Educ 205 Finals
Educ 205 Finals
Educ 205 Finals
CATEGORIES OF CURRICULUM CHANGE b. Teachers with less than two (2) years teaching
Mc Neii in 1990 categorized curriculum change as experience shall be required to prepare DLPs which shall
follows:There are five categories of curriculum change. include the following:
The five categories of curriculum change are the Objectives;
following: Subject Matter;
1. Substitution Procedure;
Assessment; and
Assignment. The cognitive process dimension represents a
c. Teachers may make modification of/or deviation from continuum of increasing cognitive complexity—from
the TGs/TMs whenever necessary to suit the learners’ remember to create. Anderson and Krathwohl identify 19
ability provided that the learning standards and specific cognitive processes that further clarify the
competencies are met. They are encouraged to enhance bounds of the six categories.
the TGs to provide activities that will develop higher
thinking skills.
d. DLPs/DLLs shall be written in the language of the
TGs/TMs. Grade 1 teachers need not translate them to REMEMBER
the Mother Tongue (MT). However, the use of MT as recognizing (identifying)
medium of instruction must be strictly followed. recalling (retrieving)
UNDERSTAND
STARTING THE CLASS RIGHT: LAYING DOWN interpreting (clarifying, paraphrasing,
THE CURRICULUM PLAN representing, translating)
First, it’s best to view your lesson objectives as goals for exemplifying (illustrating, instantiating)
your class and students. One of the most popular goal- classifying (categorizing, subsuming)
setting strategies is the ―SMART‖ criteria, which summarizing (abstracting, generalizing)
ensures goals are focused. In the context of lesson inferring (concluding, extrapolating,
planning, you can use the SMART criteria to determine interpolating, predicting)
your lesson objectives. comparing (contrasting, mapping, matching)
Is the objective specific? explaining (constructing models)
Is the objective measurable? APPLY
Is the objective attainable by all students? executing (carrying out)
Is the objective relevant to your class and implementing (using)
students? ANALYZE
Is the objective time-based to align with your differentiating (discriminating, distinguishing,
syllabus? focusing, selecting)
organizing (finding, coherence, integrating,
THE MAIN PARTS OF A LESSON PLAN outlining, parsing, structuring)
1. Intended Learning Objectives
attributing (deconstructing)
2. Subject Matter
EVALUATE
3. Procedure or Strategies of Teaching
checking (coordinating, detecting, monitoring,
4. Assessment of Learning Outcomes
testing)
5. Assignment or Agreement
critiquing (judging)
1. Learning outcomes can be defined as the particular CREATE
knowledge, skills, and abilities that an instructor intends generating (hypothesizing)
for students to learn or develop. Outcomes are more planning (designing)
specific than learning goals, which take a 10,000-foot producing (construct)
view of what an instructor desires for students to gain
from a course. Bloom’s Taxonomy has revisited by his In writing objectives or intended learning outcomes, it is
own student Lorin Anderson and David Krathwohl. always recommended that more of the higher order
thinking skills (HOTS) should be developed and less of
the low level thinking skills (LOTS) for learners. The
low level categories will develop LOTS and thinking
skills progress as the categories move higher.