11 Champs Matures
11 Champs Matures
11 Champs Matures
100
Projects (517) Exploration (172)
50
IOR & EOR
Basement (278)
2007 2017 2027 2037 2047
North Sea production (Mbpd) 2000
2005 to 2020
?
4
75 85 95 05 15
Technology has always so far allowed to delay decline
5 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
World Mature Field Stakes : reserves & ressources
• 1% recovery = 66 Gbbls
1200 Gbbls remaining (conventional only)
10 20 30
Cumulative number of exploration wells (x1000)
Reservoir size
Recovery factor (%)
100
Gas in place is the main
mature stake for gas
50
Reservoir size
Re-develop
Sécure/optimise without modifying Change recovery
developped reserves recovery mechanism Méchanism & artificial
and production and artificial lift lift method
method
Sécurise recovery Optimise recovery Ensure secondary recovery Ensure full tertiary recovery
Asset intégrity Field gardening Debottleneck In fill EOR DOWS Ass. gas and gas cap
50
EOR
Basement (278)
RF (%)
Sécure &
EOR
NP optimise
EOR 4,2
9 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
472 Gbbls
Decomposition of future world production
Daily production (Mbopd) Daily production (Mbopd)
2%
140 EOR + re-development 140
1,5%
1
60 60 1,5
55 yrs
Basement + projects + explo
1Pconv
20 20 2Pconv
Unc.
07 12 17 22 27 32 70 90 10 30 50 70
Conclusions
¾ Base + projects + explo not sufficient to satisfy demand in 2030
¾ Required re-development and EOR on existing fields
¾ Consumption growth to be maintained below 1,5 %/y
Gardening
OPEX (G$)
EOR
200 Redevpt
Basement
2007 2012 2017 2022 2027 2032
200 Redevpt
EOR
Gard.
Basement
30
Gard
Rdvpt
EOR
10
20
CAPEX
10
OPEX
Advantages Drawbacks
Age
Agecannot
cannotbe
bean
anabsolute
absolutecriteria
criteriaof
ofmaturity
maturity
Very
Veryoften
often: :maturity
maturityassociated
associatedwith
withthe
thedecline
declinephase
phase
33main
maincriteria
criteriato
todefine
definematurity
maturity
1. Reservoir maturity
Water-Cut (%)
1
More gas 250
200 20
Stress release 2
210
Kr oil decreases
Oct-99 Oct-03
GOR (100*scf/stb)
(kbopd) Water rate (kbpd)
100
Tools GOR
400 40 20
Water injection Oil
50
Water 10
Artificial lift
Equipment
Obsolescence
9 Conception
1. Old technology 1. 9 Maintenance
1.Technical
Technical
2. No spare parts 9 Modifications
3. No maint. compet. 9 Obsolescence
Update
Three main reasons 9 PID, plans Mature
fields
of the degradation of 2.
2.Methods
Methods 9 Logigrams cumulates
integrity 9 Procedures
9 Certif/calib
Competences
9 Training
3.
3.Human
Humanresources
resources 9 Turnover
Dégradation vilebrequin
Rupture du bâti
Echauffement vilebrequin
9 Main cause
Lack of lubrication of a gas lift
compressor following the wrong
functionning of a PSL
9 Consequence
Strong increase of the temperature
with high risks of ignition
9 Risk of escalation
Uncentralised information have
delayed discovery of problem and
induced a late intervention
40 Decline
30
96 98 00 02 04 06
20
Technical cost ($/bbl) 02 03 04 05
20% 24%
Benchmark
effect Mbbls/year
3 Environment 10 60
SF
2 Costs Production
1 Safety 5 PROD
40
01 02 03 04 05 5 02 03 04 05
20
kbpd Light well
LTIFr Interv.
02 03 04 05 10
1
2
20 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
00 01 02 03 04
Progressive inadaptation of ressources to needs.
