Triple Artrodesis Tobillo
Triple Artrodesis Tobillo
Triple Artrodesis Tobillo
P
rimary triple arthrodesis is a powerful and reliable procedure for
Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jan;82(1): stabilizing and correcting painful rigid flatfoot deformities with a low
47-57 rate of complications.
The first reports of triple arthrodesis date back to the turn of the 20th
Investigation performed at Twin
century1,2, and the modern technique has seen few modifications since the
Cities Orthopedics, Edina,
procedure was popularized by Ryerson in 19233. Surgical techniques have been
Minnesota
refined over the past decades, with a corresponding improvement in arthrodesis
rates and patient satisfaction. The ability to achieve a stable and corrected
COPYRIGHT © 2016 BY THE
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT
hindfoot alignment is closely associated with patient outcomes4, and therefore
SURGERY, INCORPORATED careful patient selection and preoperative evaluation are critical to achieve a
successful result. The most common indications for the procedure include
hindfoot deformity and degenerative disease associated with chronic posterior
tibial tendon dysfunction or posttraumatic or paralytic equinovarus deformity,
although the procedure can be used to address more uncommon situations.
Pain with bearing weight is the most common symptom in patients with
hindfoot arthritis, with sharp pain at the initiation of weight-bearing activity
and dull aching pain at the conclusion of activities. Patients may express dif-
ficulty when walking over uneven ground because of the increased stress
placed across the hindfoot joints with inversion and eversion motion and pain
from subfibular impingement laterally. Inspection of soft tissues and careful
incision planning are crucial in patients with a history of surgery, trauma, or
infection and if a large deformity is to be corrected. Passive inversion and
eversion of the subtalar and transverse tarsal joints often demonstrate limited
range of motion and may reproduce pain in advanced degenerative conditions.
Any residual forefoot deformity noted after correction of the hindfoot must
be addressed at the time of surgery to restore a plantigrade foot. Long-standing
hindfoot deformity is often associated with a gastrocnemius or Achilles con-
tracture, which can be identified with the Silfverskiöld test. A standing ex-
amination is critical to assess the severity of the deformity. Valgus deformity
is common in chronic posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, rheumatoid disease,
tarsal coalition, and other neuromuscular conditions. Any deformity should
be assessed as flexible or rigid, as flexible deformity may be amenable to
Disclosure: The authors indicated that no external funding was received for any aspect of this work. On
the Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms, which are provided with the online version of the
article, one or more of the authors checked “yes” to indicate that the author had a relevant financial
relationship in the biomedical arena outside the submitted work.
JB J S ESS EN TI A L SUR G I C A L TE CH NI Q U ES 2 016, 6(3 ) :e29(1 - 17) · h t t p : / / d x . d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 210 6/J BJS.ST. 16.00 009 1
Primary Triple Arthrodesis for Management of Rigid Flatfoot Deformity
reconstructive surgical procedures as opposed to arthrodesis. Weight-bearing anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique
radiographs of the foot and anteroposterior and mortise views of the ankle are performed in routine evaluation of
hindfoot deformity. Standing hindfoot alignment radiographs are often made to identify valgus deformity and assess
the degree of symmetry present between the symptomatic and asymptomatic limbs. Advanced imaging techniques such
as computed tomography (CT) are frequently unnecessary for diagnostic purposes but may assist in preoperative
planning for patients with severe deformity and in accurate assessment of fusion postoperatively.
