Actue Management of Pneumonia in Adults Patienit
Actue Management of Pneumonia in Adults Patienit
Actue Management of Pneumonia in Adults Patienit
CME Article
Bacteria including
Empyema Haemodynamics Anatomical
tuberculosis
Viruses
Respiratory
(e.g. influenza, Lung abscess Neurological
system
coronaviruses)
Fungi including
Extrapulmonary
Pneumocystis Renal system Immunological
abscess
jirovecii
Figure 1: Chart shows the approach to pneumonia in adult patients. aDifferential diagnoses of pneumonia: extrapulmonary infection (e.g. infective
endocarditis, liver abscess), heart failure, cancer, interstitial lung disease, non‑infective pneumonia (e.g. organising pneumonia, eosinophilic pneumonia),
pulmonary embolism. bDS‑CRB‑65: D‑criterion (comorbid diseases) defined as the presence of one or more of the following: congestive heart failure,
chronic renal disease, chronic liver disease, cerebrovascular disease, other chronic neurological disease or active malignancy; S‑criterion defined
as oxygen saturation of <90% measured by pulse oximetry at admission or on first physician contact without oxygen supplementation; C‑criterion
defined as confusion; R‑criterion defined as respiratory rate ≥30/min; B‑criterion defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or diastolic blood
pressure ≤60 mmHg; and 65‑criterion defined as age ≥65 years. cConsider steroids for (a) patients with an ongoing need for vasopressor therapy;
(b) patients with Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia who have arterial oxygen partial pressure <70 mmHg or peripheral oxygen saturation of <92%
in room air and (c) patients with COVID‑19 pneumonia who require either invasive mechanical ventilation or oxygen. dRelated conditions leading
to pneumonia: (a) anatomical (e.g. oral hygiene, head/neck cancer, tracheoesophageal fistula, endobronchial obstruction, abdominal distension);
(b) neurological (e.g. stroke, neuromuscular disease, alcohol/drug intoxication); and (c) immunological (e.g. poorly controlled diabetes mellitus,
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, leucopenia, immunoglobulin deficiency).
clinicians to provide good care. Rapid triaging of pneumonia S‑criterion defined as oxygen saturation of <90% as measured
can be done with one of several risk scores (e.g. Pneumonia by pulse oximetry at admission or on first physician contact
Severity Index, CURB‑65 and the Infectious Diseases Society without oxygen supplementation; C‑criterion defined as
of America/American Thoracic Society [IDSA/ATS] 2007 confusion; R‑criterion defined as respiratory rate ≥30/min;
criteria).[15,16] It must be emphasised that risk stratification B‑criterion defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or
using any score is imperfect[15‑18] and requires clinician gestalt diastolic blood pressure ≤60 mmHg; and 65‑criterion defined
as a safety net. Additionally, risk stratification by itself works as age ≥65 years. With wider availability of home‑based
only when its result is promptly linked to appropriate treatment pulse oximetry and digital blood pressure monitors, this
and disposition. score may even be applied via telemedicine. CRB‑65 ≥1
Examples of risk stratification tools for pneumonia that can be or DS‑CRB‑65 ≥2 predicts increased 30‑day mortality and
used without the need for laboratory testing are the CRB‑65[19] necessitates closely monitored management, most commonly
and the DS‑CRB‑65[20] scores [Table 3]. One point is assigned in an inpatient or, more recently, in a hospital‑at‑home setting.
to each of the following six criteria for the DS‑CRB‑65 score:
D‑criterion (comorbid diseases) defined as the presence of one ANTIMICROBIAL CHOICE FOR PNEUMONIA
or more of the following — congestive heart failure, chronic Pneumonia is caused by one or more pathogens which can
renal disease, chronic liver disease, cerebrovascular disease, directly damage the lung tissue. Early administration of
other chronic neurological disease or active malignancy; antimicrobials reduces the microbial load and blunts direct
pathogenic attack. Empirical broad‑spectrum antimicrobials tuberculosis spread. At the same time, in such countries,
should be administered based on best available data. Such empirical use of respiratory fluoroquinolones (e.g. levofloxacin,
data include knowledge on local epidemiology and hospital moxifloxacin) should be avoided as these medications are also
antibiograms. used to treat tuberculosis. Using a single antituberculosis agent
leads to drug resistance and delays culture positivity should
Studies conducted before the coronavirus disease 2019
subsequent sputum testing be done.