Exploitation and redevelopment bottlenecks
Process
Pumping
Gas flaring
Initial functionning envelope
Current operating envelope
Compression
Pumping Gas flaring Flaring
07 08 09 10 11 12 Dunbar
07 08 09 10 11 12 Dunbar
2009
350
07 08 09 10 11 12 Dunbar
22 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
Exploitation bottlenekking : gas lift Bloc 3
No P No P
(MSm3/d)
1,8
1,4
GL required 2C 1C 2C 1C
1,0
2003 2007
2 pipes
0,6 1P 1P
no pipe No P No P
0,2
03 05 07 09 11
2C 1C 2C 1C
BUF F1
2009 2011
PAC F4
1P 1P
COBP1
P = pipe
C= compressor
23 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
Re-development : new extensive needs
Drilling slots
Space Process
Initial envelope
Water injection
Space Process
Compression
Water injection
Electric power
Space Process
Compression 800 m
Water injection
Remote WHPF
Initial WHP
New WHPF
flow lines
GTS
platform
ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
prolongation
26
Surface debottlenekking + tie back of a satellite
Drilling slots
Space Process
Kombi
Electric power
Yanga
Libondo
¾ 2 injectors on NKF2
N’Kossa
¾ Gas pipe NKF1 – NKF2
Downhole
Separator
Water exit
Inlet fluid
¾ Static cyclone for high BSW (>80%) and low flow rates (<2000 bopd)
¾ Dynamic cyclone efficient for low BSW (till 50%) and high flow rates (15 kbpd)
¾ OPTISEP project in collaboration with Schlumberger (Total patent)
¾ Re-injection formation very often the killing factor
/
Fuel gas
Development of mini LNG
+ y
e
µ GTL (Velocys project)
a
Flaring r Local electricity market
Space Process
OPD2
FSO
ODP1
Compression
Water injection ODUDU
AFIA
New HP Pipes
Electric power IME
New BP Pipes
¾ Integrity & duration of installations (securisation OML 99,100, 102 – 184 kbopd)
¾ Quality of water disposal
Meet nigerian enviromental regulations
¾ Stop flaring
¾ Valorisation of gas (23 Mboe)
50 Mbbls
¾ Valorisation of Edikan reserves (22 Mbbl) 935 Mus$
¾ Additions reserves (Odudu, Afia & Ime – 4 Mbbls) 19$/bbl
60 km
Gas to
250 Mcfd
Alba POWER Plant
T1 : 3.7 Mtpy / mid 07 510 Mcfd
Need 20 MMScfd
T2 : 4.4 Mtpy / 2011-2012
Feed gas : 1250 MMSCFD
MALABO LNG
60
100
20
1 5 10 15 20 25 5 15 25
Rio del Rey profile Global marginal profile
34 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
Litchendjili : mini GNL offshore (250 MMcfpd)
MMscfd bopd
0 Km Qg (MMscfd)
2 20
Pointe-Noire Qliquid (Cond + GPL)
200
Litchendjili
Qcond (bopd)
10
10 20 30 40
Time (year)
Techn HR
system reserves, integrated
Identity card
HSE) in MMS
Protection cards
Contributors
MFI team
Alcimed (industry survey)
SBC as the facilitator
Pr Alain Bernard (Ecole Centrale Nantes) expert in vulnerability theory
Ph. Chervi (consultant for FOI)
PETRIS
TEP UK and DIG EN
Two missions in Aberdeen (July and September) to fill the Alwyn matrix
1.537
Ranking 1 to 5 No ranking for (M x P)
max weight 5 Reservoir full scale#0 to 100
PWRI DUNBAR
O/W/G
process PWRI
MPP
Fuel gas
ELLON
Control ALWYN OIL Gas
Accommodation & command HSE process
ST Fergus
Gas Terminal
Gas export
NUGGETS
Logistics
ALWYN GAS
Gas flaring
Gas condensate
process Sullom Voe
FORVIE Control Oil Terminal
Accommodation & command HSE
Oil export
W
Nuggets 2 20,64 0,32 MPP shortfalls > 1,5 Mboe in 2006
Grant 5 12,82 0,60
e Alwyn Brent 18 3,15 0,57 Risk estimated by MMS at 2 Mboe
l Alwyn Statfjord Trias 14 26,84 3,87
l Forvie 3 11,56 0,36
s Ellon 9 3,67 0,32
Dunbar 16 36,90 5,90 Among four turbines
F Oil & water Treatment 2 32,26 0,76 • Turbine A out of service since 04/07
a Gas Treatment 2 83,32 1,96 • Turbine D out of service since 09/07
c Export gas compression 9 83,32 7,82
i Water injection 23 13,00 3,05
l MPP 14 40,56 5,71 Alwyn area currently with two turbines
i Multiph pipe 18 40,56 7,14
t Oil export pipe 2 32,26 0,57
i Gas export pipe 2 83,32 1,47
e Oil Export 2 32,26 0,76
s Electrical Generation 7 115,57 8,14
Statfjord
Nuggets
20 Statfjord
V
Grant
Trias
O
Forvie
Grant
Ellon
Triassic
Brent
I 10 Forvie 2
Brent
R Ellon
10 20
7
Dunbar
Dunbar
W 30 Statfjord
5
E & Trias
Nuggets Statfjord&
L Trias
3
Nuggets
L Grant
Grant
Forvie
Brent
S
Ellon
10 Forvie Ellon Brent 1
5 10 15
150 10
F Export MP