Multiple approaches to complete a triple arthrodesis have been described. Fixation of the subtalar joint is done
with 6.5 or 7.0-mm-diameter screws; cannulated screws are acceptable and facilitate accurate placement, whereas
solid-core screws have increased strength. Screws ranging in diameter from 4.0 to 5.5 mm are utilized for the
talonavicular (TN) and calcaneocuboid (CC) joints. Headless screws provide a low-profile option and may be less
irritating for the patient. Alternatively, nitinol staples and small plates applied in compression may assist in achieving
adequate fixation, particularly for the TN and CC joints5,6. Two incisions are utilized to adequately visualize the
hindfoot joints. Laterally, an incision is made, starting 2 cm proximal to the tip of the lateral malleolus and extending
distally to the base of the fourth metatarsal. The origin of the extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) is identified at the
sinus tarsi and is reflected distally. Enhanced exposure of the middle and posterior facets of the subtalar joint may be
achieved by placing a lamina spreader between the neck of the talus and the anterior process of the calcaneus. The
CC joint is exposed after reflection of the EDB and incision of the joint capsule. Medially, a longitudinal incision is
created, starting just distal to the medial malleolus and extending 1 cm beyond the naviculocuneiform joint. Careful
subcutaneous dissection is carried down to the TN joint capsule, and the TN joint is exposed and distracted,
utilizing a lamina spreader or Hintermann distractor, taking care to avoid crushing the soft bone of the talar head. All
remaining cartilage at the various joint surfaces is removed, and the subchondral bone is fenestrated to increase the
total surface area of bleeding cancellous bone and enhance fusion. If utilized, bone graft is impacted into the involved
joints at this stage. The transverse tarsal joint is manipulated and should achieve approximately 0° to 5° of abduction
with the foot demonstrating a plantigrade position. Guidewires are then secured across the TN joint. The
calcaneus is rotated to reduce the hindfoot to 5° of valgus. Care should be taken to avoid overcorrecting the hindfoot in
varus. Guidewires are then secured across the subtalar joint, originating proximal to the weight-bearing posterior
surface of the calcaneus. Through percutaneous incisions made over each guidewire, 6.5-mm cannulated screws are
secured across the subtalar joint. Once the subtalar joint is secured, two 5.5-mm cannulated screws or a combination
of cannulated screws and a compression plate are secured across the TN joint. The CC joint is evaluated and
should not be inferiorly subluxated. Guidewires are secured across the CC joint, while the joint is manually reduced in
anatomic alignment and is secured with a combination of 4.0-mm cannulated screws, compression plate and screws,
and/or staples. The EDB is repaired over the sinus tarsi, and the TN joint capsule is reapproximated if possible.
Subcutaneous tissues and skin are reapproximated with monofilament sutures of the surgeon’s preference. Sterile
dressings are applied, and the limb is immobilized in a short leg splint with the ankle held in neutral dorsiflexion.
Patients remain non-weight-bearing for a total of 6 weeks, with the postoperative splint worn for the first 2 weeks and a
short leg cast or tall walker boot worn for the following 4 weeks. Protected weight-bearing is advanced at 6 weeks
in a boot with transition to full weight-bearing in a comfortable shoe by 3 months postoperatively if there is radiographic
evidence of fusion.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Preoperative evaluation includes careful inspection of hindfoot alignment with the patient standing. A hindfoot alignment radiograph can
assist in assessing deformity, especially in the setting of bilateral deformity or prior surgery.
• Use the ankle radiographs to identify concomitant tibiotalar joint deformity or arthritis, which require further
intervention beyond correction of the hindfoot deformity.
• Obtain standing hindfoot alignment radiographs to quantify valgus deformity and assess the degree of
symmetry between the symptomatic and asymptomatic limbs (Fig. 1).
• Advanced imaging techniques such as CT are frequently unnecessary for diagnostic purposes but may assist in
preoperative planning in severe deformity and accurate assessment of fusion postoperatively. Magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) may identify concomitant intra-articular ankle joint pathology or evidence of
deltoid injury but is not routinely performed preoperatively unless additional pathology outside the hindfoot
area of interest is suspected.
Fig. 2 Fig. 3
Fig. 2 A beanbag or bolster is utilized under the ipsilateral hip to rotate the limb and position the toes so that they are pointing to the ceiling.
Fig. 3 A sponge and occlusive dressing (e.g., Ioban surgical drape [3M Medical]) are placed over the toes to limit infection risk.
Fig. 4 The lateral exposure is performed through an incision extending from the tip of the distal end of the fibula toward the base of the
fourth metatarsal.
Video 1 The lateral approach and subtalar joint exposure.
