Nitrate Chromotropic Acid West1966
Nitrate Chromotropic Acid West1966
Nitrate Chromotropic Acid West1966
EXPERIMENTAL
Pveliminavy ex:perimen.ts
The absorption maximum of the yellow reaction product of nitrate with
chromotropic acid was found to be at 410 m,u, Preliminary experiments were made
by pipetting 2.5 ml of nitrate solution into ro-ml volumetric flasks and diluting to
3 ml by adding 0.5 ml of double-distilled water. Next, I ml of concentrated sulfuric
acid Was added, the solution was swirled and the flasks were allowed to stand for
4 min in a tray of cold water at IO-2o”, in which the water level was slightly above
that in the flask. One ml of chromotropic reagent was added to each flask which
was swirled and then allowed to stand for an additional 3 min. The volume of
solution in each flask was next made up to IO ml by the addition of concentrated
A+lal. C/bit?&
Actn, 35 (Ig66) 317-324
4400’
Ju l otter 24 Iv*.
-_________
0.150 ,’
0.100
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Ho UII
Fig. I. Vnriatiorl of absorbnncc with respect to time and the influcncc of chloritlc on color clcvcl-
opmcnt.
(1) 15 mg of nitrate/l and no chloride;
(II) 15 mg of nitrate/l with zoo mg of chloritlc/l;
(III) 15 mg of nitrate/l with 400 mg of chloritlc/l;
(IV) 15 mg of nitrate/l with IOOO mg of chloride/l;
(V) 20 mg of nitrate/l with 2000 rng of chloritlc/l;
(VI) 9.15 mg of nitrate/l with 4000 mg of chloritlc/l ant1 zo mg of antirnony(II1).
sulfuric acid, the flasks were stoppered and the contents mixed thoroughly. Sufficient
heat was developed to promote the reaction without the solutions boiling or spattering.
After the flasks were cooled to room temperature the volume was again adjusted to
IO ml. Blank experiments were run substituting double-distilled water instead of
nitrate solution.
Studies of the reaction revealed that the maximum color was devclopcd
within IO min and was found to be stable for 24 h as shown in Fig. I. The temperature
of the cooling bath was found not to be critical and may vary anywhere from IO to
2o”. Heat developed during mixing has no harmful effect as w<as shown by re-
producibility of the final absorbances. The cooling bath served simply to dissipate
sufficient heat to avoid boiling of the solutions with resultant formation of bubbles.
Maximum and constant absorbance was obtained when the total aqueous phase was
between 2.7 and 3.1 ml and the final volume was made up to IO ml using concentrated
sulfuric acid. The mole ratio method showed that two moles of nitrate react with one
mole of chromotropic acid.
Stfcdy off~otential interferences. Substances which ordinarily interfere seriously
in nitrate determinations such as nitrite, oxidizing agents, chloride and iron(II1)
were studied specially.
Chlorine and certain other oxidizing agents can react with chromotropic acid
producing yellow products. The absorption spectrum appears similar to the nitrate-
chromotropic acid system with the maximum shifted to 460 rnp. However, addition
of excess sodium sulfite before the addition of the reagent completely eliminated
Oxidnut (M.trO.r-)
0.0 0.0 I.2 mg sona- Cl.015 Mank
10 0.0 0.620 O.<JO5
40 0.0 1.2 ni& SO33- 0.015 0.000
40 3.0 1.2 mg S&2- 0.069 0*0.54
40 5.5 I .2 rng sag- 0.113 0.098
Irotr(lZI) (+ cldoridcn)
0.0 0.0 IO rng SW+ 0.015 13lank
-10 0.0 0.115 0. IO0
-10 0.0 IO mg SW+ 0.015 0.000
40 0.8 10 lllfi sw+ 0.030 o.org
u Acltlctl with the iron in cnch cnsc in the amollnt of 1000 m&/l.
the intcrfercncc due to oxidizing agents, as shown in Table I, and was without
influence on the nitrate-chromotropic acid reaction.
Nitrite produced an intense color similar to that produced by nitrate. The
absorption maximum in this case occurred at 440 mp. Addition of urea before the
addition of the reagent eliminated all nitrite as nitrogen gas, yet did not affect the
nitrate-chromotropic acid system. This provided an effective and simple means for
avoiding interferences clue to nitrite.
Chloriclc may react with nitrate in highly aciclic solutions giving the following
products
HN03 c 3 HCl -+ NOCl + Cla + z HnO.
This is a potential disaclvantage inherent in all methods employing high acid con-
centrations. In the present case the products react with chromotropic acid and might
account for the increase in sensitivity as observed by WEST AND LYLES, in which
chloride ancl chromotropic acid were introduced simultaneously into a nitrate solution.
The color cleveloped was similar to that produced with nitrate and reagent alone
but was not stable. In Fig. I, plots II, III, and IV show the chloride interference at
the 15 mg/l nitrate level when the study was carried out according to the preliminary
procedure. The rate of color development was suppressed hy chloride initially, since
nitrate and chloride reacted with each other in acidic solution before the reagent
was added. It can be seen from Fig. I, plot IV, that with IOOO mg/l of chloride, more
than son/0 of the nitrate reacted with chloride when such mixtures were kept for
4 min in a I :2 (v/v) sulfuric acid-water medium,
Recause of the unreliability of the reactions involving both nitrate and
chloride with chromotropic acid, a procedure which would eliminate chloride or the
effect of chloride was indicated. Precipitation of chloride would be effective but very
tedious. The elegance of masking techniques was tempting but challenging. However,
gratifying results were obtained using the sequestering action of antimony and it has
been established as an effective and convenient means for conditioning the test
reaction.
