FR RTP May 23 - Board Notes

FINAL PAPER 1: FINANCIAL REPORTING
Part I : Amendments applicable for May, 2023 Examination
I. Amendments to the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility) Rules, 2014

(issued on 20 th September, 2022) applicable for May, 2023 Examination
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), vide a notification dated 20 th September 2022
issued the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility) Amendment Rules, 2022.
These amendments are effective from the date of their publication in the official gazette
i.e., 20 th September 2022. Some of the significant amendments notified therein are:
 Constitution of a CSR Committee by a company having any amount in its
unspent CSR account
As per the amendment, a proviso has been added under Rule 3(1), stating that a
company that has any amount outstanding in its unspent CSR account should
constitute a CSR Committee and comply with the relevant provisions of Section
135 of the Companies Act, 2013.
 Omission of Rule 3(2) of the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility)
Rules, 2014
Rule 3(2) required that every company that ceases to fulfil the criteria prescribed
under Section 135(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 for three consecutive financial
years is not required to constitute a CSR Committee. Now as per the amendment,
this Rule 3(2) of the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility) Rules, 2014
has been omitted.
 Inclusion in the list of entities that can be engaged as implementation
agencies
Rule 4(1) of the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility) Rules, 2014
provides that the Board of Directors must ensure that CSR activities can be
undertaken by a company itself or through certain implementation agencies which
were listed therein. As per the amendment, in addition to the class of companies
listed under Rule 4(1) of the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility) Rules,
2014, new class of entities exempted under Section 10 of Clause (23C), which
may be approved by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, have been
included as implementation agencies. These entities are:
➢ Any fund or institution established for charitable purposes having regard to
the objects of the fund or institution and its importance throughout India, or
throughout any State or States,
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

2 FINAL EXAMINATION: MAY, 2023
➢ Any trust (including any other legal obligation), or institution wholly for public
religious purposes, or wholly for public religious and charitable purposes,
having regard to the manner in which the affairs of the trust or institution are
administered and supervised for ensuring that the income accruing thereto is
properly applied for the objects thereof,
➢ Any university or other educational institution existing solely for educational
purposes and not for purposes of profit, other than those mentioned in su b-
clause (iiiab) or sub-clause (iiiad) of Clause 23(C) of the Income Tax Act,
1961, and
➢ Any hospital or other institution for the reception and treatment of persons
suffering from illness or mental defectiveness, or for the reception and
treatment of persons during convalescence, or of persons requiring medical
attention or rehabilitation, existing solely for philanthropic purposes and not
for purposes of profit, other than those mentioned in sub-clause (iiiac) or
sub-clause (iiiae) of Clause 23(C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
4
 Change in the limits of expenses incurred towards impact assessment
Earlier Rule 8 of the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility) Rules, 2014
provides that every company having an average CSR obligation of ` 10 crore or
more in pursuance of Section 135(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 in the three
Edgar immediately preceding financial years, should undertake an impact assessment,
through an independent agency, of their CSR projects having outlays of ` 1 crore
or more, and which have been completed not less than one year before EI
undertaking the impact study.
a sir
YETr
e
r Bet
Such a company may book an expenditure towards CSR for that financial year,
which should not exceed five per cent of the total CSR expenditure for that
financial year or ` 50 lakh, whichever is less.
so As per the amendment, the limit to book expenditure towards impact assessment
ng
has now been reduced to two per cent (earlier five percent) of the total CSR
expenditure for that financial year or ` 50 lakh, whichever is higher (earlier
whichever is lower).
 Revision in Annexure II and e-form of the Companies (Corporate Social
Responsibility) Rules, 2014.
c
Annexure II of the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility) Rules, 2 014
prescribes a format for the annual report on CSR activities included in the
company’s board report. Some of the significant amendments in the format are:

PAPER – 1 : FINANCIAL REPORTING 3
➢ Executive summary: As per the amendment in the Annexure II, companies

are required to provide an executive summary along with the weblinks of
impact assessment of CSR projects, which have been carried out.
➢ Disclosure on CSR spent: As per the amendment, companies are required
to disclose only the total amount spent on on-going and other CSR projects.
Earlier, the format required disclosures of details of each project undertaken
by the company (both ongoing projects as well as other projects).
➢ Additional disclosure on unspent CSR amount: In disclosure of unspent
CSR amount for the preceding three financial years, companies are also
required to disclose the balance amount in unspent CSR account, and
deficiency, if any, in accordance with Section 135(6) of the Companies Act,
2013.
II. Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) (Amendment) Rules, 2022
MCA has issued Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) (Amendment) Rules, 2022
Man to amend Companies (Indian Accounting Standards) Rules, 2015 vide notification
G.S.R. 255(E) dated 23 rd March, 2022. These amendments are generally brought by
MCA to keep uniformity between Ind AS and IFRS. However, this time MCA has come
out with a carve out in Ind AS 16. These amendments come into effect from
1 st April, 2022 and is applicable for the financial year 2022-2023 onwards for the
financial statements prepared on the basis of Ind AS. Following are the areas in which
the amendments have been brought in by the MCA through this notification:
 Amendment to Ind AS 16 ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’ on accounting of
proceeds from selling of items produced during testing and carve out in this
regard from IAS 16
 Amendment to Ind AS 37 ‘Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent
Assets’ on determination of cost of fulfilling a contract for measurement of
provision for an onerous contract.
 Amendments to Ind AS 103 ‘Business Combinations’ with reference to Conceptual
Framework for Financial Reporting and insertion of certain paragraphs under
exceptions to recognition principle on liabilities, contingent liabilities and
contingent assets
 Annual improvements to Ind AS (2021) in Ind AS 101 ‘First Time Adoption of
Indian Accounting Standards’, Ind AS 109 ‘Financial Instruments’ and Ind AS 41
‘Agriculture’.

The key amendments to Ind AS pursuant to the Companies (Indian Accounting

Standards) (Amendments) Rules, 2022 are explained below:
Ind AS Significant amendment made in 2022
Ind AS 16, Para 17(e) of Ind AS 16 has been amended by adding a clarification
‘Property, Plant that the excess of net proceeds from sale of items produced during
and Equipment’ testing will not be credited to Profit or loss i.e. it will be deducted
from the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment.
However, amendment made in IAS 16 by IASB prohibited deduction
of proceeds of items produced during testing from cost of an item of
property, plant and equipment.
This differential treatment in IAS 16 and Ind AS 16 has led to a carve
out, which will have consequential impact on depreciation,
impairment and deferred tax.
Ind AS 37 Paragraph 68A has been inserted which clarifies which cost needs to
‘Provisions, be considered in the costs to fulfil a contract while determining
Contingent whether the contract as onerous.
Liabilities and
As per the amendment made in 2022, both the incremental costs to
Contingent
fulfil a contract and allocation of directly attributable costs will form
Assets’
part of the cost used for determination of onerous contract.
Para 69 has been amended by replacing ‘assets dedicated to the
contract’ to ‘assets used in fulfilling the contract’. This
amendment requires to take into consideration the impairment loss
on all the assets whose cost will be considered in assessing the
contract as onerous.
These amendments are prospective from 1 st April, 2022 with
cumulative effect recognised in the opening balance of retained
earnings or other component of equity, as appropriate on
1 st April, 2022. Comparative period financials not to be restated.
Ind AS 103 In March, 2018, IASB revised Conceptual Framework for Financial
‘Business Reporting.
Combinations’
Accordingly, ICAI in August, 2020 came out with the revised
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting (the Conceptual


Framework) under Ind AS.
The amendments made in Ind AS 103 is due to change in reference
to Conceptual Framework without change in the accounting
requirements for business combinations.
Due to revision in the Conceptual Framework, there were certain
accounting implications to contingent liabilities and levies within the
scope of Ind AS 37 and Appendix C ‘Levies’.
As per it, the assets and liabilities in a business combination are
recognised if they meet the definition of an asset or liability as per
the Conceptual Framework. The timing of recognition of a levy may
sometimes be different due to specific guidance given in Appendix
C. Therefore, while recognizing levies at the acquisition date, an
acquirer might recognise at the acquisition date a liability to pay a
levy that it would not recognise subsequently when applying
Appendix C ‘Levies’. This difference would arise because an entity
might recognise a liability earlier by applying the Conceptual
Framework. This liability would be derecognized immediately
afterwards when principles of Appendix C are applied, and the entity
would recognise a so-called Day 2 gain.
Therefore, to resolve this implication, Ind AS 103 has been amended
with regards to recognition exception for contingent liabilities and
levies by inserting para 21A to 21C. An exception has been added
to the requirements of para 11 of Ind AS 103 for liabilities and
contingent liabilities that would be within the scope of Ind AS 37 or
Appendix C if incurred separately, rather than assumed in a
business combination.
Further, Ind AS 103 prohibited the recognition of contingent assets
even prior to the 2022 amendments. However, prohibition was not
stated explicitly in Ind AS 103 itself. Therefore, para 23A has been
inserted in Ind AS 103 to explicitly prohibit recognition of contingent
asset.

