what happens at the linguistic level in terms of the three language
metafunctions : IDEATIONAL, INTERPERSONAL, TEXTUAL.
IDEATIONAL: Refers to the linguistic representation of action (who is doing what, to
whom, when, where, why, how ) It corresponds to FIELD.
INTERPERSONAL: Describes interactions between participants (such as asking,
stating, elicit information, directing, but also expressing attitudes and opinions) at the
linguistic level. Interpersonal corresponds to TENOR.
TEXTUAL: Describes the flow of information within and between texts, including how
texts are organised, what is made explicit and what is assumed as background
knowledge, how the known and the new are related, and how coherence and cohesion
are achieved. It corresponds to MODE.
6) Why did Systemic Functional approaches to genre emerge? What are the
limitations to these approaches?
Genres in SFL: Halliday’s work has served as a foundation for Systemic Functional
approaches to Genre. Their focus is on helping students “learn to exercise the
appropriate linguistic choices relevant to the needs, functions or meanings at any
time”.
● Systemic Functional approaches to genre emerge partly in response to
concerns over the efficacy of student-centred, process-based literacy teaching, with its
emphasis on “learning through doing”. Such approaches were led by J.R. Martin and
supported by scholarship in the field of education linguistics in Australia.
Limitations:
- This approach ignores the contexts in which texts are acquired and function,
which naturalises and privatises what is actually a social process of literacy acquisition.
- Process approaches deprive students of access to the systemic, patterned
textual choices that function within different contexts of situation.
- Process approaches promote a student-centred approach meant to
encourage student expression and discovery but fail to socially empower students.
- Process approaches reproduce social inequality by denying traditionally
marginalised students access to academic and cultural texts.
- Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis explain that: process-based approaches are
actually “culture bound”; their focus is on student agency and ownership, the power of
voice, student control and motivation. They reflect and privilege “the cultural
aspirations of middle class children from child-centred households”. Its pedagogy of
immersion naturally favours students whose voice is closest to the literate culture of
power in industrial society”.
How does Why if H considers the ctxt of situation the limitation is that ignores the context in which
txts are acquired? (Noe´s doubt) Halliday ignores the broader context and as a consequence it doesn’t
empower students socially. Context of situation refers to what’s going on around the language event,
the immediate environment in which the text is produced (context of production). That’s why,
Malinoski for example, realised that context of situation was not enough and started talking of context
of culture, that is to say the system of belief, values that the speaker brings into any social interaction.
Martin define genre? Explain what each element/word of his definition implies.
Genre: staged, goal-oriented social processes through which social subjects in a given
culture live their lives.
*as a social processes because members of a culture interact with each other to achieve
them.
* as goal oriented because they have evolved to get things done.
* as staged because it usually takes more than one step for participants to achieve their
goals.
8) What developments has Halliday’s model of context undergone?
Martin builds on Halliday’s work by locating genre in relation to register so that genre
and register relate to and realise one another in important ways.
Martin relates genre and register. While register (field, tenor and mode) functions on
the level of context of situation, genre functions on the level of context of culture. That
is to say, genre connects culture to a situation, and register connects the situation to
language. Martin’s formulation enriches our understanding of genre by showing how
social purposes/ motives are linked to text structures.
9) Briefly outline what the LERN project and the teaching-learning cycle are. How
have they contributed to genre pedagogy?
LERN (literacy and Education Research Network)project:
- Martin’s view of genre has been used as a part of the influential LERN project
(Literacy and Education Research Network).
AIMS: - Identify the most important genres within school literacy.
- Develop a pedagogy to teach them critically and efficiently. That pedagogy
has come to be known as the “Teaching-learning Cycle”.
TEACHING-LEARNING CYCLE:
- It has been adapted by various researchers.
- Its basic components include three categories:
● Modelling.
● Joint negotiation of text.
● Independent construction of text.
MODELLING:
Students are exposed to a number of texts representing a given member. In this stage,
students and teachers identify:
- The cultural and situational context the texts have been produced in.
- The genre function.