(COVID‑19) pandemic in the Asia‑Pacific showed that
community‑acquired bacterial pneumonia was predominantly Immunocompromised patients are susceptible to myriad
d u e t o S t re p t o c o c c u s p n e u m o n i a e , M y c o p l a s m a pathogens. For example, patients with poorly controlled
pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Chlamydophila diabetes mellitus living in the tropics may be infected
pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus, though by melioidosis. Patients with human immunodeficiency
community‑acquired methicillin‑resistant S. aureus remained virus (HIV) and low CD4 counts may get Pneumocystis jirovecii
uncommon.[21] For severe cases, Klebsiella pneumoniae, pneumonia. In non‑HIV patients on long‑term steroids and
Burkholderia pseudomallei and severe influenza pneumonia other immunomodulatory agents (e.g. biological agents), both
were additional aetiologic considerations. Therefore, to tuberculosis and P. jirovecii pneumonia should be considered.
empirically treat community‑acquired bacterial pneumonia, Highly immunocompromised patients, like those who have
β‑lactam and macrolide combination therapy would generally recently undergone haematopoietic stem cell transplantation,
be sufficient, with broader gram‑negative cover and an may even be infected by fungi/moulds (e.g. Candida,
anti‑influenza agent also required for severe cases.[12] Aspergillus, Mucor) and parasites (e.g. Strongyloides).
During the COVID‑19 pandemic, many cases of
community‑acquired pneumonia were due to SARS‑CoV‑2. STEROID USE FOR PNEUMONIA
While treatment with antibiotics is commonly recommended The immune response to infection is an overlap of proinflammatory
for bacterial pneumonia, it would not be necessary in most and anti‑inflammatory processes, and the net effect could be
instances of mild‑to‑moderate COVID‑19 pneumonia. Another hyperinflammatory or immunosuppressive.[23] Apart from
instance where antibiotics may be withheld is mild aspiration direct pathogenic attack, excessive inflammation can also lead
pneumonia due to chemical pneumonitis.[22] to organ damage. Steroids and other anti‑inflammatory agents
(e.g. interleukin‑6 inhibitors) may have a role to mitigate
Certain clinical scenarios deserve special consideration
infection‑induced inflammation. However, these drugs are
to guide the identification of possible pathogens and drug
double‑edged swords. Excessive anti‑inflammatory agent use raises
resistance [Table 2]. In countries with mid‑to‑high tuberculosis
secondary infection risk and worsens overall clinical outcomes,
prevalence, careful attention to the chest radiograph is required
especially with concurrent infection‑induced immunosuppression.
to look for active pulmonary tuberculosis. The presence of
patchy infiltrates or cavitation in the upper lobes necessitates Nonetheless, appropriate patient selection and steroid dosing
early referral for sputum testing. This not only benefits the can improve clinical outcomes. A recommended indication for
patient clinically, but also improves public health by limiting steroids is pneumonia with refractory septic shock;[12] patients
or neurological anomalies. Anatomical anomalies include could develop despite appropriate antibiotics, and the patient
head/neck cancer (before or after treatment with radiotherapy), may require further chest imaging and drainage.
tracheoesophageal fistula (e.g. due to oesophageal cancer) and
endobronchial obstruction (e.g. due to foreign body aspiration TAKE‑HOME MESSAGES
or endobronchial cancer). For the latter, a fixed and localised 1. Pneumonia is a clinical diagnosis marked by a combination
wheeze may be detected on physical examination. Neurological of cough, phlegm production, fever and lung crepitations,
anomalies affecting bulbar function (e.g. stroke, neuromuscular which suggest infection of the lung parenchyma.
disease, alcohol/drug intoxication) can present with audible 2. Even without any chest imaging or microbiological
gurgling. testing, presumed pneumonia based on clinical features
alone needs prompt attention from frontline clinicians.
