Boulez - Jameaux Content
Boulez - Jameaux Content
Boulez - Jameaux Content
Pierre Boulez is arguably the most influential composer of the second half of the
twentieth century. Here, Jonathan Goldman provides a fresh appraisal of the
composer’s music, demonstrating how understanding the evolution of Boulez’s
ideas on musical form is an important step towards evaluating his musical thought
generally. The theme of form arising from a grammar of oppositions – the legacy
of structuralism – serves as a common thread in Boulez’s output, and testifies to
the constancy of Boulez’s thought over and above his several notable aesthetic
and stylistic changes. This book lends a voice to the musical works by using the
writings – particularly the mostly untranslated collected Collège de France lectures
(1976–95) – to comment on them. It also uses five musical works from the post-
1975 period to exemplify concepts developed in Boulez’s writings, presenting a
vivid portrait of Boulez’s extremely varied production.
This series – formerly Music in the Twentieth Century – offers a wide perspective
on music and musical life since the end of the nineteenth century. Books included
range from historical and biographical studies concentrating particularly on the
context and circumstances in which composers were writing, to analytical and
critical studies concerned with the nature of musical language and questions of
compositional process. The importance given to context will also be reflected in
studies dealing with, for example, the patronage, publishing, and promotion of
new music, and in accounts of the musical life of particular countries.
Ethan Haimo
Schoenberg’s Transformation of Musical Language
Rachel Beckles Willson
Ligeti, Kurtág, and Hungarian Music during the Cold War
Michael Cherlin
Schoenberg’s Musical Imagination
Joseph N. Straus
Twelve-Tone Music in America
David Metzer
Musical Modernism at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century
Edward Campbell
Boulez, Music and Philosophy
Jonathan Goldman
The Musical Language of Pierre Boulez: Writings and Compositions
Jonathan Goldman
Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521514903
c Jonathan Goldman 2011
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library
Contents
1 Introduction 1
Boulez’s compositional path 6
Sources for theories of musical form 16
Serialism as musical structuralism 18
Notes 197
Selected recordings of works studied 213
Chronological list of works and bibliography of writings classified by work 215
Bibliography 218
Index 239
Music examples
Vienna/UE 18310) 2
1.2 Notation 1 ( C Copyright 1985 by Universal Edition AG,
Vienna/UE 18310) 3
1.3 Paradigmatic analysis of Notation 1 ( C Copyright 1985 by
UE 18547) 152
8.14 Rhythmic canon in Mémoriale, rehearsal no. 22 ( C Copyright 1985
UE 19992) 169
10.1 Six phrases from opening of Incises ( C Copyright 1994, 2002 by
UE 31966) 182
Figures
Preface
I first began working on this book at a time when it seemed as if with the
close of the twentieth century, the historical judgement against modernist
composers was definitive and without appeal. Two passages I came across
brought this home to me symbolically. The first was a reference Susan
McClary made in 2006 to the ‘hostile takeover of music studies by the
serialist mafia’ in the 1960s.1 The second was a passing reference made
by Jonathan Dunsby in a 2007 lecture to the legacy of (academic) serial
compositions:
Many critics of avant-garde twentieth-century Western Art Music – much as I
may not personally agree with them – say that all the theorizing that took
place, miles and miles of print in books and journals, not to mention letter
after letter of tenure bestowal, was entirely misapplied since no one really
wanted all those neurotic, atonal musical compositions in the first place, as I
fear the twenty-first century is beginning to demonstrate to us.2
I started to get the distinct and unsettling impression that the pre-
dominant narrative of twentieth-century music in the English-speaking
world ran something like this: abstruse, serialist autocrats had been super-
seded by postmodern pastiche-artists (or rock-inflected minimalists) who
in turn ushered in the ultimate triumph of industrially produced pop
music. According to this story, in the 1960s Pierre Boulez played the role of
ringleader (one widely read critic even referred to him as the ‘Godfather’3 ),
even if McClary’s remarks were directed against American academic com-
posers, Boulez never having maintained close links with his tenured Amer-
ican counterparts. I felt that, more often than not, the reservations – even
hostility – expressed by some critics and musicologists in the first decade
of the twenty-first century were partially the result of an unjust portrayal
of Boulez as a pointillistic serialist, whose aesthetic ideals could be entirely
circumscribed by his works from the 1950s (and first and foremost the
undergraduate analysis class workhorse, Structure 1a (1951–2)) as well as the
corresponding polemical writings from the same period (‘Éventuellement’
(1952), and the famous proclamation of the uselessness of non-serial com-
posers contained therein). These judgements seemed particularly unfair in
light of the major aesthetic shift which Boulez’s art had undergone begin-
ning in the 1970s, audible in musical works from Rituel (1974–5) onwards,
xvi Prefa ce
and ‘legible’ in the mostly untranslated writings from his years lecturing at
the Collège de France (such as the seminal ‘The system and the idea’).4 The
works from this period could be characterized variously by the presence
of thematic writing, a return to vertical harmony (often consonant albeit
always post-tonal, and with carefully chosen fixed registration) and formal
clarity. In parallel, in the writings, one senses a great concern for the audi-
ence: for the way his works are to be perceived, not only the way they are con-
ceived and then constructed. My goal in this book is to redress an imbalance
which gives pride of place to the early years of the nearly seven-decades-long
career of this important musician; in short, to affirm that Boulez should not
be relegated to the historical dustbin of twentieth-century serial excesses.
