EXPERIMENT 1 Weight Experiment

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

EXPERIMENT 1

Title: To Compare the Weber's Law in Weight Discrimination of 100 grams and 200
grams.

Classical methods of psychophysics involve the measurement of two types of sensory

thresholds: the absolute threshold, RL (Reiz Limen), the weakest stimulus that is just detectable,

and the difference threshold, DL (Differenz Limen), the smallest stimulus increment that is just

detectable (also called the Just-Noticeable Difference, the JND). Gustav Theodor Fechner

(1801–1887), in Elemente der Psychophysik (Fechner, 1860) introduced three psychophysical

methods for measuring absolute and difference (JND) thresholds: the method of adjustment; the

method of limits; the method of constant stimuli. The purpose of this exercise is to give you

experience with the measurement and computation of the JND for lifted weights using the

method of constant stimuli and to test the predictions of Weber’s Law.

You will determine difference thresholds for weight discrimination using the method of

constant stimuli for two different standard weights: 100 and 200 grams. One of the foundations

of psychophysics is Weber’s Law. It states that the difference limen is a constant proportion of

the standard:

ΔI / I = K (Weber's Law)

In this experiment you will test the hypothesis that Weber’s constant is the same for two different

standard weights, thus validating Weber’s Law.


Method

Participants

A female/male UPSI students in various faculties, aged 20 years and above.

Apparatus

Weight Discrimination instruments. If a blindfolded subject is given two similar shaped

weights and asked to compare, he/she can differentiate better if the difference is more. However

if the difference between the weights is gradually reduced at one point the subject fails to

differentiate between two weights. It consists of a box with a no. of cylinders having different

weights in ascending.

Procedure

In the method of constant stimuli, a standard stimulus is compared a number of times

with other fixed stimuli of slightly different magnitude. When the difference between the

standard and the comparison stimulus is large, the participant nearly always can correctly choose

the heavier of the two weights. When the difference is small, errors are often made. The

difference threshold is the transition point between differences large enough to be easily detected

and those too small to be detected. You will use the method of constant stimuli to measure

participant ability to discriminate small differences in weight using two standard weights:

100!grams and 200!grams. Since there are two different standard weight conditions there are two

possible testing orders.


No of order 1 st 2 nd

1 100g 200g

2 200g 100g

Table 1: Testing orders

The experimenter (E) presents a pair of weights (the standard and one of the test weights

listed on the data sheet) to the participant (P). He/she arranges a support for the preferred arm of

the participant (P) so that his/her hand will extend over one weight. By flexion of the wrist P

should be able to pick up the weight that E has placed in the appropriate position. P should lift

the standard weight first (100 or 200 grams) and then the test weight and judge whether the test

weight was heavier or lighter than the standard. The person recording the data needs to know the

actual weight of the test weight. If the test weight was judged heavier than the standard, a “+”

should be recorded on the data sheet. If the test weight was judged lighter, a “-” should be

recorded. The 11 test weights should be scrambled on the table and presented in a “random”

order. After all 11 are presented the experimenter should shuffle them again and

repeat the presentation of each test weight.

P should be blindfolded, or turn his/her face away so that he/she gets no visual cue as to

which weight is presented. E then gives P the necessary instructions:

1. “When I say, ‘Now,’ lift the standard weight which is directly below your hand, using a wrist

motion. Notice its weight, return it to the table, and lift your hand again. When I repeat,

‘Now,’ do the same with the second weight.”


2. “Report whether or not the test (second) weight seems heavier than the standard weight. Do

not give ‘equal’ judgments. Guess if you are not certain.”

3. E should present the weights in pairs, placing first the standard weight and then a comparison

weight directly below P’s hand. E should try to develop a regular rhythm. Stimuli should be

presented for 1–2 sec. duration, separated by an equal period of time. The intervals between

pairs should be longer. Allow the subject to rest from time to time. At least 10 presentations of

each test stimulus should be made. The order of the test weights should be randomized.

Results

You will test the Hypothesis that the value of the Weber fraction is the same for 100 grams as for

200 grams. The most appropriate analysis is a repeated measures. Your lab report should be

brief and contain five sections: Abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion.

These sections should conform to the American Psychological Association (APA) style

(American Psychological Association, the same with the example report). The results

section should have the figure or graph and an appropriate result of statistical test. Do

your results support Weber’s Law?


Table1: Method of Constant Stimuli Data Sheet — 100 gram Standard

Trial No 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125

10

Frequency
of Test
“Heavier

Frequency
of Test
“Lighter”

Note: The judgment of the observer should be which weight (Test or Standard) is
heavier.
Table2: Method of Constant Stimuli Data Sheet — 200 gram Standard

Trial No 175 180 185 190 195 200 205 210 215 220 225

10

Frequency
of Test
“Heavier

Frequency
of Test
“Lighter”

Note: The judgment of the observer should be which weight (Test or Standard) is
heavier.

Recommended reading:

Mohsin, S. M. (1975). Experimental psychology. New Delhi: Orient Longman Ltd (pp.

55-65)

Levin, I. P. & Hinrichs, J. V. (2000). Experimental psychology: Contemporary methods


and applications. Iowa: Brown and Benchmark (92-98)

You might also like