- The social purposes they serve.
- How structural elements reflect their functions.
- How language features carry out their functions.
Their stage moves from discussion of context and social purpose to a description/
analysis of register and language.
JOINT NEGOTIATION OF TEXT:
- Students and teachers engage in the joint negotiation and their construction
of a text within the genre.
- First conducting the research, developing content knowledge, note-taking,
observing, diagramming.
- And then working collaboratively to produce a version of the genre.
INDEPENDENT CONSTRUCTION OF TEXT:
Students work independently to construct a version of the genre. Their tasks involve:.
- Conducting research to develop content knowledge.
- Drafting the text.
- Conferencing with teachers and peers.
- Editing it.
- Evaluating it and finally publishing their text.
Teaching-learning Cycle (Cont’d)
- The cyclical shape of the model is meant to reflect its flexibility.
- Teachers can then enter into the model at the stage as is appropriate to
students’ level of preparedness.
- Due to its flexible nature, students and teachers can keep rotating through
the cycle as more and more complex genres are added.
- The cycle visibilizes the structural and linguistic features of genres, and the
connection of such features to social function.
10) Bawarshi & Reiff open up this chapter by stating that ‘Systemic Functional
approaches to genre have contributed richly to how genre is understood and applied in
textual analysis and language teaching (…)’. To what extent do you think this is true?
Reflect on the topic and provide examples to account for your answer.
I agree with the statement because genres are the area of language change and in order
to understand language we need to understand genres. Genres identification depends
on contextual cues and interaction. Teaching a language has to include the language
but at the same time teachers need to explain and give tools for the students to interact
with the context in order to achieve a correct communication and use of the language.
Genres have a purpose when used by participants in social interaction, so SFL
contributed greatly to the definition of Genres since it deals with organisation,
purposes and the choices the speakers make when engaging in social interaction.
1) What is English for Specific Purposes (ESP)? How are ESP approaches characterized?
ESP is an overarching category of Language for Specific Purposes. ESP focuses on
studying and teaching specialized varieties of English (to non-native speakers of
English) in advanced academic and professional settings. ESP is often used as an
umbrella term which comprises more specialized areas of study, such as: English for
Academic Purposes (EAP), English for Occupational Purposes (EOP), English for
Medical Purposes (EMP)
Swales (1990) mentions two key characteristics of ESP genre approaches, namely:
•Their focus on academic and research English
•Their use of genre analysis for applied ends.
2) Compare and contrast the ESP and SFL approaches to the genre.
ESP AND SFL: SIMILARITIES
• They both share the view that linguistic features are connected to social context and
function.
• They are driven by the pedagogical imperative to make visible to disadvantaged
students the connections between language and social function that genres embody.
• They are committed to the idea that explicit teaching of relevant genres provides
access to disadvantaged learners.
3) What does Swales understand by discourse communities? Explain the six defining
characteristics Swales puts forward on defining this notion.
As ‘socio-rhetorical networks that form in order to work towards sets of common
goals’. These common goals become the basis for shared communicative purposes,
with genres enabling discourse community members to achieve these communicative
purposes. Swales proposes six defining characteristics of discourse communities:
1) A broadly agreed set of public goals (which are explicitly stated or tacitly understood)
2) Mechanisms of intercommunication among its members. (telecommunication
technology/ meetings room)
3) Membership depends on individuals using these mechanisms to participate in the
life of the discourse community.
4) One or more genres in the communicative furtherance of its aims. This must be
recognizable to and defined by members of DC
5) Some specific lexis. (such as abbreviations and acronyms)
6) A threshold level of members with a suitable degree of relevant content and
discoursal expertise.
4) According to Swales, what does genre refer to? What does his working definition
involve and imply? To what extent is Swales’ definition of genre different from
Martin’s?
Swales (1990) posits that a genre ‘comprises a class of communicative events, the
members of which share some set of communicative purposes.’
⇒Genres as linguistic and rhetorical actions.