Ind AS 101 Para D13 of Ind AS 101 provides an exemption to a first-time

‘First time adopter of Ind AS with regard to cumulative translation differences
adoption of on the date of transition to Ind AS. According to it, first time adopter
Indian of Ind AS are permitted to deem all cumulative translation
Accounting differences for all foreign operations to be zero on the date of
Standards’ transition to Ind AS.
Para D13A has been inserted in Ind AS 101 which removes the
conflict between the requirements of paragraph D16(a) of
Ind AS 101 which provides exemption where a subsidiary adopts
Ind AS later than its parents and the exemptions on cumulative
translation differences at the carrying amount included in the
parent’s consolidated financial statements. Similar exemption is
available to joint venture and an associate that uses the exemption
in para D16(a) of Ind AS 101. Para D16(a) of Ind AS 101 provides
that a subsidiary can measure its assets and liabilities at the
carrying amounts in parent’s consolidated financial statements.
Ind AS 109 As per Ind AS 109, a financial liability is derecognised when it is

‘Financial extinguished, which includes exchange between an existing
Instruments’ borrower and lender due to different or substantial modification in
terms of the contract.
Further, Ind AS 109 clarified that terms are considered to have been
substantially modified when the net present value of the cash flows
under the new terms (including any fees paid net of any fees
received) and discounted using the original EIR differs by atleast
10% from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the
original terms.
Earlier what is to be included in the fees paid and fees received
was not mentioned in the standard.
Now the amendment has been made in 2022 by substituting para
B3.3.6 and inserting para B3.3.6A in Ind AS 109 which clarify that
the fees paid (for the above purpose) includes amount paid by the
borrower to or on behalf of the lender and fees received includes


fees amounts paid by the lender to or on behalf of the borrower.
The above amendment will be applied prospectively to modifications
and exchanges that occur on or after the date the entity first applies
the amendment.
Ind AS 41 Earlier para 22 of Ind AS 41 prescribed certain cash flows that would
‘Agriculture’ not be considered for the purpose of assessing the fair values.
Out of those cash flows, the amendment made in 2022 deleted the
cash flows for taxation from the exclusion list for measurement o f fair
value.
This implies that tax cash flows must be included in the fair value
measurement of biological assets as per Ind AS 41.

PART II : QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

QUESTIONS
If Ind AS 110 IndAS 103

1. 'High Speed Limited' manufactures and sells cars. The Company wants to foray into
the two-wheeler business and therefore it acquires 30% interest in Quick Bikes Limited
for ` 5,00,000 as at 1 st November, 20X1 and an additional 25% stake as at
0 1 st January, 20X2 for ` 5,00,000 at its fair value.
557 The 951
Following is the Balance Sheet of Quick Bikes Limited as at 1 st January, 20X2:
Carrying Fair Subs Carrying
T
Fair
Liabilities Assets
value value value value
Plant and
Share capital 1,00,000 3,50,000 7,50,000
equipment
Investment in
Reserves 5,50,000 4,00,000 5,00,000
bonds
Trade Trade
1,50,000 1,50,000 50,000 50,000
payables Receivables
Total 8,00,000 Total 8,00,000
Brand a Quick Bikes Limited sells the motorcycles under the brand name 'Super Start' which
serf has a fair value of ` 3,50,000 as at 1 st January, 20X2. This is a self- generated brand
therefore Quick Bikes Limited has not recognized the brand in its books of accounts.
Following is the separate balance sheet of High Speed Limited as at 1 st January, 20X2:
I
tfaked
Liabilities Amount Assets heparent
Amount
parent
Brewood Share capital 5,00,000 Plant and equipment 13,50,000
301
5TÉ
Reserves 15,00,000 Investment in Quick Bike 10,00,000
7287 457
HII
Short term loans 4,00,000 Trade Receivables 80,000
Trade payables 3,00,000 Cash and bank balances 5,20,000
Other liabilities 2,50,000
Total 29,50,000 Total 29,50,000
In relation to the acquisition of Quick Bikes Limited, you are required to:
(i) Pass the necessary journal entries to give effect of business combination in
accordance with Ind AS 103 as at acquisition date 1 st January, 20X2. NCI is

Étep 1 Id the acquirer High speed
step DOA olla X2
step I 55 7
257 5L
se
307 Prey 6L DOAcan Fx
fast
Till
held 301
Inst as Gain in
stet
III 5h
Invest
T R SOK
Brand 3 52
enter
lift
NCI 45 Fair value notgiven
steps
se
9 00,000
fast
457 2
seepqigs.tt a
Preyheld Inst 62
30 7
Nce Casi Call

GINA
am
PE All Dd 7.5L
52
Iast Ale Da
TR Alc Da Sok
3.5L
Brand All Da
Glue Blf 5L
Imist in Quick lol

TO PX IL
on Prem
to plL Profit
need Imist
1 se
TO T P
ar
TO MCI 1487
Consolidated Bal sheet of High speed Itd as at oil oil x2
ÉE
Imistin Bonds
13.547 s
212
5
Innestin Quick Subs

Intangible Assets 3.5
Brand se
aw
IE
1 32
Cook 50k
5 21
91L
Escconcept almingingnd se
G E 15L T ILI 16L
MCI 91
It m
4.5h
TP
41L
measured by the entity at fair value. Provide working notes, Ignore deferred tax
implication; and
(ii) Prepare a consolidated balance sheet of High Speed Limited as at
1 st January, 20X2. C 1 Date of
Day Agn
Ind AS 2
3 2. An entity has following details regarding cost and retail price of the goods purchased
and unsold at the beginning of the year:
Cost Retail Price

Opening inventory 6,250 8,000
Purchases 19,500 34,000
Inventory on hand
Cas Inn (23,000)
Sales for the period 19,000
Applying the retail method, compute the following:

(a) Percentage of cost price over retail price;
r
(b) Cost of closing inventory;
r
(c) Value of cost of sales (at cost); and
r
(d) Profit earned during the year on sale of inventory
Ignore the impact of mark-ups or mark-downs on the selling price.
Ind AS 19
3. From the following particulars, compute the net defined benefit liability and expense to
be recognized in Profit and Loss account. (` in lakhs)
Particulars Defined benefit obligation Plan Assets

31st Dec. 31st Dec. 31st Dec. 31st Dec.
20X2 20X1 20X2 20X1
Balance at the beginning of the year 63.25 47.08 21.80 14.65
Current service cost 5.84 4.97 - -
PIL
Interest cost 4.27 3.56 - -
PIL
Changes in demographic 0.62 1.86 - -
assumptions Oct
acarid
on Changes in financial assumptions 3.58 1.93 - -
all
DBO Tock

UI
cost 6250 19500 25780
RetailPrice 8000 34000 42000
61.31
44
Retail Price 100
of cost over
Cls Inventory cost 23000 61.311 14101
Costof Sales 11649