Both anatomical and neurological anomalies exist in
3. The general approach to pneumonia in adult patients requires
post‑operative pneumonia, which occurs after 0.5%–28% of consideration of differential diagnoses, risk stratification,
general surgical operations and 2%–54% of cardiothoracic appropriate antimicrobials, source control, organ
surgical procedures.[29] High‑risk patients may be identified support and treating related conditions (e.g. anatomical,
before non‑cardiothoracic surgery using a variety of clinical neurological and immunological conditions).
tools.[30,31] Anatomically, abdominal splinting due to ascites or 4. Rapid triaging of pneumonia can be done with one of
bowel obstruction may result in macroaspiration if not adequately several risk scores (e.g. CRB-65, DS-CRB-65).
decompressed. Neurologically, post‑operative analgesia may 5. Patients with uncomplicated pneumonia should complete
impair cough and secretion clearance, leading to atelectasis and a short course of antibiotics, typically over 5–7 days.
pneumonia in patients undergoing prolonged bedrest.
Closing Vignette
Immunological suppression not only makes the patient The patient was diagnosed with community‑acquired
vulnerable to pneumonia, but also increases the chance pneumonia. Based on her low blood pressure of 80/50 mmHg
of less‑common infections. Some conditions leading to and peripheral oxygen saturation of 89% in room air, her
immunological suppression are modifiable. Poorly controlled DS‑CRB‑65 score was 2. Intravenous normal saline 500 mL
diabetes mellitus requires glucose control while avoiding and supplemental oxygen via nasal prongs were administered.
hypoglycaemia, and a glucose target range of 7.8–10 mmol/L is An ambulance was called to bring her to the nearest emergency
reasonable in critically ill diabetic patients with pneumonia.[32] department. Her blood pressure improved to 120/90 mmHg
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome requires early institution after a further 1,000 mL of normal saline was administered.
of antiretroviral therapy. Leucopenia may be reversed using She was also given intravenous amoxicillin–clavulanic acid
granulocyte colony‑stimulating factor, while immunoglobulin and oral azithromycin and admitted to the general ward. Her
deficiency may be overcome with immunoglobulin infusion. initial chest X‑ray showed right‑sided consolidation and no
pleural effusion. Blood cultures did not have any bacterial
FOLLOW‑UP AFTER THE ACUTE EPISODE OF growth. Polymerase chain reaction tests for COVID‑19,
PNEUMONIA influenza and tuberculosis were negative. Her fever resolved on
Patients who receive appropriate therapy for pneumonia should the third day of hospitalisation, and she was discharged from
improve clinically within 48–72 h,[12,14] though complete
the hospital with another 4 days of oral amoxicillin–clavulanic
acid. Follow‑up chest X‑ray at 2 months showed complete
disease resolution takes a longer time. Post‑pneumonia cough
resolution of the right‑sided consolidation.
may persist for several weeks. Decreased physical function
may continue for months, necessitating graduated return
Financial support and sponsorship
to pre‑illness exercise levels. Radiological resolution takes
Nil.
2–3 months for most patients, and follow‑up chest radiographs
may be done then.[33] Persistent radiological abnormalities Conflicts of interest
should prompt consideration of pulmonary tuberculosis, which See KC is the handling editor of the PACC series.
is endemic in Singapore, and alternative diagnoses like lung
Kay Choong See1, MRCP, MPH, Yie Hui Lau2, MBBS, MMed (Anaes)
cancer in a patient with risk factors (e.g. smoking/elderly). 1
Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine,
Patients who improve clinically should complete a short National University Hospital, 2Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care
and Pain Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
course of antibiotics, typically over 5–7 days.[12‑14] If culture
results are available, these should be used to de‑escalate Correspondence: Dr. Kay Choong See,
broad‑spectrum antibiotics. Patients who do not improve Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine,
within 48–72 h of receiving appropriate empirical treatment National University Hospital, 1E Kent Ridge Road,
NUHS Tower Block Level 10, 119228, Singapore.