Fig. 5 After reflection of the EDB muscle, the sinus tarsi and posterior facet of the subtalar joint are exposed. The interosseous ligament is identified
within the sinus tarsi and incised to allow adequate distraction and exposure of the subtalar joint.
Fig. 6 A Hohmann retractor is placed around the posterolateral subtalar joint to protect the peroneal tendons. A lamina spreader is placed within
the sinus tarsi to allow exposure of the entire posterior facet of the subtalar joint.
• Sweep a knife vertically through the CC joint and rotate it dorsally through the bifurcate ligament (Fig. 7 and
Video 2).
• Improve visualization with plantar flexion and supination of the midfoot and placement of a lamina spreader
within the joint.
• Medially, make a longitudinal incision centered over the TN joint, starting just distal to the medial malleolus
and extending 1 cm distal to the naviculocuneiform joint (Fig. 8 and Video 3).
• Use an interval between the anterior tibial and posterior tibial tendons, taking care to protect the saphenous
vein and nerve.
• Carry out subperiosteal dissection over the TN joint with a Cobb elevator.
• Incise the TN joint capsule, and further expose the joint with a small lamina spreader placed into the joint
(Fig. 9).
• Visualize the lateral aspect of the TN joint through the lateral incision.
Fig. 7 As dissection is carried out distally, the bifurcate ligament and CC joint capsule are incised to expose the CC joint.
Video 2 Exposure of the CC joint.
Fig. 8 The medial exposure is performed through an incision starting just distal to the tip of the medial malleolus (med. mall.) and extending over
the TN joint beyond the navicular tuberosity (navic.). ATT 5 anterior tibial tendon, and PTT 5 posterior tibial tendon.
Video 3 The medial approach and TN joint exposure.
Fig. 9 The TN joint is exposed through an interval between the anterior tibial and posterior tibial tendons (top images). After the TN joint capsule is
incised, thorough debridement of the remaining chondral tissue is completed (bottom images).
Fig. 10 Fig. 11
Fig. 10 A curet and/or osteotome may be utilized to thoroughly debride the chondral tissues on both sides of the entire subtalar joint.
Video 4 Subtalar and CC joint preparation.
Video 5 TN joint preparation.
Fig. 11 Bone graft is utilized at the discretion of the individual surgeon, but may be helpful in patients at risk for poor or delayed bone-healing.
Video 6 Reduction of the hindfoot and fixation of the subtalar and TN joints.
• The cuboid has a tendency to subluxate plantarward once the hindfoot deformity is corrected. Apply manual
pressure under the plantar aspect of the cuboid to dorsally translate the cuboid and reduce the CC joint
(Figs. 12-A and 12-B).
• Pack any remaining gaps noted along the visualized joints with bone graft to maximize the joint surface
available for fusion.
Fig. 12-A
Fig. 12-B
Figs. 12-A and 12-B The order of fixation of the subtalar and TN joints frequently dictates the reduction of the CC joint. Fig. 12-A If the subtalar joint
is stabilized first (left image), the cuboid frequently subluxates inferiorly, potentially leading to lateral overload and pain if not reduced prior to
fixation. Reducing and stabilizing the TN joint first (right image) reliably maintains reduction of the CC joint. Fig. 12-B If subluxation of the CC joint is
noted after securing both the TN and subtalar joints (left image), dorsal pressure is placed under the cuboid while the joint is secured (central and
right images).
Fig. 13 Fig. 14
Fig. 13 A bump may be utilized to assist in placing the subtalar screws. A mini C-arm is versatile and easily manipulated in the operating room to
guide screw placement, but a large C-arm may also be set in a stable position to allow for rapid placement of guidewires and screws. Care
should be taken to avoid penetrating the chondral surface of the talar dome while advancing the guidewires and screws across the posterior
facet of the subtalar joint.
Fig. 14 The TN joint may be secured with a variety of methods. A partially threaded cannulated screw is typically advanced from the navicular
tuberosity across the joint into the talar neck and body (left image). The dorsal aspect of the TN joint is additionally compressed with a second screw
or small compression plate with screws (right image).
• Use a 5.5-mm screw for fixation across the CC joint. The screw may be advanced in antegrade or retrograde
fashion (Video 7).
