Case 8 People Vs Tan GR No. 117321

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs.
HERSON TAN y VERZO

G.R. No. 117321; February 11, 1998
FACTS:
Tricycle driver Freddie Saavedra went to see his wife, Delfa, to inform her that he will drive Lito
Amido and appellant Herson Tan to Barangay Maligaya. It was the last time that Freddie was seen
alive. His body was later found sprawled on a diversion road with fourteen stab wounds.
Subsequently, Lt. Santos, Cpl. Numeriano Aguilar and Pat. Rolando Alandy invited appellant in
connection with the instant case and with respect to two other robbery cases reported in Lucena
City. During their conversation, appellant allegedly gave an explicit account of what actually
transpired in the case at bar. He narrated that he and co-accused Amido were responsible for the
loss of the motorcycle and the consequent death of Saavedra. Moreover, he averred that they sold
the motorcycle to a certain Danny Teves of Barrio Summit, Muntinlupa. With the help of appellant
as a guide, the Lucena PNP immediately dispatched a team to retrieve the same.
Tan and Amido were charged with the crime of highway robbery with murder.
Lt. Carlos, on cross-examination, testified that when he invited appellant to their headquarters,
he had no warrant for his arrest. In the course thereof, he informed the latter that he was a
suspect, not only in the instant case, but also in two other robbery cases allegedly committed in
Lucena City.
In the belief that they were merely conversing inside the police station, he admitted that he did not
inform appellant of his constitutional rights to remain silent and to the assistance of counsel; nor
did he reduce the supposed confession to writing.
In a decision dated April 21, 1994, the trial court convicted appellant.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the confession of the appellant, given before a police investigator upon invitation
and without the benefit of counsel, is admissible in evidence against him.
HELD:
No. It is well-settled that the Constitution abhors an uncounseled confession or admission and
whatever information is derived therefrom shall be regarded as inadmissible in evidence against
the confessant. R.A. No. 7438 reinforced the constitutional mandate protecting the rights of
persons under custodial investigation, a pertinent provision of which reads: As used in this Act,
"custodial investigation" shall include the practice of issuing an "invitation" to a person who is
investigated in connection with an offense he is suspected to have committed, without prejudice to
the liability of the "inviting" officer for any violation of law. Custodial investigation involves any
questioning initiated by law enforcement authorities after a person is taken into custody or
otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant manner. The rules on custodial
investigation begin to operate as soon as the investigation ceases to be a general inquiry into an
unsolved crime and begins to focus a particular suspect, the suspect is taken into custody, and the
police carries out a process of interrogations that tends itself to eliciting incriminating statements
that the rule begins to operate.
Under the Constitution and existing law and jurisprudence, a confession to be admissible must
satisfy the following requirements: (1) it must be voluntary; (2) it must be made with the assistance
of competent and independent counsel; (3) it must be express; and (4) it must be in writing.
FALLO:
The decision of the Regional Trial Court of Gumaca, Quezon (Branch 62) is REVERSED and SET
ASIDE. Appellant HERSON TAN y VERZO is hereby ACQUITTED of the crime charged and his
immediate release from confinement is hereby ordered, unless there is any other lawful cause for
continued detention.
Principle:
Article III, Section 12, paragraphs (1) and (3) of the Constitution provides:
"xxx xxx xxx
Sec. 12.
(1) Any person under investigation for the commission of an offense shall have the right to be
informed of his right to remain silent and to have competent and independent counsel preferably of
his own choice. If the person cannot afford the services of counsel, he must be provided with one.
These rights cannot be waived except in writing and in the presence of counsel.
xxx xxx xxx
(3) Any confession or admission obtained in violation of this or the preceding section shall be
inadmissible against him."
Republic Act No. 7438 (R.A. No. 7438):

"As used in this Act, 'custodial investigation' shall include the practice of issuing an 'invitation' to a
person who is investigated in connection with an offense he is suspected to have committed,
without prejudice to the liability of the 'inviting' officer for any violation of law."

Case 8 People Vs Tan GR No. 117321

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 8 People Vs Tan GR No. 117321

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 8 People Vs Tan GR No. 117321

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs.

HERSON TAN y VERZO

xxx xxx xxx

Republic Act No. 7438 (R.A. No. 7438):

You might also like