Cop Pawn as
OR 19000
6280 19500 14101 761317
costof sales 7357

Profit sales
19000 11649
cuDBOOpnDBOClsp.AOpnp.at
Experience variance Oct (2.49) 4.46 - -
Benefits paid - (0.61) - (0.61)
Investment income - - 1.47 1.12
PIL
Employers’ contribution - - 8.00 7.00
Actuarial art Return on planMet

assets - - 2.12 (0.35)
Ind AS 102 7507 63 25 33.39 21.81

appa
r
4. Entity A runs a copper-mining business. Entity A has a year-end of 31 st March.
Dividends declared on the shares accrue to the employees during the three -year
period. If the condition is met, the employees will receive the shares together with the
dividends that have been declared on those shares during the three years upto
31st March, 20X3.
The entity estimates that on 1 st April, 20X0 its shares are valued at ` 10 each. The
grant date fair amount of each share is ` 10.
Entity A prepares annual financial statements for the year ended 31 st March and:
 Dx
on 1 st April, 20X0 it estimates that 800 shares will vest;
 at the end of the first year (31 st March, 20X1) it has revised this estimate to 780; r
 at 31st March, 20X2 it has further revised this estimate to 750; and
 750 shares vest on 31 st March, 20X3 based on the number of employees still
employed on that date.
On 1 st April, 20X0 as part of a long-term incentive scheme, Entity A provisionally
awards its sales employees 1,000 Entity A’s shares receivable on 31 st March, 20X3.
Explain the accounting treatment for the above share-based awards based on
satisfaction of the condition that the sales employees must remain in employment until
31st March, 20X3. The requirement to remain in employment is a service condition and
would not be reflected in the fair value of the share awards.
I Ind AS 101
5. ABC Ltd., a public limited company, is in the business of exploration and production of
oil and gas and other hydrocarbon related activities outside India. It operates overseas
projects directly and/or through subsidiaries, by participation in various joint
arrangements and investment in associates. The company was following Accounting
Standards as notified under the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules until
31st March, 20X1. However, it has adopted Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS) with
effect from 1 st April, 20X1.

880 t PA 91.94
03 Opn Met Det Ben Ciab 63.2 y
UPI 41.68
us Yao
75 07 733 39
c y PY
589 4.97
4.27 3.56
Fat Exp
1.47 1 2
ImistI
ur lend 31 3 41
E BE 2600
TO SBP Rete 2600
780 10
43
uraend
Est 2400
2400
TO SBP Rete
750 10 43
12600
31131 3
Urzed
E BE 2500
TO SBP Rete 2500
750 10 3 3
E 2600
C 12400
parents
Lid The goodwill recognised in accordance with AS 21 and AS 27 was due to corporate
structure and the line-by-line consolidation of subsidiaries’/proportionate consolidation
of jointly controlled entities’ financial statements which was prepared on historical
costs convention. ABC Ltd. has not taken into consideration the valuation of
C
Intangiblesunderlying oil and gas reserves for which excess amount (i.e. goodwill calculated as
per the relevant AS requirements) has been paid by the company at the time of
Rightwas acquisition. The company further considered that in oil and gas companies, the
recorded
which goodwill generated on acquisition of mineral rights either through jointly controlled
entities or subsidiaries, inherently derives its value from the underlying mineral rights
not
separately and, accordingly, value of such goodwill depletes as the underlying mineral resources
parentare extracted.
By AS
Therefore, taking a prudent approach and considering the above substance, the
If not company amortised the goodwill in respect of its subsidiaries / jointly controlled assets
recorded over the life of the underlying mineral rights using Unit of Production method. This
in IMA allowed the company to utilise the value of goodwill over the life of mineral rights and 1000
Becomes completely charging off the goodwill over the life of the reserves.
it
For financial year 20X0-20X1, the company has availed transition exemption under
Pathan Ind AS 101 and has not applied the principles of Ind AS 103. É
ABC Ltd. considering the substance over form of the goodwill to be in the nature of
ay
III
'acquisition costs' intends to continue amortisation of the goodwill recognised under AS
CAS Cammyin respect of its subsidiaries / joint ventures (jointly controlled entities under AS) over andAstor
the life of the underlying mineral rights using Unit of Production method, under Ind AS CA
CA also post transition date. Matanowed
Indas GW Comment on appropriateness of the accounting treatment, under Ind AS, for
Thdpodaw amortisation of the goodwill by the company and state whether the accounting
treatment in respect of amortisation of goodwill is correct or not.
intangible 200
Ind AS 23
6.
WE
LT Ltd. is in the process of constructing a building. The construction process is
Right expected to take about 18 months from 1 st January 20X1 to 30 th June 20X2. The
building meets the definition of a qualifying asset. LT Ltd. incurs the following
garately
recognised
expenditure for the construction: till 1stJuryX19
MEap gov
1 st January, 20X1 ` 5 crores
th 30th June, 20X1 ` 20 crores s remains
T 31st March, 20X2 ` 20 crores mouths cap
a 30th June, 20X2 ` 5 crores 12m
ight
Alls
500 As
200 Amortised in Ind
never
que Annually
only tested for Impairment

Borrowingdate cap rate

On 1 st July 20X1, LT Ltd. issued 10% Redeemable Debentures of ` 50 crores. The
proceeds from the debentures form part of the company's general borrowings, which it
uses to finance the construction of the qualifying asset, ie, the building. LT Ltd. had no
borrowings (general or specific) before 1 st July 20X1 and did not incur any borrowing
costs before that date. LT Ltd. incurred ` 25 crores of construction costs before
obtaining general borrowings on 1 st July 20X1 (pre-borrowing expenditure) and
` 25 crores after obtaining the general borrowings (post-borrowing expenditure).
For each of the financial years ended 31 st March 20X1, 20X2 and 20X3, calculate the
borrowing cost that LT Ltd. is permitted to capitalize as a part of the building cost.
Ind AS 115 illus 650 B Edo
7. Company X enters into an agreement on 1 st January, 20X1 with a customer for
renovation of hospital and install new air-conditioners for total consideration of
` 50,00,000. The promised renovation service, including the installation of new air -
conditioners is a single performance obligation satisfied over time. Total expected
costs are ` 40,00,000 including ` 10,00,000 for the air-conditioners. Company X
determines that it acts as a principal in accordance with Ind AS 115 because it obtains
control of the air conditioners before they are transferred to the c ustomer. The
customer obtains control of the air conditioners when they are delivered to the hospital
premises.
Company X uses an input method based on costs incurred to measure its progress
towards complete satisfaction of the performance obligation.
As at 31st March, 20X1, other costs incurred excluding the air conditioners are
` 6,00,000.
Whether Company X should include cost of the air conditioners in measure of its
progress of performance obligation? How should revenue be recognized for the year
ended 31st March, 20X1?
Ind AS 16
8. Company X built a new plant that was brought into use on 1 st April, 20X1. The cost to
construct the plant was ` 1.5 crore. The estimated useful life of the plant is 20 years
and Company X accounts for the plant using the cost model.
The initial carrying amount of the plant included an amount of ` 10 lakh for
decommissioning, which was determined using a discount rate of 10%. On
31st March, 20X2, Company X remeasures the provision for decommissioning to
` 13 lakh.

lol X1 scr isagoge
Ete io
79 Yh omewings No cap
taken yet
D Ser
1071 1 to 31131 2 0.375 er
Ser x 167 X 91123
laser
2 20h Goer x toy x q
301061 1
X
3 20 er Laer x lot Oman
31131 2
B c to be cap for 218751
the Yr ended 31131
on
court completed
For the ar ended 31131 3 301061 27 3m in C Y
Fat cap
qq.gg t
D 95 ert 1.875
20 46.875 101 31127
5 20
Ser
2
I Sox lot
X in I
301061 2
B c to be cap for the
Yr ended 31 3 3 I
Provide necessary journal entries at the end of the year i.e. 31 st March, 20X2 for
recording of depreciation and decommissioning provision.
Ind AS 20
9.
Ent
A Ltd. received a government grant of ` 10,00,000 to defray expenses for
environmental protection. Expected environmental costs to be incurred is ` 3,00,000
per annum for the next 5 years. How should A Ltd. present such grant related to
income in its financial statements? Exp 3L
Grant Exp Cnet
II
Ind AS 116
10.
Grant sep
Inca scenarios:
How will Entity Y account for the incentive in the following
121
gone
Scenario A: Ep I
Entity Y (lessor) enters into an operating lease of property with Entity X (lessee) for a
five-year term at a monthly rental of ` 1,10,000. In order to induce Entity X to enter
into the lease, Entity Y provides ` 6,00,000 to Entity X at lease commencement for
lessee improvements (i.e., lessee’s assets).
Scenario B:
Entity Y (lessor) enters into an operating lease of property with Entity X (lessee) for a
five-year term at a monthly rental of ` 1,10,000. At lease commencement, Entity Y
provides ` 6,00,000 to Entity X for leasehold improvements which will be owned by
Entity Y (i.e., lessor’s assets). The estimated useful life of leasehold improvements is
5 years mum
Ind AS 103
11. In October 20X1, IHL acquired 75% of Very Relevant Limited by paying cash
OFF
consideration of ` 0.80 million. The fair value of non-controlling interest on the date of
0.80 acquisition is ` 0.20 million. The value of Very Relevant Limited's identifiable net
assets as per Ind AS 103 is ` 1.10 million.
MUCH 0.20 With respect to acquisition of Very Relevant Limited, determine the value of gain on
bargain purchases, when NCI is measured as per:
(a) Fair value method
(b) Proportionate share of net identifiable assets method.
pe o'd
0 Ind AS 41
mutinscopf
MCICPSMA
027512. Fisheries Ltd. practices pisciculture in sweet waters (ponds, tanks and dams). The
fishing activity of Fisheries Ltd. in such sweet waters consists only of catching the
fishes. Comment whether such fishing activity will be covered within the scope of
10 257 Ind AS 41?
INA CII
GBP CO 025