• If the screw is placed from proximal to distal, create a small lateral notch behind the anterior process of the
calcaneus 1 cm proximal to the CC joint to recess the screw head (Fig. 15).
• If limited purchase of the screw or poor compression is achieved across the joint, apply a 2-hole or 4-hole
compression plate across the joint for added stability and compression.
• If a gap of .2 mm is evident at the CC joint after fixation of the subtalar and TN joints, a bone block
arthrodesis is required. A small tricortical wedge of bone may be utilized to provide osseous contact and
achieve arthrodesis. A compression plate is most useful to provide fixation in this circumstance.
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 16 After correction of the hindfoot deformity, attention is turned to the midfoot and forefoot. In long-standing hindfoot valgus deformity,
compensatory forefoot supination becomes evident when the hindfoot is corrected. This must be addressed with concomitant procedures; otherwise
the foot will not be plantigrade and recurrent deformity of the ankle and hindfoot is inevitable. A plantar flexion medial cuneiform osteotomy was
performed in this patient to correct the residual forefoot supination.
• If necessary, perform a medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy through a separate oblique incision directly
over the posterolateral calcaneal tuberosity. Advance the screws across both the osteotomy and the subtalar
joint for fixation.
• With valgus alignment but limited arthritis at the ankle joint, a deltoid ligament reconstruction can be
performed in addition to the above procedures. Eversion stress anteroposterior fluoroscopic views of the ankle
may be performed after final correction of the hindfoot to determine the competency of the deltoid ligament.
• If ankle arthritis is present, consider a tibiotalocalcaneal or pantalar arthrodesis. Alternatively, a total ankle
arthroplasty can be performed in a staged manner once the hindfoot is appropriately balanced.
Results
In one of the largest published series of patients managed with triple arthrodesis (111 patients), Pell et al. reported a
union rate of 98% at a minimum follow-up of 2 years, with 91% of patients indicating that they would be willing
to repeat the procedure under similar circumstances4. Bone graft was required in less than half of the feet. No difference
in outcomes was reported on the basis of the preoperative diagnosis. Patient satisfaction was closely associated with
the ability to correct the hindfoot deformity intraoperatively. Rosenfeld et al. corroborated these outcomes with a
4% nonunion rate and good to excellent results after triple arthrodesis in 75% of 100 feet13. Saltzman et al. reported
outcomes for 67 feet in 57 patients at an average of 24 and 44 years following triple arthrodesis14. Union rates of
81% were reported. Thirty of the 57 patients did not report any pain at the final follow-up, and 15 did not demonstrate
any residual deformity. Rates of good results and the ability to walk at least 1 mile declined between the 2 follow-up
periods. All ankles in the study demonstrated progressive radiographic degenerative disease. Despite the decline in
function and reported good results at the long-term follow-up, 95% of the patients were satisfied with the result of
the procedure and 91% would recommend the procedure to others.
Hardware design and surgical techniques have advanced throughout the years, with corresponding im-
provements in fusion rates and patient satisfaction. Throughout the recent literature, patient satisfaction rates of .85%
have been reported and most stated that they would undergo the procedure again if indicated4,5,13-18. Most patients can
return to unrestricted work duties16.
Nonunion remains the most commonly reported complication following triple arthrodesis, with rates his-
torically ranging from 10% to 23%14,15,17,19,20. With improved hardware fixation and attention to joint preparation,
fusion rates in the recent literature have exceeded 95%4,5,13,16,18. Most nonunions are noted at the TN joint,
although the rates of CC joint nonunion are as high as 20%9,13-21. Development of ankle arthritis remains a concern
and has been reported to occur in a few as 40% and as many as 100% of patients with long enough follow-up15,21.
Midfoot arthritis is also common and has been reported to occur in nearly 50% of patients4,5,14,15,21. Concern over
adjacent joint degenerative disease has led to the popularity of limited arthrodesis techniques, which are beyond
the scope of this paper. Other complications such as hardware irritation13,16,17, infection13-17, osteonecrosis15,
malunion13,14,16,18, deep-vein thrombosis13,16, and iatrogenic nerve injury4,15 remain quite rare.
