History March 2024 Grade 12 MG-2 Final
History March 2024 Grade 12 MG-2 Final
History March 2024 Grade 12 MG-2 Final
NATIONAL
SENIOR CERTIFICATE
GRADE 12
HISTORY
MARKING GUIDELINES
COMMON TEST
MARCH 2024
MARKS: 100
1. SOURCE-BASED QUESTIONS
1.1 The following cognitive levels were used to develop source-based questions:
COGNITIVE WEIGHTING OF
HISTORICAL SKILLS
LEVELS QUESTIONS
• Extract evidence from sources
• Selection and organisation of relevant 30%
LEVEL 1
information from sources (15)
• Define historical concepts/terms
• Interpretation of evidence from sources
40%
LEVEL 2 • Explain information gathered from sources
(20)
• Analyse evidence from sources
• Interpret and evaluate evidence from sources
• Engage with sources to determine its
usefulness, reliability, bias and limitations 30%
LEVEL 3
• Compare and contrast interpretations and (15)
perspectives presented in sources and draw
independent conclusions
1.2 The information below indicates how source-based questions are assessed:
• In the marking o source-based, credit needs to be given to any other valid and
relevant viewpoints, arguments, evidence or examples.
• In the allocation pf marks, emphasis should be placed on how the requirements
of the question have been addressed.
• In the marking guideline, the requirements of the question (skills that need to
be addressed) as well as the level of the question are indicated in italics.
• When assessing open-ended source-based questions, learners should be
credited for any other relevant answers.
• Learners are expected to take a stance when answering ‘to what extent’
questions in order for any marks to be awarded.
Paragraph question
Paragraphs are to be assessed globally (holistically). Both the content and structure of
the paragraph must be taken into account when awarding a mark. The following steps
must be used when assessing a response to a paragraph question:
• Read the paragraph and place a bullet () at each point within the text where the
candidate has used relevant evidence to address the question.
• Re-read the paragraph to evaluate the extent to which the candidate has
been able to use relevant evidence to write a paragraph.
• At the end of the paragraph indicate the ticks (•) that the candidate has been
awarded the paragraph; as well as the level (1, 2, or 3) as indicated in the
holistic rubric and a brief comment e.g.
____________________ • ____________ • ___________________
____________________________ •___________________________
✓✓✓✓✓
Level 2
COMMENT
• Count all the ticks for the source-based question and then write the mark on
the right hand bottom margin e.g. 32
50
• Ensure that the total mark is transferred accurately to the front/back cover of the
answer script.
2. ESSAY QUESTIONS
• Markers must be aware that the content of the answer will be guided by
the textbooks in use at the particular centre.
• Candidates may have any other relevant introduction and /or conclusion
than those included in a specific essay marking guideline for a specific essay.
The essay will be assessed holistically (globally). This approach requires the
teacher to assess the essay as a whole, rather than assessing the main points
of the essay separately. This approach encourages the learner to write an
original argument by using relevant evidence to support the line of argument.
The learner will not be required to simply regurgitate content (facts) in order to
achieve a level 7(high mark). This approach discourages learners from
preparing essays and reproducing them without taking the specific
requirements of the question into account. Holistic marking o the essay credits
learner’s opinions that are supported by evidence. Holistic assessment, unlike
content-based marking, does not penalise language inadequacies as the
emphasis is on the following:
2.4.2 During the reading of the essay, ticks need to be awarded for a relevant
introduction (which is indicated by a bullet in the marking guideline), the main
aspects/body of the essay that sustain/defends the line of argument (which is
indicated by bullets in the marking guideline) and a relevant conclusion (which
is indicated by a bullet in the marking guideline)
For example, in an essay where there are five (5) main points there could be
about seven (7) ticks.
• Irrelevant statement |
|
|
• Repetition R
• Analysis A✓
• Interpretation I✓
In the marking essays, the criteria as provided in the matrix should be used.
When assessing the essay note both the content and presentation. At the
point of the intersection of the content and presentation based on the
seven competency levels, a mark should be awarded.
(a) The first reading of essays will be to determine to what extent the main
aspects have been covered and to allocate the content level (on the
matrix).
C LEVEL 4
(b) The second reading of essays will relate to the level (on the matrix) of
presentation.
C LEVEL 4
P LEVEL 3
C LEVEL 4 }26–27
P LEVEL 3
COMMENT
COMMENT
LEVEL 7
Question has been
fully answered.
Content selection
47–50 43–46
fully relevant to line
of argument.
LEVEL 6
Question has been
answered. Content
selection relevant to 43–46 40–42 38–39
a line of argument.
LEVEL 5
Question answered
to a great extent.
Content adequately 38–39 36–37 34–35 30–33 28–29
covered and
relevant.
LEVEL 4
Question
recognisable in
answer. 30–33 28–29 26–27
Some omissions or
irrelevant content
selection.
LEVEL 3
Content selection
does relate to the
question, but does
not answer it, or
does not always 26–27 24–25 20–23
relate to the
question.
Omissions in
coverage.
LEVEL 2
Question
inadequately 20–23 18–19 14–17
addressed. Sparse
content.
LEVEL 1*
Question
inadequately
addressed or not at
14–17 0–13
all. Inadequate or
irrelevant content.