A gas pipe
Power
C
Gas process
100 MPP
Gas process
Gas pipe
I
Oil process
Export gas
Oil Export
L Gas pipe 5
Oil pipe
I WI
50 MPP MP
T Oil process
Oil export pipe
I Oil pipe WI
E
10 20 Power
44 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007 Vulnerability (%)
Reservoir vulnerability
Colour is
vulnerability
Size is impact
Conception
Degraded Limit of capacity
obsolescence
Lack of
maintenance
• Very mature system close to obsolescence • Reliable and available system (98 %)
Statfjord Trias
Multiph pipe
reservoir
Water inj
MPP
Generation
(source
(sourceUK
UKPLT
PLT07)
compression
Scale mitigation 16 Dunbar
Electrical
Export gas
07)
wells
Mandji
Asset
300
Flow (km3/d) P (bar)
Pressure (bar) 12
230
Oil 200
8 Press (bar) 160
210 Gas
WI
4 80 100
Natural Water
190
Ayol depletion Injection
79 84 89 95 00 06 70 80 90 00
75
85
95
05
To sea Cap
CLIENTS
Lopez
Anguille
Ile Mandji
Torpille
To sea Grondin
54 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
Goals and hypothesis
Goals
Maximum flexibility for any future redevelopment
No more flaring
Possibility to re-inject fresh (EOR) and produced (PWRI) water
Reduction of OPEX
Reduction of personnel 60-64
Men
55-59 Women
50-54
45-49 127
40-44
35-39
Means : several schemes envisaged 30-34
Similar design / equivalent replacement 25-29
<25
Maximum off-shore centralisation 40 80 120
Torpille
Grondin
56 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
Anguille
PG2/ Cap
Lopez
Torpille
Grondin
57 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
Anguille
PG2/ Cap
Lopez
Gas
cap
Torpille
Grondin
58 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
CLIENTS
Anguille
PG2/ Cap
Lopez
Gas
cap
Torpille
Grondin
59 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
Export
CLIENTS
ESP
Anguille Disposed
PG2/ Cap
Lopez
Gas
cap
Torpille ESP
Grondin
60 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
Export
CLIENTS
ESP
Anguille Disposed
PG2/ Cap
Lopez
Gas
cap
Torpille ESP
Grondin
61 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
Export
MP CLIENTS
ESP
Anguille Disposed
PG2/ Cap
Lopez
HP
Gas
cap
Torpille ESP
Grondin
62 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
Export
MP CLIENTS
ESP
Anguille Disposed
PG2/ Cap
Lopez
HP
ESP
Gas
cap
Export
Torpille ESP
Grondin
63 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007 Disposed
Export
MP CLIENTS
ESP
Anguille Disposed
PG2/ Cap
Lopez
HP
ESP
Gas
cap
Export
Torpille ESP
Grondin
64 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007 Disposed
Export
MP CLIENTS
ESP
Anguille Formation
water
Sea
Fresh water water
HP
ESP
Gas
cap
Export
Torpille ESP
Grondin
65 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007 Disposed
On-shore centralisation with ESPs meets objectives
Should significantly reduce OPEX and personnel
Re-injection in Torpille gas cap has numerous advantages
Should allow to reach a full non flaring policy
Should improve Torpille oil recovery factor
Could open to a future gas market
Possibility to reinject sea, fresh and production water (PWRI)
Interest of treating Grondin independently
espWatcher*
Surveillance LiftPro*
• Prevent failures Outflow Analysis
• Reduce downtime • Pump efficiency
• Find opportunities • Pump wear, sizing
• Outflow constraints
Inflow Analysis
Production Improvement • Formation damage
• Estimate extra BBLS • Reservoir pressure
• Recommend Action • Flood Pattern Optimization
Based
Basedon
onone-year
one-yearexperience
experienceglobal
globalESP
ESPsurveillance
surveillancehas
hasallowed
allowed: :
10%
10%ofofincrease
increaseproduction
production
57%
57%ofofwells
wellscan
canbenefit
benefitfrom
fromoptimization
optimizationofofthe
thelifting
liftingsystem
system
50
293 wells
142 closed
30
10
M
M
M
M
M
O
E
EM
B M
G M
M
M
M
TN E
SW
E
LO
SM
SM
YM
W
G M
M
IM
LO
PO
TC
TO
N
S
N
ST
YL
SS
N
EN
D
A
A
G
R
PA
VN
PS
TR
TC
G
TC
A
C
A
D
A
B
H
M
B
B
G
G
A
M
A
M
68 ENSPM course – 12/11/2007
Program of the day
Sécure/optimise Foggy
Foggy area
area Re-develop
Exploitation Re-développement
Bottlenecks Bottlenecks
Conventional
Re-engineering
(M&I, NRW) CAPEX CAPEX
No add. reserves Add. reserves