Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 13 views

    E Tool Research Proposal Presentation

    Uploaded by

    Rheizhelle Anne Lagura
    This document provides an evaluation tool for oral defenses of research proposals by nursing students at St. Scholastica's College in Tacloban, Philippines. It outlines a scoring rubric across four categories: visual aids, mastery of content, critical thinking, and overall presentation. Each category lists several indicators that will be scored on a scale of 1 to 4. The document also provides guidelines for the oral defense, including time limits for presentation and Q&A. Recommendations from the panel will be provided to students after the defense.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    E Tool Research Proposal Presentation

    Uploaded by

    Rheizhelle Anne Lagura
    13 views3 pages
    This document provides an evaluation tool for oral defenses of research proposals by nursing students at St. Scholastica's College in Tacloban, Philippines. It outlines a scoring rubric across four categories: visual aids, mastery of content, critical thinking, and overall presentation. Each category lists several indicators that will be scored on a scale of 1 to 4. The document also provides guidelines for the oral defense, including time limits for presentation and Q&A. Recommendations from the panel will be provided to students after the defense.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides an evaluation tool for oral defenses of research proposals by nursing students at St. Scholastica's College in Tacloban, Philippines. It outlines a scoring rubric across four categories: visual aids, mastery of content, critical thinking, and overall presentation. Each category lists several indicators that will be scored on a scale of 1 to 4. The document also provides guidelines for the oral defense, including time limits for presentation and Q&A. Recommendations from the panel will be provided to students after the defense.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    13 views3 pages

    E Tool Research Proposal Presentation

    Uploaded by

    Rheizhelle Anne Lagura
    This document provides an evaluation tool for oral defenses of research proposals by nursing students at St. Scholastica's College in Tacloban, Philippines. It outlines a scoring rubric across four categories: visual aids, mastery of content, critical thinking, and overall presentation. Each category lists several indicators that will be scored on a scale of 1 to 4. The document also provides guidelines for the oral defense, including time limits for presentation and Q&A. Recommendations from the panel will be provided to students after the defense.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    ST.

    SCHOLASTICA’S COLLEGE TACLOBAN


    Maharlika Highway, Brgy. Campetic, Palo, Leyte

    COLLEGE OF NURSING

    Performance Evaluation Tool


    Oral Defense for Research Proposal
    2nd Semester, AY 2020-2021

    Section/Group No.___________________ Date of Defense: ______________


    Group Members:
    ____________________________ _______________________________
    ___________________________ _______________________________
    ____________________________ _______________________________

    Title of the Study:


    __________________________________________________________________
    __________________________________________________________________

    Scale for Group Rating:


    4 – Competent (Requirement evidently exceeded)
    3 – Acceptable (Requirement evidently complete)
    2 – Needs Improvement (Requirement evidently incomplete)
    1 – Unacceptable (Requirements lack evidence)

    Indicators Scale
    4 3 2 1
    A. Visual Aids (10%)
    1. Artistic design and creativity without being
    distractive.
    2. Number of slides adequate for effective
    presentation.
    3. Relevance of the resources to the subject
    matter/theme/activity.
    4. Use of colors sparingly and with taste.
    5. Professional looking visual aid with
    emphasis on key points.
    Raw Score x 100 x 10%
    Total Score ______________

    B. Mastery of Content (30%)


    1. Provides substantive information regarding
    the research problem, as to its goals, objective,
    background and purpose.
    2. Command of related literature.
    3. Discussion of research methodology and
    statistical treatment.
    4. Discussion of data collection procedure
    5. Discussion on the relevant ethical
    considerations
    Raw Score x 100 x 30% _________
    Total Score

    C. Critical Thinking (40%)


    1. Evidence of original thinking and logical
    order is present.
    2. Responses are pertinent to the question/s
    asked.
    3. Responses are supported with sound/valid
    evidence.
    4. Demonstrate depth of understanding of the
    research.
    5. Commendable attitude to questions asked.
    Raw Score x 100 x 40% _________
    Total Score

    D. Overall Presentation (20%)


    1. Presentation is smooth and flows logically.
    2. Demonstrate good command of English
    language, word choice and voice.
    3. Presenter demonstrates confidence during
    presentation.
    4. Coordination and team work among group
    members is evident.
    5. Self-presentation (honesty) and lively
    interaction with the panellists.
    Raw Score x 100 x 20%
    Total Score ______________

    Total = ___________ %

    Recommendations:
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________

    ____________________________________
    Signature over printed name of Panel Member
    Date:______________________
    GUIDELINES:
    1. Students are allowed to present their proposal via powerpoint for 15 minutes.
    2. The QandA will run at a maximum of 1 hour. After the QandA, a breakout is given for
    the panellists to discuss their recommendations.
    3. The Adviser and the students shall join again for the final feedback of the presentation
    and the results of their grades.
    4. Should there be a concern to reconvene, it shall be discussed immediately as to the
    schedule that will be allotted.

    You might also like