• The position of the first ray must be assessed after correction of the hindfoot, and a plantar flexion osteotomy
or arthrodesis may be required to establish a plantigrade foot.
• Correction of a flatfoot deformity in the obese patient is difficult because of the increased girth of the thighs
leading to valgus thrust on the foot. The foot must be fused in a slightly greater degree of valgus to limit
lateral overload and pain.
References
1. Wülker N, Stukenborg C, Savory KM, Alfke D. Hindfoot motion after isolated and combined arthrodeses: measurements in anatomic specimens. Foot
Ankle Int. 2000 Nov;21(11):921-7.
2. Hoke M. An operation for stabilizing paralytic feet. Am J Orthop Surg. 1921;3:494-507.
3. Ryerson E. Arthrodesing operations on the feet. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1923;5:453-71.
4. Pell RF 4th, Myerson MS, Schon LC. Clinical outcome after primary triple arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jan;82(1):47-57.
5. Knupp M, Skoog A, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S. Triple arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Mar;29(3):293-7.
6. Seybold JD, Zide JR, Myerson MS. Hindfoot fusions in the flatfoot deformity: when and what techniques to use in late stage II and stage III deformities.
Tech Foot & Ankle. 2014;13(1):29-38.
7. Vora AM, Myerson MS, Jeng CL. The medial approach to triple arthrodesis: indications and technique for management of rigid valgus deformities in high-
risk patients. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;4(4):258-62.
8. Jeng CL, Vora AM, Myerson MS. The medial approach to triple arthrodesis. Indications and technique for management of rigid valgus deformities in high-
risk patients. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005 Sep;10(3):515-21, vi-vii.
9. Sammarco VJ, Magur EG, Sammarco GJ, Bagwe MR. Arthrodesis of the subtalar and talonavicular joints for correction of symptomatic hindfoot
malalignment. Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Sep;27(9):661-6.
10. Anand P, Nunley JA, DeOrio JK. Single-incision medial approach for double arthrodesis of hindfoot in posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction. Foot Ankle
Int. 2013 Mar;34(3):338-44.
11. Knupp M, Schuh R, Stufkens SA, Bolliger L, Hintermann B. Subtalar and talonavicular arthrodesis through a single medial approach for the correction
of severe planovalgus deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 May;91(5):612-5.
12. Brilhault J. Single medial approach to modified double arthrodesis in rigid flatfoot with lateral deficient skin. Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Jan;30(1):21-6.
13. Rosenfeld PF, Budgen SA, Saxby TS. Triple arthrodesis: is bone grafting necessary? The results in 100 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Feb;
87(2):175-8.
14. Saltzman CL, Fehrle MJ, Cooper RR, Spencer EC, Ponseti IV. Triple arthrodesis: twenty-five and forty-four-year average follow-up of the same patients.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Oct;81(10):1391-402.
15. Angus PD, Cowell HR. Triple arthrodesis. A critical long-term review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986 Mar;68(2):260-5.
16. Bednarz PA, Monroe MT, Manoli A 2nd. Triple arthrodesis in adults using rigid internal fixation: an assessment of outcome. Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Jun;20
(6):356-63.
17. Graves SC, Mann RA, Graves KO. Triple arthrodesis in older adults. Results after long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Mar;75(3):355-62.
18. Sangeorzan BJ, Smith D, Veith R, Hansen ST Jr. Triple arthrodesis using internal fixation in treatment of adult foot disorders. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993
Sep;294:299-307.
19. Friedenberg ZB. Arthrodesis of the tarsal bones; a study of failure of fusions. Arch Surg. 1948 Jul;57(1):162-70.
20. Wilson FC Jr, Fay GF, Lamotte P, Williams JC. Triple arthrodesis. A study of the factors affecting fusion after three hundred and one procedures. J Bone
Joint Surg Am. 1965 Mar;47:340-8.
21. Bennett GL, Graham CE, Mauldin DM. Triple arthrodesis in adults. Foot Ankle. 1991 Dec;12(3):138-43.