Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Demo 12 Angrymenevidenceloganswerkey

    Uploaded by

    Marianne Emil-1051
    The document summarizes evidence from a trial in two parts - the original evidence presented, and then how the evidence was re-examined critically by the jurors. In the original evidence, a knife was claimed to be the murder weapon and witnesses described seeing the crime. Upon re-examination, the jurors found issues with the credibility and accuracy of the original testimony and evidence, such as finding an identical knife, questioning how the stabbing could have occurred, and determining details that cast doubt on what the witnesses claimed to have seen.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Demo 12 Angrymenevidenceloganswerkey

    Uploaded by

    Marianne Emil-1051
    12 views2 pages
    The document summarizes evidence from a trial in two parts - the original evidence presented, and then how the evidence was re-examined critically by the jurors. In the original evidence, a knife was claimed to be the murder weapon and witnesses described seeing the crime. Upon re-examination, the jurors found issues with the credibility and accuracy of the original testimony and evidence, such as finding an identical knife, questioning how the stabbing could have occurred, and determining details that cast doubt on what the witnesses claimed to have seen.

    Original Title

    demo12angrymenevidenceloganswerkey

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes evidence from a trial in two parts - the original evidence presented, and then how the evidence was re-examined critically by the jurors. In the original evidence, a knife was claimed to be the murder weapon and witnesses described seeing the crime. Upon re-examination, the jurors found issues with the credibility and accuracy of the original testimony and evidence, such as finding an identical knife, questioning how the stabbing could have occurred, and determining details that cast doubt on what the witnesses claimed to have seen.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    12 views2 pages

    Demo 12 Angrymenevidenceloganswerkey

    Uploaded by

    Marianne Emil-1051
    The document summarizes evidence from a trial in two parts - the original evidence presented, and then how the evidence was re-examined critically by the jurors. In the original evidence, a knife was claimed to be the murder weapon and witnesses described seeing the crime. Upon re-examination, the jurors found issues with the credibility and accuracy of the original testimony and evidence, such as finding an identical knife, questioning how the stabbing could have occurred, and determining details that cast doubt on what the witnesses claimed to have seen.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    TWELVE ANGRY MEN NAME:________________________

    DATE :___________ HOUR:______

    EVIDENCE LOG
    ANSWER GUIDE
    DIRECTIONS:
    1: Summarize the details of the evidence as present during the trial.
    2: Summarize the details after the jurors reviewed the evidence critically.

    ORIGINAL EVIDENCE RE-EXAMINED EVIDENCE

    Was first claimed to be the only Juror #8 produced an identical


    one to exist known to the store switchknife.
    owner.
    Juror #2 questions how a person
    KNIFE

    The angle of the knife was 5’8” tall could stab a person 6’ 2”
    proven to have entered from a tall downward into the chest since
    downward angle. the victim was a half a foot taller.

    Juror #5 demonstrated that an


    experienced knife fighter would use
    the knife in a underhanded manner.

    The woman claimed that at It was determined that the woman


    TESTIMONY
    WOMAN’S

    12:10 A.M she witnessed the wore bifocals and that it was highly
    murder that occurred across the unlikely for her to have worn them
    street from her bed next to the as she casually looked out the
    window, which allowed her to window from her bed. It was also
    see directly across the street. determined by Juror #11 that they
    appeared to be very strong, casting
    doubt to the credibility of what she
    saw.

    The old man testified that he It was agreed that the old man
    TESTIMONY

    heard the boy state that he was probably heard the boy make the
    OLD MAN’S

    going to kill his father and a statement before, and that the old
    second later he heard the body man could not have reached the
    fall. He also stated that he door and open it from his bedroom
    reached the door in 15 seconds in less than 31 seconds.
    to observe the son leaving the Juror #9 believed the old man to be
    apartment. lying to gain attention thus, casting
    doubt on the credibility of the
    witness.

    You might also like