1657970484 (1)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Madam Deputy Chairman, from the speeches which the hon.

Minister for Planning made in this House and in the other House and

from a perusal of the note which has been circulated to us regarding

the progress that has been made in the Third Five Year Plan and the

various statements of the Government and the Planning

Commission, I have a feeling that the Government of India is trying

to assuage the feeling of dissatisfaction in the country through

promises of bright future, promises of better efforts and general

promise that everything is going to turn out all right and that there

need not be any fear or anxiety in the country. Madam, while saying

this, I realise that the country has made certain progress in the

development of our economy during the last decade. Industrial


production has increased, agricultural production has increased, the

productive capacity has been built up and we have also got

employment opportunities being created. Above all we have gained

valuable experience in the development of our economy, especially

in planning, and these are all to the credit side of the Plan.

Unfortunately, Madam, the price that we have paid for this progress

is rather heavy. The imbalances that we have created are likely to go

out of control unless definite steps are taken to see that the

imbalances are corrected at the earliest opportunity.

The problem of the distribution of income that is generated as a

result of the development efforts in the country is a perennial

question and comes up again and again in one form or the other
before this House and though I realise that no definite opinion is

possible unless we have got some authoritative data and analysis on

the subject, there is clear indication of the fact that if not economic

wealth, at least economic power, is being concentrated in fewer and

fewer hands. As long as economic power is concentrated in such few

hands it will not be possible for us to develop in the manner in which

we like, whatever may be our regulatory and control apparatus,

whatever may be our policy, whatever may be the objectives that we

place before the country. Similarly, the imbalance between the rural

and the urban sector is also increasing. I do not know whether in the

rural areas some income has been pumped in as a result of our

planned development.
It is possible that the well to do peasants, the richer peasants, might

have benefitted as a result of our economic development but as far

as the rural area as a whole is concerned, the disparity and

imbalance is definitely growing and this also a matter of concern. The

very fact that urbanisation takes place at such a rapid rate in our

country is visible proof that the imbalance has been growing with the

result that neither the urban areas not the rural areas are today in a

position to live the life that they were living before our planned

developmental efforts started. Now, there is over-congestion in the

urban areas; the civic amenities are all on the point of breaking down

and the continuously break down with the slightest accident here or

there. The slums are increasing at a rapid rate and unemployment is


increasing. Whatever may be the figures regarding crimes etc. that

may be published by the Government, there is definite impression in

the country that the crime situation is also deteriorating. That is

because of the congestion in the urban areas. Because of the

difficulties due to lack of resources, they are unable to deal with the

problems that arise as a result of this over-congestion and the

problem of law and order become more acute as a result of this

urbanisation.

Thirdly, the question of unemployment has also taken a rather

serious turn and when the Government Spokesman addresses

homilies to others regarding the agitation against high prices and

higher taxes, they completely forget that year by year one earner has
to support more and more people and we have got the authority of

no less a person than the Planning Minister himself to say that the

real income of the earner, at least in the lower income groups, has

not risen and, in spite of that, that earner has to support a larger and

larger number of dependants. There is so much dissatisfaction in the

country that people clamouring against rising prices and rising taxes.

The Planning Minister has given us a frank picture regarding what

has happened in the first year of the Third Plan Period and we are

grateful to him for this frank picture. The figures that he has cited

have given us a clear idea of what is happening to our economy at

the present moment. But he has tried to strike a note of optimism.

He has tried to explain the reasons that are responsible for this state
of affairs and he has also indicated that the Planning Commission is

conscious of all these drawbacks.

You might also like