PPE 01 04 71 150L life 20 a
yrs f unwinding It
Depm
31 31 2 TIL 31131 2
112
I Increased to 131
31131 2
144.52
Rin Prov by 21
Revised CA
cost'anadel
He
PPE 22
7 5 to preen 2h
3h2 Depth
7 51
TOPPE
31131 2
gyminging
Tortoni il
311311
ciggesinDecomm
TO Prov 2L
sun 2 L'T GOmonths
EE.IE nttuase'G inea months

Gm g
took a
Every month 110000

0113 Alc Ds
TO Def lease Ine 10k
TO cease Rental Inc 100000
Scenario B
PPE lessor's Asset
to Hz g y
Eemeight I I L
To Lease Rental Income 1 IL
10000 p.m
Depth
TAPPE 10000p.m
6460 month
Ind AS 32
FI
13. State whether the following items meet the definition of Financial Asset or Financial
Liability for an entity:
II at
Fe
(i) A bank advances an entity a five-year loan. The bank also provides the entity
with an overdraft facility for a number of years.
Entity
(ii) Entity A owns preference shares in Entity B. The preference shares entitle Entity
ÉtmasFA
A to dividends, but not to any voting rights. FAA B 2 FLIES CEI
T (iii) An entity has a present obligation in respect of income tax due for the prior year. stat due
Entity (iv) In a lawsuit brought against an entity, a group of people is seeking compensation plotin
for damage to their health as a result of land contamination believed to be caused scope
and S37
by waste from the entity’s production process. It is unclear whether the entity is
the source of the contamination since many entities operate in the same area and
produce similar waste.
not af Ind AS 33 II
14. Company P has both ordinary shares and equity-classified preference shares in issue.
BuyBalk
The reconciliation of the number of shares during Year 1 is set out below:
Number of shares
Dates in Transaction Ordinary Treasury Preference
Year 1 shares shares shares
1 st April Balance 30,00,000 (5,00,000) 5,00,000
15 th April Bonus issue – 5% (no 1,50,000 (25,000) -
corresponding changes in
resources)
1 st May Repurchase of shares for cash - (2,00,000) -
1 st November Shares issued for cash 4,00,000 - -
31 st March Balance 35,50,000 (7,25,000) 5,00,000
The following additional information is relevant for Year 1.

-
-
Company P’s net profit for the year is ` 46,00,000.
On 15 th
Prefdi
February, non-cumulative preference dividends of ` 1.20 per share were
It
He
declared. The dividends were paid on 15 th March. Preference shares do not
participate in additional dividends with ordinary shares. MetEP
- Dividends on non-cumulative preference shares are deductible for tax purposes. only701
The applicable income tax rate is 30%.
saving
The financial year of Company P ends on 31 st March.
307 tax
EimEI
a
Hal Pret din 4 21 418000

emoted
YETI.am x 12 12 26 25
He
Bonus
183333
Daul
21 11 166667
12 PAPER – 1 : FINANCIAL REPORTING 15
42 5
12 WANES 2608339
Determine the Basic EPS of the Company P for Year 1. Use the number of months or
part of months, rather than the number of days in the calculation of EPS.
Ind AS 8
Same ones
15. In 20X3-20X4, after the entity’s 31 st March, 20X3 annual financial statements were
approved for issue, a latent defect in the composition of a new product manufactu red
by the entity was discovered (that is, a defect that was not discoverable by reasonable
or customary inspection). As a result of the latent defect, the entity incurred
` 1,00,000 in unanticipated costs for fulfilling its warranty obligation in respect of sales
made before 31 st March, 20X3. An additional ` 20,000 was incurred to rectify the
latent defect in products sold during 20X3-20X4 before the defect was detected and
the production process rectified, ` 5,000 of which relates to items of inventory at
31st March, 20X3. The defective inventory was reported at cost (` 15,000) in the
financial statements of 20X2-20X3 when its selling price less costs to complete and
sell was estimated at ` 18,000. The accounting estimates made in preparing the
31st March, 20X3 financial statements were appropriately made using all reliable
information that the entity could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and
taken into account in the preparation and presentation of those financial statements.
Analyse the above situation in accordance with Ind AS 8.
Ind AS 109
ji
16. In an arm’s length transaction, Entity X buys 10,000 convertible preference shares in
Company Z for cash payments of ` 40,000, with ` 25,000 payable immediately and
soon ` 15,000 payable in two years. The market rate of annual interest for a two-year loan TO011325
SOOO XD F of to the entity would be 6%.
2nd yr 67 Explain the accounting treatment for the said transaction. 1335
738351 Ind AS 24 / Ind AS 109
17. SEL has applied for a term loan from a bank for business purposes. As per the loan
agreement, the loan required a personal guarantee of one of the directors of SEL to be
Borrower
Co SEL executed. In case of default by SEL, the director will be required to compensate for the
loss that bank incurs. Mr. Pure Joy, one of the directors had given guarantee to the
Bank lender bank pursuant to which the loan was sanctioned to SEL. SEL does not pay premium or
fees to its director for providing this financial guarantee.
Guarantor MoAlling for Fain
Ma Jay Whether SEL is required to account for the financial guarantee received from its
Books
director? Will there be any disclosures under Ind AS 24?
co Director
for Ind AS 38 / Ind AS 103 of Boston
mining
Guarantee Readont
18. An entity acquired two trade secrets (secret recipes) in a business combination.
Fin Recipe A is patented. Recipe B is not legally protected.
a n

A
Identifiable
shiegat
meB
How the acquisition of Recipe A and Recipe B would be accounted for by the entity as Recipe
per relevant Ind AS.
Ind AS 34
19. The entity’s financial year ends on 31 st March. What are the “reporting periods” for
which financial statements (condensed or complete) in the interim financial report of
the entity as on 30 th September, 20X1 are required to be presented, if:
(i)
(ii)
M
Entity publishes interim financial reports quarterly
Entity publishes interim financial reports half-yearly.
1107 X1 30091 1
1191 1 301091 1
Ind AS 105
Same Ones in owes pm
20. On 1 st
January, 20X1, the carrying amounts of the relevant assets of the division of an
entity, Star Ltd. were as follows:
• Purchased goodwill ` 1.2 lakhs;
• Property, plant and equipment (average remaining estimated useful life two years)
` 4 lakhs;
• Inventories ` 2 lakhs.
From 1st January, 20X1, Star Ltd. began to actively market the division and has
received a number of serious enquiries.
On 1 st January, 20X1, the directors estimated that they would receive ` 6.4 lakhs from
the sale of the division. Since 1 st January, 20X1, market conditions have improved and
on 30 th April, 20X1, Star Ltd. received and accepted a firm offer to purchase the
division for ` 6.6 lakhs. The sale is expected to be completed on 30 th June, 20X1.
` 6.6 lakhs can be assumed to be a reasonable estimate of the value of the division on
31st March, 20X1.
During the period from 1 st January 20X1 to 31 st March, 20X1, inventories of the division
costing ` 1.6 lakhs were sold for ` 2.4 lakhs. At 31 st March, 20X1, the total cost of the
inventories of the division was ` 1.8 lakhs. All of these inventories have an estimated
net realizable value that is in excess of their cost.
Explain the disclosure requirement related to sale of division and provide the
accounting treatment of property held for sale and discontinued operations.