• Question not addressed at all/totally irrelevant content/no attempt to structure the essay = 0
• Question includes basic and generally irrelevant information; no attempt to structure the essay = 1– 6
• Question inadequately addressed and vague; little attempt to structure the essay = 7–13
1.1
1.1.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1A – L1]
• The other two liberation movements did not want the FNLA's
armed force to have an advantage
• They wanted to allow negotiations to proceed
• Any other relevant response (any 1 x 2) (2)
1.2
1.2.1 [Definition of a concept from Source 1B – L1]
1.3
1.3.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 1C – L1]
• The USA (Ford and Kissinger) had spread the lie that Cuba was
only involved in Angola because of the orders from Soviet Union
orders
• They did not want to accept that Cuba had acted without the
influence of the Soviet Union
• Any other relevant response (any 1 x 2) (2)
1.4
1.4.1 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 1D – L2]
(8)
[50]
2.1
2.1.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2A – L1]
• ‘to be Christian’
• ‘dignified’
• ‘to fight violence with non-violence’ (any 2 x 1) (2)
• ‘terrorised’
• ‘stoned’
• ‘threatened’ (3 x 1) (3)
2.2
2.2.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2B – L1]
2.3
2.3.1 [Extraction of evidence from Source 2C – L1]
2.4
2.4.1 [Interpretation of evidence from Source 2D – L2]
• Dr Martin Luther King Jr. urged the people of Little Rock, Arkansas
to be Christian and dignified in their struggle for integration and to
fight violence with non-violence (Source 2A)
• He urged them to continue the struggle for integrated schools
(Source 2A)
• The people of Little Rock were terrorised, stoned and threatened
by ruthless mobs (Source 2A)
• He urged the people in Little Rock to meet physical force with soul
force. (Source 2A)
• Most of the people in the United States of America supported
The struggle for integration (Source 2A)
• The young minister was optimistic that segregation and discrimination
will not exist in America (Source 2A)
• Decision of the court: racial segregation of children in public schools
violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
(Sources 2B)
• The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal education (Sources 2B)
• The Court concluded that separating children based on race
created dangerous inferiority complexes that may adversely affect
black children's ability to learn (Source 2B)
• The Court concluded that racial segregation in schools is unconstitutional
(Sources 2B)
[50]
[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
and interpretative skills]
SYNOPSIS
Candidates need to explain to what extent Mobuto Sese Seko was successful in
implementing the political, economic, social and cultural policies in Congo after attaining
independence from Belgium in 1960.
MAIN ASPECTS
ELABORATION
Political policies
Economic policies
• Weak economic policies led to the decline in the state of infrastructure such as
roads etc.
• Mobutu Sese Seko created a kleptocracy were a group of appointed public
officials abused their position for financial gain
• Mobutu was forced to introduce retrocession (return of foreign owners)
• Very few foreign owners returned
• Congo’s economy collapsed
• Congo became dependent on foreign aid and investment, e.g. from the World Bank
• Any other relevant response
• Replaced Christian names with African names, e.g. The Congo was renamed Zaire
in 1971; Leopoldville became Kinshasha; Elisabethville became Lubumbashi, and
Stanleyville became Kisangani; Mobutu also changed his name from Joseph-Desire
Mobutu to Mobutu Sese Seko Kuku Ngbedu Waza Banga, meaning, ‘The All-Conquering
Warrior Who, Because of his Endurance And Inflexible Will To Win, Will go from
Conquest to Conquest Leaving Fire in His Wake’.
• Clothing: wearing of Western-style suits were outlawed (by a decree) and replaced
with ‘abacos’ (‘A bas le costumes’), meaning ‘down with the suit’
• Promoted local music
• Mobutu regarded democracy as a foreign ideology to Africa – he ruled as a Chief
in a traditional African style and used it to strengthen his own authoritarian position
• French remained the language of instruction and education system continued to
favour the urban elite
• After independence, primary education and school enrolment rose from 1,6 million
in 1960 to 4,6 million in 1974
• When state funding was withdrawn by Mobutu, parents had to start paying and
primary education started to decline
• Teachers and hospital staff went unpaid for months due to poor economic and
political practices
• Any other relevant response
• Conclusion: Candidates should sum up their argument with a relevant conclusion. [50]
[Plan and construct an original argument based on relevant evidence using analytical
and interpretative skills]
SYNOPSIS
Candidates should take a stance indicating whether they agree or disagree with the
assertion that the ideas of Malcolm X solely inspired the African Americans to fight
segregation and discrimination in the United States of America in the 1960s.
They should support their line of argument with relevant historical evidence.
MAIN ASPECTS
ELABORATION
➢ African Americans were still economically and politically crippled in the USA
➢ due to discriminatory (Jim Crow) laws
➢ Lack of sense of pride due to socio-economic circumstances (Lived in ghettos
and slum areas/poor housing/under-resourced facilities)
➢ African Americans became impatient with the slow pace
➢ African Americans were subjected to police brutality – led to growth of nationalist
feelings
• Black Power Movement advocated assertiveness, self-reliance and black pride
• The Black Panther Party was formed by Bobby Searle and Huey Newton for Self-
Defence against police brutality
• The Ten Point Plan served as the Black Panther Party manifesto that covered its
social, political and economic goals for the upliftment of the African American
community
• The Black Panther Party ran feeding schemes in black communities
• The feeding schemes eradicated hunger amongst the youth and improved learning in
schools
• BPP literacy projects eradicated illiteracy amongst the African American communities
• BPP childcare projects provided medical care to African Americans in black
communities
• The Black Panther Party got involved in street patrols, monitored police activities
and defended themselves by carrying guns (militant approach) to stop the on-going
police brutality and harassment of young urban black men
• BPP demanded that Black history must be taught in black schools
• Any other relevant response
• Conclusion: Candidates should sum up their argument with a relevant conclusion. [50]