should be re‑evaluated for differential diagnoses and for the E‑mail: [email protected]
development of complications of pneumonia. The concepts
outlined in Figure 1 can be revisited. For instance, empyema Received: 27 Mar 2022 Accepted: 31 Jul 2022 Published: 28 Feb 2023
REFERENCES factors for mortality due to pneumonia among adults from different
age groups in Singapore and mortality predictions based on PSI and
1. Strom JJ, Haugen PS, Hansen MP, Graumann O, Jensen MBB, CURB‑65. Singapore Med J 2018;59:190‑8.
Aakjaer Andersen C. Accuracy of lung ultrasonography in the hands 19. McNally M, Curtain J, O’Brien KK, Dimitrov BD, Fahey T. Validity
of non‑imaging specialists to diagnose and assess the severity of of British Thoracic Society guidance (the CRB‑65 rule) for predicting
community‑acquired pneumonia in adults: A systematic review. BMJ the severity of pneumonia in general practice: Systematic review and
Open 2020;10:e036067. meta‑analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2010;60:e423‑33.
2. Ebell MH, Bentivegna M, Cai X, Hulme C, Kearney M. Accuracy of 20. Dwyer R, Hedlund J, Henriques‑Normark B, Kalin M. Improvement of
biomarkers for the diagnosis of adult community‑acquired pneumonia: CRB‑65 as a prognostic tool in adult patients with community‑acquired
A meta‑analysis. Acad Emerg Med 2020;27:195‑206. pneumonia. BMJ Open Respir Res 2014;1:e000038.
3. Kamat IS, Ramachandran V, Eswaran H, Guffey D, Musher DM. 21. Song JH, Huh K, Chung DR. Community‑acquired pneumonia in the
Procalcitonin to distinguish viral from bacterial pneumonia: A systematic Asia‑Pacific Region. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2016;37:839‑54.
review and meta‑analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2020;70:538‑42. 22. Mandell LA, Niederman MS. Aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med
4. Gentilotti E, De Nardo P, Cremonini E, Gorska A, Mazzaferri F, 2019;380:651‑63.
Canziani LM, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of point‑of‑care tests in acute 23. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D. Sepsis‑induced
community‑acquired lower respiratory tract infections. A systematic immunosuppression: From cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy. Nat
review and meta‑analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022;28:13‑22. Rev Immunol 2013;13:862‑74.
5. Salzer HJF, Schafer G, Hoenigl M, Gunther G, Hoffmann C, 24. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM,
Kalsdorf B, et al. Clinical, diagnostic, and treatment disparities between French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines
HIV‑infected and non‑HIV‑infected immunocompromised patients with for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med
pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia. Respiration 2018;96:52‑65. 2021;47:1181‑247.
6. Shimada T, Noguchi Y, Jackson JL, Miyashita J, Hayashino Y, 25. Lemiale V, Debrumetz A, Delannoy A, Alberti C, Azoulay E. Adjunctive
Kamiya T, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis: Urinary antigen steroid in HIV‑negative patients with severe Pneumocystis pneumonia.
tests for legionellosis. Chest 2009;136:1576‑85. Respir Res 2013;14:87.
7. Del Rio‑Pertuz G, Gutierrez JF, Triana AJ, Molinares JL, 26. Group RC, Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, et al.
Robledo‑Solano AB, Meza JL, et al. Usefulness of sputum gram stain Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid‑19. N Engl J Med
for etiologic diagnosis in community‑acquired pneumonia: A systematic 2021;384:693‑704.
review and meta‑analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2019;19:403. 27. Villar J, Ferrando C, Martinez D, Ambros A, Munoz T, Soler JA, et al.
8. Steingart KR, Ng V, Henry M, Hopewell PC, Ramsay A, Cunningham J, Dexamethasone treatment for the acute respiratory distress syndrome:
et al. Sputum processing methods to improve the sensitivity of smear A multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med
microscopy for tuberculosis: A systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;8:267‑76.