QI IndAS3y_
11071 1 301091 1
Quater
e y
Bls As an 301091 1 As on 31 31 1
PIL ay no 1 1 301091 1 171 0 to 301091

0
UTD 011041 17301091 1 011641 0 to 301091 0

ay py
go UTD 011041 1 301091 1 011041 0 to 30109 X
C't py
CFS up 011041 1 301091 1 011641 0 to 301091 0
1191 1 to 301091 1
Halt Geary
e y
Bls As an 301091 1 As on 31 31 1
CI PI
PIL
011041 1 301091 1 011641 0 to 301091 0
UTD
ay py
sole up 011041 1 301691 1 011641 0 to 3010917
C't py
CFS up 011041 1 301091 1 011041 0 to 301091 0
ANSWERS
1. (i) Journal Entry

` `
Plant and Equipment Dr. 7,50,000
Investment in bonds Dr. 5,00,000
Trade Receivables Dr. 50,000
Brand Dr. 3,50,000
Goodwill (balancing figure) Dr. 5,00,000
To Investment in Quick Bikes 10,00,000
To Profit or loss A/c (W.N.1) 1,00,000
To Trade Payables 1,50,000
To NCI (W.N.3) 9,00,000
(Being assets and liabilities acquired at fair value
and previous investment considered at fair value on
the acquisition date)
Working Notes:
1. Calculation of fair value of shares on the acquisition date 1 st January, 20X2
25% Shares purchase on 1 st January, 20X2 (fair value) ` 5,00,000
30% Shares purchase on 1 st November, 20X1 at ` 5,00,000
Fair value = [(5,00,000 / 25%) x 30%] ` 6,00,000
Total consideration at fair value on acquisition date ` 11,00,000
Less: Cost of investment (5,00,000 + 5,00,000) (` 10,00,000)
Gain recognised to Profit or Loss/OCI (as appropriate) ` 1,00,000
2. Computation of Net Identifiable Assets at fair value

`
Plant and Equipment 7,50,000
Investment in bonds 5,00,000
Trade Receivables 50,000
Self-generated Brand 3,50,000
16,50,000

Less: Trade Payables (1,50,000)

Net Identifiable Assets at fair value 15,00,000
3. Measurement of Non-controlling Interest (on fair value basis)
Share of NCI (100- 30-25) 45%

Taking fair value of shares on 1 st January, 20X2 as a base ` 9,00,000
[(11,00,000/ 55%) x 45%]
(ii) Consolidated Balance Sheet of High Speed Limited as at 1 st January, 20X2

Note No. `
Assets
Non-current assets
(a) Property, plant and equipment 1 21,00,000
(b) Intangible asset 2 8,50,000
(c) Investment in bonds 5,00,000
Current Assets
(a) Financial assets
(i) Trade receivables 3 1,30,000
(ii) Cash and cash equivalents 4 5,20,000
41,00,000
Equity and Liabilities
Equity
(a) Equity share capital 5,00,000
(b) Other Equity 5 16,00,000
Non-controlling Interest (W.N.3) 9,00,000
Current Liabilities
(a) Financial liabilities
(i) Borrowings 6 4,00,000
(ii) Trade Payables 7 4,50,000
(b) Other Current Liabilities 8 2,50,000
41,00,000

Notes to Accounts
S. No. ` `
1. Property, plant and equipment
High Speed Ltd. 13,50,000
Quick Bikes Ltd. 7,50,000 21,00,000
2. Intangible asset
Goodwill 5,00,000
Brand value of Quick Bikes Ltd. 3,50,000 8,50,000
3. Trade Receivables
High Speed Ltd. 80,000
Quick Bikes Ltd. 50,000 1,30,000
4. Cash and cash equivalents
Quick Bikes Ltd. 5,20,000
5. Other Equity - Reserves
Add: Gain on investment in Quick Bikes Ltd. 1,00,000 16,00,000
6. Borrowings
Short term loans of High Speed Ltd. 4,00,000
7. Trade Payables
Quick Bikes Ltd. 1,50,000 4,50,000
8. Other Current Liabilities
2. Table showing application of Retail method for calculation of the goods sold
during the year and unsold inventory
S. No. Particulars `
Cost price of goods 6,250 + 19,500 25,750
Retail price of goods 8,000 + 34,000 42,000
(a) Cost percentage of retail price 25,750 / 42,000 61%
(b) Closing inventory (at cost) 23,000 x 61% 14,030

(c) Cost of sales for the period [(6,250 + 19,500) - 14,030] 11,720
Sales for the period 19,000
(d) Profit earned on sale of goods 19,000 – 11,720 7,280
during the year
3. Computation of defined benefit liability and expenses to be charged to Statement

of Profit and Loss:
Defined benefit Plan Assets

obligation ( ` in lakhs) ( ` in lakhs)
31st Dec 31st Dec 31st Dec 31st Dec
20X2 20X1 20X2 20X1
Balance at the beginning of year 63.25 47.08 21.80* 14.65
Changes in demographic 0.62 1.86 - -
assumptions
Changes in financial assumptions 3.58 1.93 - -
Experience variance (2.49) 4.46 - -
Benefits paid - (0.61) - (0.61)
Investment income - - 1.47 1.12
Employers’ contribution - - 8.00 7.00
Return on plan assets - - 2.12 (0.35)
Balance at the end of year 75.07 63.25 33.39 21.81*
*Difference is due to approximation.

In the BALANCE SHEET, the following will be recognised:
Net defined liability to be recognised for the period ending 31 st December, 20X1:
= ` 41.44 lakhs (` 63.25 lakhs - ` 21.81 lakhs)

Net defined liability to be recognised for the period ending 31 st December, 20X2:
= ` 41.68 lakhs (` 75.07 lakhs - ` 33.39 lakhs)

In the STATEMENT OF PROFIT AND LOSS, the following will be recognised:
Defined benefit obligation Plan Assets

(` in lakhs) (` in lakhs)
31st Dec., 31st Dec., 31st Dec., 31st Dec.,
20X2 20X1 20X2 20X1
Investment income - - (1.47) (1.12)
Total 10.11 8.53 (1.47) (1.12)
Expense to be recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss for the period ending
31st December, 20X1 = ` 7.41 lakhs (` 8.53 lakhs - ` 1.12 lakhs)
Expense to be recognised in the Statement of Profit and Loss for the period ending
31st December, 20X2 = ` 8.64 lakhs (` 10.11 lakhs - ` 1.47 lakhs).
4. The grant date fair value amount would be recognised as an expense over the three
year service period adjusted by the number of shares expected to vest. Consequently,
for each period, Entity A estimates how many eligible employees are expected to be
employed on 31 st March, 20X3 and this forms the basis for that adjustment. The journal
entries would be:
Year 1 (Year ended 31 st March, 20X1)
Employee benefit expenses A/c Dr. ` 2,600
To Share-based payment reserve ` 2,600
(To recognise the receipt of employee services in exchange for shares )

Working Notes:
1. Year 1
780 shares expected to vest x ` 10 grant date fair value of each share x 1/3 of
vesting period elapsed = ` 2,600 recognised in Year 1.
2. Year 2
(750 shares expected to vest x ` 10 grant date fair value of each share x 2/3 of
vesting period elapsed) less ` 2,600 recognised in Year 1 = ` 2,400 recognised in
Year 2.
3. Year 3
(750 shares x ` 10 grant date fair value of each share) less ` 5,000 recognised in
Years 1 and 2 = ` 2,500 recognised in Year 3.
5. Point (g) of para C4 of Ind AS 101 states that the carrying amount of goodwill or capital
reserve in the opening Ind AS Balance Sheet shall be its carrying amount in
accordance with previous GAAP at the date of transition to Ind AS after the two
adjustments. One of the adjustment states that the standard requires the first -time
adopter to recognise an intangible asset that was subsumed in rec ognised goodwill or
capital reserve in accordance with previous GAAP, the first-time adopter shall
decrease the carrying amount of goodwill or increase the carrying amount of capital
reserve accordingly (and, if applicable, adjust deferred tax and non -controlling
interests)
As per the facts given, the entity paid excess amount to avail the rights to use the
underlying oil and gas reserves. However, since the rights was not recorded in the
books at that time, the value of goodwill subsumed the value of that intangible asset
which should be separately identified in the books. Hence, value of goodwill will be
reduced accordingly and intangible asset for rights for using mine should be
recognised.
Further, regardless of whether there is any indication that the goodwill may be
impaired, the first-time adopter shall apply Ind AS 36 in testing the goodwill for
impairment at the date of transition to Ind AS and in recognising any resulting
impairment loss in retained earnings (or, if so required by Ind AS 36, in revaluation
surplus). The impairment test shall be based on conditions at the date of transition to
Ind AS. No other adjustments (eg- previous amortisation of goodwill) shall be made to
the carrying amount of goodwill / capital reserve at the date of tr ansition to Ind AS.
However, once goodwill is recognised in the opening transition date balance sheet, the
entity has to follow the provisions of Ind AS, which states that goodwill is not amortised