Among possible masking agents for chloride that were studied, mercury(II)
and antimony(W) each showed promise. However, mercury could not be used in
the present system because it was easily reduced by the reagent. Fortunately, anti-
mony was found to mask chloride so completely that true test colors developed and
remained stable even after 24 h (Fig. I, plots V and VI). Antimony did not interfere
with the nitrate-chromotropic acid system, yet it effectively masked up to 2000 mg
of chloride/l when used in the recommended procedure (Table II).
Iron(III) causes serious interference in many calorimetric procedures due to
the yellow color of its chloro-complex. In the prcscnt method this interference was
overcome by the addition of antimony which completely discharged the color by
demasking the chloroferrate(III) complex. Up to 40 mg of iron(III) per 1 showed no
in terfercncc (Table I).
Recommended procedwe
Pipet 2.5 ml of nitrate solution (standard or sample) having a nitrate content
in the range 0.2-20 mg/l into dry xo-ml volumetric flasks. To each flask add I drop of
sulfite-urea solution, place the flasks in a tray of cold water (10-20’) and add 2 ml
of the antimony sulfate solution. The flasks should be swirled during the addition
of each solution. After the mixtures have stood in the bath for about 4 mm, add I
ml of chromotropic acid reagent, swirl the flasks again and then allow to stand in
the cooling bath for an additional 3 min. Next add concentrated sulfuric acid to
TABLE 11
ARSORUANCIE OF NITHATE-CHROMOTHOPIC ACID SYSTEhl
adjust the volume to the ro-ml mark, stopper the flasks and mix the contents by
inverting them 4 times. Finally allow the solutions to stand for 45 min at room tem-
perature and again adjust the volume to the IO-ml mark with concentrated sulfuric
acid. Final mixing should be done very gently so as not to introduce gas bubbles.
Double-distilled water was substituted for nitrate solution for running blank exper-
iments.
The absorbance reading should be taken 15 min or more after the last adjust-
mcnt of volume. The cell should be rinsed with the solution and then filled carefully
so as to avoid trapping bubbles. For this operation it was found expedient to keep
the cell in a slanting position (30” to horizontal) with a ground side facing up and
pouring the solution very slowly down the side of the cell. The absorbance may be
measured in a Beckman DU or other suitable spectrophotometer at 410 rnp using
water in the reference cell.
TABLE III
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF AIISORBANCE AT VARIOUS LEVELS OF NITRATR
TABLE IV
ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES
SUMMARY
ZUSAMhlENPASSUNG
I I-l. M. I~OSCII. A. 13. ROSENPIEL~, Ii. HUSTON, I-1. 12. SHIPhlAN AND I<. %I. WOOD~ARD, J. Am.
CVufw Works Assoc., 42 (1950) 161.
2 J. W. C~row AND M. S. JOIINSTOND, .4,1ral. Cllirw A&r, 27 (rg62) ‘141.
3 17. I-lARI<OW, J. Ckc?~. .SoC., 55) (1891) 320.
4 A. M. G. MACIIONALD, ltrd. Ckuwz. Rlf~., 31 (1955) 566.
5 I-I. BARNIIS, /I~rnl.vst, 75 (1950) 388.
0 1;. I_. ZQSHER, I<. rt. IIII~RT AND H. I3xcKhf.m, .rlmzl. Chem., 30 (~958) 1972.
7 A. ivl. HARTELY AND 1L 1. As~r, J. Aw. CV/rrlcv Il'orks Assoc., 52 (~gbo) 255.
8 A. M. HARTELY AND R. 1. &XI, rl w-zl. Clrew., 35 (1963) 1207.
g 1-I. A. C. MONTGOMERY ANI) J. F. DYMOCK. klrrcrlysl. 87 (19Gz) 374.
IO J. C. SWAIN, Clrcm. I&. (Lodon). 16 (1957) 479.
I I R. BASTAIN, IC. WELXRLING AND Ii. P,\LILLA, iltial. Cltcna.. 29 (1957) 1795.
12 R. MULLER AND 0. WEDEMANN, I’owr Wasscv, 22 (1955) 247.
13 A. GIRANDVAL AND H. LAJOUS. J. Ckens. Sot., 48 (1885) 1903,
14 C. M. JOI~NSON AND A. Unwc~r, Awul. Cl~o~t., 22 (1950) 1526.
15 M. J, TAI~,\s. A?&. Chem.. 32 (1950) 1020.
16 R. lDra~sc~i, Mikvockinz. Ada, IO (1956) 1490.
17 I>. W. W. ANDRDWS, /I?ia1ysI, 8g ( I#.~) 730.
18 P. W. WIIST AND 1’. SARMA, Mikrockitrr. Acts, 4 (1957) 50G.
ICJ 1’. w. WEST AND G. L. LYLE, nncil. Chim. Acta. 23 (1gGo) 227.
20 J. J. I~ATTEN, Aural. Ckem.. 36 (rgG.+) 939.