2006;6:664‑74. 28. Gaudry S, Palevsky PM, Dreyfuss D. Extracorporeal kidney‑replacement
9. Zifodya JS, Kreniske JS, Schiller I, Kohli M, Dendukuri N, therapy for acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med 2022;386:964‑75.
Schumacher SG, et al. Xpert ultra versus xpert MTB/RIF for 29. Chughtai M, Gwam CU, Mohamed N, Khlopas A, Newman JM, Khan R,
pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with et al. The epidemiology and risk factors for postoperative pneumonia.
presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev J Clin Med Res 2017;9:466‑75.
2021;2:CD009593. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009593.pub4. 30. Laporta ML, Kruthiventi SC, Mantilla CB, Johnson RL,
10. Au WY, Cheung PPH. Diagnostic performances of common nucleic Sprung J, Portner ER, et al. Three risk stratification tools and
acid tests for SARS‑CoV‑2 in hospitals and clinics: A systematic review postoperative pneumonia after noncardiothoracic surgery. Am Surg
and meta‑analysis. Lancet Microbe 2021;2:e704‑14. 2021;87:1207‑13.
11. Collaborators GBDLRI. Estimates of the global, regional, and national 31. Kokotovic D, Degett TH, Ekeloef S, Burcharth J. The ARISCAT score
morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of lower respiratory infections in is a promising model to predict postoperative pulmonary complications
195 countries, 1990‑2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden after major emergency abdominal surgery: An external validation in a
of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:1191‑210. Danish cohort. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022;48:3863‑7.
12. Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, Anzueto A, Brozek J, Crothers K, 32. See KC. Glycemic targets in critically ill adults: A mini‑review. World J
et al. Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community‑acquired Diabetes 2021;12:1719‑30.
pneumonia. An official clinical practice guideline of the American 33. Bruns AH, Oosterheert JJ, Prokop M, Lammers JW, Hak E,
Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Hoepelman AI. Patterns of resolution of chest radiograph abnormalities
Respir Crit Care Med 2019;200:e45‑67. in adults hospitalized with severe community‑acquired pneumonia. Clin
13. Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M, Muscedere J, Sweeney DA, Infect Dis 2007;45:983‑91.
Palmer LB, et al. Management of adults with hospital‑acquired and
ventilator‑associated pneumonia: 2016 Clinical practice guidelines by
the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution‑NonCommercial‑ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to
Society. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63:e61‑111.
remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as appropriate credit
14. Lim WS, Baudouin SV, George RC, Hill AT, Jamieson C, Le Jeune I,
is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
et al. BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired
pneumonia in adults: Update 2009. Thorax 2009;64(Suppl 3):iii1‑55.
15. Noguchi S, Yatera K, Kawanami T, Fujino Y, Moro H, Aoki N, et al. Access this article online
Pneumonia severity assessment tools for predicting mortality in patients Quick Response Code:
with healthcare‑associated pneumonia: A systematic review and Website:
meta‑analysis. Respiration 2017;93:441‑50. https://journals.lww.com/SMJ
16. Chalmers JD, Mandal P, Singanayagam A, Akram AR, Choudhury G,
Short PM, et al. Severity assessment tools to guide ICU admission in
community‑acquired pneumonia: Systematic review and meta‑analysis. DOI:
Intensive Care Med 2011;37:1409‑20. 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2022-050
17. Chalmers JD, Singanayagam A, Akram AR, Mandal P, Short PM,
Choudhury G, et al. Severity assessment tools for predicting mortality in
hospitalised patients with community‑acquired pneumonia. Systematic
review and meta‑analysis. Thorax 2010;65:878‑83. How to cite this article: See KC, Lau YH. Acute management of pneumonia
18. Zhang ZX, Yong Y, Tan WC, Shen L, Ng HS, Fong KY. Prognostic in adult patients. Singapore Med J 2023;64:209-16.