but rather tested for impairment annually. Accordingly, the amortization of goodwill
based on ‘Unit of Production’ method is not correct after implementation of Ind AS.
6. Applying paragraph 17 of Ind AS 23 to the fact pattern, the entity would not begin
capitalising borrowing costs until it incurs borrowing costs (i.e. from 1 st July, 20X1)
In determining the expenditures on a qualifying asset to which an entity applies the
capitalisation rate (paragraph 14 of Ind AS 23), the entity does not disregard
expenditures on the qualifying asset incurred before the entity obtains the general
borrowings. Once the entity incurs borrowing costs and therefore satisfies all three
conditions in para 17 of Ind AS 23, it then applies paragraph 14 of Ind AS 23 to
determine the expenditures on the qualifying asset to which it applies the capitalisation
rate.
Calculation of borrowing cost for financial year 20X0-20X1
Expenditure Capitalization Period Weighted average

(current year) Accumulated Expenditure
Date Amount
1 st January 20X1 ` 5 crore 0/3 Nil
Borrowing Costs eligible for capitalisation = NIL. LT Ltd. cannot capitalise borrowing
costs before 1 st July, 20X1 (the day it starts to incur borrowing costs).
Expenditure Capitalization Period Weighted average

(current year) Accumulated Expenditure
Date Amount
1 st January, 20X1 ` 5 crore 9/12* ` 3.75 crore
30th June, 20X1 ` 20 crore 9/12 ` 15 crore
31st March, 20X2 ` 20 crore 0/12 Nil
Total ` 18.75 crore
Borrowing Costs eligible for capitalisation = 18.75 cr. x 10% = ` 1.875 cr.
*LT Ltd. cannot capitalise borrowing costs before 1 st July, 20X1 (the day it starts to
incur borrowing costs). Accordingly, this calculation uses a capitalization period from
1 st July, 20X1 to 31 st March, 20X2 for this expenditure.


Expenditure Capitalization Weighted average
Period (current Accumulated Expenditure
year)
Date Amount
1 st January, 20X1 ` 5 crore 3/12 ` 1.25 crore
30th June, 20X1 ` 20 crore 3/12 ` 5 crore
31st March, 20X2 ` 20 crore 3/12 ` 5 crore
31st March, 20X2 ` 1.875crore 3/12 ` 0.47 crore
30th June, 20X2 ` 5 crore 0/12 Nil
Total ` 11.72 crore
Borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation = ` 11.72 cr. x 10% = ` 1.172 cr.
7. Paragraph B19 of Ind AS 115 inter alia, states that, “an entity shall exclude from an
input method the effects of any inputs that, in accordance with the objective of
measuring progress in paragraph 39, do not depict the entity’s performance in
transferring control of goods or services to the customer”.
In accordance with the above, Company X assesses whether the costs incurred to
procure the air conditioners are proportionate to the entity’s progress in satisfying the
performance obligation. The costs incurred to procure the air conditioners i.e
` 10,00,000 are significantly relative to the total costs to completely satisfy the
performance obligation i.e. ` 40,00,000. Also, Company X is not involved in
manufacturing or designing of air conditioners.
Company X concludes that including the costs to procure the air conditioners in the
measure of progress would overstate the extent of the entity’s performance.
Consequently, in accordance with paragraph B19 of Ind AS 115, the entity adjusts its
measure of progress to exclude the costs to procure the air conditioners from the
measure of costs incurred and from the transaction price. The entity recognises
revenue for the transfer of the air conditioners at an amount equal to the costs to
procure the air conditioners (i.e., at a zero margin). Accordingly, the total revenue on
account of renovation would be ` 50,00,000 – ` 10,00,000 = ` 40,00,000.
Company X assesses that as at 31st March, 20X1, the performance is 20% complete
(i.e., ` 6,00,000 / ` 30,00,000).
Total revenue from renovation work would be
= ` 50,00,000 – ` 10,00,000 = ` 40,00,000.

Consequently, as at 31 st March, 20X1, Company X recognises the following:

`
Revenue [(` 40,00,000 x 20%) + ` 10,00,000] 18,00,000
Less: Cost of goods sold (` 6,00,000 of costs incurred +
` 10,00,000 costs of air conditioners) (16,00,000)
Profit 2,00,000
8. Journal Entries in the books of Company X

for the year ending ended 31 st March, 20X2
` in ` in
lakh lakh
Depreciation (profit or loss) Dr. 7.5
To Accumulated depreciation (plant) 7.5
(Being depreciation on plant recognised under straight-line method
(1,50,00,000 x 1/20))
Interest expense (profit or loss) Dr. 1.0
To Provision for decommissioning 1.0
(Being unwinding of decommissioning provision @10% recognised
in the books)
Plant Dr. 2.0
To Provision for decommissioning 2.0
(Being increase in decommissioning provision recognised
[13,00,000 – (10,00,000 +1,00,000)] at the end of the year)
9. As per paragraph 29 of Ind AS 20 ‘Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure
of Government Assistance’, grants related to income are presented as part of profit or
loss, either separately or under a general heading such as ‘Other income’.
Alternatively, they are deducted in reporting the related expense.
In accordance with the above, presentation of grants related to income under both the
methods would be as follows:
Method 1: Credit in the Statement of Profit and Loss
The entity can recognise the grant as income on a straight-line basis i.e., ` 2,00,000
per year in the statement of profit and loss either separately or under the head “Other
Income”.

This method considered on the contention that it would be inappropriate to present

income and expense items on a net basis and that separation of the grant from the
expense would facilitate comparison with other expenses not affected by a grant.
Method 2: As a deduction in reporting the related expense
Since the grant relates to environmental expenses incurred/to be incurred by the entity,
it can present the grant by reducing the grant amount every year from the related
expense i.e., environmental expense of ` 1,00,000 (i.e., net expense ` 3,00,000 –
` 2,00,000).
This method is considered based on the contention that the expenses might well not
have been incurred by the entity if the grant had not been available and presentation of
the expense without offsetting the grant might therefore be misleading.
The Standard regards both the methods as acceptable for the presentation of grants
related to income. However, method 2 may be more appropriate when the company
can relate the grant to a specific expenditure.
The Standard also provides that disclosure of the grant may be necessary for a proper
understanding of the financial statements. Disclosure of the effect of the grants on any
item of income or expense which is required to be separately disclosed is usually
appropriate.
10. Para 70 of Ind AS 116 state that at the commencement date, the lease payments
included in the measurement of the net investment in the lease comprise the following
payments for the right to use the underlying asset during the lease term that are not
received at the commencement date:
(a) fixed payments (including in-substance fixed payments as described in para B42),
less any lease incentives payable;
(b) variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate, in itially measured
using the index or rate as at the commencement date;
(c) any residual value guarantees provided to the lessor by the lessee, a party related
to the lessee or a third party unrelated to the lessor that is financially capable of
discharging the obligations under the guarantee;
(d) the exercise price of a purchase option if the lessee is reasonably certain to
exercise that option (assessed considering the factors described in para B37);
and
(e) payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects the
lessee exercising an option to terminate the lease.

