Rubric Student Peer Review

Working in Teams (Peer Review) – Rubric (overview for student)
Criteria Largely Insufficient (<4) Insufficient (5) Sufficient (6-7) Good (8-9)
1. Quality of The assignments/tasks were often The assignments/tasks were The assignments/tasks are The assignments/tasks were
self-study (ZSO) performed poorly, so that the sometimes performed poorly, so performed correctly and the performed correctly and can be
results were less useful. The that the results are less useful. The results are usable. Sometimes the considered as completed. The results
student hardly ever completed student did not always complete student is too late handing in can be used in the next project. The
tasks on time. tasks on time. tasks/assignments. assignments/tasks were all delivered
on time.
2. Team role Takes hardly any initiative. Does Takes little initiative. Does not Could take more initiative during Takes initiative and is active during
Group member not often make relevant always make relevant contributions meetings. Is either quiet or too meetings, stimulating the group
contributions to the group to the group process during dominating, but the relevance for process. Asks critical questions and
process during meetings. Does meetings. Asks too few critical the group process is not always listens to group members. Can clearly
not ask critical questions to group questions to group members clear. Could ask more critical communicate the essence of an idea.
members and/or does not listen and/or does not listen carefully questions and/or listen to group Is well prepared for meetings and
carefully. Communicates the enough. Cannot always sufficiently members more carefully. Is active outside of meetings, such as in
essence of an idea poorly. Does communicate the essence of an usually able to communicate the preparing and carrying out
not often answer questions. Is idea. Does not always answer essence of an idea. Outside tasks/assignments. Is very helpful to
often unprepared for meetings questions. Is not always prepared meetings his/her contribution is other group members.
and does not always contribute. Is for meetings and does not always usually clear. Properly prepares
hardly ever helpful to other group contribute. Is not always helpful to tasks/assignments. Is helpful to
members. other group members. other group members.
3. Open for Provides hardly ever constructive Provides little constructive Gives constructive feedback to Gives constructive feedback to fellow
feedback feedback to fellow students. feedback to fellow students. Rules fellow students, but could do this students. Rules for giving and
Rules concerning the giving and concerning the giving and receiving more often. Rules for giving and receiving feedback are followed. Is
receiving of feedback are often of feedback are sometimes receiving feedback are usually receptive to the feedback of fellow
ignored. Does not pay attention ignored. Does not always pay followed. Is often receptive to students. Makes use of the feedback
to the feedback given by fellow attention to the feedback given by feedback from fellow students, provided.
students. Does not take into fellow students. but not always. Usually makes
account the feedback that was use of the feedback provided.
given by the tutor.
Working in Teams (Peer Review) – Rubric (overview for student)
Criteria Largely insufficient (<4) Insufficient (5) Sufficient (6-7) Good (8-9)
4. Honouring The agreed tasks are completed The agreed tasks are regularly The agreed tasks are usually The agreed tasks are always
agreements too late and are incomplete most completed too late and are often completed on time and they completed on time and meet
of the time. The student is often incomplete. The student is mostly meet the requirements. requirements. The student is always
absent during meetings. The sometimes absent during meetings. The student is usually present present during meetings. The student
student does not stick to The student frequently dishonors at meetings. The student honors agreements.
honoring agreements. agreements. sometimes has difficulty
honoring agreements.
5. Communication Does not listen actively and does Does not always listen actively and Usually listens actively but does Listens actively and takes the opinion
with fellow not express a personal opinion. does not sufficiently express a not always take the opinion of of others into account. Informs fellow
students Does not inform fellow students personal opinion. Does not fellow students into account. students about progress being made,
about whether progress is being consistently inform fellow students Informs fellow students about explains his/her own opinion, and has
made. about progress being made. progress being made. ideas.

Rubric Student Peer Review

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rubric Student Peer Review

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rubric Student Peer Review

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Working in Teams (Peer Review) – Rubric (overview for student)

You might also like