In the analyses, instead of stressing the complexity of the compositional
procedures – it is all too easy to turn musical analysis into what one of my
undergraduate mathematics professors used to call ‘proof by intimidation’ –
I wanted to ensure that every compositional procedure described in this
book could not only be explained to anyone with basic musical skills, but
also heard (for example the six chords of Dérive 1 or the four themes of
Mémoriale).
To redress this imbalance is not to deny that Boulez could be considered,
as one writer called him, on the occasion of his seventy-fifth birthday,
an ‘unreconstructed modernist’,5 but to assert that he can be appreciated
and enjoyed even when the extremes of modernist fervour give way to a
more inclusive account of twentieth-century music. In short, this book was
written in the spirit of the wonderful title of a collection of readings edited
by Arved Ashby in 2004: The Pleasure of Modernist Music.
This book concentrates on two aspects of Boulez’s multifaceted career –
the composer and writer – and is intended to appeal to composers, music
historians, theorists and music students, and indeed any reader interested
in the history and aesthetics of twentieth-century music, musical manifes-
tations of artistic modernism or French cultural history generally. One of
Pierre Boulez’s chief preoccupations concerns the nature of musical form.
Understanding the evolution of his thought on form is a step towards eval-
uating his musical thought generally; it also sheds light on his most recent
works, which put his ideas on the subject into practice. The theme of form
arising from a grammar of oppositions – the legacy of structuralism – serves
as a common thread in Boulez’s output (and consequently in this book),
and testifies to the constancy of Boulez’s thought over and above his several
notable aesthetic and stylistic changes. This book, then, sets out in two
directions: on the one hand, to use the musical works to exemplify con-
cepts developed in Boulez’s writings (Part I); on the other, to lend a voice
to the musical works by using the writings to comment on them (Part II).
Prefa ce xvii
xviii Prefa ce
Prefa ce xix
xx Prefa ce
musique, and during which time I wrote the doctoral dissertation which was
the starting point for this project. The assistantship also involved me in many
other interesting Boulez-related projects. I also wish to express my gratitude
to the Université de Montréal for having given me access to the aforemen-
tioned Fonds Boulez, located in the Faculty of Music, which was established
by Jean-Jacques Nattiez and Sophie Galaise. Brief visits to the Paul Sacher
Stiftung in Basel and the Music Department of the Bibliothèque nationale
de France in Paris were also invaluable. I wish to thank Pierre Boulez for
approving the use of materials and for being favourable to the idea of my
book project, as well as his administrative assistants Klaus-Peter Altekruse
and Marion Thiem. In addition, I was delighted when Jean Radel allowed
me to use his wonderful photos in this book. Many of my ideas crystallized
while teaching a graduate seminar on Boulez at McGill University’s Schulich
School of Music in 2005. My current faculty, the School of Music of the Uni-
versity of Victoria, has been incredibly supportive. Thanks also to Nicholas
Piper for his help with the musical examples. I wish to thank my editors at
Cambridge University Press, Victoria Cooper, Rebecca Jones and Thomas
O’Reilly. Without my parents’ support and encouragement, none of this
would have been possible. Most of all, I wish to thank Jean-Jacques Nattiez
who, through his intelligence, patience and generosity, made a musicologist
out of me. This book is dedicated to him.
Abbreviations
FURTHER ABBREVIATIONS
CDMC Centre de documentation de musique contemporaine (Paris)
GRM Groupe de recherches musicales
IRCAM Institut de recherche et coordination acoustique/musique
NEM Nouvel Ensemble Moderne
NRF Nouvelle Revue française
4. Pierre Boulez at the Cité de la Musique, Paris, 23 January 2007 (photo Jean
Radel)