Further para 71 of the standard states that a lessor shall recognise lease payments
from operating leases as income on either a straight-line basis or another systematic
basis. The lessor shall apply another systematic basis if that basis is more
representative of the pattern in which benefit from the use of the underlying asset is
diminished.”
Scenario A
In accordance with above, in the given case, at lease commencement, Entity Y
accounts for the incentive as follows:
To account for the lease incentive
Deferred lease incentive Dr. ` 6,00,000
To Cash ` 6,00,000
Recurring monthly journal entries in Years 1 – 5
To record cash received on account of lease rental and amortisation of lease incentive
over the lease term
Cash Dr. ` 1,10,000
To Lease income ` 1,00,000
To Deferred lease incentive ` 10,000*
* This is calculated as ` 6,00,000 ÷ 60 months.
Scenario B
Entity Y has provided lease incentive amounting to ` 6,00,000 to Entity X for leasehold
improvements in the premises. As Entity Y has the ownership of the leasehold
improvements carried out by the lessee, it shall account for the same as property, plant
and equipment and shall depreciate the same over its useful life.
In accordance with above, in the given case, at lease commencement, Entity Y
accounts for the incentive as follows:
To record the lease incentive
Property, plant & Equipment Dr. ` 6,00,000
To Cash ` 6,00,000

Recurring monthly journal entries in Years 1 – 5

To record cash received on account of lease rental over the lease term
Cash Dr. ` 1,10,000
To Lease income ` 1,10,000
To record depreciation on PPE over the lease term using straight line method
Depreciation Dr. ` 10,000
To Accumulated Depreciation ` 10,000
11. (a) When NCI is measured as per fair value method
` in million
Fair value of consideration transferred 0.80
Fair value of non-controlling interest 0.20
1.00
Value of Very Relevant Limited’s identifiable net assets as per (1.10)
Ind AS 103
Gain on bargain purchase 0.10
(b) When NCI is measured as per proportionate share method

` in million
Fair value of consideration transferred 0.80
Proportional share of non-controlling interest in the net
identifiable assets of acquiree (1.10 x 25%) 0.275
1.075
Value of Very Relevant Limited’s identifiable net assets as per Ind (1.10)
AS 103
Gain on bargain purchase 0.025
12. Paragraph 5 of Ind AS 41, defines agricultural activity as follows:

“Agricultural activity is the management by an entity of the biological transformation
and harvest of biological assets for sale or for conversion into agricultural produce or
into additional biological assets.”

For fishing to qualify as agricultural activity, it must satisfy both of the below mentioned
conditions:
a) management of biological transformation of a biological asset; and
b) harvesting of biological assets for sale or for conversion into agricultural produce
or into additional biological assets.
Therefore, when fishing involves managed activity to grow and procreate fishes in
designated areas, such fishing is an agricultural activity as per the above definition.
Managing the growth of fish for subsequent sale is an agricultural activity as per
Ind AS 41.
In the aforementioned scenario, only fish harvesting is managed by Fisheries Ltd.
Therefore, mere fish harvesting without management of biological transformation
cannot be termed as an agricultural activity as per Ind AS 41.
Hence, fishing in sweet waters (pond, tanks and dams) where only fishing (harvesting)
is carried out without any management of biological transformation is outside the scope
of Ind AS 41.
13. (i) The entity has two financial liabilities namely (a) the obligation to repay the five-
year loan and (b) the obligation to repay the bank overdraft to the extent that it
has borrowed using the overdraft facility. Both the loan and the overdraft result in
contractual obligations for the entity to pay cash to the bank for the interest
incurred and for the return of the principal.
(ii) For Entity B: The preference shares may be equity instruments or financial
liabilities of Entity B, depending on their terms and conditions.
For Entity A: Irrespective of Entity B’s treatment, the preference shares are a
financial asset because the investment satisfies the definition of a financial asset.
(iii) An income tax liability is created as a result of statutory requirements imposed by
the government. The rights and obligations are not created by a contract. Hence,
the liability for income-tax dues is not a financial liability.
(iv) The fact that a lawsuit may result in the payment of cash does not create a
financial liability for the entity because there is no contract between the entity and
the affected group. The entity will need to consider providing for the payment as
per Ind AS 37 ‘Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets’.
14. Determination of numerator for calculation of Basic EPS
The first step in the basic EPS calculation is to determine the profit or loss that is
attributable to ordinary shareholders of Company P for the period.

Non-cumulative dividends paid on equity-classified preference shares are not deducted

in arriving at net profit or loss for the period, but they are not returns to ordinary
shareholders. Accordingly, these dividends are deducted from net profit or loss for the
period in arriving at the numerator.
(`)
Net profit 46,00,000
Preference dividends (5,00,000 shares x 1.2) (6,00,000)
Related tax (` 6,00,000 x 30%) 1,80,000 (4,20,000)
Profit or loss attributable to P’s ordinary shareholders 41,80,000
Accordingly, the numerator for calculation of Basic EPS is ` 41,80,000
Determination of denominator for calculation of Basic EPS

The second step in the basic EPS calculation is to determine the weighted -average
number of ordinary shares outstanding for the reporting period.
Number of shares Time Weight Weighted average

weighting number of shares
1 st April – opening balance 25,00,000 1
(30,00,000 – 5,00,000)
15th April – bonus issue
(1,50,000 – 25,000) 1,25,000
1 st April to 30 th April 26,25,000 1/12 2,18,750
1 st May – repurchase of shares (2,00,000)
1 st May to 31 st October 24,25,000 6/12 12,12,500
1 st November – new shares issued 4,00,000
1 st November to 31 st March 28,25,000 5/12 11,77,083
Weighted average number of shares for the year 26,08,333
The denominator for calculation of Basic EPS is 26,08,333 shares.

Basic EPS = ` 41,80,000 / 26,08,333 shares = ` 1.60 per share (approx.).
15. The defect was neither known nor reasonably possible to detect at 31 st March, 20X3 or
before the financial statements were approved for issue, hence ` 1,00,000
understatement of the warranty provision and ` 2,000 [refer Working Note]
overstatement of inventory in the 31 st March, 20X3 financial statements is not a prior

period error. The effects of the latent defect that relate to the entity’s financial position
at 31st March, 20X3 are changes in accounting estimates. In preparing its
31st March, 20X3 financial statements the entity made the warranty provision and
inventory valuation appropriately using all reliable information that the entity could
reasonably be expected to have obtained and taken into account in the preparation and
presentation of those financial statements. Consequently, the additional costs will be
expensed in calculating profit or loss for 20X3-20X4.
Working Note:
Inventory is measured at the lower of cost (ie ` 15,000) and net realisable value (ie
` 18,000 originally estimated minus ` 5,000 costs to rectify latent defect =
` 13,000). Therefore, defective inventory was overstated by ` 2,000 (` 15,000 –
` 13,000) in the year 20X2-20X3.
16. Since payment of ` 15,000 is deferred for two years, the fair value of the consideration
given for the shares is equal to ` 25,000 plus the present value of ` 15,000. The
present value of ` 15,000 deferred payment is ` 13,350 (` 15,000 ÷ 1.06 2).
Entity X will initially measure the shares purchased at ` 38,350 (i.e., ` 25,000 +
` 13,350).
Since this transaction took place at an arm’s length, this is considered to be fair value
for initial recognition in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
The difference between the ` 40,000 cash paid out and the ` 38,350, i.e. ` 1,650, will
be recognised as interest expense in profit or loss over the two year period of deferred
payment.
17. Ind AS 109 ‘Financial Instruments’, defines a financial guarantee contract as ‘a
contract that requires the issuer to make specified payments to reimburse the holder
for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due in
accordance with the original or modified terms of a debt instrument.
Based on this definition, an evaluation is required to be done to ascertain whether the
contract between director and Bank qualifies as a financial guarantee contract as
defined in Appendix A to Ind AS 109. In the given case, it does qualify as a financial
guarantee contract as:
• the reference obligation is a debt instrument (term loan);
• the holder i.e. Bank is compensated only for a loss that it incurs (arising on
account of non-repayment); and
• the holder is not compensated for more than the actual loss incurred.