⇒Genres as a relatively stable class of linguistic and rhetorical events which
members of a discourse community have typified in order to respond to and achieve
shared communicative values.
GENRE - MARTIN: Staged, goal-oriented social processes through which social
subjects in a given culture live their lives.
•Genres function:
• as social processes “because members of a culture interact with each other to achieve
them;
• as goal-oriented because they have evolved to get things done; and
• as staged because it usually takes more than one step for participants to achieve their
goals”.
5) What is the rationale behind the genre?
Swales: •The communicative purpose gives rise to and provides the rationale behind
the genre because…
•…it shapes the schematic structure of the discourse.
•…it influences and constrains choice of content and style.
6) Enumerate Bhatia’s steps to analysing genres.
Bhatia outlines 7 steps to analysing genre:
1. Placing a given genre-text in its situational context.
2. Surveying the existing research on the genre.
3. Refining the researcher’s understanding of the genre’s discourse community.
4. Collecting a corpus of the genre.
5. Conducting an ethnography of the institutional context in which the genre takes
place.
6. Deciding which level to explore, namely: lexicogrammatical, text-patterning and
structural interpretation.
7. Seeking a specialist informant from the research site to verify findings.
7) Bawarshi and Reiff posit that ‘[n]ot all ESP genre researchers (…)’ follow the steps
outlined by Bhatia. Taking Swales’ (1990) three-move ‘Creating a Research Paper’
model into consideration, analyse both the way in which they conceptualize the
notion of genre and the connection between Bhatia’s methodology for genre analysis
and Swales’ model.
Swales notion of genre: Genres are communicative events, relatively stable, that
become typified to respond to common goals. Swales has called ‘occluded genres’ that
operate behind the scenes of research articles. Such knowledge of discipline-specific
genres has enabled graduate-level non-native speakers of English to gain access to and
participate in academic and professional discourse communities.
Bhatia outlines seven steps (question 6) to analysing genres: The trajectory of the
analysis thus proceeds from a generic schematic structure to its lexico-grammatical
features, all the while attending to the genre’s communicative purpose and the
discourse community which defines it. The process is by no means linear or static, it
has tended to move from context to text, with context providing knowledge of
communicative purpose and discourse community member’s genre identifications.
Together these steps provide insight into the range of ways ESP genre researchers go
about conducting genre analyses in academic and professional contexts.
Swales first identifies the typical moves authors make within the introduction. Within
each of these moves, Swales identifies a range of possible steps RA authors can take.
From there Swales examines steps more specifically by analysing text-patterning and
lexico-grammatical features within different steps. Moving from text-patterning to
lexico-grammatical features.
8) Enumerate and briefly describe the developments the field of ESP has recently
undergone. How have these developments contributed to the study of genre?
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ESP GENRE STUDIES
• Recent ESP approaches to genre study acknowledge the dynamic, interactive nature of
genres. à Askehave & Swales, Hyland
• ESP genre researches have begun to attend “genre chains” one genre is a necessary
antecedent for another. Attending to networks of genres reveals that genre
competence involves knowledge not only of individual genres, but also of how genres
interact with one another in complex ways to achieve dynamic purposes. (Swales) –
genre intertextuality.
• Some ESP researchers have emphasized ethnographic approaches to genre studies.
Eg: Johns, Paltridge
[Genre researchers of the deeply social nature of genres, recognize that genres are not
only embedded in social contexts such as discourse communities, but also in the sense
that genres help shape social contexts. ]
Generally speaking, then, while ESP genre scholars have tended to understand genres as
communicative tools situated within social contexts, rhetorical genre scholars have tended to
understand genres as sociological concepts embodying textual and social ways of
knowing, being, and interacting in particular contexts.
So while both ESP and Rhetorical genre approaches recognize genres as relating texts and
context, the point of emphasis and analytical/pedagogical trajectory of each approach has
differed, so that, generally speaking, in ESP genre study, context has been used to understand
texts and communicative purposes while in Rhetorical Genre Studies, texts have been used to
study contexts and social actions—in particular, how texts mediate situated symbolic actions.