Ind AS 109 provides principles for accounting by the issuer of the guarantee.
However, it does not specifically address the accounting for financial guarantees by the
beneficiary. In an arm’s length transaction between unrelated parties, the beneficiary
of the financial guarantee would recognise the guarantee fee or premium paid as an
expense.
It is also pertinent to note that the entity needs to exercise judgment in assessing the
substance of the transaction taking into consideration relevant facts and
circumstances, for example, whether the director is being compensated otherwise for
providing guarantee. Based on such an assessment, an appropriate accounting
treatment based on the principles of Ind AS should be followed.
In the given case, SEL is the beneficiary of the financial guarantee and it does not pay
a premium or fees to its director for providing this financial guarantee. Accordingly,
SEL will not be required to account for such financial guarantee in its financial
statements considering the unit of account as being the guaranteed loan, in which case
the fair value would be expected to be the face value of the loan proceeds that SEL
received.
In the given case based on the limited facts provided, SEL will be required to make
necessary disclosures of such financial guarantee in accordance with Ind AS 24 as
follows:
(a) the amount of the transactions;
(b) the amount of outstanding balances, including commitments, and:
(i) their terms and conditions, including whether they are secured, and the
nature of the consideration to be provided in settlement; and
(ii) details of any guarantees given or received;
(c) provisions for doubtful debts related to the amount of outstanding balances; and
(d) the expense recognised during the period in respect of bad or doubtful debts due
from related parties.
18. Para 11 and 12 of Ind AS 38 states that the definition of an intangible asset requires an
intangible asset to be identifiable to distinguish it from goodwill. Goodwill recognised
in a business combination is an asset representing the future economic benefits arising
from other assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified
and separately recognised. The future economic benefits may result from synergy
between the identifiable assets acquired or from assets that, individually, do not qualify
for recognition in the financial statements.

Further, an asset is identifiable if it either:

(a) is separable, ie is capable of being separated or divided from the entity and sold,
transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, either individually or together with a
related contract, identifiable asset or liability, regardless of whether the entity
intends to do so; or
(b) arises from contractual or other legal rights, regardless of whether those rights
are transferable or separable from the entity or from other rights and obligations.
In the given case, Recipe A meets the contractual-legal criterion for identification as an
intangible asset because it is protected by a patent. This recipe is identified an
recognised separately from goodwill while accounting the business combination.
Since Recipe B is not protected by a patent, it does not meet the contractual-legal
criterion for identification as an intangible asset. However, Recipe B is identified as a
separate intangible asset because it meets the separability criterion. Such recipes can
be, and often are, exchanged, licensed or leased to others. Therefore, the unpatented
Recipe B should be accounted for as a separate intangible asset acquired in the
business combination.
19. Paragraph 20 of Ind AS 34, Interim Financial Reporting states as follows:
“Interim reports shall include interim financial statements (condensed or complete) for
periods as follows:
a) balance sheet as of the end of the current interim period and a comparative
balance sheet as of the end of the immediately preceding financial year.
b) statements of profit and loss for the current interim period and cumulatively for the
current financial year to date, with comparative statements of profit and loss for
the comparable interim periods (current and year-to-date) of the immediately
preceding financial year.
c) statement of changes in equity cumulatively for the current financial year to date,
with a comparative statement for the comparable year-to-date period of the
immediately preceding financial year.
d) statement of cash flows cumulatively for the current financial year to date, with a
comparative statement for the comparable year-to-date period of the immediately
preceding financial year.

Accordingly, periods for which interim financial statements are required to be

presented are provided herein below:
(i) Entity publishes interim financial reports quarterly
The entity will present the following financial statements (condensed or complete ) in
its interim financial report of 30 th September, 20X1:
Balance 30 th September 31 st March - -
sheet at 20X1 20X1
Statement of 3 months ended 3 months 6 months ended 6 months
profit and 30 th September ended 30 th 30 th September ended 30 th
loss for 20X1 September 20X1 September
20X0 20X0
Statement of 6 months ended 6 months
changes in 30 th September ended 30 th
equity for 20X1 September
20X0
Statement of 6 months ended 6 months - -
cash flows for 30 th September ended 30 th
20X1 September
20X0
(ii) Entity publishes interim financial reports half-yearly

The entity’s financial year ends 31 st March. The entity will present the following
financial statements (condensed or complete) in its half-yearly interim financial
report of 30th September, 20X1:
Balance sheet at 30 th September, 20X1 31 st March, 20X1
Statement of profit and loss for 6 months ending 6 months ending
30 September, 20X1
th 30 th September, 20X0
Statement of changes in equity 6 months ending 6 months ending
for 30 September 20X1
th 30 th September 20X0
Statement of cash flows for 6 months ending 6 months ending
30 th September 20X1 30 th September 20X0
20. The decision to offer the division for sale on 1 st January, 20X1 means that from that
date the division is classified as held for sale. The division available for immediate
sale, is being actively marketed at a reasonable price, and the sale is expected to be
completed within one year.

The consequence of this classification is that the assets of the division will be
measured at the lower of their existing carrying amounts (` 7.20 lakhs i.e. Goodwill
` 1.2 lakh + PPE ` 4 lakhs + Inventory ` 2 lakhs) and their fair value less costs to sell
(` 6.40 lakhs). This implies that the assets of the division will be measured at
` 6.40 lakhs on 1 st January, 20X1.
The reduction in carrying value of the assets of ` 0.80 lakhs (` 7.20 lakhs –
` 6.40 lakhs) will be treated as an impairment loss and allocated to goodwill, leaving a
carrying amount for goodwill of ` 0.40 lakhs (` 1.20 lakhs – ` 0.80 lakhs).
The increased expectation of the selling price of ` 0.20 lakhs (` 6.60 lakhs –
` 6.40 lakhs) will be treated as a reversal of an impairment loss. Ho wever, since this
reversal relates to goodwill, it cannot be recognised.
The assets of the division need to be presented separately from other assets in the
balance sheet. Their major classes of assets classified as held for sale should be
separately disclosed, either in the balance sheet or in the notes.
The property, plant and equipment should not be depreciated after 1 st January, 20X1,
so it’s carrying value at 31 st March, 20X1 will be ` 4 lakhs. The inventories of the
division will be shown at their year-end cost of ` 1.80 lakhs.
The division will be regarded as a discontinued operation for the year ended
31st March, 20X1. It will represent a separate line of business and will be held for sale
at the year end.
The statement of profit and loss should disclose, as a single amount, the post-tax profit
or loss of the division and the impairment loss arising on the re -measurement of the
division on classification as held for sale. Further analysis of this single amo unt may
be presented in the notes or in the statement of profit and loss. If it is presented in the
statement of profit and loss it shall be presented in a section identified as relating to
discontinued operations, i.e. separately from continuing operations.

FR RTP May 23 - Board Notes

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FR RTP May 23 - Board Notes

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FR RTP May 23 - Board Notes

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FINAL PAPER 1: FINANCIAL REPORTING

Part I : Amendments applicable for May, 2023 Examination

I. Amendments to the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility) Rules, 2014

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

➢ Executive summary: As per the amendment in the Annexure II, companies

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

The key amendments to Ind AS pursuant to the Companies (Indian Accounting

Ind AS Significant amendment made in 2022

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Ind AS Significant amendment made in 2022

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Ind AS Significant amendment made in 2022

Ind AS 101 Para D13 of Ind AS 101 provides an exemption to a first-time

Ind AS 109 As per Ind AS 109, a financial liability is derecognised when it is

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Ind AS Significant amendment made in 2022

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

PART II : QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

If Ind AS 110 IndAS 103

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Nce Casi Call

Imist in Quick lol

Innestin Quick Subs

Cost Retail Price

Applying the retail method, compute the following:

Particulars Defined benefit obligation Plan Assets

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Cls Inventory cost 23000 61.311 14101

Costof Sales 11649

costof sales 7357

Actuarial art Return on planMet

Ind AS 102 7507 63 25 33.39 21.81

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Borrowingdate cap rate

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

sun 2 L'T GOmonths

EE.IE nttuase'G inea months

Every month 110000

To Lease Rental Income 1 IL

The following additional information is relevant for Year 1.

Hal Pret din 4 21 418000

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

PIL ay no 1 1 301091 1 171 0 to 301091

UTD 011041 17301091 1 011641 0 to 301091 0

1. (i) Journal Entry

2. Computation of Net Identifiable Assets at fair value

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Less: Trade Payables (1,50,000)

3. Measurement of Non-controlling Interest (on fair value basis)

Share of NCI (100- 30-25) 45%

(ii) Consolidated Balance Sheet of High Speed Limited as at 1 st January, 20X2

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

3. Computation of defined benefit liability and expenses to be charged to Statement